EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2025 , Vol. 44 >Issue 7: 1391 - 1405

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.07.006

研究论文

粤港澳大湾区跨境标准合作的网络特征与邻近性机制

  • 刘向杰 , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • 叶玉瑶 , 1, * ,
  • 许吉黎 1
展开
  • 1.广东省科学院广州地理研究所，广州 510070
  • 2.中国科学院广州地球化学研究所，广州 510640
  • 3.中国科学院大学，北京 100049
* 叶玉瑶(1980—)，女，四川乐山人，博士，研究员，研究方向为城市群与区域发展战略。E-mail:

刘向杰(1997—)，男，广东汕头人，博士生，研究方向为经济地理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-09-30

  修回日期: 2024-12-27

  网络出版日期: 2025-07-25

基金资助

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21&ZD107)

收起

Network characteristics and proximity mechanism of cross-border standards cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

  • LIU Xiangjie , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • YE Yuyao , 1, * ,
  • XU Jili 1
Expand
  • 1. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China
  • 2. Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
  • 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2024-09-30

  Revised date: 2024-12-27

  Online published: 2025-07-25

Supported by

Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China(21&ZD107)

Fold

摘要

粤港澳三地共同制定的跨境标准是新时期大湾区制度衔接一体化的重要体现，但现有研究对跨境标准网络的关注尚显薄弱，其网络结构与邻近性机制差异亟待考察。论文聚焦于粤港澳大湾区共通执行标准，采用社会网络和多元二次指派模型(multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure，MRQAP)探讨现阶段湾区跨境标准合作的网络特征，考察多维邻近性对跨境标准合作的影响。研究表明：① 粤港澳大湾区跨境标准呈现以港澳—广佛深为主的“小世界”网络，参与机构兼具正式性与多元性特征，以行政部门和行业协会牵头为主。总体而言，湾区标准衔接尚处于以民生领域为主的初期阶段，基础设施和新兴产业领域标准衔接仍待完善。② 由正式性网络构成的政策邻近与非正式网络构成的社会邻近变量对跨境标准合作起到“去边界化”作用，反映了跨境区域创新系统从硬设施联通到软制度衔接的阶段性演进动力。研究从跨境标准合作的视角拓展了知识创新网络的跨境案例，实证上深化跨境区域创新系统的多维邻近性理论。

关键词： 跨境区域创新系统; 多维邻近性; 制度差异; 湾区标准; 粤港澳大湾区

本文引用格式

刘向杰 , 叶玉瑶 , 许吉黎 . 粤港澳大湾区跨境标准合作的网络特征与邻近性机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(7) : 1391 -1405 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.07.006

Abstract

The cross-border standards jointly formulated by Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao represent an important manifestation of institutional integration in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) in the new era. However, existing research has paid insufficient attention to the cross-border standards network, and there is an urgent need to investigate its network structure and the differences in proximity mechanisms. This study focused on the commonly enforced standards in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and employed the social network and multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MRQAP) analyses to explore the network characteristics of cross-border standards cooperation in the GBA at the current stage, while examining the impact of multidimensional proximities on cross-border standards cooperation. The research findings are as follows: 1) The cross-border standards in the GBA exhibit a "small-world" network centered on Hong Kong, Macao, Guangzhou, Foshan, and Shenzhen, with participating institutions being both formal and diverse, primarily led by administrative departments and industry associations. Overall, the integration of standards in the GBA is still in its initial stage, focusing mainly on areas related to people's living, while the integration of standards in infrastructure and emerging industries remains to be improved. 2) Policy proximity, consisting of formal networks, and social proximity, consisting of informal networks, play a "de-bordering" role in cross-border standards cooperation, reflecting the phased evolution of cross-border regional innovation systems from hard infrastructure connectivity to soft institutional integration. This study expanded the cross-border cases of knowledge innovation networks from the perspective of cross-border standards cooperation and empirically deepened the theory of multidimensional proximities in cross-border regional innovation systems.

Key words： cross-border regional innovation system; multidimensional proximity; institutional differences; Bay Area standards; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
龙小宁, 张美扬. 标准的力量: 来自中国标准必要专利的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(10): 149-168.

[Long Xiaoning, Zhang Meiyang. The power of standards: Empirical evidence from China's standard essential patents. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(10): 149-168. ]

[2]
Lundquist K J, Trippl M. Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems: A conceptual analysis[J]. Regional Studies, 2013, 47(3): 450-460.

