1992—2022年中国林地细碎化的时空演变及驱动因素研究
周一凡(1996— ),男,河北石家庄人,博士生,研究方向为资源经济与环境管理。E-mail: zhouyifan@nwafu.edu.cn |
收稿日期: 2024-07-26
修回日期: 2024-11-14
网络出版日期: 2025-05-26
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目(71873102)
Spatiotemporal change and driving factors of forest landscape fragmentation in China from 1992 to 2022
Received date: 2024-07-26
Revised date: 2024-11-14
Online published: 2025-05-26
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(71873102)
探究中国林地细碎化的演变特征及影响因素对推动林业高质量发展、提升森林生态系统服务价值具有重要意义。论文基于1992—2022年土地覆被数据,利用多维景观格局指数构建了林地细碎化指标体系,并通过空间统计和机器学习模型分析了中国林地细碎化的时空演变趋势及驱动因素。研究发现:① 1992—2022年间中国林地细碎化指数以2004年为分界点,呈现“缓慢下降—波动中上升”的变化趋势。林地斑块的规模性、边缘密集性和形状规则性均呈现“下降—轻微上升”的趋势,空间离散性则表现出“低—高—低—高”的阶段性波动特征。② 在空间格局上,林地细碎化呈现“南高北低”的特征,东南低山丘陵林区的细碎化水平最高,热带和西南高山林区次之,西北高山和东北内蒙古林区的细碎化水平最低;在省级层面上,林地细碎化指数呈现以贵州省为中心向四周递减的分布格局,广西、广东、湖北、湖南、云南等省细碎化趋势也较为明显。③ 林地细碎化的驱动因素具有阶段性和多样性。在研究期内,森林抚育对林地细碎化具有减缓效应,而人口密度和气温上升对林地细碎化有加剧效应;1992—2001年气温和木材产量是影响林地细碎化的主要因素;2002—2011年耕地面积和集体林面积对林地细碎化影响的重要性上升;2012—2022年集体林面积是影响林地细碎化的首要因素。④ 林地细碎化驱动因素的交互效应分析表明,在降水量少、森林抚育强度低的地区过度造林会加剧林地细碎化,降水量较大、气温较高的地区林地细碎化趋势更强,而造林活动在一定程度上可以缓解耕地扩张对林地细碎化的负面影响。研究有助于深化对中国林地空间格局演变规律的理解,识别不同区域林地细碎化的驱动特征,为优化林地管理政策、推进集约化经营以及提高森林生态系统服务功能提供理论依据和决策支持。
周一凡 , 薛彩霞 , 张金荣 . 1992—2022年中国林地细碎化的时空演变及驱动因素研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(5) : 941 -957 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.05.006
Exploring the evolution characteristics and influencing factors of forest land fragmentation in China is of great significance for promoting high-quality development in the forestry sector and enhancing the ecosystem service value of forests. Based on land cover data from 1992 to 2022, this study constructed a comprehensive forestland fragmentation indicator system using multidimensional landscape pattern metrics and analyzed the spatial-temporal trends and drivers of forestland fragmentation across China with spatial statistics and machine learning models. The findings are as follows: 1) In the study period, China's forestland fragmentation indices showed a shift around 2004, with a trend of gradual decline-fluctuating increase. Forest patch size, edge density, and shape regularity exhibited a decline-slight increase trend, while spatial dispersal followed a cyclical low-high-low-high fluctuation. 2) Spatially, forestland fragmentation was high in the south and low in the north, with the highest levels in Southeast China's low mountains and hilly forests, followed by tropical and southwestern mountainous forests, and the lowest in the northwestern mountains and the Inner Mongolia and Northeast forest regions. At the provincial level, fragmentation values peaked in Guizhou, gradually declining outward, with significant fragmentation also observed in Guangxi, Guangdong, Hubei, Hunan, and Yunnan. 3) The drivers of forestland fragmentation varied across periods and regions. Throughout the study period, forest management practices generally mitigated fragmentation, while increasing population density and rising temperatures intensified it. From 1992 to 2001, temperature and timber production were the primary influences on fragmentation; from 2002 to 2011, cropland area and collective forest area became more impactful; and from 2012 to 2022, collective forest area became the leading factor. 4) An examination of the interaction effects among the drivers revealed that in areas with low precipitation and limited forest management intensity, excessive afforestation can exacerbate fragmentation, while fragmentation trends are stronger in regions with higher rainfall and temperatures. Afforestation helps mitigate the adverse impacts of cropland expansion on forestland fragmentation.This study deepens the understanding of forestland spatial pattern evolution in China, identifies regional drivers of fragmentation, and provides a theoretical basis and policy support for optimizing forestland management, promoting intensive use, and enhancing forest ecosystem services.
[1] |
|
[2] |
杜之利, 苏彤, 葛佳敏, 等. 碳中和背景下的森林碳汇及其空间溢出效应[J]. 经济研究, 2021, 56(12): 187-202.
[
|
[3] |
孔凡斌, 程文杰, 徐彩瑶. 数字经济发展能否提高森林生态产品价值转化效率: 基于浙江省丽水市的实证分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2023(5): 163-184.
[
|
[4] |
周向军, 童成帅. 论习近平生态文明思想的哲学基础及其逻辑[J]. 山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023(5): 14-24.
[
|
[5] |
龙贺兴, 时卫平, 刘金龙. 中国森林破碎化及其化解研究综述及展望[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(1): 69-74.
[
|
[6] |
刘浩, 王雁斌, 刘璨. 林地细碎化、产权激励对林业生产要素配置的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(7): 1771-1783.
[
|
[7] |
贺超, 崔权雪, 刘炳薪. 经营权权能对农户林地流入意愿的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(2): 309-319.
[
|
[8] |
刘晶, 刘璨, 杨红强. 林地细碎化程度对农户营林积极性的影响[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(10): 2029-2038.
[
|
[9] |
孙国艳, 张升, 高建中. 林地细碎化程度对林农营林投入行为的影响[J]. 林业经济问题, 2022, 42(6): 599-606.
[
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
刘璨. 改革开放以来集体林权制度改革的分权演化博弈分析[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(5): 21-38.
[
|
[25] |
刘晶, 金晓斌, 徐伟义, 等. 耕地细碎化对可持续集约利用的影响机理与治理框架[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(11): 2703-2720.
[
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
龚阳春, 周亮, 孙东琪, 等. 韧性视角下中国超大城市绿带破碎化与连通性测度分析: 以北京、西安及成都为例[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(7): 1195-1205.
[
|
[29] |
廖文梅, 张广来, 周孟祺. 林地细碎化对农户林业科技采纳行为的影响分析: 基于江西吉安的调查[J]. 江西社会科学, 2015, 35(3): 224-229.
[
|
[30] |
刘焱序, 徐光, 姜洪源, 等. 东北林区生态系统服务与健康协同分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 761-771.
[
|
[31] |
孔凡斌, 廖文梅. 集体林地细碎化、农户投入与林产品产出关系分析: 基于中国9个省(区)2420户农户调查数据 [J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2014, 13(1): 64-73.
[
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |