Original Articles

The Temper atur e Sensitivity of Soil Respir ation

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resource Research, CAS Beijing 100101;
    2. College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002;
    3. Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, CAS, Beijing 100093

Received date: 2007-12-01

  Revised date: 2008-06-01

  Online published: 2008-07-25


A growing body of literature sheds new light on the importance of the temperature sensitivity (Q10) of soil respiration for understanding terrestrial carbon cycling. It has been well known that small changes in Q10 value will have great influence on soil CO2 efflux, due to its nonlinear response to temperature. Because most of large- scale carbon cycle models are based on the temperature sensitivity, the accurate determination of Q10 value is essential in estimating carbon efflux in terrestrial ecosystems and predicting future climate change. Unfortunately, this value remains uncertain yet. A fixed Q10 of 2.0 has been widely used in modeling leaf - to ecosystem- scale respiration responses to temperature, until several recent studies suggest that Q10 value is not constant during a year, but tends to decrease with increasing temperature and decreasing soil moisture. A fixed Q10 used in empirical or processes- based models, therefore, can result in a greatly over - or under - estimated soil respiration, due to the variability of Q10 value. More insight information in the relationship between Q10 and controlling factors is vital for accurately estimating soil respiration and for developing management strategies to improve soil fertility and to increase C sequestration in soil. In this paper, we reviewed recent advances and hotspots in Q10 research, especially focused on the responses of resistant and labile carbon to temperature. We further reviewed why Q10 value is so variable and explained this phenomenon based on the Michaelis -Menten kinetics. In addition, we reviewed how soil temperature and moisture influence substrate availability and enzymes activity and hence influence temperature sensitivity of soil respiration.

Cite this article

LIU Hongsheng, LIU Huajie, WANG Zhiping, XU Ming, HAN Xinguo, LI Linghao . The Temper atur e Sensitivity of Soil Respir ation[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008 , 27(4) : 51 -60 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.04.008


[1] Raich J W, Schlesinger W H. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus, 1992, 44, 81~99.

[2] Schlesinger W H. Carbon balance in terrestrial detritus. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1977, 8, 5l~8l.

[3] 方精云. 全球生态学- 气候变化与生态响应.北京:高等 教育出版社; 海德堡: 施普林格出版社, 2000,113 ~135.

[4] Lloyd J, Taylor J A. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology,1994, 8,315~322.

[5] Kirschbaum M U F. Will changes in soil organic matter act as a positive or negative feedback on global warming? Biogeochemistry, 2000,48: 21 ~ 51.

[6] Hanson P J, Edwards N T, Garten C T. et al. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48, 115~146.

[7] Fung J Y, Tucker C J, Prentice K C. Appliction of advanced very high resolution radiometer vegetation index to study atmosphere - biosphere exchange of CO2. Journal of Geophysiology Research, 1987, 93, 2999~3015.

[8] Davidson E A, Belk E, Boone R D. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology,1998, 4, 217~227.

[9] Xu M, Qi Y. Soil - surface CO2 efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7, 667~677.

[10] Fang C. Moncrieff J B. The dependence of soil CO2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2001, 33, 155~165.

[11] Qi Y, Xu M. Separating the effects of moisture and temperature on soil CO2 efflux in a coniferous forest in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. Plant Soil,2001,237,15~23.

[12] Davidson E A, Janssens I A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 2006, 440,165~173.

[13] Davidson E A, Janssens I A, Luo Y Q. On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Global Change Biology,2006, 154~164.

[14] 于贵瑞. 全球变化与陆地生态系统碳循环和蓄积. 北京: 气象出版社, 2003, 43~88.

[15] 王小国,朱波,王艳强等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤呼 吸及其温度敏感性. 生态学报,2007, 27, 1960~1968.

[16] Chen H, Harmon M E, Griffiths R P. et al. Effects of temperature and moisture on carbon respired from decomposing woody roots. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 138,51~64.

[17] Townsend A, Vitousek P M, Desmarais D J.et al. Soil carbon pool structure and temperatures sensitivity inferred using CO2 and 13CO2 incubation fluxes from five Hawaiian soils. Biogeochemistry,1997, 38, 1~17.

[18] Fierer N, Colman B P, Schimel J P. et al. Predicting the temperature dependence of microbial respiration in soil: A continental- scale analysis. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2006, 20, doi:3010.1029/2005GB002644.

