Original Articles

Reviews on Regional Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment

  • 1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
    2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2010-01-01

  Revised date: 2010-07-01

  Online published: 2011-01-25


Assessments of regional vulnerability provide a scientific basis for poverty reduction, sustainable development and formulation of adaptive strategies in vulnerable regions. Quantitative methods for regional vulnerability assessment are very difficult due to the complexity of man-land system. Vulnerability studies started late in China, and the earlier studies concerned more on the distribution of vulnerable areas but less on vulnerable people, which prevents the central and local governments from formulating scientific adaptation policies and measures. This paper reviews the understandings of vulnerability and the methods for regional climate change vulnerability assessment. Cases about qualitative analysis, index evaluation and vulnerability evaluation based on sustainable livelihood framework and GIS methods are introduced. Suggestions on vulnerability assessment based on sustainable livelihood framework are also presented for the vulnerable regions of China.

Cite this article

YU Ou, YAN Jianzhong, ZHANG Yili . Reviews on Regional Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011 , 30(1) : 27 -34 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.01.003


[1] Robert J N, Frank M J H, Marchand M. Increasing flood risks and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: Regional and global analyses. Global Environmental Change, 1999, 9(1): 69-87.

[2] Dinar A, Mendelsohn R, Evenson R, et al. Measuring the Impacts of Climate Change on Indian Agriculture. World Bank Technical Paper, 1998.

[3] Agrawala S, Raksakulthai V, Larsen P, et al. Development and climate change in Nepal: Focus on water resources and hydropower. OECD working paper, 2003.

[4] Eakin H, Luers A L. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environment systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2006, 31(1): 365-394.

[5] Box E. Quantitative evaluation of global primary productivity models generated by computers//Lieth H, Wittaker R H. Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. New York: Springer-verlag, 1975: 265-283.

[6] Cao M K, Prince S, Li K R, et al. Response of terrestrial carbon uptake to climate interannual variability in China. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(4): 536-546.

[7] Ji J J, Yu L. A simulation study of coupled feedback mechanism between physical and biogeochemical processes at the surface. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1999, 23(4): 439-448.

[8] Melillo J M, McGuire A D, Kicklighter D W, et al. Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature, 1993, 363: 234-240.

[9] Neilson R P. Vegetation redistribution: A possible biosphere source of CO2 during climatic change. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 1993, 70(1-4): 659-673.

[10] Patt A, Klein R J T. Taking the uncertainty in climate-change vulnerability assessment seriously. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 2005, 337(4): 411-424.

[11] Prentice I C, Cramer W, Harrison S P, et al. A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate. Journal of Biogeography, 1992, 19(2): 117-134.

[12] Running S W, Gower S T. FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. Tree Physiology, 1991, 9(1/2): 147-160.

[13] Uchijima Z, Seino H. Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetations(1): Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 1985, 40(4): 343-352.

[14] Woodward F I, Smith T M, Emanuel W R. A global land primary productivity and phytogeography model. Global Biochemical Cycles, 1995, 9(4): 471-490.

[15] Wu S H, Yin Y H, Zhao H X, et al. Recognition of ecosystem response to climate change impact. Advance Climate Change Research, 2005, 1(3): 115-118.

[16] 李鹤, 张平宇, 程叶青. 脆弱性的概念及其评价方法. 地理科学进展, 2008, 27(2): 18-25.

[17] Downing T E. Towards a Vulnerability Science? IHDP Newsletter Update, issue 3, 2000.

[18] 刘小茜, 王仰麟, 彭建. 人地耦合系统脆弱性研究进展. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(8): 918-927.

[19] IPCC. Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001: 3-26.

[20] Fussel H M. Vulnerability: A generally application conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 2007, 17(2): 155-167.

[21] Ellis F. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Development Countries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

[22] Bebbington A. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 1999, 27(12): 2021-2044.

[23] Carney D. Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: Progress and Possibilities for Change. London: Department for International Development, 2002.

[24] DIFD Issues. Sustainable Livelihoods-Building on Strengths. London: Department for International Development, 2002.

[25] Chatterjee K, Huq S. A report on the inter-regional conference on adaptation to climate change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2002, 7(4): 403-406.

