Original Articles

Review and Prospect of the Application of Ecological Footptint Model

  • 1. College of Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    2. Centre for Digital City and Landscape Ecology, Shenzhen Graduate School of Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received date: 2004-06-01

  Revised date: 2004-12-01

  Online published: 2005-03-25


The heart of sustainability study is measurement, and the ecological footprint (EF) model gradually becomes an important way to measure sustainability. Since it adopts a common standard, the study results of EF model could be comparable and easily understood. The EF analysis is designed to calculate the demand of a given population on nature by a common unit, namely bio-productive area, and its goal is to estimate the sustainable state by studying whether the demand exceeds the available supply. The purpose of this paper is to review the history of its application in China and abroad systematically. EF model has now been applied to measure the sustainability of many nations, cities and regions as well as for globe itself. And its applied field has been extended to land demand forecast, tourism sustainability measurement, environment impact assessment and so on. With the development of application, the EF method has been gradually modified and upgraded. To get integrated trade information, some studies took input and output calculation instead of original calculation method. The system of local productivity parameter is applied to show the regional characteristic. The bio-productive area types have been reclassified to consider greenhouse gases other than CO2 and emission sources other than energy use. The goal of long time-series research is to overcome static weakness. With other sustainable development indices, it could be easily to make available policies. At last, the paper gives a prospect on the development of EF models’ application. The index system should be modified to present the characteristic of study object. We must enhance the EF’s forecast ability and boost up the development of application in environmental, social and economic fields in China.

Cite this article

JIANG Yiyi, WANG Yanglin, PU Xinguo, WANG Jianhua . Review and Prospect of the Application of Ecological Footptint Model[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005 , 24(2) : 13 -23 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.02.002


[1] 孙鸿烈. 资源科学研究的现在与未来. 资源科学, 1998, 20(1): 3~12.

[2] 李利锋, 郑 度. 区域可持续发展评价: 进展与展望. 地理科学进展, 2002, 21(3): 237~248.

[3] Odum E P. Ecology: The link between the natural and social sciences. New York: Holt~Saunders, 1975.

[4] Odum E P. Ecology and our endangered life~support system. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1989.

[5] Jasson A M, Zucchetto J. Energy, economic and ecological relationships for Gotland, Sweden: A regional system study.Swedish Natural Science Research Council, 1978: Ecological Bulletins 28.

[6] Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121~130.

[7] Rees W E, Wackernagel M. Urban ecological footprints: Why cites cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1996: 224~248.

[8] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economic, 1999, 29: 375~390.

[9] Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective. Ecological Economic, 1997, 20: 3~24.

[10] Rees W E, Wackernagel M. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers, 1996.

[11] Rees W E, Wackernagel M. Monetary analysis: Turning a blind eye on sustainability. Ecological Economic, 1998, 29: 47~52.

[12] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Callejas L, et al. Ecological footprints of nations: How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have? Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio+5 Forum. Toronto: International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, 1997: 4~12.

[13] Hardi P, Barg S, Hodge T, et al. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practice. Occasional paper, 1997, 17: 1~2, 49~51.

[14] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Deumling D. Ecological Footprint of Nations (Nov. 2002 Update): How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have? http://www.redefiningprogress.org/publications/ef1999.pdf

[15] Living Planet Report 2002. http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/livingplanet2002.pdf

[16] Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Borgstr?m~Hansson C. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: Applications in Sweden and Sub~regions. Ambio, 1999, 28: 604~612.

[17] Lenzen M, Murray S A. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37: 229~255.

[18] Fricker A. The ecological footprint of New Zealand as a step towards sustainability. Futures, 1998, 30(6): 559~567.

[19] Bicknell K B, Ball R J, Cullen R, et al. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics, 1998, 27: 149~160.

[20] Vuuren D P V, Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 2000, 34: 115~130.

[21] Haberl H, Erb K H, Krausmann F. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprint for long period of time: The case of Austria 1926~1995. Ecological Economics, 2001, 38: 25~45.

[22] Hanley N, Moffatt I, Faichney R, et al. Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 55~73.

[23] Folke C, Larsson J, Sweitzer J. Renewable resource appropriation by cities. Presented at “Down To Earth: Practical Applications of Ecological Economics”. San Jose, Costa Rica: Third International Meeting of the International Society for Ecological Economics, October: 24~28.

[24] IIED. Citizen Action to Lighten Britain’s Ecological Footprint. A report prepared by the International Institute for Environment and Development for the UK Department of the Environment. London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 1995.

[25] Rees W E. Is sustainable city an oxymoron? Local Environment, 1997, 2(3): 303~310.

[26] Warren~Rhodes K, Koenig A. Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2001, 39: 347~359.

[27] Gerbens~Leenes P W, Nonhebel S, Ivens W P M F. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2002, 90: 47~58.

[28] Gerbens~Leenes P W, Nonhebel S. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food. Ecological Economics, 2002, 42: 185~199.

[29] Gossling S, Hansson C B, Horstmeier O, et al. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Ecological Economics, 2002, 43: 199~211.

[30] Andersson J O, Lindroth M. Ecologically unsustainable trade. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37: 113~122.

[31] Barrett J, Scott A. The Ecological Footprint: A Metric for Corporate Sustainability. www.corporate~env~strategy.com.

[32] Alden D M, Proops J L R, Gay P W. Industrial hemp’s double dividend: a study for the USA. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25: 291~301.

[33] Roth E, Rosenthal H, Burbridge P. A discussion of the use of the sustainability index: ‘ecological footprint’ for aquaculture production. Aquatic Living Resource, 2000, 13: 461~469.

[34] Berg H, Michelsen P, Troell M, et al. Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Ecological Economics, 1996, 18: 141~159.

[35] 李永展. 永续环境规划之新思维. 环境教育季刊, 1999(37): 25~34.

[36] 徐中民. 可持续发展定量研究的几种新方法评介. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2000, 10(2): 60~64.

[37] 徐中民, 张志强. 可持续发展定量指标体系的分类和评价. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 36(4):82~87.

[38] 杨世琦, 杨改河. 可持续发展研究进展. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2001, 1(4):62~66.

[39] 顾传辉, 何晋勇, 陈桂珠. 可持续发展量化的新方法. 环境保护, 2001 (8):34~35.

[40] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋. 生态足迹的概念及计算模型. 生态经济, 2000(10):8~10.

[41] 杨开忠, 杨洁, 陈洁. 生态足迹分析理论与方法. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(6): 630~636.

[42] 王万茂, 李俊梅. 规划持续性的生态足迹分析法. 国土经济, 2001(6):16~18.

[43] 刘德威, 许树辉. 生态足迹: 测量可持续性的指标框架. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2001(30):334~336.

[44] 陈 易. 生态基区与崇俭思想. 同济大学学报(人文·社会科学版), 1996, 7(1): 18~20.

[45] 陈 易. 城市可持续发展与生态基区理论. 同济大学学报, 2001, 29(11):1378~1382.

[46] 李利锋, 成升魁. 生态占用——衡量可持续发展的新指标. 自然资源学报, 2000, 15(4):375~382.

[47] 梁 星, 王祥荣. 上海地区可持续发展状况的生态痕迹评价. 复旦大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 21(4): 388~394.

[48] Wacknagel M, Lewan L, Hanson C. 利用生态痕迹评价自然资本的利用. AMBIO人类环境杂志, 1999, 28(7): 604~611.

[49] 黄肇义, 杨东援. 测度生态可持续发展的生态痕迹分析方法. 城市规划, 2001, 25(11): 26~32.

[50] 侯 瑜. 可持续发展测度指标: “生态脚印”评述. 统计研究, 2001, 8: 62~63.

[51] 谢高地, 鲁春霞, 成升魁, 等. 中国的生态空间占用研究. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6): 20~23.

[52] 匡耀求, 黄宁生. 可持续发展评价的生态踩占模型及Ecological Footprint一词的翻译. 热带地理, 2004, 24(3): 298~301.

[53] 徐中民, 陈东景, 张志强, 程国栋. 中国1999年的生态足迹分析. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3):441~445.

[54] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋, 陈东景. 中国1999年生态足迹计算与发展能力分析. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(2): 280~285.

[55] 邸 利, 孙鹏举, 李 毅, 周 莉. 西部地区土地资源利用状况与土壤侵蚀关系研究. 水土保持研究, 2004, 11(1): 43~46.

