南京市居民网络购物行为特征——以书籍和衣服为例

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.04.008

Abstract

Abstract:

With the rapid development of information and communication technology (ICT), e-shopping has increasingly become a significant part of today’s social and economic life, deeply influencing residents’ shopping behavior and the development of traditional retail trade. Residents’ shopping behavior differs in different countries, among different groups of people, and with different types of goods. This article analyzes the characteristics of e-shopping behavior of Nanjing residents and compares residents’ e-shopping behavior by distinguishing product types based on a sample survey. The survey was conducted in Nanjing City from April to June 2015 by a research group at Nanjing University, which resulted in 963 valid samples that were later applied for analysis of variance. The study result has important implications for understanding the interactions between e-shopping and in-store shopping, as well as the influence of online shopping on transportation and urban retail space. By comparing two types of products—books and clothes, the article summarizes the general characteristics of Nanjing residents’ e-shopping behavior based on shopping frequency, distance of shopping trips, and shopping attitudes. The result of one-way ANOVA shows that residents’ e-shopping behavior is a complicated process. Considering the two types of products, residents with different e-shopping frequencies clearly differ in socioeconomic attributes, spatial locations, Internet use and shopping habits, and shopping attitudes. Residents with different frequencies of shopping clothes online have significantly more dissimilarities, which means experience goods response more strongly to the new shopping mode. Specifically, people with a high frequency of shopping books online are often older (with an average age of about 33), have higher level of education and household monthly income, are more likely to use online search to get product information and less sensitive to prices. People with a high frequency of shopping clothes online are often younger (with an average age of about 30.4), have higher level of education and household monthly income, and low shopping accessibility in place of residence with an average trip distance of 20 minutes, more likely have rich experiences in using the Internet and conduct unexpected consumption, value the recreational function of shopping, and pursue fashion. The results of this study may provide some references and basic data for dissecting the relationships between online shopping and in-store shopping from a geographic perspective and examining trends of retail sales in the city.

Key words: Information & Communication Technology(ICT), e-shopping, types of goods, one-way ANOVA, Nanjing City

Yuqing ZHANG, Feng ZHEN, Yongming ZHANG. Characteristics of e-shopping behavior of Nanjing residents:A case of books and clothes[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(4): 476-486.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.3

Tab.4

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.5

Tab.6

Tab.7

Tab.8

References 32

[1]	艾瑞咨询. 2015. 2014年中国网络购物行业年度监测报告[DB/OL]. 2015-06-26[2015-08-26].
	[iResearch. 2015. China online shopping report 2014[DB/OL]. 2015-06-26[2015-08-26]..]
[2]	柴彦威, 沈洁, 翁桂兰. 2008. 上海居民购物行为的时空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 28(2): 221-227.
	[Chai Y W, Shen J, Weng G L.2008. A study on activity space of shopping of Shanghai residents: Temporal and spatial characteristics and relative influencing factors[J]. Economic Geography, 28(2): 221-227.]
[3]	陈秀山, 倪小恒. 2006. 信息通信技术对服务业布局的影响分析[J]. 中国软科学,(4): 109-117, 129. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2006.04.016
	[Chen X S, Ni X H.2006. The analysis of ICT’s impact on service industry’s location[J]. China Soft Science,(4): 109-117, 129.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2006.04.016
[4]	韩会然, 焦华富, 王荣荣, 等. 2011. 城市居民购物消费行为研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(8): 1006-1013. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.007
	[Han H R, Jiao H F, Wang R R, et al.2011. Progress and prospects of the research on shopping behavior of urban residents[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(8): 1006-1013.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.08.007
[5]	焦华富, 韩会然. 2013. 中等城市居民购物行为时空决策过程及影响因素: 以安徽省芜湖市为例[J]. 地理学报, 68(6): 750-761.
	[Jiao H F, Han H R.2013. Research on temporal and spatial decision-making process and influencing factors of residents’ shopping behavior in medium-sized cities: A case study of Wuhu City in Anhui Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 68(6): 750-761.]
[6]	刘学, 甄峰, 张敏, 等. 2015. 网上购物对个人出行与城市零售空间影响的研究进展及启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(1): 48-54. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.006
	[Liu X, Zhen F, Zhang M, et al.2015. Research review of online shopping impact on personal travel and urban retail space and implications[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(1): 48-54.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.01.006
[7]	申悦, 柴彦威, 王冬根. 2011. ICT对居民时空行为影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(6): 643-651. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001
	[Shen Y, Chai Y W, Wang D G.2011. Reviews on impacts of information and communication technologies on human spatial-temporal behavior[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(6): 643-651.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001
[8]	孙智群, 柴彦威, 王冬根. 2009. 深圳市民网上购物行为的空间特征[J]. 城市发展研究, 16(6): 106-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.06.019
	[Sun Z Q, Chai Y W, Wang D G.2009. The spatial characteristics of e-shopping behavior of Shenzhen residents[J]. Urban Studies, 16(6): 106-112.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2009.06.019
[9]	汪明峰, 卢姗. 2012. 替代抑或补充: 网上购物与传统购物出行的关系研究[J]. 人文地理, 27(3): 44-49.
	[Wang M F, Lu S.2012. Substitution or complementarity: Online shopping and its relationship with traditional shopping behavior[J]. Human Geography, 27(3): 44-49.]
[10]	汪明峰, 卢姗, 袁贺. 2013. 网上购物对不同区位消费者行为的影响: 市区和郊区的比较[J]. 城市规划, 37(11): 84-88, 95.
	[Wang M F, Lu S, Yuan H.2013. Influences of online shopping on consumer behaviors at different shopping locations: A comparative study on city center and suburb[J]. City Planning Review, 37(11): 84-88, 95.]
[11]	席广亮, 甄峰, 汪侠, 等. 2014. 南京市居民网络消费的影响因素及空间特征[J]. 地理研究, 33(2): 284-295. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402008
	[Xi G L, Zhen F, Wang X, et al.2014. Study on the influencing factors and spatial characteristics of residents’ online consumption in Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 33(2): 284-295.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402008
[12]	曾思敏, 陈忠暖. 2013. 国外网上零售商业空间及其影响效应研究综述[J]. 人文地理, 28(1): 36-42.
	[Zeng S M, Chen Z N.2013. A review on spatial organization of e-retail and its impact abroad[J]. Human Geography, 28(1): 36-42.]
[13]	Alba J, Lynch J, Weitz B, et al.1997. Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces[J]. Journal of Marketing, 61(3): 38-53.
[14]	Anderson W P, Chatterjee L, Lakshmanan T R.2003. E-commerce, transportation, and economic geography[J]. Growth and Change, 34(4): 415-432. doi: 10.1046/j.0017-4815.2003.00228.x
[15]	Cao X Y.2012. The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 46(7): 993-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.007
[16]	Choo S, Lee T, Mokhtarian P L.2007. Relationships between US consumer expenditures on communications and transportation using almost ideal demand system modeling: 1984-2002[J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(5): 431-453.
[17]	Chung J, Rao V R.2012. A general consumer preference model for experience products: Application to internet recommendation services[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(3): 289-305. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1954001
[18]	Couclelis H.2004. Pizza over the internet: E-commerce, the fragmentation of activity and the tyranny of the region[J]. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(1): 41-54. doi: 10.1080/0898562042000205027
[19]	Farag S, Krizek K J, Dijst M.2006. E-shopping and its relationship with in-store shopping: Empirical evidence from the Netherlands and the USA[J]. Transport Reviews, 26(1): 43-61.
[20]	Farag S, Schwanen T, Dijst M, et al.2007. Shopping online and/or in-store? A structural equation model of the relationships between e-shopping and in-store shopping[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 41(2): 125-141. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.02.003
[21]	Handy S, Cao X Y, Mokhtarian P.2008. Neighborhood design and children’s outdoor play: Evidence from northern California[J]. Children, Youth and Environments, 18(2): 160-179.
[22]	Huang P, Lurie N H, Mitra S.2009. Searching for experience on the web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods[J]. Journal of Marketing, 73(2): 55-69.
[23]	Mokhtarian P L.1990. A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 24(3): 231-242. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(90)90060-J
[24]	Mokhtarian P L.2004. A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce[J]. Transportation, 31(3): 257-284. doi: 10.1023/B:PORT.0000025428.64128.d3
[25]	Pendyala R M, Goulias K G, Kitamura R.1991. Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel[J]. Transportation, 18(4): 383-409. doi: 10.1007/BF00186566
[26]	Ren F, Kwan M P.2009. The impact of geographic context on e-shopping behavior[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(2): 262-278. doi: 10.1068/b34014t
[27]	Salomon I.1986. Telecommunications and travel relationships: A review[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 20(3): 223-238. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(86)90096-8
[28]	Talukdar D, Gauri D K, Grewal D.2010. An empirical analysis of the extreme cherry picking behavior of consumers in the frequently purchased goods market[J]. Journal of Retailing, 86(4): 336-354. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2010.06.002
[29]	Tang C S, Bell D R, Ho T H.2001. Store choice and shopping behavior: How price format works[J]. California Management Review, 43(2): 56-74. doi: 10.2307/41166075
[30]	Turley L W, Milliman R E.2000. Atmospheric effects on shop-ping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence[J]. Journal of Business Research, 49(2): 193-211.
[31]	Weltevreden J W J.2007. Substitution or complementarity? How the Internet changes city centre shopping[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(3): 192-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.09.001
[32]	Weltevreden J W J, Van Rietbergen T.2009. The implications of e-shopping for in-store shopping at various shopping locations in the Netherlands[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(2): 279-299.

