研究论文

河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征、典型地域类型及其形成机制

  • 李雨婷 , 1 ,
  • 李钢 , 1, 2, * ,
  • 温小婷 1 ,
  • 王娟 1 ,
  • 李佳 1
展开
  • 1.西北大学城市与环境学院,西安 710127
  • 2.陕西省地表系统与环境承载力重点实验室,西安 710127
*李钢(1979—),男,四川成都人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为人地关系与空间安全、灾害地理与犯罪地理、时空大数据与数字人文。E-mail:

李雨婷(1997—),女,河南商丘人,博士生,研究方向为人口失踪与犯罪地理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-09-03

  修回日期: 2025-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42271239)

Spatiotemporal characteristics, typical regional types, and formation mechanism of child trafficking crimes in Henan Province

  • LI Yuting , 1 ,
  • LI Gang , 1, 2, * ,
  • WEN Xiaoting 1 ,
  • WANG Juan 1 ,
  • LI Jia 1
Expand
  • 1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an 710127, China
  • 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi'an 710127, China

Received date: 2024-09-03

  Revised date: 2025-03-10

  Online published: 2025-06-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(42271239)

摘要

拐卖人口犯罪古来有之,且延续至今,给家庭和谐和社会稳定带来严重破坏。基于网络开放数据,论文采用数理统计和空间可视化等方法分析1970—2018年河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空演变特征,并进一步探究其地域类型和形成机制。研究发现:① 1970—2018年,河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的年际变化为“中间高、两端低”的倒“V”型,其与生育政策、打拐力度和观念转变等密切相关,而月份变化则呈明显的季节分异,春季和夏季是高发季节,这多受气候、农忙和假期等影响。② 河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的地域分异明显,其东北部的滑县、原阳县、兰考县和中部的二七区是犯罪的热点区域,而西北部、西部和南部的大部分区县是低发区域。③ 河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的地域类型以拐入男童主导型、拐入女童主导型和拐出男童主导型为主。分阶段看,拐入男童主导型数量呈下降趋势,拐出男童主导型呈上升趋势,而拐入女童主导型则呈小幅增长。④ 计划生育约束下,河南省重男轻女严重、经济发展和教育水平较差的地区,面临生育受限、无法生育或儿子离世时,出于“传宗接代”和“养老送终”的目的多拐入男童,形成拐入男童主导型;而重男轻女较轻的地区则期望“儿女双全”,或部分条件较差的男性希望通过买妻进入婚姻,面临生育受限、无法生育或婚姻失配时,出于照料养老和生育子女的目的多拐入女童,形成拐入女童主导型。在买方市场旺盛、犯罪动机充足和监管力度不足等作用下,犯罪市场化选择和便利的运输条件促进河南省拐出男童主导型的形成。

本文引用格式

李雨婷 , 李钢 , 温小婷 , 王娟 , 李佳 . 河南省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征、典型地域类型及其形成机制[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(6) : 1256 -1271 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.06.012

Abstract

Human trafficking has existed since ancient times and persists to this day, causing serious damage to family and social harmony and stability. Based on open-source data on the Internet, this study employed statistical analysis and spatial visualization methods to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of child trafficking in Henan Province from 1970 to 2018. Furthermore, it exploreed the regional types and formation mechanisms of these crimes. The results are as follows: 1) From 1970 to 2018, the annual variation of child trafficking in Henan Province showed an inverted-"V" shape, high in the middle and low at both ends. It was closely related to fertility policies, anti-trafficking enforcement efforts, and shifts in societal attitudes. In terms of monthly variation, a clear seasonal differentiation was observed, with spring and summer being the peak seasons, largely influenced by climate, agricultural activities, and holidays. 2) The spatial distribution of child trafficking in Henan Province showed significant regional disparities. Hotspot areas include Huaxian County, Yuanyang County, and Lankao County in the northeast, and Erqi District in the central region, while most counties in the northwest, west, and south are low-incidence areas. 3) The regional types of child trafficking in Henan Province were mainly dominated by trafficking in boys, trafficking in girls, and trafficking out boys. Through the study period, the number of boy-inflow-dominant areas has decreased, while the number of boy-outflow-dominant areas has shown an upward trend, and the number of girl-inflow-dominant areas has shown a slight increase. 4) Due to the influence of the family planning policy, regions in Henan Province with severe son preference, poor economic development, and lower educational levels tend to traffic in boys due to restricted fertility, inability to conceive, or the loss of a son, driven by the purposes of "continuing the family line" and "providing old-age support", thereby forming the boy-inflow-dominant type. In contrast, regions with less pronounced son preference often desire "having both a son and a daughter", or some economically disadvantaged men seek to enter marriage by purchasing wives. When faced with fertility restrictions, inability to conceive, or marital mismatches, these regions tend to traffic in girls for the purposes of caregiving in old age and childbearing, forming the girl-inflow-dominant type. The formation of the trafficking out boys is facilitated by a robust buyer's market, sufficient criminal motivation, inadequate regulatory enforcement, market-driven criminal choices, and convenient transportation conditions.

[1]
Malah Y F, Asongu S. An empirical analysis of human trafficking in an era of globalization[J]. Journal of Economic Studies, 2022, 49(7): 1269-1283.

[2]
于悦, 李钢, 金安楠, 等. 记忆要素与生活经历对被拐儿童寻亲的影响: 基于寻亲成功案例杨某某的实证[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(3): 47-57.

[Yu Yue, Li Gang, Jin Annan, et al. How memory elements and life experiences affect trafficked child seeking relatives: A case study based on Yang, a trafficked child who successfully found back her relatives. Human Geography, 2023, 38(3): 47-57. ]

[3]
王静, 李正, 王涛, 等. 中国拐卖儿童犯罪活动网络时空演变及形成机制: 基于寻亲成功案例的分析[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2024, 51(1): 64-75, 89.

[Wang Jing, Li Zheng, Wang Tao, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and formation mechanism of China's child abduction and trafficking network: Based on the analysis of success stories of family search. Journal of Zhejiang University (Science Edition), 2024, 51(1): 64-75, 89. ]

[4]
中国法律年鉴编辑部. 中国法律年鉴(1991—2023)[M]. 北京: 中国法律年鉴社, 1991—2023.

[Editorial Department of the China Law Yearbook . Law yearbook of China (1991-2023) . Beijing, China: China Law Yearbook Press, 1991—2023. ]

[5]
中华人民共和国中央人民政府. “团圆”行动这一年: 找回历年失踪被拐儿童10932名[EB/OL]. 2021-12-31 [2024-07-13]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/31/content_5665883.htm.

[The Central People's Government of The People's Republic of China. "Reunion" action of the year: Retrieve 10932 missing and abducted children from previous years. 2021-12-31 [2024-07-13]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-12/31/content_5665883.htm.]

[6]
李钢, 王会娟, 谭然, 等. 中国拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征与形成机制: 基于“成功案例”的管窥[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(12): 2505-2520.

DOI

[Li Gang, Wang Huijuan, Tan Ran, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and formation mechanism of child trafficking in China based on "successful cases". Geographical Research, 2017, 36(12): 2505-2520. ]

[7]
Bagheri A. Child organ trafficking: Global reality and inadequate international response[J]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2016, 19(2): 239-246.

[8]
徐嘉辉, 李钢, 徐锋, 等. 典型拐入地河北省拐卖犯罪的多维特征与形成机制: 聚焦犯罪人的实证分析[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(9): 1513-1522.

DOI

[Xu Jiahui, Li Gang, Xu Feng, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and formation mechanism of typical demand-front places in trafficking crime: An empirical analysis of offenders. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(9): 1513-1522. ]

DOI

[9]
Locke R A. Rescued, rehabilitated, returned: Institutional approaches to the rehabilitation of survivors of sex trafficking in India and Nepal[D]. Denver, USA: University of Denver, 2010.

