Evaluation of Coordination Degree between Regional Development and Eco-Environment on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains
Online published: 2009-09-25
In this research, 34 indexes have been selected to build the regional development sub-system and the eco-environment sub-system for quantitative evaluation, which are closely related to the level of regional development and eco-environment. Accordingly, the regional development-eco-environment index system and synergisticity model of the economic belt on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains have been built, with which synthesized evaluation can be done to analyze the coordination degree between regional development and eco-environment and the overall development level. The results show that the level of regional development and the condition of eco-environment in different cities are quite different. What’s more, the coordination level between regional development and eco-environment in different areas are different. Based on the coordination degree, combined with coordinated development degree and the evaluation results of the sub-systems, the 17 cities on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains have be divided into three groups: (1) regional development and eco-environment synchronous coordinate region, including Shihezi, Miquan, Fukang, Kuytun, Changji and Manas; (2) regional development and eco-environment approachable coordinated region, including Urumqi, Karamay, Hutubi, Bole, Qitai and Mori; and (3) ecological dominated region, including Wenquan, Jinghe, Usu, Shawan and Jimsar. Finally, corresponding sustainable development strategys for different regions have been put forward.
TANG Hong1,2|YANG Degang1|QIAO Xuning1|3|YANG Li1|2|WANG Guogang1|2 . Evaluation of Coordination Degree between Regional Development and Eco-Environment on the Northern Slope of the Tianshan Mountains[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009 , 28(5) : 805 -813 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.05.020
[1] 李小彬. 武汉市经济与环境发展协调度分析. 湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 13(1): 63-65.
[2] Mingworth V. The Penguin Dictionary of Physics. Beijing: Foreign Language Press, 1996.
[3] 孟庆松,韩文秀. 复合系统协调度模型研究. 天津大学学报,2000,33(4):444-446.
[4] 戴西超,谢守祥,丁玉梅.技术—经济—社会系统可持续发展协调度分析. 统计与决策,2005，(3): 29-32.
[5] 韩跃,薛惠锋,梁丽均. 面向协调的区域“经济—环境”系统管理模型. 工业工程与管理, 2006，(1): 18-22.
[6] 赵延峰,陈艳艳,罗铭. 城市交通复合系统协调度模型研究. 道路交通与安全,2006, (4): 31-33, 45.
[7] 罗铭,陈艳艳,刘小明. 交通—土地利用复合系统协调度模型研究. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2008, 32(4): 585-588.
[8] 张竟竟,陈正江,杨德刚. 城乡协调度评价模型构建及应用. 干旱区资源与环境,2007, 21(2): 5-11.
[9] 陆远权,刘建锋,杨丹. 城镇化与产业结构协调度测度研究：以三峡库区为个案分析. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2007, 13(6): 1-5.
[10] Konstantions B, Nijkamp P. Environmental-economic modeling with semantic insufficiency and factual uncertainty.Environmental System, 1996 (25): 167-183.
[11] Howarth R B, Norgaad R B .Environmental valuation under sustainable development. American Economic Review, 1998:82.
[12] 吴跃明,郎东锋,张子珩,等. 环境—经济系统协调度模型及其指标体系. 中国人口·资源与环境,1996, 6(2): 47-50.
[13] 周敏,吴瑞明. 可持续发展的协调性特征及其描述. 科学管理研究,2000, 18(1): 59-61.
[14] 刘艳清. 区域经济可持续发展系统的协调度研究. 社会科学辑刊,2000(5): 79-83.
[15] 邢端生. 水资源生态经济系统协调度模型研究. 黑龙江科技信息,2008(15): 51,10.
[16] 杨世琦,杨正礼,高旺盛. 不同尺度下区域农业系统协调度的评价. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2008, 36(5): 64-72.
[17] 刘志亭,孙福平. 基于3E协调度的我国区域协调发展评价. 青岛科技大学学报,2005, 26(6): 555-558.
[18] 张晓东,池天河. 90年代中国省级区域经济与环境协调度分析. 地理研究,2001, 20(4): 506-515.
[19] 戴淑燕,黄新建. 可持续发展协调度的评价方法分析. 科技与管理, 2004, 28(6): 22-23, 27.
[20] 温琰茂,柯雄侃,王峰. 人地系统可持续发展评价体系与方法研究. 地球科学进展,1999, 14(1): 51-54.
[21] 徐世龙. 可持续发展定量评价指标体系的构想. 统计与信息论坛,2000,15(1):7-14.
[22] 刘渝琳. 我国可持续发展指标体系的设计和评价方法探索. 生态经济,1999, 18(6): 17-20.
[23] 徐建华. 现代地理学中的数学方法. 高等教育出版社, 2002: 224-229.
[24] 梅虎. 西藏交通社会效益评价及优化研究. 地理科学, 2008, 28(2):205-209.
[25] 乔标,方创琳,黄金川. 干旱区城市化与生态环境交互耦合的规律性及其验证. 生态学报, 2006, 26(7): 2183-2190.
[26] 邵波,陈兴鹏. 中国西北地区经济与生态环境协调发展现状研究. 干旱区地理,2005, 28(1): 136-141.
[27] 蔡文春. 新疆区域经济协调发展分析及空间模式选择. 中国科学院研究生院,2006.
[28] 张豫芳,杨德刚,张小雷,等. 天山北坡城市群地域空间结构时空特征研究. 中国沙漠,2008,28(4):795-801.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |