EN中文

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY >

2010 , Vol. 29 >Issue 4: 478 - 482

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.04.013

Original Articles

Comprehensive Effectiveness Evaluation of Land-use in China Based on Correspondence Analysis

Expand
  • 1. College of Environment and Planning of Liaocheng University, Liaocheng252059,China;
    2. Institute of Geography and Remote Sensing, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received date: 2009-08-01

  Revised date: 2009-12-01

  Online published: 2010-04-24

Fold

Abstract

Effectiveness evaluation is the base and starting point for land-use general planning. Taking 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities of China inland as samples, an index system including product effectiveness, quality status, structure status, utilizing level, utilizing intensity, and conditions of resources is set up for comprehensive evaluation of China’s land-use. Under the help of Matlab6.5 we used correspondence analysis to characterize the status of comprehensive effectiveness of land-use in China. The conclusions of the study are: 1) China’s land-use effectiveness is controlled under the first and the second main factors which express the effects of production effectiveness and utilizing intensity, and the factors of quality status and amount of resources have limited effects on China’s land-use effectiveness. 2) Investment increase in construction results in increase of the output from construction land and the decrease of the output from agricultural land, and eventually results in the loss of output of land-use. 3) 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities are assorted into 7 types, and Shanghai, Beijing, Tianjin belong to a high-level type of which two main factors act harmoniously.

Key words： China; comprehensive effectiveness; correspondence analysis; factor loading; Land-use

Cite this article

ZHU Yuxin,ZHANG Jinzong . Comprehensive Effectiveness Evaluation of Land-use in China Based on Correspondence Analysis[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010 , 29(4) : 478 -482 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.04.013

References


[1] 朱瑜馨, 张锦宗. 聊城市土地利用现状评价研究. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(3): 24-26.

[2] 田春, 李世平. 基于DEA方法的山西省城市土地利用相对效率分析. 国土与自然资源研究, 2009(1): 43-44.

[3] 王秀红, 何书金, 张镱锂, 等. 基于因子分析的中国西部土地利用程度分区. 地理研究, 2001, 20(6):732-738.

[4] 宁波, 龚文峰, 范文义. 基于RS和GIS帽儿山土地利用适宜性评价. 东北林业大学学报, 2009, 37(2):56-58.

[5] 王雁雁, 王红梅. 基于土地利用现状评价的黑龙江省分区. 国土与自然资源研究, 2007(1): 52-53.

[6] 王琼, 高敏华, 瓦哈甫·哈力克. 基于因子分析的新疆土地利用经济效益分析. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2008, 24(4): 385-390.

[7] 高啸峰, 王树德, 宫阿都, 等. 基于主成分分析法的土地利用/覆被变化驱动力研究. 地理与地理信息科学, 2009, 25(1): 36-39.

[8] 李岩岩, 傅桦, 张洪睿. 济南市可持续土地利用研究. 首都师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2009, 30(1): 65-69.

[9] 蒋春艳, 刁承泰. 土地利用经济效益时空变异分析. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(6):130-137.

[10] 廖晓勇 , 陈治谏 , 王海明, 等. 西藏土地利用综合分区. 山地学报, 2009, 27(1): 96-101.

[11] 卢纹岱. SPSS for Windows统计分析. 3版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2006: 506-512.

[12] 曾道明, 纪宏金, 高文, 等. R-Q型因子分析与对应分析. 物探化探计算技术, 2008, 30(1): 78-80.

[13] 虞欣, 郑肇葆. 基于对应分析的训练样本的选择. 测绘学报, 2008, 37(2): 190-195.

[14] 张瑞钢, 钱家忠, 赵卫东, 等. 对应分析法在地下水化学特征分析中的应用. 合肥工业大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 31(10): 1552-1555.

[15] 苏艺, 许兆义, 鄢贵权. 对应分析方法在地下水环境系统分析中的应用. 北方交通大学学报, 2004, 28(4): 48-53.

[16] 高思璇. 应用多元统计分析. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005.

[17] 祝国瑞, 张根寿. 地图分析. 北京: 测绘出版社, 1994, 291-308.

[18] 朱会义. 中国土地利用的分区优势及其演化机制. 地理学报, 2007, 62(12): 1318-1326.

[19] 陈佑启, Peter H Verburg, 徐斌. 中国土地利用变化及其影响的空间建模分析. 地理科学进展, 2000, 19(2): 116-127.

[20] 孟晓晨, 赵星烁. 中国土地利用总体规划实施中主要问题及成因分析. 中国土地科学, 2007, 21(3): 19-31.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