EN中文

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY >

2006 , Vol. 25 >Issue 4: 118 - 128

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.04.013

Original Articles

Review and Evaluation of Resear ches on Urban- Rur al Inter action Development in the Last Fifteen Year s

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China|
    2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China|
    3. Institute of Regional Economics and Urban Economics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872

Received date: 2006-02-01

  Revised date: 2006-05-01

  Online published: 2006-07-25

Fold

Abstract

Urban- rural interaction development refers to the two- way flowing and optimial allocation of capital, labor, material, information and other socio- economic factors in urban- rural space. Urban- rural interaction development has changed one- way flowing pattern of urban- rural socio- economic factors under urban- rural segregation system, promoting urban- rural common development and overall optimization of regional spatial structure. Meanwhile, in the cross- research field of urban geography and rural geography, urban- rural interaction development will also help to widen research system of geography and provide new research framework for constituting a new round of regional planning and urban- rural planning. Therefore, in the process of building new socialism rural areas and harmonious society, it is necessary to carry out theoretic and practical study on urban- rural interaction development. This article summarized the domestic and foreign research achievements on connotation, mechanism, pattern and way of urban- rural interaction development during the last 15 years, and pointed out that the current researches might mostly favor qualitative and static aspects, while lacking quantitative and dynamic analysis from perspective of the different spatio- temporal dimensions. Therefore, there are three principal issues urgently needed to be solved in the future: (1) Strengthening the research on basic principles of urban- rural interaction development. Spatial economics theory, system science theory and coordination symbiotic theory may be used to analyze the form, content, structure, function and mechanism of urban- rural interaction development. (2) Strengthening the research on mechanism and rule of spatio - temporal evolvement of urban - rural interaction development. Some mathematical methods may be used: firstly, the Two- stage Nested Theil Decomposition method and Exploring Spatial Data Analysis method may be used to reveal the spatial difference of urban- rural interaction development. Secondly, Wavelet Analysis method may be used to reveal temporal variation characteristic of urban- rural interaction development. Thirdly, Grey Association Analysis method and Granger Cause and Effect Analysis method may be used to reveal the relations between urban- rural interaction development and their driving factors. (3) Strengthening the research on the pattern and optimization countermeasure of urban- rural interaction development in different types of regions. Questionnaire and interview methods may be used.

Key words： association; regional planning; urban- rural interaction

Cite this article

DUAN Juan,WEN Yuyuan,LU Qi . Review and Evaluation of Resear ches on Urban- Rur al Inter action Development in the Last Fifteen Year s[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2006 , 25(4) : 118 -128 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2006.04.013

References


[1] Preston D. Rural- urban and inter- settlement interaction: theory and analytical structure. Area, 1975, (7):171～174.

[2] Gould W T S. Rural- Urban Interaction In the Third World. University of livepool, mimeo,1985.

[3] Rondinelli D A. Applied Methods of Regional Analysis: The Spatial Dimensions of Development Policy. Westview, Boulder, 1985.

[4] Tim Unwin. Agricultural Restructuring and Integrated Rural Development in Estonia. Journal of Rural Studies, 1997, 13(1): 93～112.

[5] George C S Lin. Transportation and Metropolitan Development in China's Pearl River Delta: The Experience of Panyu. Habitat Intl, 1999, 23(2):249～270.

[6] T#pfer K. Rural Poverty, Sustainability and Rural Development in the 21st Century: A Focus on Human Settlements. Z.f. Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung, 2000, (41):98～105.

[7] Ayele Gelan. Trade liberalisation and urban- rural linkages: a CGE analysis for Ethiopia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2002, (24):707～738.

[8] Jon Sigurdson. Rural industrialization in China: Approaches and results. World Development, 1975, 3(7- 8):527～538.

[9] Raphael Bar- El,Daniel Felsenstein. Entrepreneurship and rural industrialization: Comparing urban and rural patterns of locational choice in Israel. World Development, 1990, 18(2):257～267.

