研究论文

1992—2022年中国林地细碎化的时空演变及驱动因素研究

  • 周一凡 ,
  • 薛彩霞 , * ,
  • 张金荣
展开
  • 西北农林科技大学,经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100
*薛彩霞(1980— ),女,陕西杨凌人,博士,教授,研究方向为资源经济与环境管理、企业管理、林业经济与政策。E-mail:

周一凡(1996— ),男,河北石家庄人,博士生,研究方向为资源经济与环境管理。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-07-26

  修回日期: 2024-11-14

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(71873102)

Spatiotemporal change and driving factors of forest landscape fragmentation in China from 1992 to 2022

  • ZHOU Yifan ,
  • XUE Caixia , * ,
  • ZHANG Jinrong
Expand
  • College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

Received date: 2024-07-26

  Revised date: 2024-11-14

  Online published: 2025-05-26

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(71873102)

摘要

探究中国林地细碎化的演变特征及影响因素对推动林业高质量发展、提升森林生态系统服务价值具有重要意义。论文基于1992—2022年土地覆被数据,利用多维景观格局指数构建了林地细碎化指标体系,并通过空间统计和机器学习模型分析了中国林地细碎化的时空演变趋势及驱动因素。研究发现:① 1992—2022年间中国林地细碎化指数以2004年为分界点,呈现“缓慢下降—波动中上升”的变化趋势。林地斑块的规模性、边缘密集性和形状规则性均呈现“下降—轻微上升”的趋势,空间离散性则表现出“低—高—低—高”的阶段性波动特征。② 在空间格局上,林地细碎化呈现“南高北低”的特征,东南低山丘陵林区的细碎化水平最高,热带和西南高山林区次之,西北高山和东北内蒙古林区的细碎化水平最低;在省级层面上,林地细碎化指数呈现以贵州省为中心向四周递减的分布格局,广西、广东、湖北、湖南、云南等省细碎化趋势也较为明显。③ 林地细碎化的驱动因素具有阶段性和多样性。在研究期内,森林抚育对林地细碎化具有减缓效应,而人口密度和气温上升对林地细碎化有加剧效应;1992—2001年气温和木材产量是影响林地细碎化的主要因素;2002—2011年耕地面积和集体林面积对林地细碎化影响的重要性上升;2012—2022年集体林面积是影响林地细碎化的首要因素。④ 林地细碎化驱动因素的交互效应分析表明,在降水量少、森林抚育强度低的地区过度造林会加剧林地细碎化,降水量较大、气温较高的地区林地细碎化趋势更强,而造林活动在一定程度上可以缓解耕地扩张对林地细碎化的负面影响。研究有助于深化对中国林地空间格局演变规律的理解,识别不同区域林地细碎化的驱动特征,为优化林地管理政策、推进集约化经营以及提高森林生态系统服务功能提供理论依据和决策支持。

本文引用格式

周一凡 , 薛彩霞 , 张金荣 . 1992—2022年中国林地细碎化的时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(5) : 941 -957 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.05.006

Abstract

Exploring the evolution characteristics and influencing factors of forest land fragmentation in China is of great significance for promoting high-quality development in the forestry sector and enhancing the ecosystem service value of forests. Based on land cover data from 1992 to 2022, this study constructed a comprehensive forestland fragmentation indicator system using multidimensional landscape pattern metrics and analyzed the spatial-temporal trends and drivers of forestland fragmentation across China with spatial statistics and machine learning models. The findings are as follows: 1) In the study period, China's forestland fragmentation indices showed a shift around 2004, with a trend of gradual decline-fluctuating increase. Forest patch size, edge density, and shape regularity exhibited a decline-slight increase trend, while spatial dispersal followed a cyclical low-high-low-high fluctuation. 2) Spatially, forestland fragmentation was high in the south and low in the north, with the highest levels in Southeast China's low mountains and hilly forests, followed by tropical and southwestern mountainous forests, and the lowest in the northwestern mountains and the Inner Mongolia and Northeast forest regions. At the provincial level, fragmentation values peaked in Guizhou, gradually declining outward, with significant fragmentation also observed in Guangxi, Guangdong, Hubei, Hunan, and Yunnan. 3) The drivers of forestland fragmentation varied across periods and regions. Throughout the study period, forest management practices generally mitigated fragmentation, while increasing population density and rising temperatures intensified it. From 1992 to 2001, temperature and timber production were the primary influences on fragmentation; from 2002 to 2011, cropland area and collective forest area became more impactful; and from 2012 to 2022, collective forest area became the leading factor. 4) An examination of the interaction effects among the drivers revealed that in areas with low precipitation and limited forest management intensity, excessive afforestation can exacerbate fragmentation, while fragmentation trends are stronger in regions with higher rainfall and temperatures. Afforestation helps mitigate the adverse impacts of cropland expansion on forestland fragmentation.This study deepens the understanding of forestland spatial pattern evolution in China, identifies regional drivers of fragmentation, and provides a theoretical basis and policy support for optimizing forestland management, promoting intensive use, and enhancing forest ecosystem services.