[3]
张虹鸥, 吴康敏, 王洋, 等. 粤港澳大湾区创新驱动发展的科学问题与重点研究方向[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 135-142.

[Zhang Hong'ou, Wu Kangmin, Wang Yang, et al. Scientific issues and key research directions of innovation-driven development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 135-142. ]

[4]
刘云刚, 侯璐璐, 许志桦. 粤港澳大湾区跨境区域协调: 现状、问题与展望[J]. 城市观察, 2018(1): 7-25.

[Liu Yungang, Hou Lulu, Xu Zhihua. Cross-border collaboration in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Progress, problems and prospect. Urban Insight, 2018(1): 7-25. ]

[5]
陈朋亲. 粤港澳大湾区规则相互衔接的制度复杂性与行为策略[J]. 学术论坛, 2023, 46(3): 32-43.

[Chen Pengqin. Institutional complexity and behavioral strategies of the rules of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Academic Forum, 2023, 46(3): 32-43. ]

[6]
陈洪超, 齐虹丽. 碎片化: 粤港澳大湾区团体标准治理为何难以推进? 基于整体性治理视角的分析[J]. 标准科学, 2023(2): 6-15.

[Chen Hongchao, Qi Hongli. Fragmentation: Why is it difficult to promote association standard governance in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area? Analysis from the perspective of holistic governance. Standard Science, 2023(2): 6-15. ]

[7]
Blind K, Kenney M, Leiponen A, et al. Standards and innovation: A review and introduction to the special issue[J]. Research Policy, 2023, 52(8): 104830. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104830.

[8]
Henkel J. Licensing standard-essential patents in the IoT-Avalue chain perspective on the markets for technology[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(10): 104600. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104600.

[9]
周青, 陈静, 杨伟, 等. 后发企业如何提升国际技术标准话语权? 中车株洲所的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(7): 82-100.

[Zhou Qing, Chen Jing, Yang Wei, et al. How can latecomer enterprises broaden their influence on international technical standard setting: An exploratory case study of CRRC Zhuzhou Institute. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(7): 82-100. ]

[10]
侯冠华. 美国对华技术标准竞争: 动因、举措与挑战[J]. 国际论坛, 2024, 26(1): 110-133, 159.

[Hou Guanhua. US technical standards competition with China: Motivations, initiatives and challenges. International Forum, 2024, 26(1): 110-133, 159. ]

[11]
洪蕾, 刘冬, 徐梦佳, 等. 长三角区域地方生态环境标准发展的时空格局演变及其影响机制研究[J]. 环境生态学, 2024, 6(1): 45-52.

[Hong Lei, Liu Dong, Xu Mengjia, et al. Research on the spatial-temporal pattern evolution and influencing mechanism of the development of local ecological environmental standards in the Yangtze River Delta. Environmental Ecology, 2024, 6(1): 45-52. ]

[12]
刘晓倩, 王艳. 我国长三角区域养老地方标准数据分析研究[J]. 中国标准化, 2023(22): 53-56.

[Liu Xiaoqian, Wang Yan. Research on local standards for elderly care in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. China Standardization, 2023(22): 53-56. ]

[13]
Schott L, Schaefer K J. Acceptance of Chinese latecomers' technological contributions in international ICT standardization: The role of origin, experience and collaboration[J]. Research Policy, 2023, 52(1): 104656. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104656.

[14]
Botzem S, Dobusch L. Standardization cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards[J]. Organization Studies, 2012, 33(5/6): 737-762.

[15]
Delcamp H R, Leiponen A. Innovating standards through informal consortia: The case of wireless telecommunications[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2014, 36: 36-47.

[16]
Wen W, Forman C M, Jarvenpaa S L. The effects of technology standards on complementor innovations: Evidence from the IETF[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(6): 104518. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104518.

[17]
Arnold L, Hukal P. The varying effects of standardisation on digital platform innovation: Evidence from OpenStreetmap[J]. Innovation, 2024. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2024.2345319.

[18]
戚聿东, 杜博, 叶胜然. 知识产权与技术标准协同驱动数字产业创新: 机理与路径[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(8): 5-24.

