Overview of the Informal Sector Research Overseas
Received date: 2009-11-01
Revised date: 2010-05-01
Online published: 2010-12-25
The concept of informal sector was first put forward by Hart in 1971, and then was used in a governmental report of ILO in the next year. Since the 1970s, the research on the informal sector rose rapidly overseas, which focused on the developing countries and regions initially. It was found that the informal sector also existed in the developed countries and regions as the research was carried out deeply. But it was different from the developing countries and regions in the way of existence and the mechanism of forming. The research on the informal sector overseas had formed a set of theory system and achievements, which included the characters, spatial agglomeration and differentiation of the informal sector, the relationship with the formal sector, the impacts, and the policies.
The abroad research showed that the informal sector was marginal, heterogeneous and complicated. This economic activity had different intension and extension under different economic, social and systematic conditions. The spatial distribution of the informal sector took on unbalanced state and concentrated in the urban high intense activity area. Different types of the informal sector had spatial variations due to the suburbanization, the inner city decline, and the immigrants.
The theories of the informal sector mainly included the poverty employment, the dual economy, the regulation, and the embeddedness theory. The poverty employment theory, also called the social marginalization theory, pointed out that the rural people were obliged to take the informal activities because they immigrated into cities more rapidly than the formal sectors could create the employment opportunities. The dual economy theory put forward that the upper circulations and the lower circulations were two opposite sectors of the urban economic activity, and the informal sector was one of the lower circulations. But the dual structure of the urban economy was changing with the urban development. Based on the poverty employment theory, the regulation theory considered that the informal sector attributed to the excessive regulation rather than the labor surplus. From the point view of structuralism, the embeddedness theory argued that the informal sector was not only a form of making a living but also embedded deeply in the modern economic network.
The informal sector was related with the formal sector in the process of production, distribution, and supply. They were competitive and reliant with each other. The informal sector had effect on the GDP, and was the important income source of the urban poverty. However, it would bring on the social polarization. Most researches indicated that the informal sector was still the important part of present urban economic activity, and it was hardly formalized due to lack of the capital, system, technique, and so on. Hence what the government could do was to induce it reasonably.
Although the abroad research had gotten remarkable achievements, it was lack of the spatial characters of the informal practitioners, the comprehensive angle of view, the impacts on the region space, and the comparative and quantitative studies.
Key words： characters; impacts; informal sector; policy; theory
YIN Xiaoying, YAN Xiaopei, XUE Desheng . Overview of the Informal Sector Research Overseas[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010 , 29(12) : 1479 -1489 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.12.003
[1] 约翰斯顿R J. 人文地理学词典. 柴彦威等, 译. 北京: 商 务印书馆, 2004.
[2] Hart K. Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 1973, 11(1): 61-89.
[3] Bromley R. A new path to development? The significance and impact of Hernando De Soto’s ideas on underdevelopment, production, and reproduction. Economic Geography, 1990, 66(4): 328-348.
[4] McGee T G, Yeung Y M. Hawkers in Southeast Asian Cites: Planning for the Bazaar Economy. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 1977.
[5] Portes A, Castells M, Benton L A. The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
[6] Lubell H, Zarour C. Resilience amidst crisis: The informal sector of Dakar. International Labour Review,1990, 129(3): 387-396.
[7] Funkerhouser E. The urban informal sector in Central America: Household survey evidence. World Development, 1996, 24(11): 1737-1751.
[8] Tipple G. The place of home-based enterprises in the informal sector: Evidence from Cochabamba, New Delhi, Surabaya and Pretoria. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(4): 611-632.
[9] Quassoli F. Migrants in the Italian underground economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(2): 212-231.
[10] Lyons M, Snoxell S. Creating urban social capital: some evidence from informal traders in Nairobi. Urban Studies, 2005, 42(7): 1077-1097.
[11] Sik E. From the multicolored to the black and white economy: The Hungarian second economy and the transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1994, 18(1): 46-70.
