跨区域产业技术关联与产业创新——基于中国制造业的分析

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.11.004

Abstract

Abstract:

Geographic proximity arising from industrial agglomeration can promote firm innovation and thereby industrial development. Scholars of evolutionary economic geography further propose that technology proximity is more important than geographic proximity, which provides essential theoretical support for explaining the role of interregional industrial linkages in local industrial development. However, the existing literature mainly focuses on the technological relatedness within regions but lacks research for interregional relatedness, especially the effects of interregional technology relatedness on regional innovation. Based on the input-output panel data of 2002, 2007, and 2012 from 30 provinces of the mainland of China, this study used the gravity model and cross-entropy method to fit the interprovincial trade flow matrix of the industries and further computed the index of intraregional and interregional technological relatedness. This study then used a two-way fixed effect model to examine the effects of intraregional and interregional technological relatedness on industrial innovation based on the data of 16 manufacturing sectors in 30 provinces in 2002, 2007, and 2012. First, the results show that the degree of interregional technological relatedness of industries has been strengthened, especially the linkages within city agglomerations. Second, interregional technological relatedness of industries has a positive effect on industrial innovation, but local technological relatedness of industries would weaken this positive effect. Therefore, the government should remove institutional barriers and encourage the inter- or intraregional industrial linkages that promote regional industrial innovation.

Key words: technological relatedness, intraregional relatedness, cross-regional relatedness, regional industrial innovation, input-output

QIAN Xiaoying, SUN Bindong. Interregional technological relatedness and industrial innovation: An analysis based on China’s manufacturing industry[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1822-1831.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Regression results of the gravity models based on interprovincial railway transportation

变量	ln flow
变量	矿物性建筑材料	钢铁及有色金属	焦炭	石油	粮食
$lnoutpu t ki$	0.176^***	0.013^***	0.392^***	0.152^***	0.628^***
	(0.023)	(0.005)	(0.125)	(0.062)	(0.132)
$lninpu t sj$	0.125^***	0.241^***	0.148^**	0.152^***	0.135^***
	(0.052)	(0.072)	(0.056)	(0.025)	(0.031)
$lnGD P k$	0.124	0.012	0.112	0.012	0.413^**
	(0.109)	(0.009)	(0.120)	(0.009)	(0.126)
$lnGD P s$	0.154	0.058	0.254	0.258	0.215
	(0.125)	(0.052)	(0.157)	(0.142)	(0.172)
$lnDi s ks$	-0.814^***	-0.758^***	-0.628^**	-0.785^***	-0.144^***
	(0.241)	(0.135)	(0.297)	(0.152)	(0.025)
常数	3.073^***	-2.361^***	2.351^***	2.212^***	-0.729^***
	(1.123)	(0.851)	(0.581)	(0.812)	(0.152)
观测样本	2400	2400	2400	2400	2400
R²	0.421	0.373	0.392	0.401	0.315

Tab.1

Tab.2

Comparison of five commodities and input-output sectors and their gravity models

商品	制造业	引力模型
矿物性建筑材料	纺织业、服装皮革制品、木材加工、造纸印刷、非金属制品	$lnflow = 3.073 + 0.176 lnoutput + 0.125 lninput - 0.814 lnDis$
钢铁及有色金属	金属冶炼加工、金属制品、通用设备、交用运输设备、电气机械器材、通信设备、仪器仪表、其他制造业	$lnflow = - 2.361 + 0.013 lnoutput + 0.241 lninput - 0.758 lnDis$
焦炭	石油加工炼焦	$lnflow = 2.351 + 0.392 lnoutput + 0.148 lninput - 0.628 lnDis$
石油	化学工业、石油加工业	$lnflow = 2.212 + 0.152 lnoutput + 0.152 lninput + 0.785 lnDis$
粮食	食品制造及烟草加工	$lnflow = - 0.729 + 0.628 lnoutput + 0.135 lninput + 0.413 lnGD P k - 0.144 lnDis$

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.4

Tab.5

References 31

[1]	盛科荣, 张红霞, 赵超越. 中国城市网络关联格局的影响因素分析: 基于电子信息企业网络的视角[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(5):1030-1044.
	[ Sheng Kerong, Zhang Hongxia, Zhao Chaoyue. Determinants of the urban spatial network in China: An analysis through the lens of corporate networks within electronic information industry. Geographical Research, 2019,38(5):1030-1044. ]
[2]	Taylor P J, Derudder B. World city network: A global urban analysis[M]. London, UK: Routledge, 2015.
[3]	Dicken P, Kelly P F, Olds K, et al. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy[J]. Global Networks, 2001,1(2):89-112.
[4]	Capello R. The city network paradigm: Measuring urban network externalities[J]. Urban Studies, 2000,37(11):1925-1945.
[5]	Yeung H W, Liu W, Dicken P. Transnational corporations and network effects of a local manufacturing cluster in mobile telecommunications equipment in China[J]. World Development, 2006,34(3):520-540.
[6]	贺灿飞, 黎明. 演化经济地理学[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,46(4):387-391.
	[ He Canfei, Li Ming. Evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Henan University (National Science), 2016,46(4):387-391. ]
[7]	Boschma R. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda[J]. Regional Studies, 2016,51(3):351-364.
[8]	贺灿飞. 区域产业发展演化: 路径依赖还是路径创造?[J]. 地理研究, 2018,37(7):1253-1267.
	[ He Canfei. Regional industrial development and evolution: Path dependence or path creation? Geographical Research, 2018,37(7):1253-1267. ]
[9]	Berge M V D, Weterings A. Relatedness in eco-technological development in European regions [R]. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1413. Utrecht, Netherland: Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, 2014.
[10]	Neffke F, Henning M, Boschma R. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions[J]. Economic Geography, 2011,87(3):237-265.
[11]	史进. 全球和地方力量对中国城市制造业增长的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(10):1571-1582.
	[ Shi Jin. Global and local factors of city growth in China based on the change in the manufacturing sector. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(10):1571-1582. ]
[12]	毛熙彦, 贺灿飞. 区域发展的“全球—地方”互动机制研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(10):1449-1461.
	[ Mao Xiyan, He Canfei. A review of global-local interactions for regional development. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(10):1449-1461. ]
[13]	黎诗扬, 朱华晟, 丁玥. 国际贸易对地区劳动力技能升级的影响: 基于中国大陆地区地级市的数据分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(10):1514-1522.
	[ Li Shiyang, Zhu Huasheng, Ding Yue. The impact of international trade on regional skill upgrading: Analysis of prefecture-level cities in the mainland of China. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(10):1514-1522. ]
[14]	王俊松. 相关性多样化、内外资联系与城市创新能力[J]. 南方经济, 2015(12):55-70.
	[ Wang Junsong. Related variety, extraregional linkages and urban innovation ability. South China Journal of Economics, 2015(12):55-70. ]
[15]	Boschma R, Heimeriks G, Balland P. Scientific knowledge dynamics and relatedness in biotech cities[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(1):107-114.
[16]	赵勇, 白永秀 . 知识溢出: 一个文献综述[J]. 经济研究, 2009(1):144-156.
	[ Zhao Yong, Bai Yongxiu. Knowledge spillovers: A survey of the literature. Economic Research Journal, 2009(1):144-156. ]
[17]	Almeida P, Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks[J]. Manage Science, 1999,45(7):905-917.
[18]	Hussler C. Culture and knowledge spillovers in Europe: New perspectives for innovation and convergence policies?[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2004,13(6):523-541.
[19]	Keller W. Geographic localization of international technology diffusion[J]. America Economic Review, 2002,92(1):120-142.
[20]	Breschi S, Lissoni F. Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2000,10(4):975-1005.
[21]	贺灿飞, 任永欢, 李蕴雄. 产品结构演化的跨界效应研究: 基于中国地级市出口产品的实证分析[J]. 地理科学, 2016,36(11):1605-1613.
	[ He Canfei, Ren Yonghuan, Li Yunxiong. The mechanism of cross-boundary product evolution in China: An empirical analysis based on export product of prefecture-level cities. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(11):1605-1613. ]
[22]	纪韶, 朱志胜. 中国省际劳动力流动的特征演变及经济合理性研究: 1995—2010[J]. 经济与管理, 2013,27(8):20-26.
	[ Ji Shao, Zhu Zhisheng. Study on the feature and economic rationality of inter-provincial labor flows in China: 1995-2010. Economy and Management, 2013,27(8):20-26. ]
[23]	Andersson M, Bjerke L, Karlsson C. Import flows: Extraregional linkages stimulating renewal of regional sectors?[J]. Environment Planning A, 2013,45(12):2999-3017.
[24]	Zhu S, He C. Upgrading in China's apparel industry: International trade, local clusters and institutional contexts[J]. Post Communist Economies, 2018. doi: 10.1080/14631377.2017.1362099. pmid: 31565030
[25]	Boschma R, Martín V, Minondo A. Neighbour regions as the source of new industries[J]. Paper in Regional Science, 2017,96(2):227-245.
[26]	龙小宁, 王俊. 中国司法地方保护主义: 基于知识产权案例的研究[J]. 中国经济问题, 2014(3):3-18.
	[ Long Xiaoning, Wang Jun. Local judicial protectionism in China: An empirical study of people's supreme court IP cases. China Economic Studies, 2014(3):3-18. ]
[27]	行伟波, 李善同. 本地偏好、边界效应与市场一体化: 基于中国地区间增值税流动数据的实证研究[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2009,8(4):1455-1474.
	[ Xing Weibo, Li Shantong. Home biases, border effects and market integration: An empirical study based on inter-provincial. China Economic Quarterly, 2009,8(4):1455-1474. ]
[28]	李善同. 2002年中国地区扩展投入产出表 [M]. 北京: 经济科学出版社, 2010.
	[ Li Shangtong. Input output table of China's regional expansion in 2002. Beijing, China: Economic Science Press, 2010. ]
[29]	Los B, Verspagen B. R&D spillovers and productivity: Evidence from U.S. manufacturing microdata[J]. Empirical Economics, 2000,25(1):127-148.
[30]	Hidalgo C A, Klinger B, Barabasi A L, et al. The product space conditions the development of nations[J]. Science, 2007,317:482-487. pmid: 17656717
[31]	Lu J, Tao Z. Trends and determinants of China's industrial agglomeration[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2009,65(2):167-180.