[56] 张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋, 陈东景. 中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹. 地理学报, 2001, 56(5):599~610.

[57] 罗先香, 杨建强. 中国西北干旱区水资源可持续利用对策研究. 地域研究与开发, 2003, 22(1): 73~76.

[58] 潘晓玲, 潘小珍, 李永东. 论我国西北干旱区的可持续发展. 地域研究与开发, 2001, 20(3): 18~22.

[59] 陈东景, 徐中民, 程国栋, 张志强. 中国西北地区的生态足迹. 冰川冻土, 2001, 23(2):164~169.

[60] 徐中民, 张志强, 程国栋. 甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析. 地理学报, 2000, 55(5):607~616.

[61] 陈东景, 徐中民. 生态足迹理论在我国干旱区的应用与探讨. 干旱区地理, 2001, 24(4):305~309.

[62] 常月明, 王心源, 沙俊英. 农牧交错带水土流失的危害及其成因. 地域研究与开发, 2004, 23(1): 80~83.

[63] 黄 青, 任志远, 王晓峰. 黄土高原地区生态足迹研究. 国土与自然资源研究, 2003, 2: 57~58.

[64] 胡孟春, 张永春, 缪旭波, 沈渭寿, 马荣华. 张家口市坝上地区生态足迹初步研究. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(2):317~320.

[65] 苏 筠, 成升魁, 谢高地. 大城市居民生活消费的生态占用初探. 资源科学, 2001, 23(6):25~29.

[66] 王书华, 张义丰, 王忠静, 毛汉英. 基于生态足迹模型的城郊经济协调评估——以河北省新乐市为例. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(1): 78~82.

[67] 尤 飞, 钟有丽, 王传胜. 生态经济持续性的度量和趋势预测. 自然资源学报, 2002, 17(6): 743~749.

[68] 赵秀勇, 缪旭波, 孙勤芳,钱汪洋. 生态足迹分析法在生态持续发展定量研究中的应用——以南京市1998年的生态足迹计算为例. 农村生态环境, 2003, 19(2):58~60.

[69] 李金平, 王志石. 澳门2001年生态足迹分析. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 197~201.

[70] 李永展, 陈安琪. 台中都市区都市永续性之衡量. http://www.bp.ntu.edu.tw/bpwww/paper/No10/Lee.htm.

[71] Ferng J J. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40: 53~69.

[72] 郭秀锐, 杨居荣, 毛显强. 城市生态足迹计算与分析——以广州为例. 地理研究, 22(5): 654~663.

[73] 罗贞礼, 黄璜. 可持续发展评价模型: 生态足迹方法及其应用——以南方丘陵山区郴州市为例. 热带地理, 2004, 24(2): 140~144.

[74] 戴明忠, 盛学良. 江阴市近5年生态足迹计算与分析. 长江流域资源与环境. 2004, 13(5): 482~487.

[75] 周 嘉, 尚金城. 绥化市可持续发展状况的生态足迹分析. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3): 333~338.

[76] 闵庆文, 余卫东, 成升魁. 商丘市居民生活消费生态足迹的时间序列分析. 资源科学, 2004, 26(5): 125~131.

[77] 李静. 基于生态足迹分析的深圳市可持续发展评价. 国土与自然资源研究, 2004, 4: 7~9.

[78] 陈东景, 徐中民, 马安青. 祁连山区生态经济系统可持续发展研究——以青海省祁连县为例. 国土与自然资源研究, 2002, 3: 3~5.

[79] 王书华, 王忠静. 基于生态足迹模型的山区生态经济协调发展定量评估——以贵州镇远县为例. 山地学报, 2003, 21(3): 324~330.

[80] Ferng J J. Using composition of land multiplier to estimate ecological footprints associated with production activity. Ecological Economics, 2001, 37: 159~172.

[81] Hubacek K, Giljum S. Applying physical input~output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities. Ecological Economics, 2003, 44: 137~151.

[82] 白艳莹, 王效科, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿. 苏锡常地区生态足迹分析. 资源科学, 2003, 25(6): 31~37.

[83] 秦耀辰, 牛树海. 生态占用法在区域可持续发展评价中的运用与改进. 资源科学, 2003, 25(1): 1~8.