[19] 刘立新,董云社,齐玉春等. 内蒙古锡林河流域土壤呼 吸的温度敏感性.中国环境科学, 2007, 27,226~230.

[20] Grogan P, Jonasson S. Temperature and substrate controls on intra- annual variation in ecosystem respiration in two subarctic vegetation types. Global Change Biology, 2005,11, 465~475.

[21] Katterer T, Reichstein M, Andrén O. et al. Temperature dependence of organic matter decomposition: a critical review using literature data analyzed with different models. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1998, 27, 258~262.

[23] Reichstein M, K?tterer T, Andrén O. et al. Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition vary with soil organic matter quality? Biogeosciences, 2005, 2, 737~747.

[24] Illeris, L, Christensen T R, Mastepanov M. Moisture effects on temperature sensitivity of CO2 exchange in subarctic heath ecosystem. Biogeochemistry, 2004, 70, 315~330.

[25] Bosatta E, #gren G I. Soil organic matter quality interpreted thermodynamically. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1999, 31, 1889~1891.

[26] #gren G I, Bosatta E. Reconciling differences in predictions of temperature response of soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2001, 34,129~132.

[27] #gren G I. Temperature dependence of old soil organic matter. Ambio,2000, 29,56~57.

[28] Fierer N, Craine J M, Mclauchlan K. et al. Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology, 2005, 86, 320~326.

[29] Fierer N, Schimel J P, Holden P A. et al. Influence of drying- rewetting frequency on soil bacterial community structure. Microbial Ecology, 2003, 45, 63~71.

[30] Knorr W, Prentice I C, House J I.et al. Long- term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature, 2005, 433, 298~301.

[31] Giardina C P, Ryan M G. Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature, 2000, 404, 858~861.

[32] Conen F, Leifeld J, Seth1 B. et al. Warming mobilises young and old soil carbon equally (temperature sensitivity Q10). Biogeosciences Discuss, 2006, 3, 1355~1366.

[33] Fang C, Smith P, Moncrieff J B. et al. Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature, 2005, 433, 57~59.

[34] Fang C, Smith P, Smith J U. Is resistant soil organic matter more sensitive to temperature than the labile organic matter? Biogeosciences, 2006, 3, 65~68.

[35] Fang C, Smith P, Smith J U. et al. Incorporating microorganisms as decomposers into models to simulate soil organic matter decomposition. Geoderma, 2005, 129,139 ~ 146.

[36] Baath E,Wallander H. Soil and rhiosphere microorganisms have the same Q10 for respiration in a model system. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9, 1788~1791.

[37] Keith H, Jacobsen K L, Raison R J. Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperatue and moisture on soil respiration in Eucalyptus forest. Plant Soil,1997,190,127~141.

[38] Mark G, Tjoelker J O,Reich P B.Modeling respiration of vegetation:evidence for a general temperature - dependent Q10.Global Change Biology,2001,7, 223~230.

[39] Curiel Y J, Janssens I A, Carrara A et al. Annual Q10 of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biology, 2004,10, 161~169.

[40] Curiel Y J, Janssens I A, Carrara A et al. Interactive effects of temperature and precipitation in a temperate maritime pine forest. Tree Physiology, 2003,23, 1263~1270.

[41] H%gberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N et al. Large - scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature, 2001, 411, 789~792.

[42] Craine J M, Wedin D A, Chapin F S III. Predominance of ecophysiological controls on soil CO2 flux in a Minnesota grassland. Plant Soil, 1999, 207, 77~86.

[43] Liu H S, Li F M, Jia Y. Effects of shoot removal and soil water content on root respiration of spring wheat and soybean. Environmental & Experimental Botany, 2006, 56, 28~35.

[44] Kuzyakov Y, Siniakina S V. Siphon method of separating root - derived organic compounds from root respiration in non- sterile soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Sciences, 2001,164, 511~517.

[45] Peterjohn W T, Steudler P A, Steudler P A. Responses of trace gas fluxes and N availability to experimentally elevated soil temperatures. Ecological Application,1994, 4, 617~625.

[46] McHale P J, Mitchell M J, Bowles P. Soil warming in a northern hardwood forest: trace gas fluxes and leaf litter decomposition. Canada Journal of Forest Research, 1998,28, 1365~1372.

[47] Rustad L E, Fernandez I J. Experimental soil warming effects on CO2 and CH4 flux from a low elevation spruce- fir forest soil in Maine, USA. Global Change Biology, 1998,4, 597~605.

