EN中文

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY >

2012 , Vol. 31 >Issue 2: 239 - 247

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.013

Science Geography as a Discipline: The Foundation of Theory, Content and Nature

Expand
  • 1. College of Tourism and Geographical Sciences, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
    2. College of Social Development, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China

Received date: 2011-04-01

  Revised date: 2011-07-01

  Online published: 2012-02-25

Fold

Abstract

With the development of society, scientific activities have been one of the socialization divisions, and obviously, there should exist a regional structure. Some geographers have studied the relationship among science, technology and society from the point of view of geography, and put forward some concepts such as "science and technology geography", "technology geography" and "science geography". But few studies have been conducted on the relationship among science and technology, geography and the geographical research of scientific history. This paper re-explained the connotation of "science geography", especially as a concept of a discipline. There is an ideological turn in scientific history research, namely the geographical turn. There is also an ideological turn in modern geographical research, namely the turn to the soft side of research knowledge, technology, information, and transmission. Attention should be paid to the "society influence on the development of science through geography" in the ideological change of scientific history research, but not to "science influence on the development of society through geography". Although geographers have made some contributions to the ideological change in the scientific history, their main aim is to research the scientific history from the perspective of geography, not the influence of science through geography. So, as a discipline, science geography contains the following aspects: (1) exertting the "society influence on the development of science through geography"; (2) implementing practicing the general plan of "developing geography based on the mission", and constructing the "science influence on the development of society through geography"; (3) paying attention to the regional factors influencing the development of science. Science geography should also include the following aspects: (1) space structure of scientific research and its organization; (2) Space structure and the relationship between science and relevant organizations, geographical environment, economic conditions, technology, society, and culture; (3) the influence of science research and its relations with natural landscape, social landscape and cultural landscape; (4) the influence of science research and its relations with the development of "man-earth regional system".

Key words： development of geography; disciplinary nature; foundation of theory; research contents; science geography

Cite this article

SUN Jun, PAN Yujun, YAO Hui, GUO Lingsheng, HE Ruifang, LIU Shufen, ZHAO Jianxia, YANG Xiaoyan . Science Geography as a Discipline: The Foundation of Theory, Content and Nature[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012 , 31(2) : 239 -247 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.02.013