[10] 宁越敏. 新城市化进程———90 年代中国城市化动力机制和特点探讨. 地理学报, 1998, (5):470～477.

[11] 崔功豪, 马润潮. 中国自下而上城市化的发展及其机制. 地理学报, 1999, (2):106～115.

[12] 段杰, 李江. 中国城市化进程的特点、动力机制及发展前景. 经济地理, 1999, (6):79～83.

[13] 李同升, 厍向阳.城乡一体化发展的动力机制及其演变分析———以宝鸡市为例. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 30 (3):256～260.

[14] 李培祥, 李成固. 论城乡互动: 解决“三农”问题的机制与对策.地理科学, 2003, 23(4):408～413.

[15] 吴伟年. 城乡一体化的动力机制与对策思路———以浙江省金华市为例. 世界地理研究, 2002, 11(4):46～53.

[16] 张安录. 城乡相互作用的动力学机制与城乡生态经济要素流转. 城市发展研究, 2000, (6):51～55.

[17] 罗雅丽, 李同升. 制度因素在我国城乡一体化发展过程中的作用分析. 人文地理, 2005, (4):47～50+86.

[18] 曲亮, 郝云宏. 基于共生理论的城乡统筹机理研究. 农业现代化研究, 2004, 25(5):371～374.

[19] 高佩义. 中外城市化比较研究. 天津: 南开大学出版社, 1991.

[20] 胡必亮, 马昂主.城乡联系理论与中国的城乡联系. 经济学家, 1993, (4):98～109.

[21] 费孝通. 小城镇、大问题, 小城镇建设探讨.北京: 人民日报出版社, 1985.

[22] 曾菊新. 现代城乡网络化发展模式. 北京:科学出版社, 2001.

[23] Stohr W B, Taylor D R F. Development from Above or below? The Dialectics of Regional Plannning in Developing Countries. Wiley, Chichester,1981.

[24] 周叔莲, 金培. 国外城乡经济关系理论比较研究. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 1993.

[25] 刘易斯·芒福德著, 倪丈彦, 束峻峰译. 城市发展史:起源、演变与前景. 北京:中国建筑工业出版杜, 1989.

[26] Ginsburg N, Koppel B, Mcgee T G. The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, 1991.

[27] 周叔莲, 郭克莎. 中国地区城乡经济关系研究. 北京:经济管理出版社, 1994.

[28] 刘维新. 城乡一体化的“三位一体”发展模式. 城市发展研究, 1996, (6):26～28.

[29] 黄伟雄. 珠江三角洲城乡一体化发展模式与格局的探讨. 经济地理, 2002, 22(3): 335～338.

[30] 姚士谋, 房国坤, J.Nipper. 中德经济发达地区城乡一体化模式比较———以长江三角洲与莱茵河下游地区为例. 人文地理, 2004, 19(2):25～29.

[31] 朱丽霞. 中国大都市区域的城乡协调发展研究———以浙江省宁波市为例. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14 (2):149～ 154.

[32] 唐曦文, 彭治权. 珠海市城乡协调发展研究. 城市规划汇刊, 1999, (5):38～43.

[33] 谢飞.经济背景下的苏州城市化发展模式. 世界地理研究, 2000, (4):77～81.

[34] 朱磊. 城乡一体化理论及规划实践- - 以浙江省温岭市为例. 经济地理, 2000, (5):44～48.

[35] 程必定. 从中部地区一个县的实践看统筹城乡发展的一般路径. 中国农村经济, 2004, (12): 40～44.

[36] 张复明, 郭廷儒. 山西省城市化地域模式研究. 城市发展研究, 2000, (2):24～28.

[37] 曾菊新, 冯娟. 论西部地区的城镇网络化发展. 地域研究与开发, 2003, 22(1):22～25.