	样本属性	样本量	比例/%
性别	男	404	42.1
性别	女	555	57.9
年龄	18~24岁	173	18.7
	25~34岁	473	51.2
	35~44岁	199	21.6
	45岁以上	78	8.5
学历	小学及以下	5	0.5
	初中	43	4.5
	高中/中专	104	10.8
	大专	226	23.5
	本科	448	46.6
	研究生及以上	135	14.1
就业状态	全职工作	823	86.7
	全日制在校学生	108	11.4
	在职学生	18	1.9
家庭平均月收入	<1000元	4	0.4
	1000~1999元	27	2.8
	2000~2999元	75	7.9
	3000~4999元	204	21.5
	5000~6999元	206	21.8
	7000~9999元	168	17.7
	10000~14999元	135	14.2
	15000~19999元	68	7.2
	>20000元	62	6.5
居住地	市区	534	55.5
居住地	郊区	429	44.5

购买频率	商品类型
	衣服		书籍
	网络购买/%	实体店购买/%	网络购买/%	实体店购买/%
很少	26.1	29.0	55.5	70.8
两个月一次	19.1	25.6	22.0	14.9
一个月一次或两次	33.8	23.7	18.7	10.7
一个月三次或更多	21.0	21.7	3.8	3.6
总计	100.0	100.0	100.0	100.0

购物出行最常采用的交通方式	商品类型
购物出行最常采用的交通方式	衣服/%	书籍/%
步行	14.0	14.6
电动自行车或助力车	13.0	13.7
公交（包括巴士、地铁、轻轨等）	49.7	52.8
自行车	1.3	1.9
出租车	3.1	2.6
私家汽车或摩托车	18.9	14.4
合计	100.0	100.0

购物出行的距离/min	商品类型
购物出行的距离/min	衣服/%	书籍/%
<5	3.4	5.5
6~10	18.1	15.4
11~20	27.2	23.0
21~30	27.4	25.1
31~40	13.9	16.5
41~50	5.0	5.5
51~60	2.7	3.3
>60	2.3	5.7
合计	100.0	100.0

