Original Articles

Research on Spatial Patterns and Input-output Analysis of Industrial Competitiveness of Economic Regions in China

  • 1. College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2011-11-01

  Revised date: 2012-01-01

  Online published: 2012-08-25


This paper established an evaluation index system of industrial competitiveness and examined the industrial competitiveness of 286 cities by using principal component analysis. We also studied the level of industrial competitiveness and the characteristics of spatial patterns in eight economic regions of China. Bringing agglomeration and external linkage which are the spatial elements into Cobb-Douglas production function, this paper analyzed the contribution degrees of technology, capital, labor and spatial elements at different levels of industrial development. The results are shown as follows. (1) The development level of industrial competitiveness in eastern coastal economic region is the highest among the eight regions, followed by south coastal economic region, north coastal economic region, northeast economic region, middle Yangtze River economic region, middle Yellow River economic region, northwest economic region and southwest economic region. Each economic region has its own spatial characteristics. (2) It is feasible to bring space elements into the production function model, which confirms that spatial elements have an important effect on the output though the contribution rates are different at different levels of industrial development. (3) With the advancement of industrial level, there are some trends as follows: the comprehensive technology first increases but then decreases; the labor force continues reducing, the capital increases steadily, and the space elements first decrease but then increase. Finally, the strong- and weak-level cities at the existing technical level have obvious increasing return to scale, while relatively strong- and relatively weak-level cities do not. The key point to promote the industrial development of the strong- and the weak-level cities is to strengthen the input of each element, yet for relatively strong- and relatively weak-level cities it is to change the structure of factor inputs and raise the contribution rates of capital and space elements.

Cite this article

ZENG Chunshui, LIN Xueqin, WANG Kaiyong, LIU Kun, WANG Ting . Research on Spatial Patterns and Input-output Analysis of Industrial Competitiveness of Economic Regions in China[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012 , 31(8) : 1005 -1012 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.08.003


[1] 王开泳, 陈田. 珠江三角洲都市经济区地域构成的判别与分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 820-828.

[2] 周一星, 张莉. 改革开放条件下的中国城市经济区. 地理学报, 2003, 58(2): 271-284.

[3] 孙姗姗, 朱传耿, 李志江. 淮海经济区经济发展差异研究. 地理学报, 2009, 64(8): 924-934.

[4] 孙平军, 修春亮, 丁四保, 等. 东北地区域发展的非均衡性与空间极化研究. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(6):715-723.

[5] 伍世代, 李婷婷. 海西城市群工业空间格局与演化分析. 地理科学, 2011, 31(3): 309-315.

[6] 南振兴, 程桂荣. 中国地区工业竞争力比较. 财经问题研究, 2004(9): 53-56.

[7] 联合国工业发展组织, 中国国务院发展研究中心译. 工业发展报告: 2002/2003: 通过创新和学习提高竞争力.北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2003: 105 -170.

[8] 杨晓光, 樊杰. 中国农村工业地区竞争力差异分析. 地理科学, 2005, 25(1): 1-6.

[9] 龚奇峰, 彭炜, 于英川. 工业竞争力评价方法及其应用.中国软科学, 2001(9): 108-112.

[10] International Institute for Management Development(IMD). The World Competitiveness Yearbook Lausanne,Switzerland 1997, 1998.

[11] 迈克尔·波特. 国家竞争优势. 李明轩, 邱如美, 译. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2002.

[12] 李小建, 李国平, 曾刚, 等. 经济地理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008.

[13] 聂辰席. 邯郸市工业竞争力实证分析. 中国工业经济,2002(6): 58-64.

[14] 武义清. 我国地区工业竞争力变动趋势分析. 乡音,2003, 23(7): 22-25.

[15] 魏后凯, 吴利学. 中国地区工业竞争力评价. 中国工业经济, 2002(11): 54-62.

[16] 千庆兰, 陈颖彪. 中国地区制造业竞争力类型划分. 地理研究, 2006, 25(6): 1050-1062.

[17] 吴玉鸣. 中国区域工业竞争力的因子分析及非均衡差异研究. 华东师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2003, 35(3): 113-119.

[18] 董晓花, 王欣, 陈利. 柯布—道格拉斯生产函数理论研究综述. 生产力研究, 2008(3): 148-150.

[19] Hu Z H. Reliable optimal production control withCobb-Douglas model. Reliable Computing, 1998(4):63-69.

[20] Krugman P. Geography and Trade. Cambridge M A: MITPress, 1991.

[21] 申玉铭, 吴康, 任旺兵. 国内外生产性服务业空间集聚的研究进展. 地理研究, 2009, 28(6): 1494-1507.

[22] Cabusy P, Vanhaverbeke W. The territoriality of the networkeconomy and urban networks: Evidence from flanders.Entrepreneurship & Regional Devlopment, 2006, 18(7): 25-53.

[23] 杨威, 金凤君, 王成金. 两广地区工业—资源—环境系统协调性分析. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(8): 913-919.

[24] 周侃, 蔺雪芹. 新农村建设以来京郊农村人居环境特征与影响因素分析. 人文地理, 2011, 29(3): 76-82.

[25] Tan B H. Cobb-Douglas Production Function[EB/OL].2008-11-20[2012-01-07]. http: //docentes. fe. unl. pt/~jamador/Macro/cobbdouglas.

[26] 国务院发布《地区协调发展的战略和政策》报告[EB/OL]. 2005-05-16[2012-01-07]http: //www. chinainfoseek.com/info_class/vocadt / view. php? dt_id=16096.

[27] 刘天宝, 韩增林. 基于八大经济区的区域经济差异及趋势分析. 国土与自然资源研究, 2009, 37(3): 12-13.