	变量	变量解释	平均值	标准差	最小值	最大值
因变量	Innov	新产品产值占该行业总产值比重	0.174	0.037	0.087	0.316
	ln Patent	人均专利申请数	2.534	1.149	-0.306	4.969
	ln Prod	人均GDP	3.932	1.484	0.736	11.856
核心变量	InterRD	跨区域产业关联密度	0.329	0.319	0.001	0.988
控制变量	LocRD	本地产业关联密度	0.379	0.216	0.006	0.969
	LQ	地区产业的区位商	0.940	0.852	0.001	7.502
	ln Opt	地区产业总产值	15.482	2.088	6.605	19.845
	SOE	国有企业总产值占该产业总产值比重	0.413	0.232	0	1.000
	Subsidy	企业补贴收入与产业总产值的比值	0.006	0.010	0	0.078
	R&D	地区产业的研发经费投入与总产值比重	0.070	0.049	0.007	0.487
	Trade	区产业进出口总额与工业总产值比值	0.134	0.169	0	0.796

变量	基本回归			稳健检验
	模型1	模型2	模型3	模型4	模型5
	Innov	Innov	Innov	Prod	Patent
InterRD	0.145^***	0.114^**	0.153^***	1.072^***	0.286^***
	(0.038)	(0.056)	(0.050)	(0.227)	(0.101)
LocRD×InterRD			-0.076^***	-0.523^***	-0.546^*
LocRD×InterRD			(0.017)	(0.364)	(0.540)
LocRD	0.149^***	0.116^*	0.138^***	0.857^***	0.405^***
	(0.052)	(0.038)	(0.059)	(0.201)	(0.031)
LQ		0.018^***	0.017^***	1.305^***	4.468^***
		(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.052)	(0.094)
Opt		0.009^***	0.008^***	0.045^***	2.081^***
		(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.014)	(0.023)
SOE		0.003	0.002	-0.275^***	-3.788^***
		(0.004)	(0.004)	(0.088)	(0.140)
Subsidy		0.529^***	0.512^***	11.318^***	-1.809
		(0.084)	(0.080)	(2.239)	(2.933)
R&D		0.093^***	0.089^***	23.807^***	2.229^***
		(0.019)	(0.018)	(0.520)	(0.577)
Trade		0.035^***	0.038^***	1.769^***	0.779^***
		(0.005)	(0.006)	(0.146)	(0.208)
常数	0.141^***	-0.004	-0.003	-0.148	-12.558^***
	(0.003)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.227)	(0.341)
观测样本	1440	1440	1440	1440	1440
省份	30	30	30	30	30
R²	0.418	0.651	0.663	0.922	0.691

