Original Articles

A Review on Gentrification in European and North American Countries

  • Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, CAS, Nanjing 210008, China

Received date: 2011-10-01

  Revised date: 2012-01-01

  Online published: 2012-06-25


The gentrification research of Europe and North America represents the mainstream and direction of the world's gentrification research. On the basis of an introduction to the tradition and derivational concepts of gentrification, this article analyzed and summarized the main theoretical explanation schools developed since the formation of concept of gentrification, especially on the two leading camps: explanation from production or supply and the explanation from consumption or demand. This article introduced three development tides of gentrification of Europe and America, and divided all gentrification research conducted since half a century ago into four development stages. They are stage of phenomenon description on gentrification, stage of fireworks between two camps, stage of theoretical integration and stage of political reply discussion on gentrification. After a simple evaluation of gentrification serving as a development strategy of the global cities and of main social-spatial effects of gentrification, this article made an investigation into the prospect of the worldwide gentrification research, and pointed out that there was still enormous space for the gentrification research even though much gentrification research has been conducted. This is because, firstly, in the aspect of theoretical research, gentrification has become an important topic in urban research, city planning and urban geography, and has always been a hot topic and academic frontier in other related social sciences. Secondly, in the aspect of empirical research, gentrification was found in almost all the big cities in the world, the process, causes, features and effects of gentrification in different countries or areas are significantly different, as a result of various social, political and economic backgrounds among countries. Therefore, there is plenty of work to do in empirical research in each country or area. Thirdly, in the aspect of expended gentrification research, the research scope and the definition of gentrification has changed remarkably since 1964, and even the concept of gentrification in the 21st century is different from the concept in the 1990s. The construction of“geography of gentrification”should be attributed to the temporaniess and variability of gentrification.

Cite this article

SONGWeixuan . A Review on Gentrification in European and North American Countries[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012 , 31(6) : 825 -834 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.020


[1] Hamnett C. The blind men and the elephant: The explanationof gentrification. Transactions of the Institute of BritishGeographers, 1991, 16(2): 173-189.

[2] Carpenter J, Lees L. Gentrification in New York, Londonand Paris: An international comparison. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 1995, 19(2):286-303.

[3] Hackworth J, Smith N. The changing state of gentrification.Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,2001, 94(4): 464-477.

[4] Smith N. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and theRevanchist City. London: Routledge, 1996.

[5] Weesep J. Gentrification as a research frontier. Progressin Human Geography, 1994, 18(1): 74-83.

[6] Beauregard R. Trajectories of neighbourhood change:The case of gentrification. Environment and Planning A,1990, 22(7): 855-874.

[7] Caulfield J. City Form and Everyday Life, Toronto’sGentrification and Critical Social Practice. Toronto, Canada:University of Toronto Press, 1994.

[8] Ley D. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of theCentral City. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.

[9] Shaw K. Whose image? Global restructuring and communitypolitics in the inner-city. Unpublished Master’s Thesis,Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University, 2000.

[10] Logan W. The Gentrification of Inner Melbourne: A PoliticalGeography of Inner City Housing. St. Lucia, Australia:University of Queensland Press, 1985.

[11] He S J. State-sponsored Gentrification under market transition:The case of Shanghai. Urban Affairs Review,2007, 43(2): 171-198.

[12] Sassen S. The Global City. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UniversityPress, 1991.

[13] Glass R. Introduction//Centre for Urban Studies. London:Aspects of Change. London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1964.

[14] Glass R. The mood of London//Donnison D, Eversely D.London: Urban Patterns, Problems and Policies. London:Heinemann, 1973.

[15] Smith N, Williams P. Gentrification of the city. Boston:Allen & Unwin, 1986.

[16] Hamnett C. Gentrification and the middle-class remakingof inner London, 1961 – 2001. Urban Studies, 2003, 40(12): 2401-2426.

[17] Butler T. Gentrification and the Middle Classes. Ashford:Ashgate, 1997.

[18] Smith N. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and therevanchist city. London: Routledge, 1996.

[19] Smith D,‘Studentification’: the gentrification factory?//Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification in global context:The new urban colonialism. London: Routledge, 2005.

[20] Kennedy M, Leonard P. Dealing with neighborhoodchange: A primer on gentrification and policy choices.The Brookings Institute Center on Urban and MetropolitanPolicy, 2001.

[21] Smith N. New globlism, new urbanism: Gentrification asglobal urban strategy. Antipode, 2002, 34(3): 427-450.

[22] Shaw K. Gentrification: What it is, why it is, and whatcan be done about it. Geography Compass, 2008, 2(5):1697-1728.

[23] Davidson M, Lees L. New-build‘gentrification’andLondon’s riverside renaissance. Environment and PlanningA, 2005, 37(7): 1165-1190.

