A geospatial perspective of the “five major securities” in Northeast China
Received date: 2025-01-07
Revised date: 2025-03-05
Online published: 2025-05-26
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41971202)
Doctoral Innovation Ability Enhancement Project, Department of Education, Jilin Province(JJKH20250320BS)
At present, global and regional security issues are complicated and volatile, and as a frontier field of strategic games between major powers, geopolitical competition in the Asia-Pacific region has shown a multidimensional trend, and the construction of a new security pattern has become a strategic cornerstone of China's modernization and development. As the core carrying area of the "five major securities" (national defense, food, ecological, energy, and industrial securities), the Northeast region's strategic barrier function and geopolitical pivot role are irreplaceable for the country's overall security. However, there are three limitations in the existing research on the spatial practice of security governance: first, the cross-scale transmission mechanism of security elements has not yet been deconstructed, resulting in the disconnection of the governance chain of "national strategy-regional function-local practice"; second, the analysis of the coupling effect of multiple security elements is insufficient, and there is a lack of spatial interaction models based on geographic embeddedness; third, the lack of spatial and temporal refinements in risk simulation makes it difficult to support the dynamic optimization of the resilience system. In view of these, this study attempted to break through the obstacles and address deficiencies of existing studies from a geospatial perspective based on the disciplinary characteristics of geography and the geographic embeddedness of the "five major securities". On the basis of summarizing and analyzing the existing studies, this study constructed an exploratory analysis framework mainly based on core structure identification-regional dominant security function division-multiscenario and security risk simulation, and suggested that the Northeast region should comprehensively evaluate the security function system and leading role of each regional unit based on the core structure of "one side, one corridor, one network, one zone, three belts, three bases, and four channels", and simulate the security geographic spatial pattern of the Northeast region under different development scenarios and security risks from a dynamic perspective, in order to discover the dynamic changes in security service value. Finally, this study proposed optimized governance strategies focusing on the three aspects of giving full play to the regional advantages, coordinating regional development, and integrating policy objectives, so as to provide useful references for the concrete implementation of the "five major securities" in the Northeast region.
WEI Ye , MA Yuwei . A geospatial perspective of the “five major securities” in Northeast China[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2025 , 44(5) : 869 -879 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.05.001
感谢范奕辰、靳冉、林传岳、孙甜甜、闫柏存同学在东北地区“五大安全”的核心地理空间结构图绘制过程中的辛苦付出。
[1] |
赵吉, 王静. 总体国家安全观的战略内涵与时代价值: 以复杂适应性变革为分析框架[J]. 社会主义研究, 2024(4): 165-172.
[
|
[2] |
宋长青, 程昌秀, 史培军. 新时代地理复杂性的内涵[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(7): 1204-1213.
[
|
[3] |
程利莎, 王士君, 杨冉. 中国东北地区地缘关系演化过程及区域效应[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1284-1292.
[
|
[4] |
李正, 武友德, 陈才, 等. 转化博弈视域下图们江合作通航的困局与出路研究[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(4): 393-401.
[
|
[5] |
张帆, 韩鹏, 贝金娣. 黑土地保护政策的变迁历程与演进特征[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2025, 30(1): 234-249.
[
|
[6] |
苗欣然, 李泽红, 王梦媛. 粮食供应安全下东北黑土区耕地利用系统韧性时空演变: 以齐齐哈尔市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2023, 45(9): 1801-1816.
[
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
冯琳, 雷国平. 基于生态安全格局的东北典型黑土区生态保护红线划定与优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2024, 39(2): 426-445.
[
|
[10] |
张忠华, 胡杰, 邵羽函. “双碳” 目标下东北区域新能源高质量发展的相关思考[J]. 中外能源, 2022, 27(2): 17-23.
[
|
[11] |
刘清才, 齐欣. “一带一路”框架下中国东北地区与俄罗斯远东地区发展战略对接与合作[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2018, 27(2): 34-51, 127.
[
|
[12] |
孙浩进, 申浩然. 东北地区保障产业安全研究[J]. 边疆经济与文化, 2023(9): 1-5.
[
|
[13] |
刘嘉琳, 汤吉军. 东北地区战略性新兴产业与传统产业融合发展研究: 基于动态演化博弈模型分析[J]. 经济问题探索, 2020(11): 95-104.
[
|
[14] |
王智慧. 如何再续“冰雪奇缘”? 北京冬奥会后期效应与东北冰雪产业振兴的理论逻辑及实践路径[J]. 武汉体育学院学报, 2022, 56(5): 29-38.
[
|
[15] |
李灿松, 胡志丁, 葛岳静, 等. 当前国外政治地理学边境安全研究进展[J]. 热带地理, 2014, 34(4): 454-462.
[
|
[16] |
马克明, 傅伯杰, 黎晓亚, 等. 区域生态安全格局: 概念与理论基础[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 761-768.
[
|
[17] |
贾宁, 董欣, 宁雄, 等. 基于BP神经网络水质模型的城市安全距离研究: 以芜湖和马鞍山为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36(6): 1905-1912.
[
|
[18] |
谢映霞. 城市基础设施与公共安全专题会议综述[J]. 城市规划, 2012, 36(1): 69-72.
[
|
[19] |
鲁钰雯, 翟国方. 人工智能技术在城市灾害风险管理中的应用与探索[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021, 36(2): 22-31, 39.
[
|
[20] |
彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 664-677.
[
|
[21] |
魏冶, 修春亮. 城市网络韧性的概念与分析框架探析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3): 488-502.
[
|
[22] |
孙阳, 张落成, 姚士谋. 基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 151-158.
[
|
[23] |
方创琳, 王岩. 中国城市脆弱性的综合测度与空间分异特征[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2): 234-247.
[
|
[24] |
彭翀, 袁敏航, 顾朝林, 等. 区域弹性的理论与实践研究进展[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015(1): 84-92.
[
|
[25] |
黄晓军, 黄馨, 崔彩兰, 等. 社会脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 1512-1525.
[
|
[26] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |