区域经济一体化视角下“行政区经济”约束强度的定量测度及时空演化分析——以成德绵地区为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.09.003

Abstract

Abstract:

As an economic phenomenon characterized by the interaction of self-governance of development and regional competition under the framework of administrative divisions, "administrative regional economy" (ARE) has a profound impact on regional coordinated development. With the perspective of regional economic integration, this study constructed an ARE measurement model (AREM) based on ARE function and improved potential model, and took the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region as an example to quantitatively describe the spatiotemporal evolution of the constraint strength of ARE from 2005 to 2018. The results show that: 1) In 2005-2018, ARE of the study area experienced three stages of development—overall rise-rapid decline-fluctuation, and the rigid constraint of administrative divisions on economic integration generally declined, with a clear regional integration trend. 2) 2009 was the inflection point (peak) of the ARE change, and the various stages of the ARE change were strongly coupled with policy and administrative division adjustments, indicating that AREM has reasonable applicability. 3) The transition of ARE type steadily took place during 2005-2018: high-intensity and 60% of medium-intensity cities transformed into low-intensity cities, and the proportion of low-intensity cities increased from 51.7% to 91.4%. This shows that ARE has decreased significantly and the level of regional integration has increased. 4) The spatial pattern of ARE in the study area experienced the process of central polarization-central to peripherial decline-peripheral collapse, and effective measures were taken in terms of regional coordinated development with remarkable results, which promoted the displacement of ARE's center of gravity to the south (3° west) by 10.08 km. In the future, it is necessary to optimize the regional system of the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region by reforming the administrative structure and timely promoting the adjustment of administrative divisions, weakening the restriction of administrative divisions, and building an integrated development model.

Key words: administrative regional economy, quantitative measurement model, regional economic integration, spatiotemporal evolution, Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region

FENG Rundong, WANG Kaiyong. Spatiotemporal evolution of the constraint strength of “administrative regional economy” from the perspective of regional economic integration: A case study of the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region, China[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1447-1459.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 40

[1]	王珏, 陈雯. 全球化视角的区域主义与区域一体化理论阐释[J]. 地理科学进展, 2013,32(7):1082-1091. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.07.011
	[ Wang Jue, Chen Wen. Implication of regionalism and regional integration under the global shift. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(7):1082-1091. ]
[2]	樊杰, 梁博, 郭锐. 新时代完善区域协调发展格局的战略重点[J]. 经济地理, 2018,38(1):1-10.
	[ Fan Jie, Liang Bo, Guo Rui. Strategic emphasis of regional coordinated growth pattern optimization in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Economic Geography, 2018,38(1):1-10. ]
[3]	陆大道, 姚士谋, 李国平, 等. 基于我国国情的城镇化过程综合分析[J]. 经济地理, 2007,27(6):883-887.
	[ Lu Dadao, Yao Shimou, Li Guoping, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the urbanization process based on China's conditions. Economic Geography, 2007,27(6):883-887. ]
[4]	刘君德. 中国转型期“行政区经济”现象透视: 兼论中国特色人文—经济地理学的发展[J]. 经济地理, 2006,26(6):897-901.
	[ Liu Junde. Perspective of the "administrative region economy" phenomenon in China' s transitional period: An introduction of human and economic geography with Chinese characteristics. Economic Geography, 2006,26(6):897-901. ]
[5]	刘小康. “行政区经济”概念再探讨[J]. 中国行政管理, 2010(3):42-47.
	[ Liu Xiaokang. Re-discussing the concept of administrative regional economy. Chinese Public Administration, 2010(3):42-47. ]
[6]	Taylor P J. Leading world cities: Empirical evaluations of urban nodes in multiple networks[J]. Urban Studies, 2005,42(9):1593-1608. doi: 10.1080/00420980500185504
[7]	Feiock R C, Scholz J T. Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 342-345.
[8]	Brenner N. Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union[J]. Urban Planning International, 2008,36(3):431-451.
[9]	Feiock R C. Metropolitan governance and institutional collective action[J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2008,44(3):356-377. doi: 10.1177/1078087408324000
[10]	Macleod G, Goodwin M. Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1999,23(4):503-527. doi: 10.1191/030913299669861026
[11]	Alesina A, Spolaore E. On the number and size of nations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997,112(4):1027-1056. doi: 10.1162/003355300555411
[12]	Alesina A, Spolaore E, Wacziarg R. Economic integration and political disintegration[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90:1276-1296. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.5.1276
[13]	Martin D G. New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood by Neil Brenner[J]. Economic Geography, 2010,82(1):113-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2006.tb00291.x
[14]	De Lombaerde P, Iapadre L, Mccranie A, et al. Using network analysis to study globalization, regionalization, and multi-polarity: Introduction to special section[J]. Network Science, 2018,6(4):494-516. doi: 10.1017/nws.2018.25
[15]	刘君德. 中国转型期凸现的“行政区经济”现象分析[J]. 理论前沿, 2004(10):20-22.
	[ Liu Junde. Analysis of the phenomenon of "administrative district economy" in China's transition period. Theoretical Front, 2004(10):20-22. ]
[16]	舒庆, 刘君德. 一种奇异的区域经济现象: 行政区经济[J]. 战略与管理, 1994(5):82-87.
	[ Shu Qing, Liu Junde. A strange phenomenon of regional economy: Administrative-region economy. Strategy and Management, 1994(5):82-87. ]
[17]	王开泳, 陈田. 行政区划研究的地理学支撑与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2018,73(4):688-700. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804008
	[ Wang Kaiyong, Chen Tian. Geographical prospects of spatial governance through a review on administrative divisions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):688-700. ]
[18]	范今朝. “行政区经济”理论的核心涵义与模型表达[J]. 科学经济社会, 2018,36(2):61-68.
	[ Fan Jinzhao. On the theory of "Economy of Administrative Area": A new explanation and its model. Science Economy Society, 2018,36(2):61-68. ]
[19]	陈浩, 张京祥. 功能区与行政区“双轨制”: 城市政府空间管理与创新: 以南京市区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2017,37(10):59-67.
	[ Chen Hao, Zhang Jingxiang. Rising dual system of functional territory and administrative territory: Unraveling the spatiality of urban state and its transformation based on the case study of the city proper of Nanjing. Economic Geography, 2017,37(10):59-67. ]
[20]	曾冰, 张朝, 龚征旗, 等. 从行政区和经济区关系演化探析我国省际交界地区发展[J]. 经济地理, 2016,36(1):27-32, 52.
	[ Zeng Bing, Zhang Zhao, Gong Zhengqi, et al. The provincial border regions in China from the relation between the administrative area and the economic zone. Economic Geography, 2016,36(1):27-32, 52. ]
[21]	李郇, 徐现祥. 中国撤县(市)设区对城市经济增长的影响分析[J]. 地理学报, 2015,70(8):1202-1214. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508002
	[ Li Xun, Xu Xianxiang. Impact analysis of turning counties (cities) into districts to the urban economic growth in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(8):1202-1214. ]
[22]	王志凯, 史晋川. 行政区划调整与城市化经济空间: 杭州、萧山地方政府博弈的实证[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2015,45(3):103-111. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2014.12.071
	[ Wang Zhikai, Shi Jinchuan. The adjustment of administrative divisions and the economic space of urbanization: An empirical study on local administrations of Hangzhou and Xiaoshan. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2015,45(3):103-111. ]
[23]	叶冠杰, 李立勋. 行政区划调整与管理体制改革对经济强县经济发展的影响: 以广东省佛山市顺德区为例[J]. 热带地理, 2018,38(3):394-404.
	[ Ye Guanjie, Li Lixun. Effects of administrative division adjustments and structural reforms on economic development of economically strong counties: A case study on Shunde. Tropical Geography, 2018,38(3):394-404. ]
[24]	刘力, 白渭淋. 区域经济一体化与行政区经济的空间效应研究: 基于“泛珠三角”区域合作与广东“双转移”的政策协同效应[J]. 经济地理, 2010,30(11):1773-1778.
	[ Liu Li, Bai Weilin. The spatial effects study on regional economic integration and administrative economy: Based on the regional cooperation of pan pearl dealt and bi-transfer strategy of Guangdong. Economic Geography, 2010,30(11):1773-1778. ]
[25]	张伟丽, 李建新. 中国行政区经济协调发展的空间格局及演化分析[J]. 经济地理, 2013,33(6):8-14.
	[ Zhang Weili, Li Jiaxin. Analyzing spatial pattern and evolution about administrative economic coordinated development degree of China. Economic Geography, 2013,33(6):8-14. ]
[26]	刘涛. 行政区经济: 长株潭经济一体化的瓶颈[J]. 经济地理, 2005,25(5):682-684, 706.
	[ Liu Tao. Chinese administrative economy: The bottleneck of the integration of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan. Economic Geography, 2005,25(5):682-684, 706. ]
[27]	吴常艳, 黄贤金, 陈博文, 等. 长江经济带经济联系空间格局及其经济一体化趋势[J]. 经济地理, 2017,37(7):71-78.
	[ Wu Changyan, Huang Xianjin, Chen Bowen, et al. Analysis of economic and spatial linkage and economic integration trend in Yangtze River economic belt from social network analysis perspective. Economic Geography, 2017,37(7):71-78. ]
[28]	张伟丽, 覃成林, 李小建. 中国地市经济增长空间俱乐部趋同研究: 兼与省份数据的比较[J]. 地理研究, 2011,30(8):1457-1470.
	[ Zhang Weilin, Qin Chenglin, Li Xiaojian. Study on spatial club convergence of prefectural economic growth: In comparison with provincial data. Geographical Research, 2011,30(8):1457-1470. ]
[29]	安筱鹏. 利益主体多元化背景下的区域经济一体化[J]. 人文地理, 2003,18(5):61-64.
	[ An Xiaopeng. The regional economic integration under the background of benefit main bodies diversity. Human Geography, 2003,18(5):61-64. ]
[30]	程敏, 连月娇. 基于改进潜能模型的城市医疗设施空间可达性: 以上海市杨浦区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018,37(2):266-275. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.02.009
	[ Cheng Min, Lian Yuejiao. Spatial accessibility of urban medical facilities based on improved potential model: A case study of Yangpu District in Shanghai. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(2):266-275. ]
[31]	Gharani P, Stewart K, Ryan G L. An enhanced approach for modeling spatial accessibility for in vitro fertilization services in the rural Midwestern United States[J]. Applied Geography, 2015,64:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.005
[32]	Wu C, Ye X Y, Du Q Y, et al. Spatial effects of accessibility to parks on housing prices in Shenzhen, China[J]. Habitat International, 2017,63:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.010
[33]	周业安, 冯兴元, 赵坚毅. 地方政府竞争与市场秩序的重构[J]. 中国社会科学, 2004(1):56-65, 206.
	[ Zhou Yean, Feng Xingyuan, Zhao Jianyi. Local governments' competition and reconstruction of market order. Social Sciences in China, 2004(1):56-65, 206. ]
[34]	徐建华, 岳文泽. 近20年来中国人口重心与经济重心的演变及其对比分析[J]. 地理科学, 2001,21(5):385-389.
	[ Xu Jianhua, Yue Wenze. Evolvement and comparative analysis of the population center gravity and the economy gravity center in recent twenty tears in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2001,21(5):385-389. ]
[35]	李芸, 战炤磊. 政府与市场关系的模式重构与路径选择: 全面深化改革背景下的系统考量[J]. 南京社会科学, 2015(11):70-76.
	[ Li Yun, Zhan Zhaolei. Models and paths of dealing with the relationship between government and market: System considerations under the background of comprehensive deepening reform. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2015(11):70-76. ]
[36]	林春. 财政分权与中国经济增长质量关系: 基于全要素生产率视角[J]. 财政研究, 2017(2):73-83, 97.
	[ Lin Chun. Study on the relationship between fiscal decentralization system and the quality of China's economic growth: Based on the perspective of total factor productivity. Public Finance Research, 2017(2):73-83, 97. ]
[37]	汪德根, 陈田. 基于竞争力评价的区域旅游产业发展差异: 以中国东部沿海三大旅游圈为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011,30(2):249-256. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.02.015
	[ Wang Degen, Chen Tian. Differences of regional tourism development based on competitiveness evaluation: A case study of the three circles in eastern coastal China. Progress in Geography, 2011,30(2):249-256. ]
[38]	蒋海兵, 徐建刚, 祁毅. 京沪高铁对区域中心城市陆路可达性影响[J]. 地理学报, 2010,65(10):1287-1298. doi: 10.11821/xb201010013
	[ Jiang Haibing, Xu Jiangang, Qi Yi. The influence of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railways on land accessibility of regional center cities. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(10):1287-1298. ]
[39]	李晖, 陈丽娜. 成德绵军民融合一体化之绵阳路径研究[J]. 成都工业学院学报, 2019,22(3):71-74.
	[ Li Hui, Chen Lina. Development path of Mianyang based on the civil-military integration of the CDM area. Journal of Chengdu Technological University, 2019,22(3):71-74. ]
[40]	王开泳, 陈田, 刘毅. “行政区划本身也是一种重要资源”的理论创新与应用[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(2):195-206. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181380
	[ Wang Kaiyong, Chen Tian, Liu Yi. New discussion and reflection on "Administrative division itself can be seen as a resource". Geographical Research, 2019,38(2):195-206. ]

目标层	准则层	指标层	数据与数据处理	权重
行政区经济	政府掌控资源和生产要素以及从事经济活动的能力	财政分权	财政支出 (X₁)、税收收入 (X₂)	X₁:0.06; X₂:0.05
		经济增长	GDP增长率 (X₃)	X₃:0.07
		财政实力	财政收入 (X₄)	X₄:0.09
		投资发展	固定资产投资/GDP (X₅)	X₅:0.06
		城市建设	建成区面积 (X₆)	X₆:0.08
		经济控制力	国有经济单位固定资产投资 (X₇)	X₇:0.08
		公共服务	每万人拥有医生数 (X₈)、每万人在校生数 (X₉)	X₈:0.01; X₉:0.02
		地区产业	工业生产总值 (X₁₀)、产业同构系数 (X₁₁)	X₁₀:0.02; X₁₁:0.03
	市场掌控资源和生产要素以及从事经济活动的能力	主体规模	规模以上企业产值 (Y₁)	Y₁:0.05
		消费能力	社会消费品零售总额 (Y₂)	Y₂:0.07
		经济活力	私营企业税收 (Y₃)、技术交易额^* (Y₄)	Y₃:0.08; Y₄:0.02
		市场发育	商品交易市场数量 (Y₅)、商品交易市场交易额 (Y₆)	Y₅:0.03; Y₆:0.02
		民营化程度	非国有单位职工数/总职工数 (Y₇)	Y₇:0.02
		投资	非公有制社会投资/总社会投资 (Y₈)、民间投资规模^* (Y₉)	Y₈:0.03; Y₉:0.01
		地区产业	非国有企业工业生产总值/工业生产总值 (Y₁₀)	Y₁₀:0.06
		外资	外资企业产值/企业总产值 (Y₁₁)	Y₁₁:0.04