[24] Lees L. A re-appraisal of gentrification: Towards a geographyof gentrification. Progress in Human Geography,2000, 24(3): 389-408.

[25] Badcock B. Thirty years on: Gentrification and classchangeover in Adelaide’s inner suburbs, 1966-96. UrbanStudies, 2001, 38(9): 1559-1572.

[26] Phillips M. Rural gentrification and the processes of classcolonization. Journal of Rural Studies, 1993, 9(2):123-140.

[27] Rose D. Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the uneven developmentof Marxist urban theory. Environment andPlanning D, 1984, 2(1): 47-74.

[28] Beauregard R. The chaos and complexity of gentrification//Smith N, Williams P. Gentrification of the City. London:Allen and Unwin, 1986.

[29] Mills C. Life on the upslope: The postmodern landscapeof gentrification. Environment and Planning D, 1988, 6(2): 169-189

[30] Lees L. Rethinking gentrification: Beyond the positionsof economics or culture. Progress in Human Geography,1994, 18(2): 137-150.

[31] Smith N. Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to thecity movement by capital, not people. Journal of theAmerican Planners Association, 1979, 45(4): 538-548.

[32] Harvey D. The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in theHistory and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Oxford,UK: Basil Blackwell, 1985.

[33] Hall T. Urban Geography. London: Routledge, 1998.

[34] Smith N. Gentrification and uneven development. EconomicGeography, 1982, 58(1): 39-55.

[35] Smith N. Gentrification and the rent gap. Annals of Associationof American Geographers, 1987, 77(3): 462-478.

[36] Ley D. Liberal ideology and post-industrial city. Annalsof the Association of American Geographers, 1980, 70(2): 238-258.

[37] Ley D. Gentrification and the politics of the new middleclass. Environment and Planning D, 1994, 12(1): 53-74.

[38] Ley D. Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification:A Canadian assessment. Annals of the Associationof American Geographers, 1986, 76(4): 521-535.

[39] Ley D. The New Middle Class and the Remaking of theCentral City. UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.

[40] Hamnett C. Gentrification and the middle-class remakingof inner London, 1961-2001. Urban Studies, 2003, 40(12): 2401-2426.

[41] May J. Globalization and the politics of place: Place andidentity in an inner city London neighbourhood. Transactionsof the Institute of British Geographers, 1996, 21(1):194-215.

[42] Bondi L. Gender divisions and gentrification: A critique.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,1991, 16(2): 190-198.

[43] Warde A. Gentrification as consumption: Issues of classand gender. Society and Space, 1991, 9(2): 223-232.

[44] Butler T, Hamnett C. Gentrification, class and gender. Environmentand Planning D, 1994, 12(4): 477-493.

[45] Mcdowell L. The new service class: Housing, consumptionand lifestyle among London bankers in the 1990s.Environment and Planning A, 1997, 29(11): 2061-2078.

[46] Rose D. A feminist perspective of employment restructuringand gentrification: The case of Montréal//Wolch J,Dear M. The Power of Geography: How Territory ShapesSocial Life. London and Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1989.

[47] Wilson E. The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Controlof Disorder, and Women. London: Virago Press,1991.

[48] Lees L. Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusiveurban renaissance? Urban Studies, 2008, 45(12):2449-2470.

[49] Redfern P A. A new look at gentrification: 1. Gentrifica-tion and domestic technologies. Environment and PlanningA, 1997, 29(6): 1275-1296.

[50] Redfern P A. A new look at gentrification: 2. A model ofgentrification. Environment and Planning A, 1997, 29(7):1335-1354.

[51] Bondi L. Gender, class, and gentrification: Enriching thedebate. Environment and Planning D, 1999, 17(3):261-282.

[52] Slater T. Looking at the‘North American City’throughthe lens of gentrification discourse. Urban Geography,2002, 23(2): 131-153.

[53] Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification in a Global Context:The New Urban Colonialism. London: Routledge,2005.

[54] Clark E. The order and simplicity of gentrification: A politicalchallenge//Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification ina Global Context: the New Urban Colonialism. London:Routledge, 2005.

[55] Lees L, Ley D. Introduction to special issue on gentrificationand public policy. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(12):2379-2384.

[56] Ley D. Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification/‘/Upward Neighborhood Trajectories’conference,Glasgow, Scotland, 2002: 26-27.

[57] Redfern P A. What Makes Gentrification‘Gentrification’.Urban Studies, 2003, 40(12): 2351-2366.

[58] Shaw K. Local limits to gentrification: implications for anew urban policy//Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrificationin a Global Context: the New Urban Colonialism. London:Routledge, 2005.

[59] Bourne L S. The myth and reality of gentrification: Acommentary on emerging urban forms. Urban Studies,1993, 30(1): 183-189.

[60] Lees L, Slater T, Wyly E K. Gentrification. New York andLondon: Routledge, 2008.

