EN中文

PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY >

2009 , Vol. 28 >Issue 2: 245 - 252

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.02.012

Original Articles

Ecological Security Assessment and Prediction for Shenzhen

Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environment Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300384, China;
    2. Institute of Graduate Studies, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China;
    3. Education College, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300384, China

Received date: 2008-08-01

  Revised date: 2008-12-01

  Online published: 2009-03-25

Fold

Abstract

Based on the pressure-status-response (PSR) conceptual model, this paper constructs the ecological security evaluation index system of Shenzhen. It selects the AHP(analytic hierarchy process) and the entropy-right method to empowering all indicators. Through the fuzzy synthetic method and using the SPSS software, it obtains a result of ecological security dynamic changes of Shenzhen from 1997 to 2006 by calculating, analyzing and evaluating. Then it builds prediction model using stepwise regression analysis, and verifies the security grades of ecology data of Shenzhen in 2006. The results show that: it is an approaching situation of ecological security synthetic indices from less security to relative security of Shenzhen from 1997 to 2005, and reaches relative security status in 2006. The membership of ideal security and relative security will get larger gradually while the membership of terribly security gets smaller. It also shows that the limiting factors impacting ecological security of Shenzhen is diminishing gradually, and the development potential is great; the ecological security of Shenzhen will go up to ideal status in 2022 through the prediction model.

Key words： ecological security; evaluation; fuzzy evaluation pattern; prediction; PSR model; Shenzhen

Cite this article

LI Peiwu1, LI Guicai2, ZHANG Jinhua1, LI Zihe3, XU Feng1 . Ecological Security Assessment and Prediction for Shenzhen[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009 , 28(2) : 245 -252 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.02.012

References


[1] 肖荣波，欧阳志云，韩艺师等. 海南岛生态安全评价. 自 然资源学报, 2004, 19(6):769~775.

[2] 王根绪，程国栋，钱鞠. 生态安全评价研究中的若干问题. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(9):1551~1556.

[3] OBER COSTANZA, RALPH D'ARGE, RUDOLF DEGROOT, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem service and natural cap ital. Nature, 1997, 387:253~260.

[4] 肖笃宁，陈文波，郭福良. 论生态安全的基本概念和研究 内容. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(3):354~358.

[5] 曲格平. 关注生态安全之一: 生态环境问题已经成为国 家安全的热门话题. 环境保护, 2002,(5):3~5.

[6] 吴开亚. 主成分投影法在区域生态安全评价中的应用. 中国软科学, 2003,(9):123~126.

[7] 左伟，王桥,王文杰等. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准 研究. 地理学与国土研究,2002,18(1):67~71.

[8] 张卫民，安景文，韩朝. 熵值法在城市可持续发展评价 问题中的应用. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2003,(6):115~ 118.

[9] 贾良清，欧阳志云，赵同谦等. 城市生态安全评价研究. 生态环境, 2004, 13(4):592~596.

[10] 任志远，黄青，李晶. 陕西省生态安全及空间差异定量分 析. 地理学报, 2005, 60(4):597~606.

[11] Alcamo J, EndejanMB, Kaspar F, et al. The GLASS mod2el: A strategy for quantifying global environmental security. Environ Sci Policy, 2001，4:1~12.

[12] Tong C. Review on environmental indicator research. Research on Environmental Science, 2000,13(4):53.

[13] Corválan C, Briggs D, Kjellstrom T. Development of environmental health indicators. In: Briggs D, eds. Link -age Methods for Environment and Health Analysis. General guide2lines. Geneva:UNEP, USEPA and WHO, 1996，19~ 53.

[14] 周文华，王如松. 城市生态安全评价方法研究. 生态学杂 志, 2005, 24(7):848~852.

[15] 杨京平. 生态安全的系统分析. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002, 26~38,127~258.

[16] 刘红，王慧，刘康. 我国生态安全评价方法研究述评. 自 然生态保护, 2005，(8).

[17] 左伟，王桥，王文杰等. 区域生态安全评价指标与标准 研究. 地理学与国土研究, 2002,18(1):67~71.

[18] 周金星，陈浩，张怀清. 首都圈多伦地区荒漠化生态安全 评价. 中国水土保持科学, 2003,1(1):80~84.

[19] 俞孔坚. 生物保护的景观生态安全格局. 生态学报, 1999，19(9):8~15.

[20] Allen H. Environmental indicators: A systematic approach tomeasuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resource Institute. Washington D C, USA,1995，121~152.

[21] 施晓清，赵景柱，欧阳志云. 城市生态安全及其动态评价 方法. 生态学报, 2005, 25(12): 3239~3245.

[22] 周文华， 王如松. 城市生态安全评价方法研究—以北京 市为例. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(7): 848~853.

[23] 吕洪德， 胡海清. 我国城市生态安全问题的系统分析及 对策. 环境科学动态, 2004, (4): 44~48.

[24] 张卫民，安景文，,韩朝. 熵值法在城市可持续发展评价 问题中的应用. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2003, (6):115~ 118.

[25] 许学强，张俊军. 广州城市可持续发展的综合评价. 地理 学报, 2001,56(1):54~63.

[26] 姜启源. 数学模型. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.305~ 335.

[27] 倪绍祥. 土地类型与土地评价概论. 北京:高等教育出版 社, 1999,282~293.

[28] 董金玮，郑新奇. 基于改进PSR 模型的济南市生态安全 评价研究. 资源开发与市场,2007, 23 (1).

[29] 吴国庆. 区域农业可持续发展的生态安全及其评价研 究. 自然资源学报,2001,16 (3):227~233.

[30] 吴开亚，孙世群，聂磊. 生态安全的灰关联评价方法探 讨. 安徽农业大学学报, 2004,31(3):368~371.

[31] 谢花林， 李波. 城市生态安全评价指标体系与评价方 法研究. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版) , 2004,40(5): 705~710.

[32] 曹慧，胡锋，李辉信等. 南京市城市生态系统可持续发 展评价研究. 生态学报, 2002，22(5):787~792.

[33] 吴琼，王如松，李宏卿等. 生态城市指标体系与评价方 法. 生态学报, 2005, 25(8):2090~2095.

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