Original Articles

Progress in the Study of Border and Border Effects Issues by Economic Geographers: Western Countries&rsquo|Experience and Its Implications for China

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-01-01

  Revised date: 2010-03-01

  Online published: 2010-05-25


As a special location, national border has been paid attention to by scholars extensively in western countries. The study has focused on “Border Effect” ever since the discourse by L?觟sch in economic geography. National border was merely taken as an “impediment line” between two countries in traditional economic geography. In the 1980s to mid-1990s, large quantities of literatures emerged on analyzing the “Impediment Effect” using econometrics. As the progress of globalization and regional economic integration, the “Integration Effect” along the border region and the transformation of border effects have caused in-depth debate among scholars, especially on “borderless”. And these become the major themes in this field. Compared to the progress in border effects study by western geographers, as discoursed in this paper, studies in this field in China are just starting up. Further studies are suggested to focus on the mechanism of industry agglomeration in border regions, the mode of cooperation in cross-border areas, the border zone institutional design and the cross-border governance in the context of “opening of China’s border region”.

Cite this article

WANG Liang, LIU Weidong . Progress in the Study of Border and Border Effects Issues by Economic Geographers: Western Countries&rsquo|Experience and Its Implications for China[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010 , 29(5) : 601 -608 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.05.013


[1] 王恩涌. 国家的边界及其类型. 地理教学, 1997(4): 8-10.

[2] 刘远图. 边界: 建立睦邻友好国家关系的纽带和桥梁. 中国边疆史地研究, 2003, 3(1): 1-10.

[3] 汤建中. 边界效应与跨国界经济合作的地域模式: 以东亚地区为例. 人文地理, 2002, 17(1): 8-12.

[4] 李铁立. 边界效应与跨边界次区域经济合作研究. 长春: 东北师范大学博士论文, 2004.

[5] Clark T. National boundary, border zones, and marketing strategy: A conceptual framework and theoretical model of secondary boundary effects. Journal of Marketing, 1994, 58: 67-80.

[6] 王铁崖. 国际法. 北京: 法律出版社, 1995.

[7] 梁双陆, 程小军. 国际区域经济一体化理论综述. 经济问题探索, 2007(1): 40-46.

[8] Evans C L. The economic significance of national border effects. The American Economic Review, 2003, 9(4): 1291-1312.

[9] McCallum J. National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns. The American Economic Review, 1995, 9(3): 615-623.

[10] Niebuhr A. Integration effects in border regions: A survey of economic theory and empirical studies. HWWA Discussion Paper, 2001.

[11] 李强. 全球化、主权国家与世界政治秩序. 战略与管理, 2001(2): 13-24.

[12] 廖什. 经济空间秩序: 经济财货与地理间的关系. 王守礼, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995.

[13] Hoover E M. The Location of Economic Activity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.

[14] 张庭伟. 新自由主义: 城市经营, 城市管制, 城市竞争力. 城市规划, 2004, 28(5): 43-50.

[15] Dicken P. 全球性转变. 刘卫东等,译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2007, 104-139.

[16] 刘卫东, 马丽, 刘毅. 经济全球化对我国区域发展空间格局的影响. 地域研究与开发, 2003, 22(6):11-17.

[17] Hsu J Y. A site of transnationalism in the ‘Ungrounded Empire’: Taipei as an interface city in the cross-border business networks. Geoforum, 2005, 36(5): 654-666.

[18] WTO Secretariat. Regional Trade Agreements: Facts and Figures.
[2009-10-12]. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_e.htm.

[19] Rauch J E. Increasing returns to scale and the pattern of trade. Journal of International Economics, 1989, 26(3-4): 359-369.

[20] Rauch J E. Comparative advantage, geographic advantage and the volume of trade. The Economic Journal, 1991,101(408): 1230-1244.

[21] 刘卫东,陆大道. 经济地理学研究进展. 中国科学院院刊, 2004, 19(1): 35-39.

[22] 梁双陆. 国际区域经济一体化进程中的边界效应研究综述. 思想战线, 2008, 34(2): 109-114.

[23] Elizondo P L, Krugman P. Trade policy and Third World Metropolis. Journal of Development Economics, 1996, 49(1): 137-150.

[24] 刘卫东. 论我国互联网的发展及其潜在空间影响. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 347-356.

[25] 彼得·罗布森, 国际一体化经济学. 戴炳然 译. 上海: 上海译文出版社, 2001:12.

[26] 李铁立. 西方边境区经济发展及边境区经济合作评述. 国际经贸探索, 2005, 21(6): 8-12.

[27] Br?觟cker J. How do international trade barriers affect interregional trade//Anderson A E, Isard W, Puu T, et al. Regional and Industrial Development Theories, Models and Empirical Evidence. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984: 219-239.

[28] Helliwell J F. Do national border matter for Quebec’s trade? Canadian Journal of Economics,1996, 29(3): 507-522.