[61] Criekingen M, Decroly J M. Revisiting the diversity ofgentrification: Neighbourhood renewal processes in Brusselsand Montreal. Urban Studies, 2003, 40(12):2451-2468.

[62] Lipton G. Evidence of central city revival. Journal of theAmerican Institute of Planners, 1977, 43(2): 136-147.

[63] Pitt J. Gentrification in Islington. Barnsbury People's Forum,1977, 28(1): 11-21.

[64] Harvey D. Class monopoly rent, finance capital and theurban revolution. Regional Studies, 1974, 8(3): 239-255.

[65] Harvey D. The urban process under capitalism: A frameworkfor analysis. International Journal of Urban Research,1978, 2(1): 101-131.

[66] Smith N. Blind man’s bluff, or Hamnett’s philosophicalindividualism in search of gentrification. Transactions ofthe Institute of British Geographers, 1992, 17(1):110-115.

[67] Ley D. Styles of the times: Liberal and neoconservativelandscapes in inner Vancouver 1968-1986. Journal of HistoricalGeography, 1987, 13(1): 40-56.

[68] Smith N. Of yuppies and housing: Gentrification, socialrestructuring and the urban dream. Environment and PlanningD, 1987, 5(1): 151-172.

[69] Clark E. The rent gap and transformation of the built environment:Case studies in Malm? 1860-1985. GeografiskaAnnaler, 1988, 70(2): 241-254.

[70] Badcock B. An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1989, 79(1): 125-145.

[71] Ley D, Olds K. Landscape as spectacle: World’s fairsand the culture of heroic consumption. Environment andPlanning D, 1988, 6(2): 191-212.

[72] Lees L. Review of N. Smith (1996) and T. Butler (1997).Environment and Planning A, 1998, 30(11): 2257-2260.

[73] Wyly E K, Hammel D J. Mapping neo-liberal Americanurbanism//Atkinson R, Bridge G. Gentrification in AGlobal Context. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.

[74] Slater T. Comparing gentrification in south Parkdale, Torontoand lower Park Slope, New York City: A‘NorthAmerican’model of neighborhood reinvestment? Centerfor Neighborhood Research, paper11, April, 2003.

[75] Porter L, Shaw K. Whose Urban Renaissance? An InternationalComparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies.London: Routledge, 2009.

[76] Davison M. Gentrification as global habitat: A process ofclass formation or corporate creation? Transactions of theInstitute of British Geographers NS, 2007, 32(4):490-506.

[77] Butler T. Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification,suburbanization or new urbanism? InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research, 2007, 31(4):759-781.

[78] Bailey N, Robertson D. Housing renewal, urban policyand gentrification. Urban Studies, 1997, 34(4): 561-578.

[79] Uitermark J, Duyvendak J W, Kleinhans R. Gentrificationas a governmental strategy: Social control and social cohesionin Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and PlanningA, 2007, 39(1): 125-141.

[80] Newman K, Ashton P. Neoliberal urban policy and newpaths of neighborhood change in the American inner city.Environment and Planning A, 2004, 36(7): 1151-1172.

[81] Wyly E K, Hammel D. Gentrification, segregation, anddiscrimination in the American urban system. Environmentand Planning A, 2004, 36(7): 1215-1241.

[82] Spain D. A gentrification research agenda for the 1990s.Journal of Urban Affairs, 1992, 14(2): 125-134.

[83] Walks A, August M. The factors inhibiting gentrification in areas with little non-market housing: Policy lessonsfrom the Toronto experience. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(12): 2594-2625.

[84] Goldberg D T. The new segregation. Race and Society,1998, 1(1): 15-32.

[85] Levy P, Cybriwsky R. The hidden dimensions of cultureand class: Philadelphia//Laska S, Spain D. Back to theCity. New York: Pergamon Press, 1980.

[86] Bridge G. Time-space trajectories in provincial gentrification.Urban Studies, 2003, 40(12): 2545-2556.

[87] Boddy M. Designer neighbourhoods: New-build residentialdevelopment in nonmetropolitan UK cities: The caseof Bristol. Environment and Planning A, 2007, 39(1):86-105.

[88] Butler T, Robson G. Plotting the middle classes: Gentrificationand circuits of education. Housing Studies, 2003,18(1): 5-28.

[89] Slater T, Winifred C, Lees L. Gentrification research:New directions and critical scholarship. Environment andPlanning A, 2004, 36(7): 1141-1150.

[90] Lees L. Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklynheights, New York city. Urban studies, 2003, 40(12):2487-2509.

[91] Berry B L J. Islands of renewal in seas of decay//PetersonP. The New Urban Reality. Washington, D C: The BrookingsInstitution, 1985.

[92] Wyly E, Hammel D. Islands of decay in seas of renewal:Urban policy and the resurgence of gentrification. HousingPolicy Debate, 1999, 10(4): 711-771.