Characteristics of change in integrated rural-urban development: a case study of Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality

Abstract

Abstract: Existing research on evaluating the level of integrated rural-urban development by quantitative assessment methods often fails to separate the overall development index and coordinated development index and demonstrate cross-sectional and time series data simultaneously, and results in the "black box" effect by data aggregation. This article proposes a three dimensional coordinate system, including overall development index, coordinated development index, and temporal dimension and then converts the three dimensional coordinate system into a two dimensional coordinate system with the "nine squares" method, thereby making it possible to quantitatively evaluate the characteristics of change of each city within a city group. The level of balance and integration of development between urban and rural areas is divided into economic, industrial, infrastructural, and public services. An assessment on the characteristics of change of 19 cities in the Sichuan and Chongqing region during 2006-2011 was carried out. The research result shows that cities in the region achieved remarkable results in reducing the gap in economy and public services fields between urban and rural areas, but large gaps in the fields of industry and infrastructure still exist. The progress in Chongqing Municipality and the city of Chengdu is much greater than in other cities in the region. This research can provide theoretical guidance and methodological tools for improving rural-urban development in the Sichuan and Chongqing region, and can be useful for the evaluation of integrated rural-urban development in other cities of China.

Key words: integrated rural-urban development, economy, industries, infrastructure, public services, Sichuan, Chongqing

摘要： 针对当前国内研究区域城乡统筹水平定量测评方法中存在的问题,如未能区分整体发展指标和协调发展指标,截面和时序数据难以同时体现,以及城乡统筹评价指标体系集成数据导致的“黑箱子”效应等问题,本文建立了涵盖城乡整体发展水平指标、城乡协调发展水平指标及时间指标的三维坐标系统,并通过转化为二维“九宫格”坐标系统的方法,提出一种包含时序数据和截面数据的城乡统筹水平综合评估的方法论,定量地测评一个区域内各城市在某个特定时间段内的城乡统筹演化特征。本文将城乡统筹水平分为经济、产业、基础设施、公共服务4个方向,对川渝19市2006-2011年间城乡统筹演化特征进行了分类研究。研究结果表明,川渝19市在城乡经济和公共服务统筹方面整体差距缩小且成效显著,而在产业和基础设施统筹方面城乡差距仍在拉大;成渝二市的整体成效远超过区域内其他城市。上述研究成果可对川渝19市优化城乡统筹发展方向提供理论指导和方法论工具,亦可为国内其他地区城乡统筹成效的测评方法提供指导与示范。

关键词: 城乡统筹, 经济, 产业, 基础设施, 公共服务, 四川, 重庆

LIU Jiemin, LV Bin. Characteristics of change in integrated rural-urban development: a case study of Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality[J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(10): 1266-1274.

刘洁敏, 吕斌. 川渝地区城乡统筹水平演化特征分类研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(10): 1266-1274.

