EN中文

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY >

2011 , Vol. 30 >Issue 2: 249 - 256

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.02.015

Original Articles

Differences of Regional Tourism Development Based on Competitiveness Evaluation: A Case Study of the Three Circles in Eastern Coastal China

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Tourism Department of Suzhou University, Suzhou 215021, China

Received date: 2010-04-01

  Revised date: 2010-07-01

  Online published: 2011-02-25

Fold

Abstract

Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and cluster analysis and establishing a three-level indicator system of regional tourism competitiveness, this paper measures and analyses tourism competitiveness in the three circles economic in eastern coastal region of China. By measuring the differences of tourism competitiveness from the angle of I (O) coefficient, the study reveals the differences of tourism development among the provinces and the three circles in eastern coastal China using 9 secondary indicators, and recognizes the spatial disparity of tourism competitiveness in eastern coastal China, and on the basis of which, tentative countermeasures for implanting and upgrading regional tourism competitiveness are put forward.

Key words： decomposition; differences; eastern coastal China; evaluation indicator system; tourism competitive cabability

Cite this article

WANG Degen, CHEN Tian . Differences of Regional Tourism Development Based on Competitiveness Evaluation: A Case Study of the Three Circles in Eastern Coastal China[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011 , 30(2) : 249 -256 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.02.015

References

[1] Deasy G, Griess P. Impact of a tourist facility on its hinterland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1966, 56(1): 295-306.

[2] Metin K, Mike R. Measuring tourist destination competitiveness: Conceptual considerations and empirical finding. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 1999, 18(3): 273-283.

[3] Michael J E, James N. Tourism destination competitiveness: A quantitative approach. Tourism Management, 2004, 25(6): 777-788.

[4] Brent J R, Ritchie J R B, Crouch G I. The competitive destination: A sustainability perspective. Tourism Management, 2000, 21(1): 1-7.

[5] Murphy P, Pritchard M P, Smith B. The destination product and its impact on traveller perceptions. Tourism Management, 2000, 21(1): 43-52.

[6] Dwyer L, Prasada P. The price competitiveness of travel and tourism: a comparison of 19 destinations . Tourism Management, 2000, 21(1): 9-22.

[7] Prideaux B. The role of the transport system in destination development. Tourism Management, 2000, 21(1):53-63.

[8] Mihalic T. Environmental management of a tourist destination: A factor of tourism competitiveness .Tourism Management, 2000, 21(1): 65-78.

[9] 杨森林, 郭鲁芳, 王莹. 中国旅游业国际竞争策略. 上海:立信会计出版社, 1996.

[10] 黎洁, 赵西萍. 论国际旅游竞争力及其阶段性演进. 社会科学家, 1999(5): 19-22.

[11] 张明清, 刘超. 旅游产业国际竞争力的理论思考与竞争态势分析. 经济问题探索, 2000(4): 116-119.

[12] 万绪才, 李刚, 张安. 区域旅游业国际竞争力定量评价理论与实践研究. 经济地理, 2001, 21(3): 355-358.

[13] 朱应皋, 万绪才. 全球旅游11强(国)旅游业国际竞争力综合评价. 地理与地理信息科学, 2004, 20(3): 109-112.

[14] 冯学钢, 赖坤. 中国旅游业发展环境国际竞争力比较研究. 世界经济研究, 2003(7): 40-45.

[15] 周常春, 保继刚. 肇庆城市旅游竞争力研究. 地域研究与开发, 2005, 24(2): 78-83.

[16] 丁蕾, 吴小根, 丁洁. 城市旅游竞争力评价指标体系的构建及应用. 经济地理, 2006, 26(3): 511-515.

[17] 董锁成, 李雪, 张广海, 等. 城市群旅游竞争力评价指标体系与测度方法探讨. 旅游学刊, 2009, 24(2): 30-36.

[18] 李玺. 城市商务旅游竞争力: 评价体系及方法的创新研究. 旅游学刊, 2010, 25(4): 27-31.

[19] 苏伟忠, 杨英宝, 顾朝林. 城市旅游竞争力评价初探. 旅游学刊, 2003, 18(3): 39-42.

[20] 汪德根, 刘昌雪. 江苏省区域旅游产业差异及“板块旅游”发展战略. 地理与地理信息科学, 2008, 24(5):98-102.

[21] 魏后凯. 中国地区间居民收入差异及其分解. 经济研究, 1996(11): 66-73.

[22] 陈健昌, 保继刚. 旅游者的行为研究及其实践意义. 地理研究, 1988,7(3): 44-50.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