Original Articles

Agricultural Land Use Responses to Increasing Labor Opportunity Cost in Suixian County of Henan Province

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Gradate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-01-01

  Revised date: 2010-05-01

  Online published: 2010-09-25

Abstract

Increasing labor opportunity cost has become one of the most important influencing factors for agricultural land use changes. Based on 328 household survey data in Suixian County, Henan Province, this paper analyzed the types of labor employment and non-agricultural work time and wages, and then calculated the labor opportunity cost by using different labor types’ chances of getting non-agricultural job as the correction factor to amend wages. It was found that labor opportunity cost significantly affected land use practices of rural households. Households with higher labor opportunity cost always have higher nonfarm income. They are less dependent on agricultural production and more likely to lease their cultivated land to other farmers. These farmers are also inclined to grow food craps which need less labor inputs but have higher labor productivity. This results in homogenization of regional land use structure in terms of crop types. As to land use intensity, along with the increase of labor opportunity cost, labor intensity and yield -increasing inputs in agriculture decrease rapidly, while labor-saving inputs show an increasing trend. The households with larger labor opportunity cost are willing to increase machinery inputs as a substitute for labor inputs. Because of the reduction of yield-increasing inputs, the households with larger labor opportunity cost have lower grain yield per area

Cite this article

CHEN Yuqi, LI Xiubin, ZHU Huiyi, ZHANG Wen . Agricultural Land Use Responses to Increasing Labor Opportunity Cost in Suixian County of Henan Province[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010 , 29(9) : 1067 -1074 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.09.007

References


[1] 李翠珍,孔祥斌,秦静,等.大都市区农户耕地利用及其对粮食生产能力的影响.农业工程学报,2008, 24(1):101-107.

[2] Angelsen A. Agricultural expansion and deforestation: Modeling the impact of population, market forces and property rights. Journal of Development Economics, 1999, 58(1):185-218.

[3] Reardon T, Crawford E, Kelly V. Links between nonfarm income and farm investment in Afiican households: Adding the capital market perspective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994, 76(5): 1172-1176.

[4] Kilic T, Carletto C, Miluka J, et al. Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: Evidence fiom Albania. Agricultural Economics, 2009, 40(2): 139-160.

[5] Gibon A. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 59(1):47-69.

[6] Gellrich M, Zimmermann N E. Investigating the regionalscale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: A spatial statistical modeling approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79(1): 65-76.

[7] Strijker D. Marginal lands in Europe-causes of decline. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2005,6(2): 99-106.

[8] Hatirli S A, Ozkanb B, Fert C. An ecnnnmetrm analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture. ReneWallle and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(6): 608-623.

[9] Tanrivermis H. Agricultural land use change and sustain able use of land resources in the Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54 (3): 553- 564.

[10] Herath P H, Takeya H. Factors determining intercropping by rubber smallholders in Sri Lanka: A logit analysis. A- gricultural Economics, 2003, 29(2):159-168.

[11] Stampini M, Davis B. Does non-agricultural labor relax farmers' credit constraints? Evidence from longitudinal data for Vietnam. Agricultural Economics, 2009, 40 (2): 177一188.

[12] MacDonald D, Crabtree J R, Wiesinger G. Agricultural a- bandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. Journal of Environ- mental Management, 2000, 59(1): 47-69.

[13] Yamada S, Okubo S, Kitagawa Y, et al. Restoration of weed communities in abandoned rice paddy fields in the Tama Hills, central Japan. Agriculture, Ecosystems&En- vironment 2007, 119(1-2): 88一102.

[14] Van den Berg M M. The impact of increasing farm size and mechanization on rural income and rice production in Zhejiang Province, China. Agricultural Systems, 2007, (94): 841-850.

[15] Rozelle S, Huang J, Zhang L. Emerging markets, evolving institutions, and the new opportunities for growth in Chi- na's rural economy. China Economic Review, 2002, 13(4): 345-353.

[16] 程化雨,董捷.农户土地利用要素投入特征研究.农业现代化研究,2003, 24(2): 137-140.

[17] 董德坤.基于农民土地观念的农干寸土地产权制度研究
[D].北京:中国科学院,2008.

[18] 山玉军,李秀彬,辛良杰,等.农业劳动力机会成本上升对农地利用的影响.自然资源学报,2009, 24 (3): 369- 377.

[19] 萨缪尔森.保罗,诺德豪斯.威廉.经济学.北京:人民邮电出版社,2004.

[20] 李秀彬,朱会义,谈明洪,等.土地利用集约度的测度方法.地理科学进展,2008, 27(6): 12-17.

[21] 陈瑜琦,李秀彬.1980年以来中国耕地利用集约度的结构特征.地理学报,2009, 64(4): 469-478.

Outlines

/