The study of runoff and sediment reduction benefits of soil and water conservation measures has been improved at different scales separately; however, there are relatively few studies on the scale effect of runoff and sediment reduction benefits of soil and water conservation measures in basins of different scales. In this study for Chabagou, Dalihe and Wudinghe basins, runoff and sediment reduction benefits of soil and water conservation measures in the 1970s are calculated by three methods: rainfall-runoff and rainfall-sediment statistical model (R-RSM), double accumulative curve method (DACM) and time series contrasting method (TSCM) accordingly. As a result, average runoff reduction benefits are 14.47%, 20.22% and 20.78% respectively and average sediment reduction benefits are 64.97%, 43.62% and 47.26% respectively. The results show that there is no scale effect in the results from the three methods when they are applied separately to calculate runoff and sediment reduction benefits in basins of three scales. Runoff reduction efficiency (RRE) and sediment reduction efficiency (SRE) indicating the“efficiency”of the runoff and sediment reduction benefits are introduced, and after analyzing the relationship between runoff reduction efficiency and sediment reduction efficiency of basins of three scales, several conclusions are obtained. (1) Sediment reduction efficiency is always greater than runoff reduction efficiency in basins of three scales, however, the ratio of sediment reduction efficiency to runoff reduction efficiency of small scale basin is greater than that of middle and large scale basins and there is no scale effect of the ratio between middle and large scale basins. (2) Sediment reduction efficiency of small scale basin is lower than that of middle and large scale basins, while runoff reduction efficiency of small scale basin is greater, and runoff reduction efficiency and sediment reduction efficiency of middle and large scale basins are so close that there is no scale effect.
QI Junyu, CAI Qiangguo, CAI Le, SUN Liying
. Scale Effect of Runoff and Sediment Reduction Effects of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in Chabagou, Dalihe and Wudinghe Basins[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011
, 30(1)
: 95
-102
.
DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.01.012
[1] 郝建忠. 黄丘一区水土保持单项措施及综合治理减水减沙效益研究. 中国水土保持, 1993(3): 26-31.
[2] 陈中方. 常家沟水土保持试验站各种水土保持措施减沙效果的对比分析. 泥沙研究, 1985(3): 88-93.
[3] 胡传银, 连光学, 王保英, 等. 何店小流域水土保持措施蓄水拦沙效益分析. 中国水土保持, 2004(10): 32-33.
[4] 高小平, 康学林, 郭宝文. 坡面措施对小流域治理的减水减沙效益分析. 中国水土保持, 1995(6): 13-15.
[5] 冉大川, 刘斌, 罗全华, 等. 泾河流域水沙变化水文分析.人民黄河, 2001, 23(2): 9-11.
[6] 冉大川, 刘斌, 罗全华, 等. 泾河流域水土保持措施减水减沙作用分析. 人民黄河, 2001, 23(2): 6-8.
[7] 赵俊侠, 王宏, 马勇, 等. 1990-1996 年渭河流域水沙变化原因初步分析. 水土保持学报, 2001, 15(6): 136-139.
[8] 王宏, 熊伟新. 渭河流域降雨产流产沙经验公式初探. 中国水土保持, 1994(8): 15-18.
[9] 王宏, 杨国礼, 王瑞芳. 渭河流域水利水保措施对泥沙、径流影响分析计算. 水土保持通报, 1994, 14(5): 48-52.
[10] 王宏, 张智忠. 渭河主要支流产流产沙规律及水保措施减水减沙效益. 水土保持通报, 1995, 15(4): 55-59.
[11] 沈燕舟, 张明波, 黄燕, 等. 大通江、平洛河水保措施减水减沙分析. 水土保持研究, 2002, 9(1): 34-37.
[12] 张明波, 黄燕, 郭海晋, 等. 嘉陵江西汉水流域水保措施减水减沙作用分析. 泥沙研究, 2003(1): 70-74.
[13] 张明波, 郭海晋, 徐德龙, 等. 嘉陵江流域水保治理水沙模型研究与应用. 水土保持学报, 2003, 17(5): 110-113.
[14] 李景玉, 张楠, 王荣彬. 黄河流域土壤侵蚀产沙模型研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2005, 25(2): 103-111.
[15] 程琴娟, 蔡强国, 李家永. 表土结皮发育过程及其侵蚀响应研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(4): 114-122.
[16] 师长兴. 黄土高原水土保持减沙效益的尺度效应初步分析. 水土保持通报, 2006, 26(3): 51-54.
[17] 杨新, 延军平, 刘宝元. 无定河年径流量变化特征及人为驱动力分析. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(6): 637-642
[18] 许炯心. 无定河流域侵蚀产沙过程对水土保持措施的响应. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6): 972-981.
[19] 熊贵枢, 张胜利. 大理河减水减沙效益初步分析. 人民黄河, 1983(1): 32-36.
[20] 方海燕. 黄土丘陵沟壑区产流产沙尺度效应及泥沙输移动态研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 2007: 20-25.
[21] 张胜利. 无定河流域综合治理减沙效益. 泥沙研究, 1984(3): 1-10.
[22] 张胜利. 岔巴沟年径流泥沙变化初步分析. 水土保持通报, 1983(2): 60-64.