[12] Neef R. Aspects of the informal economy in a transforming country: The case of Romania. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2002, 26(2): 299-322.
[13] Portes A, Schauffler R. Competing perspectives on the Latin American informal sector. Population and Development Review, 1993, 19(1): 33-60.
[14] Morris M H, Pitt L F. Informal sector activity as entrepreneurship: Insights from a South African township. Journal of Small Business Management, 1995, 33(1): 78-86.
[15] Feltscher S. Small trade and the world economy: Informal vendors in Quito, Ecuador. Economic Geography, 1994, 70(2): 167-187.
[16] Williams C C,Windebank J. Spatial variations in the informal sector: A review of evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 1994, 28(8): 819-825.
[17] Simon P B. Informal responses to crises of urban employment: An investigation into the structure and relevance of small-scale informal retailing in Kaduna, Nigeria. Regional Studies, 1998, 32(6): 547-557.
[18] Waldinger R, Lapp M. Back to the sweatshop or ahead to the informal sector? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1993, 17(1): 6-29.
[19] Cox R, Watt P. Globalization, polarization and the informal sector: The case of paid domestic workers in London. Area, 2002, 34(1): 39-47.
[20] Hillmann F. A look at the "hidden side": Turkish women in Berlin's ethnic labor market. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(2): 267-282.
[21] Pessar P R. Sweatshop workers and domestic ideologies: Dominican women in New York’s apparel industry. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1994, 18(1): 127-142.
[22] Stratigaki M, Vaious D. Women’s work and informal activities in Southern Europe. Environment and Planning A, 1994, 26(8): 1221-1234.
[23] Aspaas H R. Heading households and heading businesses: Rural Kenyan women in the informal sector. Professional Geographer, 1998, 50(2): 192-204.
[24] Sassen S. The informal economy: Between new development and old regulations. The Yale Law Journal, 1994, 103(8): 2289-2304.
[25] Knights M. Bangladeshi immigrants in Italy: From geopolitics to micropolitics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1996, 21(1): 105-123.
[26] Hays-Mitchell M. Streetvending in Peruvian Cities: The spatio-temporal behavior of ambulants. Professional Geographer, 1994, 46(4): 425-438.
[27] Bromlay R. Street vending and public policy: A global review. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2000, 20(1/2): 1-28.
[28] Acho-chi C. The mobile street food service practice in the urban economy of Kumba, Cameroon. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 2002, 23(2): 131-148.
[29] McGee T G. Hawkers in Hong Kong: A Study of Planning and Policy in a Third World City. Hong Kong: Centers of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong, 1973.
[30] Bromley R D F. Informal commerce: Expansion and exclusion in the historic centre of the Latin American city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1998, 22(2): 245-263.
[31] Okpara E E. Rural-urban migration and urban employment opportunities in Nigeria. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1986, 11(1): 67-74.
[32] Rogerson C M. Urban poverty and the informal economy in South African’s economic heartland. Environment and Urbanization, 1996, 8(1): 167-179.
[33] Kesteloot C, Meert H. Informal spaces: the geography of informal economic activities in Brussels. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(2): 232-251.
[34] Williams C C, Windebank J. Black market work in the European Community: Peripheral work for peripheral localities? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1995, 19(1): 23-29.
[35] Williams C C. Tackling the participation of the unemployment in paid informal work: A critical evaluation of the deterrence approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2001a, 19(5): 729-749.
[36] Williams C C. Geographical variations in the nature of undeclared work. Geografiska Annaler, 2004, 86B(3): 187-200.
[37] Williams C C, Windebank J. Why do people engage in paid informal work? A comparison of higher- and lowerincome urban neighbourhoods in Britain. Community, Work & Family, 2002, 5(1): 67-83.
[38] Williams C C, Windebank J. Paid informal work in deprived neighborhoods. Cities, 2000, 17(4): 285-291.
[39] Williams C C, Windebank J. Beyond profit-motivated exchange: Some lesson from the study of paid informal work. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2001, 8(1): 49-61.