References

[1] 詹姆斯O. 威勒, 等. 空间经济分析. 王兴中, 等译. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社, 1988: 6.
[2] M.戈德史密斯等. 科学的科学: 技术时代的社会. 赵红州, 蒋国华, 译. 北京: 科学出版, 1985: 182-197.
[3] Park S K. Knowledge, networks and regional development in the periphery in the internet era. Progress in Human Geography, 2004, 28(3): 283-286.
[4] M.E.波洛维茨卡娅. 美国科学研究的地理学. 中国科学院图书馆情报部, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983.
[5] 赵海军. 论科技地理学. 陕西师大学报: 自然科学版, 1992, 20(4): 68-71.
[6] 陈慧琳. 科技地理学: 一门极待研究的新学科. 贵州师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1998, 16(1): 91-96.
[7] 钟书华. 技术地理: 一门即将产生的边缘学科. 华中理工大学学报: 社科版, 1991, 3(1): 116-120.
[8] 王新坚. 科学地理学刍论. 求索, 1992, 11(2): 25-29.
[9] Smith N. Degeneracy in theory and practice: Spatial interactionism and radical eclecticism. Progress in Human Geography, 1981, 5(1): 111-115.
[10] Herbert S. Contemporary geographies of exclusion I: Traversing skid road. Progress in Human Geography, 2008, 32(5): 659-666.
[11] 叶超, 蔡运龙. 地理学方法论变革的案例剖析: 重新审视《地理学中的例外论》之争. 地理学报, 2009, 64(9): 1134-1142.
[12] 孙俊, 潘玉君, 和瑞芳, 等. 地理学第一定律(TFL)之争及其对地理学理论建设的启示. 地理研究, 2012, 31(3): 384-397.
[13] 吴大猷. 吴大猷科学哲学文集. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 1996: 326.
[14] 董英哲. 科学与技术的辩证统一. 西北大学学报, 1987, 7(2): 110-118.
[15] 王耀德. 科学与技术关系的三个问题. 江西财经大学学报, 2004, 5(4): 84-87.
[16] 夏先良. 知识论. 北京: 对外经济贸易大学出版社, 2000: 7.
[17] 孙正聿. 哲学通论. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2005: 58-60.
[18] 丁长青. 科学技术学. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 2003: 71-74.
[19] 魏屹东. 科学社会学新论. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 57-63.
[20] 汤浅光朝. 科学中心的转移. 赵红洲, 译. 科学与哲学, 1979, (2): 53- 73.
[21] 赵红州. 科学能力学引论. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984: 1-15.
[22] 冯烨, 梁立明. 世界科学中心转移的时空特征及学科层次析因(上). 科学学与科学技术管理, 2000, 21(5): 4- 8.
[23] 孙俊, 潘玉君, 贾星客, 等. 科学活动中心形成的历史地理基础. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(11): 14-20.
[24] 彭福扬, 王树仁. 从计量研究角度看技术活动中心转移. 科学学研究, 1998, 16(3): 17-20.
[25] 黄欣荣, 王英. 论古代科学中心的转移. 赣南师范学院学报, 1990, 10(2): 74-80.
[26] 黄欣荣, 王英. 技术中心及其活动规律的统计研究. 科学学研究, 1990, 7(2): 19-28.
[27] 北海. 科学与社会进步: 介绍苏联科学家彼·? 列·卡皮察的主要观点. 民主与科学, 1990, 2(5): 19-20.
[28] 郭俊立. 科学的文化建构论. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 1.
[29] 约翰·齐曼. 真科学: 它是什么, 它指什么. 曾国屏, 匡辉, 张成岗, 译. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2008: 4.
[30] 袁江洋. 科学中心转移规律再检视. 科学文化评论, 2005, 2(2): 60-75.
[31] 冯烨, 梁立明. 世界科学中心转移与文化中心分布的相关性分析. 科技管理研究, 2006, 25(2): 192- 196.
[32] 施若谷. 试论科技教育与科技中心转移的关系. 自然辩证法研究, 1999, 15(11): 43- 46.
[33] 姜国钧. 论教育中心转移与科技中心转移的关系. 科学技术与辩证法, 1999, 16(1): 43- 46.
[34] 刘鹤玲. 世界科学中心形成的经济、政治、文化前提. 自然辩证法研究, 1998, 16(4): 47- 50.
[35] K 马尔科夫. 现代地理学的一般问题//Л.库德里亚舍瓦. 现代苏联地理学的理论问题. 马广志, 李旭旦, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 55.
[36] Withers C. History and philosophy of geography 2002-2003: Geography in its place. Progress in Human Geography, 2005, 29(1): 64-72.
[37] Medrum M. Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge(review). Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 2005, 36(1): 75-76.
[38] Livingstone D N. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[39] 蔡运龙, 严祥. 将科学置于地方: 科学知识的地理//蔡运龙, Bill Wyckoff. 地理学思想经典解读. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2011: 383-389.
[40] Livingstone D N. Some methodological problems in the history of geographical thought. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 1979, 70(2): 226-231.
[41] Livingstone D N. The history of science and the history of geography: Interactions and implications. History of Science, 1984, 22(1): 271-302.
[42] Livingstone D N. Text, talk and testimony: Geographical reflections on scientific habits: An afterword. British Journal for the History of Science, 2005, 38(3): 93-100.
[43] Powell R C. Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography, 2007, 31(3): 309-329.
[44] 孙天胜, 曹诗图. 中国地理学面临的挑战及发展对策. 地理教育, 2000, 20(4): 4-5.