[29] Helliwell J F. How Much Do National Borders Matter? Washington, D C: Brookings Institutional Press, 1998.

[30] Wei S J. Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integrate. NBER Working Paper, 1996, No.5531.

[31] Olper A, Raidmondi V. Access to OECD agricultural market: A gravity border effect approach. 11th EAAE Congress Paper, 2005.

[32] Matthias H. Border effect estimates for France and Germany combining international trade and intra-national transport flows. HEI Working Paper, 2006, No.13.

[33] Br?cker J. How would an EU-membership of the Visegrád-countries affect Europe’s economic geography? Annals of Regional Science, 1998, 32(1): 91-114.

[34] Requena F, Llano C. The border effects in Spain: An industry-level analysis. ETSG Annual Conference. Vienna, 6-9 September Version, 2006.

[35] Kei-MuYi. Vertical specialization and the border effect puzzle. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper, 2005, No.5-24.

[36] Nitsch V. National borders and international trade: Evidence from the European Union. Canadian Journal of Economics, 2000, 22(4): 1091-1105.

[37] Head K, Mayer T. Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Review of World Economics, 2000, 136(2): 284-314.

[38] Anderson J E, Eric van Wincoop. Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1): 170-192.

[39] 张荐华, 陈铁军. 欧美国家边境地区的一体化效应及其启示. 财贸经济, 2004(2): 80-85.

[40] Venables A J. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. International Economic Review, 1996, 37(2): 341-359.

[41] Hanson G H. Regional adjustment to trade liberalization. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1998, 28(4): 419-444.

[42] Hanson G H. Economic integration, intra-industry trade and frontier regions. European Economic Review, 1996,40(2): 941-949.

[43] Hanson G H. U.S.-Mexico integration and regional economics: Evidence from border city Pairs. Journal of Urban Economics, 2001,50(2): 259-287.

[44] Sander B, Schmidt K D. Wirtschaftliche Perspektiven von Grenzregionen-Ein internationaler Vergleich. Die Weltwirtschaft, 1998(4): 443-461.

[45] Barjak F, Heimpold G. Development problems and policies at the German border with Poland: Regional aspects of trade and investment. Discussion Paper, No. 101, Institute for Economic Research, Halle, 1999.

[46] Heimpold G. Consequences of an opening border for the regional policy in a border region: The case of the German border with Poland. Discussion Paper, No.25, Institute for Economic Research, Halle, 2000.

[47] Kawka R. Regional development along the former inner-German border after Unification. Congress of the European Regional Science Association Paper, 2003.

[48] Stiller S. Integration in the German-Polish border region: Status quo and current development. Congress of the European Regional Science Association Paper, 2003.

[49] Anderson J, O’Dowd L. Borders, border regions and territorially: Contradictory meaning, changing, significance. Regional Studies, 1999, 33(7): 593-604.

[50] 甄峰. 信息时代的区域空间结构. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004: 46-60.

[51] 叶舜赞. 一国两制模式的区域一体化研究. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.

[52] 方维慰. 区域一体化趋势下国家的边界功能. 西安联合大学学报, 1999, 4(2): 108-111.

[53] Yeung H W. Capital, state and space: Contesting the borderless world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1998, 23(3): 291-309.

[54] Ohmae K. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Interlinked Economy. London: HarperCollins,1990.

[55] 大前研一. 无国界的世界. 北京: 中信出版社, 2007.

[56] Ohmae K. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. London: HarperCollins, 1995.

[57] Reich R B. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st Century Capitalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1991.

[58] O’Brien R. Global Financial Integration: The End of Geography. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1992.

[59] 曼纽尔·卡斯特.网络社会的崛起. 夏铸九 等, 译. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2005.

[60] 罗伯特·赖克. 边界的革命. 经济展望, 2000, (1): 56.

[61] Horseman M, Marshall A. After the Nation State: Citizens, Tribalism and the New World Disorder. London: HarperCollins, 1994.

[62] Cox K. Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Gower of the Local. New York: Guilford Press, 1997.

[63] Dicken P, Kelly P, et al. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards an analytical framework for the global economy. AAG Meeting Paper, 1998.3.

[64] Evens P. The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Police, 1997, 50(1): 62-87.

[65] Kuper A. Democracy Beyond Borders: Justice and Repreentation in Global Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

[66] Caney S. Justice beyond borders: A global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[67] Newman D A. Paasi. Fences and neighbors in the Post-Modern World: Boundary narratives in Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography,1998, 22(2):186-207.

[68] Newman D. The line that continue to separate US: Borders in our “borderless” world. Progress in Human Geography, 2006, 30(2): 143-161.

[69] Gualini E. Cross-border governance: Inventing regions in a trans-national multi-level policy. DISP Paper, 2003,152: 43-52.

[70] Yang C. Multilevel governance in the cross-boundary region of Hong Kong-Pearl River Delta China. Environment and Planning A, 2005, 37(12): 2147-2168.