[26] Adger W N. Vulnerability. Global Environment Change, 2006, 16(3): 268-281.

[27] Polsky C, Neff R, Yarnal B. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerable scoping diagram. Global environment change, 2007, 17(3-4):472-485.

[28] Sen A. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.

[29] Swift J. Why are rural people vulnerable to famine? IDS Bulletin, 1989, 20(2): 8-15.

[30] Adger W N. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 1999, 27(2): 249-269.

[31] Liverman D M. Drought impacts in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1990, 80(1): 49-72.

[32] Luers A L, Lobell D B, Sklar L S, et al. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 2003, 13(4): 255-267.

[33] Calvo C, Dercon S. Measuring individual vulnerability. Oxford Economics Discussion Paper, 2005.

[34] Calvo C.Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty: Peru, 1998-2002. World Development, 2008, 36(6): 1011-1020.

[35] Adger W N. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3): 268-281.

[36] Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke E. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 1984, 52(3): 761-766.

[37] Berry P M, Rounsevell M D A, Harrison P A, et al. Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environmental Science &Policy, 2006, 9(2):189-204.

[38] Patwardhan A, Sharma U. Improving the methodology for assessing natural hazard impacts. Global and Planetary Change, 2005, 47(2-4): 253-265.

[39] Siegel P B. Using an Asset-based Approach to Identify Drivers of Sustainable Rural Growth and Poverty Reduction in Central America: A Conceptual Framework. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2005.

[40] Twigg J. Sustainable Livelihoods and Vulnerability to Disasters. Disaster Management Working Paper, 2001.

[41] Sharp K. Squaring the ''Q''s? methodological reflections on a study of destitution in Ethiopia. World Development, 2007, 35(2): 264-280.

[42] Sharp K. Measuring destitution: Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches in the analysis of survey data. IDS Working Paper, 2003.

[43] 李小云, 董强, 饶小云, 等. 农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用. 中国农村经济, 2007(4): 32-39.

[44] Elasha B, Elhassan N, Ahmed H, et al. Sustainable livelihood approach for assessing community resilience to climate change: Case studies from Sudan. AIACC Working Paper, 2005.

[45] Hahn M B, Riederer A M, Foster S O. The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change: A case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change, 2009, 19(1):74-88.

[46] 安迪, 许建初. 可持续生计框架:对云南的生物多样性保护与社区发展的针对性. 昆明: 云南省生物多样性和传统知识研究会(CBIK), 2003.

[47] Cutter S L, Mitchell J T, Scott M S. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2000, 90(4): 713-737.

[48] 郝璐, 王静爱, 史培军, 等. 草地畜牧业雪灾脆弱性评价:以内蒙古自治区为例. 自然灾害学报, 2003, 12(2):51-57.

[49] Metzger M J, Leemans R, Schroter D. A multidisciplinary multi-scale framework for assessing vulnerabilities to global change. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2005, 7(4): 253-267.

[50] 刘燕华. 中国自然灾害灾情指标及区域特征探讨. 中国减灾, 1994, 4(2): 29-34.

[51] 刘燕华, 李钜章, 赵跃龙. 中国近期自然灾害程度的区域特征. 地理研究,1995, 14(3): 14-25.

[52] 赵跃龙, 刘燕华. 中国脆弱生态环境类型划分及范围确定. 云南地理环境研究,1994, 6(2): 34-44.

[53] 赵跃龙, 刘燕华. 中国脆弱生态环境分布及其与贫困的关系. 人文地理, 1996, 11(2): 1-7.

[54] 刘燕华, 李秀彬. 脆弱生态环境与可持续发展. 北京: 商务印书馆出版, 2001.

[55] 黄宗智. 中国农村的过密化与现代化: 规范认识危机及出路. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 1992.

[56] 阎建忠, 吴莹莹, 张镱锂, 等. 青藏高原东部样带农牧民生计的多样化. 地理学报, 2009, 64(2): 221-233.

[57] 武艳娟, 李玉娥. 气候变化对生计影响的研究进展. 中国农业气象, 2009, 30(1): 8-13.