阶段	类型	低强度型	较低强度型	中强度型	较高强度型	高强度型
累积上升阶段 (2005—2009年)	低强度型	1	0	1	1	0
	较低强度型	2	14	2	1	0
	中强度型	0	2	2	5	0
	较高强度型	0	0	0	0	1
	高强度型	0	0	0	0	1
快速下降阶段 (2009—2013年)	低强度型	0	2	1	0	0
	较低强度型	0	13	4	1	0
	中强度型	0	3	1	1	0
	较高强度型	1	3	1	0	1
	高强度型	0	0	0	2	0
波动起伏阶段 (2013—2018年)	低强度型	2	1	0	0	0
	较低强度型	6	15	1	0	0
	中强度型	0	7	1	0	0
	较高强度型	0	1	1	0	0
	高强度型	0	0	0	0	0

Spatiotemporal evolution of the constraint strength of “administrative regional economy” from the perspective of regional economic integration: A case study of the Chengdu-Deyang-Mianyang region, China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 40

Related Articles 5

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHOU Heng, YANG Yongchun. Dual-core separation structure of the Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration: Investment network of private enterprises under the background of regional economic integration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(5): 852-866.
[2]	LIAO Xia, SHU Tianheng, SHEN Liyin, REN Yitian, YANG Nan. Identification and evolution of peri-urban areas in the context of urban-rural integrated development:A case study of Suzhou City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(11): 1847-1860.
[3]	Hanqing LI, Wen YUAN, Mingqing MA, Wu YUAN. Manufacturing industry agglomeration characteristics in the Pearl River Delta and evolution based on growth data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1291-1302.
[4]	Defeng ZHENG, Xiaoxing LIU, Yanyan WANG, Leting LV. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of natural capital utilization in China based on three-dimensional ecological footprint [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1328-1339.
[5]	Jing XI, Yang CHENG. Spatiotemporal evolution of residential care facilities in Beijing and policy impacts [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(9): 1187-1194.