[Qi Yudong, Du Bo, Ye Shengran. Mechanism and pathways of intellectual property rights and technology standards synergistically driving digital industry innovation. China Industrial Economics, 2022(8): 5-24. ]

[19]
陈伟. 作为规范的技术标准及其与法律的关系[J]. 法学研究, 2022, 44(5): 84-100.

[Chen Wei. Technical standards as norms and their relationship with law. Chinese Journal of Law, 2022, 44(5): 84-100. ]

[20]
王庆扬, 谢沛荣, 熊尚坤, 等. 5G关键技术与标准综述[J]. 电信科学, 2017, 33(11): 112-122.

[Wang Qingyang, Xie Peirong, Xiong Shangkun, et al. Key technology and standardization progress for 5G. Telecommunications Science, 2017, 33(11): 112-122. ]

[21]
马海涛. 知识流动空间的城市关系建构与创新网络模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(4): 708-721.

[Ma Haitao. The theoretical construction and network simulation of intercity innovative relationships in knowledge flow space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(4): 708-721. ]

[22]
刘承良, 桂钦昌, 段德忠, 等. 全球科研论文合作网络的结构异质性及其邻近性机理[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(4): 737-752.

[Liu Chengliang, Gui Qinchang, Duan Dezhong, et al. Structural heterogeneity and proximity mechanism of global scientific collaboration network based on co-authored papers. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(4): 737-752. ]

[23]
席强敏, 李国平, 孙瑜康, 等. 京津冀科技合作网络的演变特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(6): 1359-1373.

[Xi Qiangmin, Li Guoping, Sun Yukang, et al. Evolutionary characteristics of science and technology cooperation network of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its influencing factors. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(6): 1359-1373. ]

[24]
刘承良, 管明明, 段德忠. 中国城际技术转移网络的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477.

[Liu Chengliang, Guan Mingming, Duan Dezhong. Spatial pattern and influential mechanism of interurban technology transfer network in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(8): 1462-1477. ]

[25]
戴靓, 曹湛, 马海涛, 等. 中国城市知识合作网络结构演化的影响机制[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78(2): 334-350.

[Dai Liang, Cao Zhan, Ma Haitao, et al. The influencing mechanisms of evolving structures of China's intercity knowledge collaboration networks. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023, 78(2): 334-350. ]

[26]
桂钦昌, 杜德斌, 刘承良, 等. 基于随机行动者模型的全球科学合作网络演化研究[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(10): 2631-2647.

[Gui Qinchang, Du Debin, Liu Chengliang, et al. The evolution of the global scientific collaboration network: A stochastic actor-oriented model approach. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(10): 2631-2647. ]

[27]
曹湛, 朱晟君, 戴靓, 等. 多维邻近性对区域创新合作网络形成的影响: 基于江浙沪医学科研机构的实证[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(9): 2531-2547.

[Cao Zhan, Zhu Shengjun, Dai Liang, et al. The impact of multidimensional proximity on the formation of regional innovative collaboration network: A case study of medical science institutions in the Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai region. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(9): 2531-2547. ]

[28]
Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39(1): 61-74.

[29]
陈林, 张玺文. 建设统一大市场: 粤港澳大湾区市场一体化的演化历程、经济规律与可借鉴经验[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2023, 39(5): 4-15.

[Chen Lin, Zhang Xiwen. Building a unified market: The evolution, economic laws and referential experience of market integration of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. International Economics and Trade Research, 2023, 39(5): 4-15. ]

[30]
刘圆圆, 王娟, 胡葳, 等. 粤港澳大湾区标准竞合案例及竞合概念模型研究[J]. 中国标准化, 2021(S1): 35-41.

[Liu Yuanyuan, Wang Juan, Hu Wei, et al. Study on the standard co-opetition case and conceptual model in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. China Standardization, 2021(S1): 35-41. ]

[31]
Johnson C M. Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in central Europe[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2009, 16(2): 177-191.

[32]
Trippl M. Developing cross-border regional innovation systems: Key factors and challenges[J]. Tijdschrift voor Econoomische en Sociale Geografie, 2010, 101: 150-160.

[33]
Cappellano F, Rizzo A. Economic drivers in cross-border regional innovation systems[J]. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2019, 6(1): 460-468.

[34]
Chandra K, Wang J, Luo N, et al. Asymmetry in the distribution of benefits of cross-border regional innovation systems: The case of the Hong Kong-Shenzhen innovation system[J]. Regional Studies, 2023, 57(7): 1303-1317.

[35]
Balland P A, Boschma R, Frenken K. Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics[J]. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(6): 907-920.

[36]
Torre A. On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission[J]. Regional Studies, 2008, 42(6): 869-889.

[37]
许吉黎, 叶嘉安, 林初昇, 等. 珠三角高科技企业与香港科技创新赋能的关联特征及影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2024, 79(6):1521-1539.

[Xu Jili, Yeh Anthony G O, Lin George C S, et al. Relational characteristics between high-technology firms in the Pearl River Delta and the empowerment for technological innovation by Hong Kong and influencing factors. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(6):1521-1539. ]

[38]
Capello R, Caragliu A, Fratesi U. Breaking down the border: Physical, institutional and cultural obstacles[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 94(5): 485-513.

[39]
赵晓斌, 强卫, 黄伟豪, 等. 粤港澳大湾区发展的理论框架与发展战略探究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2018, 37(12): 1597-1608.

[Zhao Xiaobin, Qiang Wei, Huang Weihao, et al. Theoretical framework and development strategy of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(12): 1597-1608. ]

[40]
刘毅, 任亚文, 马丽, 等. 粤港澳大湾区创新发展的进展、问题与战略思考[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(9): 1555-1565.

[Liu Yi, Ren Yawen, Ma Li, et al. Progress, problems, and strategies of innovation and development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(9): 1555-1565. ]

[41]
许吉黎, 叶玉瑶, 罗子昕, 等. 新发展格局下粤港澳大湾区高科技产业多尺度空间联系与政策启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(9): 1592-1605.

[Xu Jili, Ye Yuyao, Luo Zixin, et al. Multi-scalar spatial linkages initiated by high-tech industries in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and policy implications against the backdrop of China's new development paradigm. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(9): 1592-1605. ]

[42]
吴旗韬. 粤港澳大湾区交通流网络空间结构和边界效应测度[J]. 热带地理, 2024, 44(5): 783-793.

[Wu Qitao. Spatial structure and border-effect measurement of transportation-flow network in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Tropical Geography, 2024, 44(5): 783-793. ]

[43]
王长建, 叶玉瑶, 汪菲, 等. 粤港澳大湾区协同发展水平的测度及评估[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(2): 206-219.

[Wang Changjian, Ye Yuyao, Wang Fei, et al. Measurement and evaluation of the coordinated development in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(2): 206-219. ]

[44]
Van den Broek J, Smulders H. Institutional hindrances in cross-border regional innovation systems[J]. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2015, 2(1): 116-122.

[45]
赵辰霖, 徐菁媛. 粤港澳大湾区一体化下的粤港协同治理: 基于三种合作形式的案例比较研究[J]. 公共行政评论, 2020, 13(2): 58-75, 195-196.

[Zhao Chenlin, Xu Jingyuan. Collaborative governance between Hong Kong and the Mainland: A comparative case study on the three forms of cross-border governance. Journal of Public Administration, 2020, 13(2): 58-75, 195-196. ]

[46]
胡关子. 中国区域标准化发展的历程、模式与展望[J]. 区域经济评论, 2021(6): 93-99.

[Hu Guanzi. The process, model and prospects of China's regional standardization development. Regional Economic Review, 2021(6): 93-99. ]

[47]
Barnett G A. Encyclopedia of social networks[M]. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2011: 634-636.

[48]
Yang W, Fan F, Wang X, et al. Knowledge innovation network externalities in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: borrowing size or agglomeration shadow?[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2022, 34(9): 1020-1037.

[49]
Ma H, Xu X. The effects of proximities on the evolving structure of intercity innovation networks in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Comparison between scientific and technology knowledge[J]. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 2023, 27(3): 390-413.

[50]
王韬, 黄绍娜, 黄剑文, 等. 粤港澳大湾区标准对接应用研究[J]. 中国标准化, 2021(3): 127-129.

[Wang Tao, Huang Shaona, Huang Jianwen, et al. Research on the interaction and application of standards in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. China Standardization, 2021(3): 127-129. ]

[51]
傅田, 陶岚, 李翔宇. 粤港澳大湾区建设数字湾区中的标准化路径与对策研究[J]. 标准科学, 2024(2): 23-27.

[Fu Tian, Tao Lan, Li Xiangyu. Research on standardization path and countermeasures for building the digital Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Standard Science, 2024(2): 23-27. ]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