购物态度	求新	购物享受	成本节约	冲动消费	时间节约
我喜欢购买新颖的产品	0.725
买东西时我喜欢追随潮流	0.654
向别人展示我与众不同很重要	0.625
我喜欢了解新颖的产品	0.599
购物通常是一件很无聊的事		-0.786
购物是有趣的	0.421	0.583
我在买东西时通常很匆忙		-0.540
购物可以帮助我放松		0.470
我在购买之前通常会比较价格			0.760
购买新颖的产品时,我通常很谨慎			0.707
买东西时获得最低的价格很重要			0.575
我买东西时通常不在意商品的价格		-0.439	-0.394
我买东西的时候通常是没有计划的				0.804
我经常会买购物计划外的东西				0.668
我通常会有并坚持我的购物计划	0.669			-0.492
我有足够的时间去购物					-0.834
我常常太忙而没有时间去购物					0.731

Characteristics of e-shopping behavior of Nanjing residents:A case of books and clothes

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 32

Related Articles 14

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

变量		One-way ANOWA
		书籍		衣服
		F值	P值	F值	P值
社会经济属性	年龄	4.862	0.002^*	3.375	0.018^*
	学历	12.072	0.000^*	4.582	0.003^*
	家庭平均月收入	10.836	0.000^*	5.738	0.001^*
空间特征	购物可达性	0.260	0.855	4.342	0.005^*
网络使用及购物习惯	使用互联网时间	7.113	0.000^*	10.313	0.000^*
	上网频率	1.733	0.159	10.606	0.000^*
	网络搜索使用频率	13.434	0.000^*	30.280	0.000^*
购物态度	冲动消费心理	3.690	0.012^*	9.293	0.000^*
	购物享受心理	1.763	0.153	7.638	0.000^*
	时间节约心理	0.375	0.771	1.497	0.214
	成本节约心理	6.112	0.000^*	1.153	0.327
	求新心理	2.183	0.088	6.379	0.000^*

变量		书籍网上购物频率
变量		很少	两个月一次	一个月一次或两次	一个月三次或更多
社会经济属性	年龄	-0.2503[一个月一次或两次]	-0.2452[一个月一次或两次]	0.2503[很少] 0.2452[两个月一次]
	学历	-0.4077[两个月一次] -0.3944[一个月一次或两次]	0.4077[很少]	0.3944[很少]
	家庭平均月收入	-0.7310[一个月一次或两次] -1.0545[一个月三次或更多]		0.7310[很少]	1.0545 [很少]
网络使用及购物习惯	使用互联网时间	-0.2764[两个月一次] -0.2517[一个月一次或两次]	0.2764[很少]	0.2517[很少]
网络使用及购物习惯	网络搜索使用频率	-0.5213[两个月一次] -0.6155[一个月一次或两次] -0.6527[一个月三次或更多]	0.5213[很少]	0.6155[很少]	0.6527 [很少]
购物态度	冲动消费心理	0.2488[两个月一次]	-0.2488[很少] -0.2694[一个月一次或两次]	0.2694[两个月一次]
购物态度	成本节约心理	0.2509[一个月一次或两次]	0.4320[一个月一次或两次]	-0.2509[很少] -0.4320[两个月一次]