[1]
Xu H, Yue C, Zhang Y, et al. Forestation at the right time with the right species can generate persistent carbon benefits in China[J]. PNAS, 2023, 120(41): e2304988120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2304988120.

[2]
杜之利, 苏彤, 葛佳敏, 等. 碳中和背景下的森林碳汇及其空间溢出效应[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(12): 187-202.

[Du Zhili, Su Tong, Ge Jiamin, et al. Towards the carbon neutrality: The role of carbon sink and its spatial spillover effects. Economic Research Journal, 2021, 56(12): 187-202.]

[3]
孔凡斌, 程文杰, 徐彩瑶. 数字经济发展能否提高森林生态产品价值转化效率: 基于浙江省丽水市的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2023(5): 163-184.

[Kong Fanbin, Cheng Wenjie, Xu Caiyao. Does the development of digital economy improve the value transformation efficiency of forest ecological products: An empirical analysis in Lishui, Zhejiang Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023(5): 163-184.]

[4]
周向军, 童成帅. 论习近平生态文明思想的哲学基础及其逻辑[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(5): 14-24.

[Zhou Xiangjun, Tong Chengshuai. On the philosophical basis and logic of Xi Jinping's thought on ecological civilization. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2023(5): 14-24.]

[5]
龙贺兴, 时卫平, 刘金龙. 中国森林破碎化及其化解研究综述及展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(1): 69-74.

[Long Hexing, Shi Weiping, Liu Jinlong. Research review and outlook of forest fragmentation and its solutions in China. World Forestry Research, 2018, 31(1): 69-74.]

[6]
刘浩, 王雁斌, 刘璨. 林地细碎化、产权激励对林业生产要素配置的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(7): 1771-1783.

DOI

[Liu Hao, Wang Yanbin, Liu Can. The effect of forestland fragmentation and tenure incentive on the allocation of forest production input. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023, 38(7): 1771-1783.]

DOI

[7]
贺超, 崔权雪, 刘炳薪. 经营权权能对农户林地流入意愿的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(2): 309-319.

DOI

[He Chao, Cui Quanxue, Liu Bingxin. Impact of the powers and functions of management right on farmers' willingness to transfer in forestland. Resources Science, 2022, 44(2): 309-319.]

DOI

[8]
刘晶, 刘璨, 杨红强. 林地细碎化程度对农户营林积极性的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2029-2038.

DOI

[Liu Jing, Liu Can, Yang Hongqiang, et al. The impact of forestland fragmentation on farmers' investment incentives on forestland. Resources Science, 2018, 40(10): 2029-2038.]

DOI

[9]
孙国艳, 张升, 高建中. 林地细碎化程度对林农营林投入行为的影响[J]. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42(6): 599-606.

[Sun Guoyan, Zhang Sheng, Gao Jianzhong. The impact of the degree of forestlands fragmentation on the forest farmers' forests management inputs. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2022, 42(6): 599-606.]

[10]
Cai Y, Zhu P, Liu X, et al. Forest fragmentation trends and modes in China: Implications for conservation and restoration[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2024, 133: 104094. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2024.104094.

[11]
Fischer R, Taubert F, Müller M S, et al. Accelerated forest fragmentation leads to critical increase in tropical forest edge area[J]. Science Advances, 2021, 7: eabg7012. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg7012.

[12]
Batar A K, Shibata H, Watanabe T. A novel approach for forest fragmentation susceptibility mapping and assessment: A case study from the Indian Himalayan region[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13: 4090. doi: 10.3390/rs13204090.

