Defending letters: A pragmatic response to assaults on the humanities
Received date: 2017-10-24
Request revised date: 2018-03-25
Online published: 2018-03-28
Copyright
This paper is a mainly pragmatic response to utilitarian criticisms of the humanities. It first outlines political, public and practical fronts on which the humanities are under assault, identifying critics and their conspirators. Then, as a part of its defence of the humanities it expounds some of their central strengths. These range from the philosophical to the practical: lending critical perspectives to knowledge production, enriching lives, developing skills for uncertain and increasingly connected futures, improving science and supporting institutional income and credibility. Finally, the paper suggests that humanists must not only continue valuable conceptual and empirical disciplinary work but must add the very defence of the humanities to professional activity.
Key words: arts; crisis; defending; humanities; liberal arts; utility
Iain HAY . Defending letters: A pragmatic response to assaults on the humanities[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018 , 37(3) : 317 -326 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.03.002
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
4Humanities. 2015. Mission[EB/OL]. 2015-04[2018-03-25].
|
| [2] |
American Academy of Arts and Sciences.2013. The heart of the matter[R]. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
|
| [3] |
American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2015. National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Funding Levels[R/OL]. 2015-10[2018-03-25].
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
Institute for the Future. 2011. Future work skills 2020[R/OL]. [2018-03-25]. .
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
| [46] |
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.2015. Integration of Education in the Humanities, Science, Engineering and Medicine[R/OL]. 2015-07-27[2018-03-27]. .
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
OECD. 2016. Future of Work in Figures[R/OL]. 2016-01-14[2018-03-25]. .
|
| [50] |
OECD Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting. 2016. Ministerial statement. Building more resilient and inclusive labour markets. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development[R/OL]. 2016-01-15[2018-03-26].
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
PBO (Parliamentary Budget Office). 2016. Higher education loan program: Impact on the budget[R]. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. (Report No. 02/2016).
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |