EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2025 , Vol. 44 >Issue 7: 1526 - 1542

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.07.015

研究论文

地缘经济合作视角下中国向湄公河流域产业转移的时空异质性解析

  • 周绍聪 , 1 ,
  • 葛旭瑞 1 ,
  • 李灿松 , 1, 2, * ,
  • 黄宇 3 ,
  • 李松祥 1 ,
  • 王涛 1
展开
  • 1.云南师范大学地理学部，昆明 650500
  • 2.云南省西南联合研究生院，昆明 650092
  • 3.中国科学院青藏高原研究所，青藏高原地球系统与资源环境全国重点实验室，北京 100101
* 李灿松(1980―)，男，白族，云南鹤庆人，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为民族地理、南亚东南亚地缘政治与地缘经济。E-mail:

周绍聪(1999—)，女，云南腾冲人，硕士生，主要从事南亚东南亚区域国别研究。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-12-17

  修回日期: 2025-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-25

基金资助

云南省哲学社会科学创新团队项目(2023CX02)

国家自然科学基金项目(42101231)

收起

Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of China’s industrial transfer to the Mekong River Basin from the perspective of geoeconomic cooperation

  • ZHOU Shaocong , 1 ,
  • GE Xurui 1 ,
  • LI Cansong , 1, 2, * ,
  • HUANG Yu 3 ,
  • LI Songxiang 1 ,
  • WANG Tao 1
Expand
  • 1. Department of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China
  • 2. Southwest Joint Graduate School of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650500, China
  • 3. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2024-12-17

  Revised date: 2025-04-08

  Online published: 2025-07-25

Supported by

Yunnan Philosophy and Social Science Innovation Team(2023CX02)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42101231)

Fold

摘要

从地缘经济合作视角出发，探究中国向湄公河流域产业转移，对于剖析双方地缘经济合作、深化投资、推动区域发展具有重要意义。基于2010—2023年中国企业迁移数据，论文采用社会网络分析、参数最优地理探测器、灰色关联分析等方法，进一步探究中国向湄公河流域产业转移的时空异质性及驱动机理。结果显示：① 产业转移时空异质性显著。产业转移经历了“增长—下降—回升”三阶段，转出数量呈现东部沿海向西部内陆递减趋势，转入地地理优势和沿海偏好显著，首都集聚效应尤为突出。② 转出地以东部沿海为核心呈放射状向湄公河流域转出；转入地泰国产业转入量最高，老挝转入量最低，与中国和湄公河流域国家间地缘关系、外交关系程度高度契合；湄公河流域国家间转移模式各异。③ 第二产业占产业转移总量的72%，以制造业中劳动密集型中小企业为主，第三产业占比27%，第一产业仅占1%。成本驱动是第二产业主要迁移动力，第三产业随第二产业配套转移，第一产业主要受自然条件限制，转移最少。④ 产业转移受多重因素综合影响，呈现“双核驱动—四维支撑—多因子交互”驱动机理。经济、资源、政治三大因素与产业转移数量关联度最高，其中经济发展与基础建设起关键作用。澜沧江—湄公河合作通过多领域协同，缓解产业转移各要素的不平衡性，优化区域产业链布局，助力经济高质量发展。

关键词： 地缘经济合作; 产业转移; 驱动机理; 湄公河流域

本文引用格式

周绍聪 , 葛旭瑞 , 李灿松 , 黄宇 , 李松祥 , 王涛 . 地缘经济合作视角下中国向湄公河流域产业转移的时空异质性解析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(7) : 1526 -1542 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.07.015

Abstract

From the perspective of geo-economic cooperation, Exploring China's industrial transfer to the Mekong River Basin is of great significance for analyzing geoeconomic cooperation between the two countries, deepening investment, and promoting regional development. Based on the migration data of Chinese enterprises from 2010 to 2023, this study adopted social network analysis, parameter optimal geographical detector, and gray correlation analysis methods to further explore the spatiotemporal heterogeneity and driving mechanism of industrial transfer to the Mekong River Basin. The results show that: 1) The spatiotemporal heterogeneity of industrial transfer was significant. Industrial transfer has gone through three stages of growth-decline-rebound. The number of outgoing enterprises showed a decreasing trend from the eastern coast to the western inland. Geographical advantages and coastal preferences of the transfer destinations were significant, and the capital city clustering effect was particularly prominent. 2) The transfer-out places were concentrated in the eastern coast and radiating to the Mekong River Basin; Thailand had the highest number of industrial transfers, and Laos had the lowest number of transfers, which is highly consistent with the geopolitical and diplomatic relations between China and countries of the Mekong River Basin; and the transfer modes between countries of the Mekong River Basin were different. 3) The secondary industry accounted for 72% of the total industrial transfers, with mainly labor-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises in the manufacturing industry, the tertiary industry accounted for 27%, and the primary industry accounted for only 1%. Cost was the main migration driving force of the secondary industry. The tertiary industry was transferred together with the secondary industry. The primary industry was mainly limited by natural conditions and the transfer was the least. 4) Industrial transfer was influenced by multiple factors, presenting the pattern of "dual-core drive, four-dimensional support, multi-factor interaction". The three factors of economy, resources, and politics had the highest correlation with the quantity of industrial transfer, among which economic development and infrastructure construction played a key role. Through multi-field coordination, Lancang-Mekong River Basin cooperation alleviated the imbalance of various factors of industrial transfer, optimized the layout of regional industrial chains, and promoted high-quality economic development.

Key words： geoeconomic cooperation; industrial transfer; driving mechanism; Mekong River Basin

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
吕越, 王者, 于喆宁. 全面认识产业转移的新特征新模式: 基于开放视角下的事实与分析[J]. 南方经济, 2024(9): 117-134.

[Lv Yue, Wang Zhe, Yu Zhening. A thorough grasp of the emerging features and paradigms in industrial transfer: Based on the facts and analysis from an open perspective. South China Journal of Economics, 2024(9): 117-134. ]

[2]
Zhang X X, Zhu K F, Wang S Y. The impact of manufacturing transfer from China to India on China's GDP and employment[J]. China Finance and Economic Review, 2024, 13(4): 76-105.

[3]
许吉黎, 叶玉瑶, 罗子昕, 等. 新发展格局下粤港澳大湾区高科技产业多尺度空间联系与政策启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(9): 1592-1605.

[Xu Jili, Ye Yuyao, Luo Zixin, et al. Multi-scalar spatial linkages initiated by high-tech industries in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and policy implications against the backdrop of China's new development paradigm. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(9): 1592-1605. ]

[4]
孙斌栋, 郑晓辉. 从“点—轴系统”理论到大国多中心区域协调发展模式[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(12): 2991-3006.

[Sun Bindong, Zheng Xiaohui. From the "pole-axis system" theory to the polycentric and coordinated regional development model of large countries. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(12): 2991-3006. ]

[5]
周頔. 中国新能源产品不仅不存在"产能过剩", 还是对全球供给的贡献[N]. 21世纪经济报, 2024-07-03(6).

[Zhou Yi. China's new energy products not only do not have "overcapacity", but also contribute to global supply. 21st Century Economic Report, 2024-07-03(6). ]

[6]
Logan D C. Chinese views of strategic stability: Implications for U.S.-China relations[J]. International Security, 2024, 49(2): 56-96.

[7]
Ortuoste M. Cascading risks in a social-ecological system: The South China Sea disputes[J]. Third World Quarterly, 2024, 45(14): 2088-2107.

[8]
张友国. 区域间产业转移模式与梯度优势重构: 以长江经济带为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(3): 87-99.

[Zhang Youguo. Inter-regional industrial transfer pattern and gradient advantage reconstruction: A case study of Yangtze River economic belt. China Soft Science, 2020(3): 87-99. ]

[9]
付晨玉, 秦尊文. 地区产业转移与承接能力评价: 以长江三峡生态经济走廊为例[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(17): 88-98.

[Fu Chenyu, Qin Zunwen. Regional industrial transfer and undertaking capacity evaluation: An example of the Three Gorges ecological and economic corridor of Yangtze River. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(17): 88-98. ]

[10]
王效梅, 余正颖, 刘小勇. 广东省经济增长的扩散回流与市场区效应实证检验[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10): 1636-1645.

[Wang Xiaomei, Yu Zhengying, Liu Xiao-yong. An empirical test of spread-backwash and market area effects of economic growth in Guangdong Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 1636-1645. ]

[11]
张公嵬. 我国产业集聚的变迁与产业转移的可行性研究[J]. 经济地理, 2010, 30(10): 1670-1674, 1687.

[Zhang Gongwei. The study of industrial agglomeration change and the probability of industry transfer in China. Economic Geography, 2010, 30(10): 1670-1674, 1687. ]

[12]
彭桂芳. 广东省产业和劳动力转移的可行性探讨[J]. 经济纵横, 2009(5): 79-81.

[Peng Guifang. Discussion on the feasibility of industrial and labour transfer in Guangdong Province. Economic Review Journal, 2009(5): 79-81. ]

[13]
彭继增, 王幼娟, 李爽. 赣州对接融入粤港澳大湾区的可行性研究: 基于承接产业转移的视角[J]. 金融与经济, 2020(5): 89-96.

[Peng Jizeng, Wang Youjuan, Li Shuang. Feasibility Study on the Integration of Ganzhou into the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Based on the perspective of undertaking industrial transfer. Finance and Economy, 2020(5): 89-96. ]

[14]
Krijnen K, Blenkinsopp P, Heeren R M A, et al. Processing next-generation mass spectrometry imaging data: Principal component analysis at scale[J]. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2024, 35(12): 3063-3069.

[15]
Su W, Ai Z T, Yang B. A new personalized environment control system for hospital beds with design optimization by Taguchi-based grey relational analysis[J]. Building and Environment, 2025, 267: 112206. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112206.

[16]
Li Y X, Zhang Y F, Zhang X H, et al. Distribution of geothermal resources in Eryuan County based on entropy weight TOPSIS and AHP-TOPSIS methods[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2024, 11(2): 213-226.

[17]
蔡琦晟, 郭于玮, 鲁政委. 全球产业链重塑趋势: 产业转移的视角[J]. 金融与经济, 2024(9): 54-64.

[Cai Qisheng, Guo Yuwei, Lu Zhengwei. The trend of reshaping the global industrial chain: The perspective of industrial transfer. Finance and Economy, 2024(9): 54-64. ]

[18]
黄徐亮, 徐海东, 倪鹏飞, 等. 长三角地区产业转移特征及其影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2023, 43(1): 124-132.

[Huang Xuliang, Xu Haidong, Ni Pengfei, et al. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Industrial Transfer in Yangtze River Delta. Economic Geography, 2023, 43(1): 124-132. ]

[19]
高沙尔·吾拉孜, 杨廷章, 孙威. 京津冀地区制造业与生产性服务业的互动关系和机制分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(7): 1290-1306.

[Gaoshaer Wulazi, Yang Tingzhang, Sun Wei. Interactive relationship of manufacturing and producer service industries in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and mechanism. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43(7): 1290-1306. ]

[20]
王金杰, 王庆芳, 刘建国, 等. 协同视角下京津冀制造业转移及区域间合作[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(7): 90-99.

[Wang Jinjie, Wang Qingfang, Liu Jianguo, et al. Transfer and cooperation mechanism of manufacturing industry in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei under the synergetic perspective. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(7): 90-99. ]

[21]
朱小玉, 滕阳川, 施文凯, 等. 新一轮国际产业转移驱动因素影响研究: 基于人工成本、税费成本与其他因素的比较分析[J]. 国际税收, 2024(10): 54-63.

[Zhu Xiaoyu, Teng Yangchuan, Shi Wenkai, et al. A study on the driving factors of a new round of international industrial transfer: A comparative analysis of labor costs, tax and fee costs and other factors. International Taxation in China, 2024(10): 54-63. ]

[22]
刘晓婧. 手机产业链由中国转移至印度的驱动机理及影响因素[J]. 南亚研究季刊, 2024(3): 59-77, 158.

[Liu Xiaojing. Driving mechanisms and influencing factors of mobile phone industry chain shifting from China to India. South Asian Studies Quarterly, 2024(3): 59-77, 158. ]

[23]
Zhao S B, Wang X P, Li K L, et al. Evolution and influencing factors of the transnational investment network of China-Africa international cooperation parks[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(11): 2205-2228.

[24]
王珊, 陈新保, 龙欣悦, 等. 豫皖鄂湘赣承接国际产业转移的影响因素及其空间效应[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2022, 38(6): 60-67.

[Wang Shan, Chen Xinbao, Long Xinyue, et al. Influencing factors and spatial effects of undertaking international industrial transfer in Henan-Anhui-Hubei-Hunan-Jiangxi Region. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2022, 38(6): 60-67. ]

[25]
Ruiz-Barradas A, Nigam S. Hydroclimate variability and change over the Mekong River Basin: Modeling and predictability and policy implications[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2018, 19(5): 849-869.

[26]
Chen J X, Wang Y, Zhao Z F, et al. Natural and human-induced decline and spatio-temporal differentiation of terrestrial water storage over the Lancang-Mekong River Basin[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2025, 35(1): 112-138.

[27]
Campbell I, Barlow C. Hydropower development and the loss of fisheries in the Mekong River Basin[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2020, 8: 566509. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.566509.

[28]
Mallick P. Transboundary river cooperation in Mekong Basin: A sub-regional perspective[J]. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 2022, 9(1): 50-71.

[29]
葛旭瑞, 李灿松, 胡平平, 等. 湄公河流域国家地缘政治风险评估与影响研究[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2022, 38(6): 52-59.

[Ge Xurui, Li Cansong, Hu Pingping, et al. Geopolitical risk assessment and impact of Mekong River Basin countries. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2022, 38(6): 52-59. ]

[30]
Romanos C. Liquid territories: The configuration of geographic space in the cartography of the Mekong River's catchment areas[J]. Water History, 2025, 17: 61-76.

[31]
陈世亮, 李霞, 钱钊晖, 等. 澜沧江—湄公河流域干旱趋势及其对生态系统碳固定的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(3): 747-764.

[Chen Shiliang, Li Xia, Qian Zhaohui, et al. Drought trend and its impact on ecosystem carbon sequestration in Lancang-Mekong River Basin. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(3): 747-764. ]

[32]
刘艳丽, 赵志轩, 孙周亮, 等. 基于水利益共享的跨境流域水资源多目标分配研究: 以澜沧江—湄公河为例[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(3): 387-393.

[Liu Yanli, Zhao Zhixuan, Sun Zhouliang, et al. Multi-objective water resources allocation in trans-boundary rivers based on the concept of water benefit-sharing: A case in the Lancang-Mekong River. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(3): 387-393. ]

[33]
王文宇, 贺灿飞. 关系经济地理学与贸易网络研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(3): 461-476.

[Wang Wenyu, He Canfei. Relational economic geography and trade network research. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(3): 461-476. ]

[34]
李晓, 刘宝琦. 制造业国际贸易网络结构演变: 1995—2018: 基于社会网络方法的分析[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2023, 39(12): 4-20.

[Li Xiao, Liu Baoqi. Evolution of international trade network structure in manufacturing sector: 1995-2018: An analysis based on STERGM. International Economics and Trade Research, 2023, 39(12): 4-20. ]

[35]
孙春晓, 裴小忠. 长三角纺织业创新网络的演化特征与影响因素研究: 基于社会网络分析方法和空间计量模型的实证[J]. 工业技术经济, 2021, 40(7): 28-35.

[Sun Chunxiao, Pei Xiaozhong. Research on the evolutionary characteristics and influencing factors of the textile industry innovation network in the Yangtze River Delta: Empirical analysis based on social network analysis methods and spatial econometric models. Journal of Industrial Technology and Economy, 2021, 40(7): 28-35. ]

[36]
罗婉璐, 王武林, 林珍, 等. 中国城乡融合时空演化及驱动因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(4): 629-643.

[Luo Wanlu, Wang Wulin, Lin Zhen, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of urban-rural integration in China. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(4): 629-643. ]

[37]
Song Y Z, Wang J F, Ge Y, et al. An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis: Cases with different types of spatial data[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2020, 57(5): 593-610.

[38]
石晶, 石培基, 李雪红, 等. 石羊河流域生态系统服务时空变化及其多尺度影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(2): 276-289.

[Shi Jing, Shi Peiji, Li Xuehong, et al. Spatial and temporal variability of ecosystem services in the Shiyang River Basin and its multi-scale influencing factors. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43(2): 276-289. ]

[39]
赵鹏军, 刘迪. 中国小城镇基础设施与社会经济发展的关联分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256.

[Zhao Pengjun, Liu Di. Analysis of the relationships between infrastructure and socioeconomic development in towns of China. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(9): 1245-1256. ]

[40]
孟广文, 杜明明, 赵钏, 等. 中国海外园区越南龙江工业园投资效益与启示[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(6): 16-25.

[Meng Guangwen, Du Mingming, Zhao Chuan, et al. Investment benefits and enlightenments of Longjiang industrial park (China overseas industrial park) in Vietnam. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(6): 16-25. ]

[41]
王惠文, 葛岳静, 马腾. 地缘位势与中国—中亚地缘关系初探[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(9): 10-21.

[Wang Huiwen, Ge Yuejing, Ma Teng. Preliminary study on geo-potential and its application on China-Central Asia geopolitical relations. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(9): 10-21. ]

[42]
谢国娥, 许瑶佳, 杨逢珉. “一带一路”背景下东南亚、中东欧国家投资环境比较研究[J]. 世界经济研究, 2018(11): 89-98, 173.

[Xie Guo'e, Xu Yaojia, Yang Fengmin. A comparative study of investment environment in Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe under the background of "One Belt and One Road". World Economy Studies, 2018(11): 89-98, 173. ]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