[45] Sheppard E, Couclelis H, Graham S, et al. Geographies of the information society. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 1999, 13(8): 797-823.
[46] 孙俊, 潘玉君, 张谦舵. 地理学学科研究的科学社会学视角. 人文地理, 2011, 26(3): 10-15.
[47] Wright J K. Terrae incognitae: The place of the imagination in geography. Annals of Association of American Geographers, 1947, 37(1): 1-15.
[48] 李光. 科技社会化及其给我国带来的机遇与挑战. 科学学研究, 2003, 21(2): 113-116.
[49] 李喜先. 科学系统论. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995: 263-287.
[50] 陆大道. 中国地理学发展若干值得思考的问题. 地理学报, 2003, 58(1): 3-8.
[51] 蔡运龙, 陆大道, 周一星, 等. 中国地理科学的国家需求与发展战略. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 811-819.
[52] 陆大道. 人文—经济地理学的方法论及其特点. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3): 387-396.
[53] 陆大道. 改变世界的十大地理思想译序//苏珊·汉森. 改变世界的十大地理思想. 肖平, 王方雄, 李平, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 2-9.
[54] 陆大道. 人文地理学中区域分析的初步探讨. 地理学报, 1984, 9(4): 394-407.
[55] 陆大道. 中国地理学的发展与全球变化研究. 地理学报, 2011, 66(2): 147-156.
[56] Miller H J. Tobler's first law and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94 (2): 284-289.
[57] 苏珊·汉森. 改变世界的十大地理思想. 肖平, 王方雄, 李平, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009: 1-13.
[58] 潘玉君. 地理学基础. 1 版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 40-45.
[59] Cutter S L, Golledge R, William L G. The big questions in geography. The Professional Geographer, 2002, 54(3): 305-317.
[60] 林珲, 龚建华, 施晶晶. 从地图到地理信息系统与虚拟地理环境: 试论地理学语言的演变. 地理与地理信息科学, 2003, 19(4): 18-23.
[61] Sui D Z. Tobler's first law of geography: A big idea for a small world. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94(2): 269-277.
[62] 孙俊, 潘玉君, 和瑞芳, 等. 科学普及中行为缺失的案例剖析: 以地理学为例. 科普研究, 2011, 6(2): 46-54.
[63] Couclelis H. Spatial information technologies and societal problems//Craglia H, Onsrud H. Geographic Information Research: Transatlantic Perspectives. London: Taylor and Francis, 1999: 15-24.
[64] Couclelis H. The third domain: the spread and use of GIS with social science. Cartographica, 2004, 39(1): 17-24.
[65] Whatmore S J. Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 2009, 33(5): 587-598.
[66] 魏屹东, 郭贵春. 科学中心转移现象的社会文化语境分析. 科学技术与辩证法, 2001, 18(6): 52-55.
[67] Frenken K. Geography of Scientific Knowledge: A Proximity Approach. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies( ECIS), 2010: 3.
[68] 朱亚宗. 地理环境如何影响科技创新: 科技地理史与科技地理学核心问题试探. 科学技术与辩证法, 2003, 20 (5): 61-66.
[69] 陈益升. 科学系统的经济环境. 科学学研究, 1994, 12 (3): 14-19.
[70] 刘则渊, 王海山. 近代世界哲学高潮与科学中心关系的考察. 科研管理, 1981, 2(1): 7-21.
[71] 龚炜. 科学技术进步与地缘政治理论发展研究[D]. 华中师范大学, 2008: 3.
[72] 林学俊. 从科学中心转移看科研组织形式的演变. 科学技术与辩证法, 1998, 9(4): 53-56.
[73] 菲利普·比斯坎, 等. 欧洲科学帝国的衰落. 邱举良, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 3-8.
[74] Livingstone D N. Science, text and space: Thoughts on the geography of reading. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2005, 30(4): 391-392.
[75] 吴传钧. 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统. 经济地理, 1991, 11(3): 1-6.
[76] 潘玉君. 困境与出路: 全球问题与人地共生. 自然辩证法研究, 1995, 10(6): 1-3.
[77] 贾文毓. 人文地理新探索. 北京: 气象出版社, 2007: 64.
[78] 胡兆量. 中国人才地理特征. 经济地理, 1998, 18(3):8-14.
[79] 徐宝芳. 人才地理学体系研究与建设//中国地理学会. 地理学的理论与实践: 纪念中国地理学会成立九十周年学术会议文集. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001: 28.
[80] 樊杰, 吕昕. 简论人地关系地域系统研究的核心领域: 土地利用变化. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(4): 429-430.
[81] Railien? L. How geography and natural science subjects come into contact. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 2003, 2(4): 62-69.
[82] Barnes T J. In the beginning was economic geography: A science studies approach to disciplinary history. Progress in Human Geography, 2001, 25(4): 455-478.
[83] Hands D W. The sociology of scientific knowledge: Some thoughts on the possibilities//Backhouse R. New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, 1994: 75-106.
[84] 杨吾杨. 地理学思想简史. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1988: 177.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