Original Articles

Temporal and Spatial Variance of Event Tourism in Beijing Suburbs

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. Planning Office, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received date: 2010-12-01

  Revised date: 2011-03-01

  Online published: 2011-08-25

Abstract

With event and event tourism prevailing in rural areas of China, events no longer just belong to local economic development strategy, but part of regional development strategy. At a regional scale, different host regions vary in natural resources, social economy and traffic locations, along with changeable macroscopic economic policies, leading to an unbalanced development of events in both temporal distribution and spatial distribution which presents transitional and differentiation characteristics. Hence a comprehensive understanding of the space-time characteristics of events and corresponding influential factors will do a great help to the analysis of the evolution rule of spatiotemporal structure of events, as well as to the distribution optimization and resource integration of event and event tourism. Above all, this paper takes Beijing suburbs as a regional case and collects a database from 1980 to 2009 in the ten counties including Tongzhou, Shunyi and Daxing. Based on which, first it presents the inter-annual and intra-annual distribution rules of events through SPSS regression analysis, then divides the development of event and event tourism into three stages: nascent stage, promotion stage and generalization stage, and summarizes the features of the above three stages respectively. Secondly, to probe into the spatial variance of event and event tourism, the paper divides the ten counties into four quadrants by introducing Boston matrix method, and concludes their spatial differential features correspondingly. Further, using the altitude tinting method of GIS, it sums up the three spatial differential features throughout the region: heterogeneity of geographical distribution, non-positive relation between event development level and economic performance, and coordination between geographical distribution of event styles and urban tourism functional areas. Finally, from the perspectives of urbanization level and spatial accessibility, this paper estimates and evaluates the relationships between the above factors and the spatial differential phenomenon. The results indicate that urbanization level has not only a certain relationship with rural event development level, but also an apparent relationship with event frequency, while spatial accessibility is highly related to the rural event development level, and even directly affects the economic benefits of rural tourism. On this basis, combining the experience of rural events application at a regional scale in Beijing suburbs with the above results, it further explains and explores the causes and influential factors of the spatial differential phenomenon.

Cite this article

DAI Linlin, GAI Shijie . Temporal and Spatial Variance of Event Tourism in Beijing Suburbs[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011 , 30(8) : 1056 -1064 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.013

References

[1] Zhang L, Zhao S X. City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities, 2009, 26(5): 245-254.

[2] 北京市旅游局. 乡村旅游“北京模式”研究. 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 2010.

[3] Getz D. Event Studies: Theory, research and policy for planned events. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinema, 2007: 12-54.

[4] Getz D. Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(4): 403-428.

[5] Gartner W C. Rural tourism development in the USA. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2004, 6(3): 151-164.

[6] 戴光全, 保继刚. 西方事件及事件旅游研究的概念、内容、方法与启发(上). 旅游学刊, 2003, 18(5): 26-34.

[7] 约翰·艾伦. 大型活动项目管理. 王增东, 杨磊, 译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2002: 35-78.

[8] Thomas R, Wood E. Event-based tourism: A survey of local authority strategies in the UK. Local Governance, 2004, 29(2): 127-136.

[9] Higham J E S, Ritchie B. The evolution of festivals and other events in rural Southern New Zealand. Event Management, 2001, 7(1): 39-49.

[10] Xie P. Visitors’perceptions of authenticity at a rural heritage festival. Event Management, 2004, 8(3): 151-160.

[11] Janiskee R. The temporal distribution of America’s community festivals. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 1996, 3(3): 129-137.

[12] Whitford M. Regional development through domestic and tourist event policies: Gold Coast and Brisbane, 1974-2003. Tourism and Leisure Science, 2004, (1): 1-24.

[13] 马聪玲. 中国节事旅游研究: 理论分析与案例解读. 北京: 中国旅游出版社, 2009: 143.

[14] 郭大力. 北京郊区小城镇发展30 年. 北京规划建设, 2009(1): 53-55.

[15] 董恒年, 张妙弟, 刘运伟. 北京郊区休闲度假旅游用地现状及未来趋势研究. 旅游学刊, 2007, 22(4): 48-52.

[16] Yu Y, Turco D M. Issues in tourism event economic impact studies: The case of the Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta. Current Issues in Tourism, 2000, 3(2): 138-149.

[17] Getz D, Fairley S. Media management at sport events for destination promotion. Event Management, 2004, 8(3): 127-139.

[18] 邹统钎. 北京市郊区旅游发展战略研究: 经验、误区与对策. 北京: 旅游教育出版社, 2004: 104-105.

[19] Mangion D, McNabb Y. Perceived impacts of a rural tourism event//Purchase S. ANZMAC 2005 Conference. Tourism Marketing. Perth: University of Western Australia, 2005: 57-63.

[20] Reid S. The social consequences of rural events: The Inglewood Olive Festival//Cooper C, Arcodia C, Solnet D, et al. The Creating Tourism Knowledge, Proceedings of the CAUTHE Conference 2004. Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2004: 51-60.

[21] Wilson S, Fesenmaier D R. Factors for success in rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 2001, 18(1): 37-53.
Outlines

/