Original Articles

The Interregional Difference Analysis on the New Countryside Construction in Guangdong

  • College of Public Management|South China Agricultural University|Guangzhou 510642, China

Online published: 2009-09-25


Building a socialist new countryside in China is a new idea that is put forward under the guidance of the strategic thinking of emancipation the mind, implementing the scientific concept of development and construction of harmonious society for  rural development in the new era. The new countryside construction in Guangdong Province has gained great achievements, however, at the regional level, there are big differences,which not only affect Guangdong on quickening the pace of new countryside construction, but also will affect it to realize the strategic goals of the economic and social sustainable development, a well-off society as well as taking the lead in realizing socialist modernization. On the basis of building the index system of the socialist new countryside construcion for appraising the effectiveness from the five aspects of the production development, the well-off life, the civil local custom, the neat village and democratic management, this paper analyses the realization extent and the existing constraint factors of the new countryside construction from the four major economic regions in Guangdong Province. The study reaches some conclusion as follows: (1) The current extent of implementation is up to 75.5%. (2) There are significant differences in interregions, where the current extents of implementation are 85.3%, 71.1%, 69.5% and 67.0%respectively in the Pearl River Delta, East Wing, West Wing and Northern Mountainous Areas. (3) The main constraint factors are the degree of organization of agricultural production, agricultural infrastructure and the income gap between the urban and rural areas in the Pearl River Delta; the economic strength, the degree of organization of agricultural production and the rate of the clean energy utilization and so on in the East Wing; agricultural infrastructure, Engel's Coefficient, the clean energy utilization, the quality of drinking water and the waste disposal in the West Wing, and the village profile, the lower standard of living of farmers and economic backwardness in the Northern Mountainous Areas.

Cite this article

ZHANG Xiaojun|TANG Huijun|OUYANG Kongren . The Interregional Difference Analysis on the New Countryside Construction in Guangdong[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009 , 28(5) : 751 -758 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.05.013


[1]  农业部课题组. 建设社会主义新农村若干问题研究. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005:106-107.

[2]  曹明贵,盛正国, 念延辉, 等. 新农村的制度建设. 北京:经济科学出版社,2007:1-3.

[3]  李立清,李明贤. 社会主义新农村建设评价指标体系研究. 经济学家, 2007(1):45-50.

[4]  朱孔来,姜明. 对社会主义新农村有关理论及测度指标体系的思考. 山东社会科学,2007(6):126-129.

[5]  郭翔宇,余志刚,李丹. 社会主义新农村的评价标准、指标体系与方法. 农业经济问题,2008(3):73-76.

[6]  黄剑文. 社会主义新农村建设指标体系研究. 安徽工业大学学报:社会科学版,2008,25(4):33-35.

[7]  周亚莉. 社会主义新农村评价指标体系探讨. 统计与决策,2006(13):67-68.

[8]  周亚莉. 社会主义新农村综合评价模型探讨. 云南社会科学,2006(4):68-71.

[9]  熊巍,泮传快. 湖北省新农村建设评价指标体系研究. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(34):15238-15241.

[10] 申丽娟,丁恩俊. 关于新农村建设评价指标体系的探讨. 统计与决策,2007(4):60-61.

[11] 李明贤,李立清. 新农村建设评价理论及其实践研究. 经济体制改革,2006(6):89-92.

[12] 霍建军,韩玉龙,李桂琦. 新农村建设指标体系综合评价. 黑龙江社会科学, 2007(5):81-83.

[13] 吴国玺,何富忠.河南省新农村建设的类型:区域差异及发展模式研究. 安徽农业科学,2008,36(11):4762- 4764.

[14] 庄天慧,张海霞,杨锦秀, 等. 四川省民族地区新农村发展战略及评价指标体系探讨. 西南民族大学学报:人文社科版,2008(5):91-94.

[15] 曲福田. 江苏社会主义新农村建设若干理论问题. 南京:江苏人民出版社,2007:67.

[16] 曲福田,何军,吴豪杰. 江苏省新农村建设指标体系、实现程度与区域比较研究. 农业经济问题,2007(2):62-66.

[17] 田亚平,李虹,李超文. 新农村建设的村级评价指标体系:以湖南省衡南县工联村为例. 经济地理,2007,27(3):366-369.

[18] 高明秀,王鸿光,于洪福, 等. 新农村建设水平评价方法及其实证.山东农业大学学报:社会科学版,2008(1):36-41.

[19] 湖南省统计局. 湘西:社会主义新农村统计评价问题研究
[EB/OL]. (2007-05-21)
[2008-12-03].http: // www. hntj.gov. cn /sxfx /xxfx /200606260006.htm.

[20] 四川省统计局. 四川泸州市社会主义新农村建设目标初探
[2008-12-03]. http: //www. lzstj. cn/ Article / ShowArticle. asp? ArticleID=23.

[21] 张德扬. 广东社会主义新农村建设百村调查. 北京:中国农业出版社,2007: 5.