PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY

Dynamic assessment of ecological security in the Yangtze River Economic Belt based on three-dimensional ecological footprint

XU Qiuyi, YAN Fengqin, DING Zhi, TANG Xuguang, YAO Li

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 43(6): 1184-1202. DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2024.06.011

生态压力指数EPI	<0.50	0.50~0.80	0.81~1.00	1.01~1.50	1.51~2.00	>2.00
生态安全程度	很安全	较安全	轻度不安全	中度不安全	高度不安全	严重不安全

Tab.2 Ecological pressure index classes

Other figure/table from this article

Fig.1 Land use of the study area
Tab.1 Ecological footprint accounting system
Tab.3 Three-dimensional ecological footprint driving factors
Fig.2 Changes of the per capita regional footprint size in the YREB
Fig.3 Changes of per capita footprint size in the YREB by land use type
Fig.4 Composition of per capita footprint size of various land use types in the YREB
Fig.5 Proportion of per capita footprint size of various land use types in the YREB
Fig.6 Changes of the per capita regional footprint depth in the YREB
Fig.7 Changes of per capita footprint depth in the YREB by land use type
Fig.8 Composition of per capita footprint depth of various land use types in the YREB
Fig.9 Proportion of per capita footprint depth of various land use types in the YREB
Fig.10 Three-dimensional ecological footprint of the YREB
Fig.11 Temporal changes of provincial ecological pressure index and ecological and economic coordination coefficient in the YREB during 2000-2020
Fig.12 Spatial changes of provincial ecological pressure index and ecological and economic coordination coefficient in the YREB during 2000-2020
Fig.13 Changes of provincial occupancy rates of capital flows and use ratios of stock-flows in the YREB during 2000-2020
Tab.4 Results of the partial least squares regression