变量	东部	中部	西部	东北
InterRD	0.168^***	0.151^***	0.045^**	0.041
	(0.057)	(0.050)	(0.021)	(0.043)
InterRD×LocRD	-0.083^***	-0.111^***	-0.065^*	-0.012
InterRD×LocRD	(0.024)	(0.033)	(0.038)	(0.072)
LocRD	0.139^***	0.161^***	0.027^*	0.037
	(0.055)	(0.070)	(0.015)	(0.038)
控制变量	包含	包含	包含	包含
常数	-0.008	0.026	0.004	0.040
	(0.018)	(0.031)	(0.013)	(0.035)
观测样本	480	288	528	144
省份	10	6	11	3
R²	0.692	0.736	0.841	0.829

Interregional technological relatedness and industrial innovation: An analysis based on China’s manufacturing industry

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 31

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	AO Rongjun, ZHOU Xiaoqi, CHEN Jing. From technological relatedness to skill relatedness: A new perspective for understanding regional evolution pathways [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(3): 558-572.
[2]	YANG Jingluan, WANG Jiao'e, LIU Weidong. Characteristics and evolution path of technological innovation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(9): 1566-1578.
[3]	LI Wei, HE Canfei. Regional industrial diversification of China: Based on technological relatedness and complexity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 620-634.
[4]	SUN Caizhi, ZHENG Jingwei. Structural path analysis of water resources consumption in China based on input-output table [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(3): 370-381.
[5]	NING Siyu, HUANG Jing, WANG Zhiqiang, WANG Huimin. Indirect economic losses of flood disaster based on an input-output model: A case study of Hubei Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 420-432.
[6]	SUN Caizhi, YAN Xiaodong. Measurement and transfer analysis of grey water footprint of Chinese provinces and industries based on a multi-regional input-output model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 207-218.
[7]	Zhi ZHENG, Weidong LIU, Zhouying SONG, WUZHATI Yeerken, Yi LIANG. The Belt and Road production networks and China’s participation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 951-962.
[8]	Zhenfa LI, Canfei HE, Bin LI. Regional specialization of China's export products [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(7): 963-975.
[9]	Xiao LI, Yuming SHEN, Ling QIU. Correlation analysis of producer services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 299-307.
[10]	Qi GUO, Canfei HE. Progress of research on technological relatedness in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 229-238.
[11]	Chunla LIU, Weidong LIU, Dadao LU, Zhipeng TANG. Inter-provincial industry eco-compensation in China based on input-output method [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(1): 67-77.
[12]	ZENG Chunshui, LIN Xueqin, WANG Kaiyong, LIU Kun, WANG Ting. Research on Spatial Patterns and Input-output Analysis of Industrial Competitiveness of Economic Regions in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(8): 1005-1012.
[13]	LIU Hongguang,LIU Weidong,TANG Zhipeng. The Origin Source and Its Elasticity Analysis of the CO₂ Emission Induced by Fossil Fuel Using Industrial Activities in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(6): 670-676.
[14]	WANG Deli, FANG Chuanglin, GAO Xuan. Comparison on Evolution of Industrial Linkage Structure Based on Input-Output Table amomg China, Japan and the US [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2010, 29(5): 609-618.
[15]	HU Dan, SONG Yujing, SHEN Yuming, QIU Ling. Beijing's Producer Services: Growth, Changes and Spatial Structures [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 28(2): 264-270.