[13]
Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity[J]. PNAS, 2011, 108(9): 3465-3472.

DOI PMID

[14]
Seto K C, Güneralp B, Hutyra L R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools[J]. PNAS, 2012, 109(40): 16083-16088.

DOI PMID

[15]
Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran E, et al. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2005, 15(1): 23-31.

[16]
Seidl R, Schelhaas M J, Rammer W, et al. Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2014, 4(9): 806-810.

PMID

[17]
Taubert F, Fischer R, Groeneveld J, et al. Global patterns of tropical forest fragmentation[J]. Nature, 2018, 554: 519-522.

[18]
Ma J, Li J, Wu W, et al. Global forest fragmentation change from 2000 to 2020[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 3752. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39221-x.

[19]
Esteban E J L, Castilho C V, Melgaço K L, et al. The other side of droughts: Wet extremes and topography as buffers of negative drought effects in an Amazonian forest[J]. New Phytologist, 2021, 229(4): 1995-2006.

DOI PMID

[20]
Hartmann H, Bastos A, Das A J, et al. Climate change risks to global forest health: Emergence of unexpected events of elevated tree mortality worldwide[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2022, 73: 673-702.

DOI PMID

[21]
Kubitza C, Krishna V V, Urban K, et al. Land property rights, agricultural intensification, and deforestation in Indonesia[J]. Ecological Economics, 2018, 147: 312-321.

[22]
Bologna M, Aquino G. Deforestation and world population sustainability: A quantitative analysis[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 7631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6.

[23]
Kotze D J, Lowe E C, MacIvor J S, et al. Urban forest invertebrates: How they shape and respond to the urban environment[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2022, 25(6): 1589-1609.

[24]
刘璨. 改革开放以来集体林权制度改革的分权演化博弈分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(5): 21-38.

[Liu Can. The decentralization of collective forestland tenure reform in China since the reform and opening-up from the perspective of evolutionary game theory. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(5): 21-38.]

[25]
刘晶, 金晓斌, 徐伟义, 等. 耕地细碎化对可持续集约利用的影响机理与治理框架[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(11): 2703-2720.

DOI

[Liu Jing, Jin Xiaobin, Xu Weiyi, et al. Influence mechanism of cultivated land fragmentation on sustainable intensification and its governance framework. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(11): 2703-2720.]

DOI

[26]
Yang J, Huang X. The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019[J]. Earth System Science Data Discussions, 2021, 13(8): 3907-3925.

[27]
Liu J J, Coomes D A, Gibson L, et al. Forest fragmentation in China and its effect on biodiversity[J]. Biological Reviews, 2019, 94(5): 1636-1657.

DOI

[28]
龚阳春, 周亮, 孙东琪, 等. 韧性视角下中国超大城市绿带破碎化与连通性测度分析: 以北京、西安及成都为例[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(7): 1195-1205.

DOI

[Gong Yangchun, Zhou Liang, Sun Dongqi, et al. Measurement and analysis of fragmentation and connectivity of green belts in Chinese megacities from a resilience perspective: A case study of Beijing, Xi'an and Chengdu. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2023, 43(7): 1195-1205.]

DOI

[29]
廖文梅, 张广来, 周孟祺. 林地细碎化对农户林业科技采纳行为的影响分析: 基于江西吉安的调查[J]. 江西社会科学, 2015, 35(3): 224-229.

[Liao Wenmei, Zhang Guanglai, Zhou Mengqi. Analysis of the impact of forestland fragmentation on farmers' forestry technology adoption behavior: Based on a survey in Ji'an, Jiangxi Province. Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2015, 35(3): 224-229.]

[30]
刘焱序, 徐光, 姜洪源, 等. 东北林区生态系统服务与健康协同分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 761-771.

[Liu Yanxu, Xu Guang, Jiang Hongyuan, et al. Synergy between ecosystem services and ecosystem health in the forest area of Northeast China. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(6): 761-771.]

[31]
孔凡斌, 廖文梅. 集体林地细碎化、农户投入与林产品产出关系分析: 基于中国9个省(区)2420户农户调查数据 [J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2014, 13(1): 64-73.

[Kong Fanbin, Liao Wenmei. Collective woodland fragmentation, farmers' input and output of forest product: A study based on survey data of 2420 households from 9 provinces (regions) in China. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2014, 13(1): 64-73.]

文章导航

/