[48] Saleska S R, Harte J, Torn MS. The effect of experimental ecosystem warming on CO2 fluxes in a montane meadow. Global Change Biology, 1999, 5, 125~141.

[49] Luo Y, Wan S, Hui D, et al. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie. Nature, 2001, 413, 622 ~625.

[50] Rustad L E, Campbell J L, Marion G M. et al. A metaanalysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia, 2001, 126, 543 ~ 562.

[51] Melillo J M, Steudler P A, Aber J D. et al. Soil warming and carbon - cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Science, 2002, 298, 2173~2176.

[52] Liu H S, Li L H, Han X G. et al. Respiratory substrate availability plays a crucial role in the response of soil respiration to environmental factors. Applied soil Ecology, 2006, 32, 284~292.

[53] Liski J H, llvesniemi H, Makela A. et al. CO2 emissions from soil in response to climatic warming are overestimated- the decomspoition of old soil organic mater is tolerant of temperature. Ambio,1999, 28, 171~174.

[54] Thornley J H M, Cannell M G R. Soil carbon storage response to temperature: a hypothesis. Annual of Botany, 2001, 87, 591~598.

[55] Trumbore S. Age of soil moronic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constrains on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications, 2000, 10, 399~411.

[56] Trumbore S. Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems - recent progress and challenges. Global Change Biology, 2006,12, 141~153.

[57] Law B E, Kelliher F M, Baldocchi D D. et al. Spatial and temporal variation in respiration in a young Ponderosa pine forest during a summer drought. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2001, 110, 27~43.

[58] Xu M, Qi Y. Spatial and temporal variations of Q10 determined by soil respiration measurements at a Sierra Nevadan forest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2001, 15, 687~696.

[59] Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology. Berlin: Springer- Verlag, 1995, 67~91.

[60] Gulledge J, Schimel J P. Controls on soil carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in a variety of Taiga Forest stands in Interior Alaska. Ecosystems, 2000, 3, 269~282.

[61] Cook B D, Allan D L. Dissolved organic carbon in old field soils: total amounts as a measure of available resources for soil mineralization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1992, 24, 585~594.

[62] Cleveland C C, Nemergut D R , Schmidt S K. et al. Increase in soil respiration following labile carbon additions linked to rapid shifts in soil microbial community composition. Biogeochemistry,2006, DOI 10.1007/s10533- 006- 9065- z.

[63] Raich J W, Potter C S, Bhagawati D. Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980- 94. Global Change Biology, 2002,8,800~812.

[64] Cornelissen J H. Bodegom P M. Aerts R. et al. Global negative vegetation feedback to climate warming responses of leaf litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. Ecology Letters, 2007, 10:619~627.

[65] Reichstein M, Subke J, Angeli A C. et al. Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time? Global Change Biology, 2005, 11, 1754~1767.

[66] Papendick R I, Campbell G S. Water Potential Relations in Soil Microbiology. Soil Science Society of America Special Publications Number 9, Madison Soil Science Society of America, Inc., 1981, 1~22.

[67] Linn D M, Doran J W. Effect of water- filled pore space on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide production in tilled and nontilled soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1984, 48, 1267~1272.

[68] Doran J W, Mielk I N, Power J F. Ecology of soil microorganisms in the microhabitat environments Transactions of the 14th Int. Congress of soil Science. 1999,Symposium III- 3, 94~99 .

[69] Skopp J, Jawson D M, Doran D W. Steady- state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil water content. Soil Science Society of American Journal,1990, 54,1619 ~ 1625.

[70] D?rr H, Münich K O. Annual variation in soil respiration in selected areas of the temperate zone. Tellus, 1987, 39 (B),114~121.

[71] Dai A, Wigley T M L, Boville B A. Climates of the 20th and 21st centuries simulated by the NCAR Climate System Model. Journal of Climate,2001, 14, 485~519.

[72] 陈全胜, 李凌浩, 韩兴国等. 典型温带草原群落土壤呼 吸温度敏感性与土壤水分的关系. 生态学报, 2004, 24,831~836.

[73] 陈全胜李凌浩, 韩兴国等.土壤呼吸对温度升高的适应. 生态学报, 2004, 24, 2649~2655.

[74] Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S M. et al. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long - term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy. Global Change Biology,1996, 2, 169~182.

[75] Biasi C, Rusalimova O, Meyer H, et al. Temperature- dependent shift from labile to recalcitrant carbon sources of artic heterotrophs. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2005, 19, 1401~1408.