[10]
Joffres C, Mills E, Joffres M, et al. Sexual slavery without borders: Trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation in India[J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2008, 7: 22. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-22.

PMID

[11]
Rai R, Rai A K. Nature of sex trafficking in India: A geographical perspective[J]. Children and Youth Services Review, 2021, 120: 105739. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105739.

[12]
Rudolph A, Schneider F. International human trafficking: Measuring clandestinity by the structural equation approach[J]. Social Inclusion, 2017, 5(2): 39-58.

[13]
Omorodion F I. Vulnerability of Nigerian secondary school to human sex trafficking in Nigeria[J]. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2009, 13(2): 33-48.

PMID

[14]
周俊俊, 李钢, 洪丹丹, 等. 新世纪以来中外儿童贩运研究热点与趋势: 基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(9): 1430-1442.

DOI

[Zhou Junjun, Li Gang, Hong Dandan, et al. The progress of child trafficking studies in China and abroad since 2000: A bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(9): 1430-1442. ]

DOI

[15]
Bell S R, Frank R W. The spatial dynamics of freedom of foreign movement and human trafficking[J]. Journal of Human Rights, 2022, 21(4): 365-382.

[16]
Sokat K Y. Understanding the role of transportation in combating human trafficking in California[J]. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2022, 15: 100673. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100673.

[17]
梁文杰. S省管控拐卖妇女儿童犯罪的研究[D]. 太原: 山西大学, 2020.

[Liang Wenjie. A study on the prevention and control of the crime of trafficking in women and children in S Province. Taiyuan, China: Shanxi University, China: , 2020. ]

[18]
詹佳欣, 彭勃来. 拐卖妇女儿童犯罪行为的成因及预防: 基于情境行动理论视角[J]. 河北公安警察职业学院学报, 2024, 24(1): 37-40.

[Zhan Jiaxin, Peng Bolai. On causes and prevention of trafficking in women and children: Based on the situational action theory. Journal of Hebei Vocational College of Public Security Police, 2024, 24(1): 37-40. ]

[19]
李璐. 被拐卖儿童获救后的收养问题研究[D]. 天津: 天津师范大学, 2016.

[Li Lu. Research on the problem of trafficking in children were rescued after the adoption. Tianjin, China: Tianjin Normal University, 2016. ]

[20]
罗翔. 论买卖人口犯罪的立法修正[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(3): 132-145.

[Luo Xiang. On the legislative amendment of crimes related to human trafficking. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 2022, 40(3): 132-145. ]

[21]
李钢, 于悦, 周俊俊, 等. 中国拐卖人口犯罪地理研究: 进展评述与治理启示[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(9): 1403-1418.

DOI

[Li Gang, Yu Yue, Zhou Junjun, et al. Geographical studies on human trafficking in China: Progress review and governance implications. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(9): 1403-1418. ]

DOI

[22]
刘玲, 李钢, 薛淑艳, 等. 四川省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空演变过程及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(5): 853-865.

DOI

[Liu Ling, Li Gang, Xue Shuyan, et al. Spatiotemporal change and influencing factors of child trafficking crime in Sichuan Province. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(5): 853-865. ]

DOI

[23]
夏海, 李钢, 周俊俊, 等. 西南地区拐卖犯罪时空特征与影响因素[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(9): 1534-1546.

DOI

[Xia Hai, Li Gang, Zhou Junjun, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns, influencing factors, and prevention and control measures of human trafficking in Southwest China. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(9): 1534-1546. ]

DOI

[24]
刘玲, 李钢, 王皎贝, 等. 川渝地区儿童非正常迁移的时空分异特征与影响因素分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2022, 28(6): 82-97.

[Liu Ling, Li Gang, Wang Jiaobei, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation and influencing factors of irregular migration of children in Sichuan-Chongqing region. Population and Development, 2022, 28(6): 82-97. ]

[25]
杨兰. 云南省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征及形成机制[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2020.

[Yang Lan. Spatio-temporal patterns and formation mechanism of child trafficking in Yunnan Province. Xi'an, China: Northwest University, 2020. ]

[26]
洪丹丹, 李钢, 徐嘉辉, 等. 安徽省跨国拐卖妇女犯罪的时空分异与形成机制[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(9): 1500-1512.

DOI

[Hong Dandan, Li Gang, Xu Jiahui, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and the formation mechanism of transnational women trafficking in Anhui Province. Tropical Geography, 2022, 42(9): 1500-1512. ]

DOI

[27]
李钢, 薛淑艳, 马雪瑶, 等. 中国儿童非正常迁移的时空分异及综合机制: 拐卖与抱养对比视角[J]. 人口研究, 2020, 44(3): 102-117.

[Li Gang, Xue Shuyan, Ma Xueyao, et al. Spatio-temporal differentiation and comprehensive mechanism of irregular migration of children in China: Comparison between child trafficking and informal adoption. Population Research, 2020, 44(3): 102-117. ]

[28]
Huang Z L, Weng W G. Analysis on geographical migration networks of child trafficking crime for illegal adoption from 2008 to 2017 in China[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 528: 121404. doi: 10.1016/J.PHYSA.2019.121404.

[29]
李钢, 王莺莺, 杨兰, 等. 拐入侧视域下我国拐卖儿童犯罪的时空格局[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(3): 95-102.

[Li Gang, Wang Yingying, Yang Lan, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern of child trafficking crime in China: A demand-front perspective. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47(3): 95-102. ]

[30]
戚伟, 赵美风, 刘盛和. 1982—2010年中国县市尺度流动人口核算及地域类型演化[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2131-2146.

DOI

[Qi Wei, Zhao Meifeng, Liu Shenghe.Spatial statistics and regional types evolution of China's county-level floating population during 1982-2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2131-2146. ]

[31]
Bossen L. Forty million missing girls: Land, population controls and sex imbalance in rural China[J]. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, 2005, 10(3): 1692. doi: laurel-bossen/1692/article.

[32]
李钢, 谭然, 王会娟, 等. 中国拐卖儿童犯罪时空格局演变及其影响因素[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(2): 26-34.

[Li Gang, Tan Ran, Wang Huijuan, et al. Spatio-temporal change and influencing factors of trafficking in children in China. Human Geography, 2018, 33(2): 26-34. ]

[33]
孙峰华, 毛爱华. 犯罪地理学的理论研究[J]. 人文地理, 2003, 18(5): 70-74.

[Sun Fenghua, Mao Aihua. Study on the theories of criminal geography. Human Geography, 2003, 18(5): 70-74. ]

[34]
王皎贝, 李钢, 周俊俊, 等. 湖北省拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征及其影响因素[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(1): 73-83.

[Wang Jiaobei, Li Gang, Zhou Junjun, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and influencing factors of child trafficking in Hubei Province. Human Geography, 2021, 36(1): 73-83. ]

[35]
河南省统计局. 河南统计年鉴(1987—2021)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1987—2021.

[Henan Statistics Department. Henan statistical yearbook (1987-2021). Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, 1987—2021.]

[36]
国务院人口普查办公室. 中国人口普查分县资料(1990、2000、2010)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1993, 2002, 2012

[The Population Census Office of The State Council. Tabulation on the population census of the people's republic of China by county 1990, 2000, 2010. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, 1993, 2002, 2012. ]

[37]
Zhou J J, Li G, Wang J B, et al. Patterns, evolution and determinants of child trafficking in Henan Province, China[J]. Children's Geographies, 2023, 22(2): 201-216.

[38]
柳林, 姜超, 周素红, 等. 城市入室盗窃犯罪的多尺度时空格局分析: 基于中国H市DP半岛的案例研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(12): 2451-2464.

DOI

[Liu Lin, Jiang Chao, Zhou Suhong, et al. Spatial-temporal patterns of burglary at multiple scales: The case of DP Peninsula in H City, China. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(12): 2451-2464. ]

[39]
龚为纲. 男孩偏好的区域差异与中国农村生育转变[J]. 中国人口科学, 2013(1): 66-76, 127.

[Gong Weigang. Regional disparity of son preference and fertility transition in rural China. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2013(1): 66-76, 127. ]

[40]
张原震. 统筹解决河南人口问题的对策研究[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 2007.

[Zhang Yuanzhen. Research on strategies for the integrated management of population issues in Henan Province. Beijing, China: Atomic Energy Press, 2007. ]

[41]
冯慧芬. 河南省人口出生性别比及其影响因素的研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2005.

[Feng Huifen. Study on the gender ratio at birth and its influencing factors in Henan . Zhengzhou, China: Zhengzhou University, 2005. ]

[42]
李伯华, 段纪宪. 对中国出生婴儿性别比的估计[J]. 人口与经济, 1986(4): 19-23.

[Li Bohua, Duan Jixian. Estimation of the gender ratio at birth in China. Population & Economics, 1986(4): 19-23. ]

[43]
河南省统计局. 河南省人口普查资料(1982、1990、2000)[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 1982, 1990, 2000.

[Henan Statistics Department. Tabulation on the population census of Henan Province (1982, 1990, 2000). Beijing, China: China Statistics Press,1982, 1990, 2000. ]

[44]
穆光宗, 陈俊杰. 中国农民生育需求的层次结构[J]. 人口研究, 1996, 20(2): 25-33.

[Mu Guangzong, Chen Junjie. Structure of fertility demands of the Chinese peasants. Population Research, 1996, 20(2): 25-33. ]

[45]
杨雪燕, 李树茁, 尚子娟. 儿子偏好还是儿女双全? 中国人生育性别偏好态度构成及其政策含义[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2011(6): 27-34.

[Yang Xueyan, Li Shuzhuo, Shang Zijuan. Son preference or preference for having son and daughter? Chinese attitudes towards reproduction and policy implications. Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, 2011(6): 27-34. ]

[46]
刘景琦. “过日子”视角下农民家庭的生育决策: 兼论农民“儿女双全”的生育决策是如何形成的[J]. 中共杭州市委党校学报, 2018(1): 68-77.

[Liu Jingqi. Fertility choices in rural China: Understanding the "one son, one daughter" ideal from the perspective of everyday life. Journal of the Party School of CPC Hangzhou, 2018(1): 68-77. ]

[47]
陈忱, 平玉丽. 中国人口性别偏好的变迁研究(2010—2021)[J]. 南方人口, 2024, 39(1): 46-60.

[Chen Chen, Ping Yuli. The transition of gender preference in China: 2010-2021 . South China Population, 2024, 39(1): 46-60. ]

[48]
龙冬平, 柳林, 周素红, 等. 地理学视角下犯罪者行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(7): 886-902.

DOI

[Long Dongping, Liu Lin, Zhou Suhong, et al. Research progress of criminal behavior from the perspective of geography. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(7): 886-902. ]

DOI

[49]
王锡章. 拐卖儿童犯罪的现状与遏制对策: 以F省为例的实证研究[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 31(5): 21-31.

[Wang Xizhang. Current status and prevention strategies for child trafficking crimes: An empirical study based on the case of F Province. Journal of People's Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 31(5): 21-31. ]

[50]
龚龙飞. 追踪“7·14”特大贩婴[J]. 中国新闻周刊, 2017-02-22.

[Gong Longfei. Investigating the "7·14" major infant trafficking incident. News China, 2017-02-22. ]

[51]
Xiong W R. Evidence of son preference in the child trafficking market for illegal adoption in China[J]. Journal of Human Trafficking, 2021, 9(2): 242-255.

文章导航

/