References

1 白志礼, 谭江蓉, 曲晨. 2007. 县域城镇化问题的特异性与发展思路探究[J]. 城市发展研究, 14(5): 31-36. [Bai Z L, Tan J R, Qu C. 2007. The specialty and research way for the urbanization of country-level[J]. Urban Studies, 14(5): 31-36.]
2 曹伟, 周生路, 吴绍华. 2014. 基于土地精明利用的城乡统筹系统调控[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(5): 667-677. [Cao W, Zhou S L, Wu S H. 2014. Regulation of urban-rural harmony system based on land smart use[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(5): 667-677.]
3 曹扬, 于峰, 康艺凡. 2011. 基于整合AHP/DEA方法的城乡统筹评价[J]. 统计与决策, (24): 58-60. [Cao Y, Yu F, Kang Y F. 2011. Jiyu zhenghe AHP/DEA fangfa de chengxiang tongchou pingjia[J]. Statistics and Decision, (24): 58-60.]
4 陈鸿彬. 2009. 城乡统筹发展定量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 地域研究与开发, 26(2): 62-65. [Chen H B. 2009. Construction of the indicator system of the quantitive evaluation for urban-rural intergrated development[J]. Areal Research and Development, 26(2): 62-65.]
5 董晓峰, 尹亚, 刘理臣, 等. 2011. 欠发达地区城乡一体化发展评价研究: 以甘肃省为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 18(8): 31-36. [Dong X F, Yin Y, Liu L C, et al. 2011. Study on the evaluation of urban-rural integration of less-developed areas: taking Gansu Province as an example[J]. Urban Studies, 18(8): 31-36.]
6 郭艳红, 李红兵, 孙文彪, 等. 2011. 城乡统筹视角下城市土地利用集约评价研究: 以山东省胶南市为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 18(11): 中彩页1-4. [Guo Y H, Li H B, Sun W B, et al. 2011. Study on the evaluation of urban land intensive utilization in the view of urban and rural harmonious development: a case of Jiaonan City in Shandong Province[J]. Urban Studies, 18(11): color pages 1-4.]
7 韩俊. 2009. 中国城乡关系演变60年: 回顾与展望[J]. 改革, (11): 5-14. [Han J. 2009. Evolution of the relationship between rural and urban areas in the past sixty years: looking back and prospect[J]. Reform, (11): 5-14.]
8 李宾, 周向阳. 2014. 我国城乡统筹水平发展趋势的实证研究[J]. 统计与决策, (6): 170-173. [Li B, Zhou X Y. 2014. Woguo chengxiang tongchou shuiping fazhan qushi de shizheng yanjiu [J]. Statistics and Decision, (6): 170-173.]
9 李志强, 雷海章. 2006. 模糊聚类: 中东部地区城乡统筹水平的分类与比较[J]. 农业技术经济, (1): 30-34. [Li Z Q, Lei H Z. 2006. A fuzzy method to evaluate the coordinated development level between the central and western regions of China[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, (1): 30-34.]
10 刘彦随. 2007. 中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设[J]. 地理学报, 62(6): 563-570. [Liu Y S. 2007. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(6): 563-570.]
11 刘自强, 李静, 鲁奇. 2008. 41个国家城乡发展演变规律总结与变革的临界点分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 17(3): 1-7, 42. [Liu Z Q, Li J, Lu Q. 2008. Summary of evolution law about urban-rural development in 41 countries and analysis on critical point of transition[J]. World Regional Studies, 17(3): 1-7, 42.]
12 龙花楼. 2013. 论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J]. 地理学报, 68(8): 1019-1028. [Long H L. 2013. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(8): 1019-1028.]
13 罗雅丽, 李同. 2005. 城乡关联性测度与协调发展研究: 以西安市为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 21(5): 68-71. [Luo Y L, Li T. 2005. Study on evaluation of the urban-rural correlation and coordinated development of urban and rural areas: taking Xi'an City as an example[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 21(5): 68-71.]
14 马珂. 2011. 城乡统筹发展评价体系的构建及应用[J]. 城市问题, (8): 10-17. [Ma K. 2011. Construction and application of the evaluation system of urban-rural comprehensive development[J]. Urban Problems, (8): 10-17.]
15 仇方道, 熊瑾燕. 2007. 江苏省城乡统筹发展水平评价与区域分异[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, (4): 13-15. [Qiu F D, Xiong J Y. 2007. On comprehensive evaluation and regional discrepancy of integrating rural and urban development in Jiangsu[J]. Territory & Natural Resources Study, (4): 13-15.]
16 王冰松, 杨开忠. 2009. 城乡统筹发展的机理与途径: 以重庆市为例[J]. 城市问题, (4): 61-64. [Wang B S, Yang K Z. 2009. Dynamics and approaches to the comprehensive development between urban and rural areas[J]. Urban Problems, (4): 61-64.]
17 王传松. 2013. 城乡统筹发展水平综合评价: 以重庆为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 34(5): 82-91. [Wang C S. 2013. Comprehensive evaluation of urban-rural overall development: taking Chongqing as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 34(5): 82-91.]
18 吴建楠, 姚士谋, 曹有挥, 等. 2010. 长江三角洲城市群城乡统筹发展的空间差别化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 19(S1): 21-26. [Wu J N, Yao S M, Cao Y H, et al. 2010. Differentiation of urban and rural harmonious development in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 19(S1): 21-26.]
19 吴涛, 李同晟. 2011. 基于城乡一体化发展的关中地区基础设施建设评价[J]. 地域研究与开发, 30(4): 71-75. [Wu T, Li T S. 2011. Study on evaluation of the infrastructure construction based on the urban-rural integrated development: a case study of Guanzhong area[J]. Areal Research and Development, 30(4): 71-75.]
20 吴先华, 王志燕, 雷刚. 2010. 城乡统筹发展水平评价: 以山东省为例[J]. 经济地理, 30(4): 596-601. [Wu X H, Wang Z Y, Lei G. 2010. A study on evaluation of urban-rural integrated development level: a case study of Shandong Province[J]. Economic Geography, 30(4): 596-601.]
21 吴永生. 2006. 区域性城乡统筹的空间特征及其形成机制: 以江苏省市域城乡为例[J]. 经济地理, 26(5): 810-814. [Wu Y S. 2006. A study on the regional spatial characteristics and forming mechanism of planning overall cities and countrysides: a case study of city area in Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 26(5): 810-814.]
22 薛晴, 霍有光. 2011. 城乡一体化的理论渊源及其嬗变轨迹考察[J]. 经济地理, 30(11): 1779-1784. [Xue Q, Huo Y G. 2011. The origin and evolution path survey of the urban and rural integration[J]. Economic Geography, 30(11): 1779-1784.]
23 杨娜, 罗其友, 高明杰. 2010. 偃师市城乡统筹发展综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 26(2): 301-307. [Yang N, Luo Q Y, Gao M J. 2010. Comprehensive evaluation of urban and rural coordination in Yanshi City[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 26(2): 301-307.]
24 杨娜曼, 肖地楚, 黄静波. 2014. 城乡统筹发展视角下湖南省城乡协调发展评价[J]. 经济地理, 34(3): 58-64. [Yang N M, Xiao D C, Huang J B. 2014. Urban and rural balanced development evaluation in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 34(3): 58-64.]
25 杨志海, 刘雪芬, 王雅鹏. 2013. 县域城镇化能缩小城乡收入差距吗: 基于1523个县(市)面板数据的实证检验[J]. 华中农业大学学报: 社会科学版, (4): 42-48. [Yang Z H, Liu X F, Wang Y P. 2013. Can urbanization of county narrow gap of urban-rural income: empirical test based on panel data of 1523 counties (cities)[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University: Social Sciences Edition, (4): 42-48.]
26 张振龙. 2012. 城乡一体化规划理论与实施机制研究: 以苏州市为例[J]. 现代城市研究, (4): 15-20. [Zhang Z L. 2012. Theory, implementation and mechanism of urban-rural integration planning: a case study of Suzhou City[J]. Modern Urban Research, (4): 15-20.]
27 Simon K. 1955. Economy growth and income inequality[J]. American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.

[1]	HU Zhiding, BI Shiyao. Understanding Western geoeconomy and geoeconomics [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 43(2): 387-401.
[2]	WANG Kai, LIU Meilun, TAN Jiaxin, GUAN Rui, GAN Chang. Urban-rural integration effect of the spatial correlation network of tourism economy in the Wuling Mountain Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 43(2): 246-261.
[3]	WANG Kun, TONG Xin, GUO Jie, ZHANG Hong'ou. Progress in international geographical studies on e-waste: Implications for understanding China’s waste regime transformation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(7): 1420-1430.
[4]	XIONG Wei, ZHANG Xinyue, LIU Zhigao. A review of infrastructure-led development model studies and research framework [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(6): 1181-1191.
[5]	HONG Huikun, CAI Zhicong, LIAO Heping, WANG Gang, LIU Ting. Housing-employment coordinated development and rural revitalization path at the county level in Chongqing Municipality: From the conjugate perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(6): 1098-1111.
[6]	YANG Fang, ZHANG Hai, LIU Xiaorong. Digital economy driving household consumption:Mechanism and spatial effects [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(5): 837-851.
[7]	LI Jing, LIAO Heping, LIU Yuanli, ZHANG Jie. Spatiotemporal changes and correlation of the new urbanization and urban-rural income gap in Sichuan Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(4): 657-669.
[8]	FANG Yelin, WANG Qiuyue, HUANG Zhenfang, WU Yanni. Spatial and temporal evolution of tourism economic resilience and mechanism of impact in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(3): 417-427.
[9]	ZHANG Pei, WANG Jiao'e, XIAO Fan. Spatial evolution and determinants of new infrastructure development in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(2): 209-220.
[10]	ZHANG Yinghao, WANG Mingfeng, KUANG Aiping, FU Linrong, CUI Luming. Multidimensional mechanisms and spatial effects of digital economy enabling urban innovation and development in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(12): 2283-2295.
[11]	MU Enyi, HE Canfei. Theoretical thinking in environmental economic geography from the perspective of economic cycle [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(12): 2423-2438.
[12]	MA Lijun, AO Ye. Influence and spatial spillover effects of the digital economy on the high-quality development of the tourism industry [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(12): 2296-2308.
[13]	LI Yuanjun, WU Qitao, JIN Shuangquan, FANG Shun, YANG Dingnan, LIANG Muxin. Spatio-temporal pattern and formation mechanism of expressway traffic flows in Guangdong Province based on the online toll collection data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(11): 2113-2125.
[14]	FENG Yaxin, AN Ning. Progress of infrastructure research from the perspective of feminist geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(10): 2058-2070.
[15]	LI Xiande, LI Weijiang, LI Min. Location of Chinese automobile manufacturing enterprises and influencing factors [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(10): 1994-2005.