[38] 白永秀, 岳利萍. 陕西城乡一体化水平判别与区域经济协调发展模式研究. 嘉兴学院学报, 2005, 17(1): 76～80+86.

[39] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 东北地区城乡结构的演变机理与统筹发展. 人文地理, 2005, (4): 51～55.

[40] 陈雯, 吴楚材. 中国城市化在城乡关系中的作用及其发展. 经济地理, 1995, 15(3):25～29.

[41] 蒋励, 张信源. 乡村城镇化与城乡经济协调发展. 农业现代化研究, 1995, (3):96～99.

[42] 曾菊新, 祝影. 论城乡关联发展与文化整合. 人文地理, 2002, 17(4):7～11.

[43] 许大明, 修春亮, 王新越. 信息化对城乡一体化进程的影响及对策. 经济地理, 2004, 24(2):221～225.

[44] 陈家宝. 城乡一体化进程中的资源整合与对接———南京市城乡“二元结构”成因及其对策实证分析. 中国农村经济, 2002, (10):62～68.

[45] Kazuhiko Takeuchi,Yutaka Namiki,Hiroyasu Tanaka. Designing eco- villages for revitalizing Japanese rural areas. Ecological Engineering, 1998, 11(1- 4):177～197.

[46] Holger Magel. Urban- Rural Interrelationship for Sustainable Development. Keynote speech at the opening ceremony of the 2nd FIG Regional Conference, Marrakech,Morocco,2003 - 12 - 2. http://www.fig.net/ council/magel - papers/magel_marrakech_ 2003_opening.pdf.

[47] Balanced urban /rural sustainable development - a proposal for a Baltic 21 Lighthouse Project. SENIOR OFFICIALS GROUP Twenty Second Meeting,Sopot,Poland, 2005.May 9- 10. http://www.baltic21.org/meeting_ documents /SOG%2022/ SOG_22- 6.4- 5_ Balanced_rural- Urban_development- proposed_LHP.pdf.

[48] The Governor's Commission on Family Farms Second Annual Report. Frankfort,Kenuckyt,2000- 9- 27. http://agpolicy.ky. gov/planning/documents/gcff/annual_report_2000.pdf.

[49] ESDP and urban- rural partnership- Finnish perspective. http://users.tkk.fi/～kschmidt/urban rural.html.

[50] Keneva Kunz. Urban- Rural Partnership in Europe. http://www.nordregio.se/north002art.htm.

[51] 曾磊, 雷军, 鲁奇. 我国城乡关联度评价指标体系构建及区域比较分析. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6):763～771.

[52] 战金艳, 鲁奇.中国基础设施与城乡一体化的关联发展. 地理学报, 2003, 58(4):611～619.

[53] 战金艳, 邓祥征, 岳天祥. 基础设施建设水平与城乡生态经济系统发展的耦合分析———安康地区的实例研究. 人文 地理, 2005, (4):37～41.

[54] 鲁奇, 曾磊, 王国霞, 等. 重庆城乡关联发展的空间演变分析及综合评价. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2004, 14(2): 81～87.

[55] 李志强, 雷海章. 模糊聚类:中东部地区城乡统筹水平的分类与比较. 农业技术经济, 2006, (1):30～34.

[56] 朱允卫, 黄祖辉. 经济发展与城乡统筹互动关系的实证分析———以浙江省为例. 农业经济问题, 2006, (5):9～14.

[57] 李岳云, 陈勇, 孙林. 城乡统筹及其评价方法. 农业技术经济, 2004, (1):24～30.

[58] 张淑敏, 刘辉, 任建兰. 山东省区域城乡一体化的定量分析与研究. 山东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 19(3): 65～68.

[59] 罗雅丽, 李同升. 城乡关联性测度与协调发展研究———以西安市为例. 地理与地理信息科学, 2005, 21(5):68～71.

[60] 修春亮, 许大明, 祝翔凌. 东北地区城乡一体化进程评估. 地理科学, 2004, 24(3):320～325.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