[1]	CHENG Long, ZHANG Jiyu, SU Jie, YIN Haiwei, KONG Fanhua, LI Zhixuan. Accessibility and fairness of community retailing under offline and online scenarios [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(12): 2297-2310.
[2]	ZOU Sicong, ZHANG Shanqi, ZHEN Feng. Measurement of community daily activity space and influencing factors of vitality based on residents’ spatiotemporal behavior: Taking Shazhou and Nanyuan streets in Nanjing as examples [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 580-596.
[3]	LI Zhixuan, HE Zhongyu, ZHANG Yiming, JIN Shuangshuang, WANG Xuemei, ZHU Jie, LIU Shicen. Impact of greenspace exposure on residents’ mental health: A case study of Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 779-791.
[4]	JIN Annan, LI Gang, WANG Jianpo, Muhammad Sajid MEHMOOD, YU Yue, LIN Zhe. Location choice and optimization of development of community-oriented new retail stores: A case study of Freshippo stores in Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2013-2027.
[5]	CAO Chen, ZHEN Feng, WANG Xia, JIANG Yupei. Study on the influence of commuting behavior characteristics of urban residents on health in Nanjing City based on structural equation model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2043-2053.
[6]	CUI Zhe, SHEN Lizhen, LIU Zishen. Spatial agglomeration characteristics of service industry in Xinjiekou CBD of Nanjing City and change: Based on micro enterprise data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1832-1844.
[7]	XU Manling, FU Xiao, TANG Junyou, LIU Zhiyuan. Effects of weather factors on the spatial and temporal distributions of metro passenger flows: An empirical study based on smart card data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 45-55.
[8]	YAN Menglu,WANG Baiyuan,ZHAO Xiaofeng,ZHONG Taiyang. Influence of commercialized production-oriented “new professional farmers” on the plastic tunnels transition: A case study in Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1294-1304.
[9]	Xi CHEN, Jianxi FENG. Health effects of built environment based on a comparison of walkability and air pollution:A case study of Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 296-304.
[10]	WU Xianghua, CHEN Xinyu, YUAN Feng. Job-housing relationship of people with housing difficulties and influencing factors in Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1890-1902.
[11]	JI Xiaomei, CUI Huifang, TAO Zhuomin. Changes in Nanjing street names from the perspective of social memory [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1692-1700.
[12]	LI Zhixuan, HU Hong. Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the effects of urban residential differentiation on residents’ physical activities [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1712-1725.
[13]	Enyu CHANG, Feng ZHEN, Chen SUN. Use of community networks and its impact on community participation: A case study of Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(7): 785-794.
[14]	Diehan YANG, Jianglong CHEN, Feng YUAN. Impact of urban spatial restructuring on spatial-temporal evolution ofland leasing in Nanjing City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(2): 246-.

变量		衣服网上购物频率
变量		很少	两个月一次	一个月一次或两次	一个月三次或更多
社会经济属性	年龄	0.2468[两个月一次]	-0.2468[很少]
	学历	-0.2986[一个月一次或两次] -0.2824[一个月三次或更多]		0.2986[很少]	0.2824[很少]
	家庭平均月收入	-0.3951[一个月一次或两次] -0.6749[一个月三次或更多]		0.3951[很少]	0.6749[很少]
空间特征	购物可达性		0.3813[一个月一次或两次]	-0.3813[两个月一次]
网络使用及购物习惯	使用互联网时间	-0.2750[两个月一次] -0.2400[一个月一次或两次] -0.4608[一个月三次或更多]	0.2750[很少]	0.2400[很少] -0.2208[一个月三次或更多]	0.4608[很少] 0.2208[一个月一次或两次]
	上网频率	-0.3052[一个月一次或两次] -0.5145[一个月三次或更多]	-0.2714[一个月三次或更多]	0.3052[很少]	0.5145[很少] 0.2714[两个月一次]
	网络搜索使用频率	-0.6197[两个月一次] -0.6936[一个月一次或两次] -1.2096[一个月三次或更多]	0.6197[很少] -0.5899[一个月三次或更多]	0.6936[很少] -0.5160[一个月三次或更多]	1.2096[很少] 0.5899[两个月一次] 0.5160[一个月一次或两次]
购物态度	冲动消费心理	-0.4439[一个月三次或更多]	-0.4421[一个月三次或更多]	-0.2858[一个月三次或更多]	0.4439[很少] 0.4421[两个月一次] 0.2858[一个月一次或两次]
	购物享受心理	-0.4316[一个月三次或更多]	0.3473[一个月三次或更多]	-0.2519[一个月三次或更多]	0.4316[很少] 0.3473[两个月一次] 0.2519[一个月一次或两次]
	求新心理	-0.2524[一个月一次或两次] -0.3979[一个月三次或更多]		0.2524[很少]	0.3979[很少]