[40] Williams C C. Reconceptualising paid informal exchange: Some lessons from English cities. Environment and Planning A, 2001, 33(1): 121-140.
[41] Lozano B. Informal sector workers: Walking out the system's front door? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1983, 7(3): 340-362.
[42] Aguilar A G. The urban labor market in Mexico: Global change, informality, and social polarization. Urban Geography, 1997, 18(2): 106-134.
[43] Portes A, Sassen-Koob S. Making it underground: Comparative material on the informal sector in Western market economies. The American Journal of Sociology, 1987, 93(1): 30-61.
[44] McGee T G. The persisitence of the proto-proletariat: Occupational structures and planning of the future of Third World Cities//Abu-Lughod, Hay Richard. Third World Urbanization. New York: Maaroufa Press, 1977: 196-212.
[45] McGee T G. An invitation to ball: Dress formal or informal?// Rimmer P J, Smith D W Drakakis, McGee T G. Food, Shelter and Transport in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Canberra: The Australian National University, 1978.
[46] Williams Colin C, Windebank Jan. Spatial variations in the informal sector: A review of evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies, 1994, 28(8): 819-825.
[47] 赫尔南多·德·索托. 另一条道路. 于海生, 译. 北京: 华夏 出版社, 2007.
[48] Boer L. (In)formalization: the forces beyond. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1990, 14(3): 404-422.
[49] Sassen S. Informalization in advanced market economies
[ EB/OL]. 1997
[2006-9-1]. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_123590.pdf.
[50] Leonard M. The long-term unemployed, informal economic activity and the "underclass" in Belfast: Rejecting or reinstating the work ethic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1998, 22(1): 42-59.
[51] Kloostrerman R, Leun J V D, Rath J. Mixed embeddedness: (In)formal economic activites and immigrant businesses in the Netherlands. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(2): 252-266.
[52] Pavlovskaya M. Other transitions: multiple economies of Moscow households in the 1990. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94(2): 329-351.
[53] Amin A T M N. The informal sector in Asia from the decent work perspective. 2002-4
[2006-9-1]. http://www.ilo.org/employment/Whatwedo/Publications/lang--en/docName--WCMS_122057/index.htm
[54] Daniels P W. Urban challenges: The formal and informal economies in mega-cities. Cities, 2004, 21(6): 501-511.
[55] Sharpe B. Informal work and development in the West. Progress in Human Geography, 1988, 12(3): 315-336.
[56] Chu Y W. Informal work in Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1992, 16(3): 420-441.
[57] Cheng L, Gereffi G. The informal economy in East Asian development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1994, 18(2): 194-219.
[58] Rondinelli D A. Cities as agricultural markets. Geographical Review, 1987, 77(4): 408-420.
[59] Schneider F, Enste D H. Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 2000, 38(1): 77-114.
[60] Schneider F. The size of shadow economies in 145 countries from 1999 to 2003. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 2005, Ⅺ(2): 113-129.
[61] Pahl R E. Some remarks on informal work, social polarization and the social structure. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1988, 12(2): 247-268.
[62] Roberts B. Informal economy and family strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1994, 18(1): 6-23.
[63] Vinay P. Family life cycle and the informal economy in central Italy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1985, 9(1): 82-98.
[64] Lynch K. Urban fruit and vegetable supply in Dar es Salaam. The Geographical Journal, 1994, 160(3): 307-318.
[65] Drakakis-Smith D W. Food systems and the poor in Harare under conditions of structural adjustment. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 1994, 76(1): 3-20.
[66] Freeman D B. Doi Moi policy and the small-enterprise boom in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The Geographical Review, 1996, 86(2): 178-197.
[67] Williams C C. Formalising the informal economy: The case for local initiatives. Local Government Studies, 2005, 31(3): 335-349.
[68] Mead D C, Morrisson C. The informal sector elephant. World Development, 1996, 24(10): 1611-1619.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |