Original Articles

Regional Differ ence of Ecological Footpr ints of Cropland in J iangsu Province Based on Emergy Analysis

  • Yangzhou College of Science and Technology,Yangzhou 225000,China

Received date: 2008-02-01

  Revised date: 2008-06-01

  Online published: 2008-07-25


Some scholars have calculated ecological footprint using the theory of emergy analysis. But there are some drawbacks in their studies. This paper singles out the ecological footprint of cropland from 6 types of land use as study topic focusing on the regional differences in Jiangsu province, revises the ecological carrying capacity with productivity factor because land use efficiencies vary across regions, and uses ecological gap index (EGI) in place of ecological deficit or remainder to evaluate the ecological sustainability. In the research of ecological carrying capacity of cropland, the solar radiation, precipitation, soil fertility, the efficiency of land use and area of cropland are considered as natures of ecological carrying capacity, and a new concept of “standard area”is established in terms of the quality class of cropland. In Jiangsu province, ecological carrying capacity of cropland in northern region is more than that in the middle and southern regions, that is, Yancheng, Huaian and Suqian have the highest ones while those Wuxi, Nanjing and Suzhou are the lowest. Ecological footprint of cropland in southern region is less than that in the middle and northern regions, that is, Yancheng, Nantong and Huaian have the greatest ones while those Wuxi, Suzhou and Changzhou are the least. Ecological gap indexes of cropland of all 13 regions in Jiangsu are all lower than 0.5, which means croplands usees are unsustainable. Cropland’ s EGI in the middle part is lower compared with southern and northern parts, and the midst is better than the eastern and western districts in Jiangsu’s middle part. Suzhou and Wuxi have the highest EGI, and that Nantong and Yancheng have the lowest EGI. The results can be helpful for integrating the theory of emergy analysis to the conventional model of ecological footprint and for sustainable use of cropland in this province.

Cite this article

DUAN Qiling . Regional Differ ence of Ecological Footpr ints of Cropland in J iangsu Province Based on Emergy Analysis[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008 , 27(4) : 96 -102 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2008.04.014


[1] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1996.

[2] 李利锋,成升魁. 生态占用———衡量可持续发展的新指 标. 自然资源学报,2000,15(4):375~382.

[3] 杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁. 生态足迹分析理论与方法. 地理 科学进展,2000,15(6):630~636.

[4] 胡小飞,代力民,陈伏生等. 基于生态足迹模型的延边地 区可持续发展评价. 生态学杂志,2006,25(2):129~134.

[5] Ferguson A R B. The logical foundations of ecological footprints. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1999, 1(2): 149~156.

[6] Van Vuuren D P, Smeets E M W. Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 2000, 34(1): 115~130.

[7] Erb K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926 ~2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247~259.

[8] Odum H T. Emergy in ecosystems. In: Poluin, N. ed. Ecosystem Theory and Application. New York: Kohn Wiley & Sons,1986, 337~369.

[9] Odum H T. Self- organization, transformity and information. Science, 1988, 242: 1132~1139.

[10] Odum H T. Environmental accounting. Emergy and environmental decision making. New York: Wiley, 1996.

[11] Zhao S, Li Z Z, Li W L. Modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecological modeling, 2005, 185(1): 65~75.

[12] 张芳怡,濮励杰,张健. 基于能值分析理论的生态足迹 模型及应用———以江苏省为例. 自然资源学报,2006,21 (4):653~661.

[13] 王建源,陈艳春,李曼华等. 基于能值分析的山东省生 态足迹. 生态学杂志,2007,26(9):1505~1510.

[14] 蓝盛芳,钦佩,陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析. 北京: 化学工业出版社,2002, 3~128.

[15] 周生路,李如海,王黎阳等. 江苏省农用地资源分等研 究. 南京:东南大学出版社,2004, l1~22.