城市蓝绿空间疗愈任务景观形成机理与量表开发
张淑雅(1999— ),女,河北石家庄人,硕士生,研究方向为健康地理、疗愈景观。E-mail: 1431127636@qq.com |
收稿日期: 2024-08-09
修回日期: 2025-01-23
网络出版日期: 2025-05-26
基金资助
贵州省科技支撑计划项目(黔科合支撑[2022]一般254号)
国家自然科学基金项目(72462010)
国家自然科学基金项目(42461031)
贵州省高校哲学社会科学实验室试点建设资助(黔教哲[2023]04号)
贵州师范大学学术新苗基金项目(黔科合平台人才[2018]5769-21)
贵州省2024年度省级“金课”(2024JKHH0072)
Formation mechanism and scale development of therapeutic taskscapes for urban blue-green spaces
Received date: 2024-08-09
Revised date: 2025-01-23
Online published: 2025-05-26
Supported by
Guizhou Science and Technology Plan([2022]254)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(72462010)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42461031)
Guizhou Province Philosophy and Social Sciences Laboratory Pilot Construction Funding for Southwest Ethnic Cultural Heritage Digital Gene Extraction Technology and Innovative Application Laboratory([2023]04)
Academic New Talents Funds of Guizhou Normal University([2018]5769-21)
Guizhou Province's 2024 Provincial "Golden Course"(2024JKHH0072)
当前,城市蓝绿空间逐渐成为人们获得疗愈体验的重要场所,因而探讨疗愈景观如何赋能人的身心健康具有现实意义。论文以疗愈任务景观为切入点,通过文献回顾及深度访谈总结疗愈任务景观的概念、构成维度和测量题项,以贵阳市3处城市蓝绿空间为案例地,通过问卷调查开发检验了城市蓝绿空间疗愈任务景观量表。研究结果包括:① 构建了包含景观氛围、任务活动、情感契合和具身认知4个维度、22个测项的疗愈任务景观量表体系,量表信效度较好;② 疗愈任务景观与心流体验和恢复性体验构念存在显著正向相关,即量表的效标效度较好。研究突破了以往有关疗愈任务景观定性研究的边界,将主题延伸到疗愈任务景观的实证研究上,进一步厘清了之前相对模糊的城市蓝绿空间疗愈任务景观概念,为疗愈任务景观的量化研究提供了标准可靠的测量工具,能为城市蓝绿空间疗愈资源合理开发提供实践启示。
张淑雅 , 杨洋 , 杜芳娟 , 李雪莲 , 孔雨柔 . 城市蓝绿空间疗愈任务景观形成机理与量表开发[J]. 地理科学进展, 2025 , 44(5) : 1036 -1049 . DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2025.05.012
With the acceleration of urbanization, people's mental health is facing unprecedented threats. Urban blue-green spaces are increasingly emerging as crucial destinations for individuals to undergo healing processes. Consequently, investigating how therapeutic landscapes facilitate the enhancement of physical and mental well-being holds significant practical importance. At the present, research is gradually expanding to the interaction between humans and space or resources. However, the analysis of the relationship between urban blue-green spaces and human healing from the perspective of activity relationships is still relatively weak, lacking explanatory power and empirical exploration. This situation weakens the social influence and practical value of urban blue-green space research. The concept of therapeutic taskscapes emphasizes that participants interact with the environment through specific task activities, and empirical research on therapeutic taskscapes is needed to fill the theoretical gap mentioned above. This study focused on therapeutic taskscapes, summarizing its concept, dimensions, and measurement indicators through literature review and in-depth interviews. The empirical research was conducted in three urban blue-green spaces in Guiyang City, developing and validating a scale for assessing therapeutic taskscapes in urban blue-green spaces through questionnaire surveys. The research outcomes encompass: 1) Developing a scale system for therapeutic taskscapes, encompassing four dimensions—Atmosphere, Job crafting, Emotion engagement, and Embodied cognition—with 22 measurement indicators. The scale exhibits satisfactory reliability and validity. 2) Therapeutic taskscapes exhibit significant positive correlations with the constructs of flow experience and restorative experience, indicating that the scale has good criterion-related validity. This study transcended previous qualitative research on therapeutic taskscapes, broadening the scope to empirical studies. It clarified the previously ambiguous concept of urban blue-green space therapeutic taskscapes and offered a standardized and reliable measurement tool for their quantitative analysis, which provides practical insights for the healthy development of urban blue-green space healing resources.
[1] |
徐磊青. 恢复性环境、健康和绿色城市主义[J]. 南方建筑, 2016(3): 101-107.
[
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
Van den Berg A E,
|
[4] |
西蒙·贝尔. 公众健康和幸福感考量的城市蓝色空间: 城市景观研究新领域[J]. 陈奕言, 译. 风景园林, 2019, 26(9): 119-131.
[
|
[5] |
邱婴芝, 陈宏胜, 李志刚, 等. 基于邻里效应视角的城市居民心理健康影响因素研究: 以广州市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(2): 283-295.
[
|
[6] |
张琳, 杨珂. 基于村民与游客不同视角的传统村落景观感知研究: 以云南大理沙溪寺登村为例[J]. 园林, 2022, 39(7): 20-27.
[
|
[7] |
何琪潇, 谭少华. 社区公园中自然环境要素的恢复性潜能评价研究[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(8): 67-71.
[
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
周佩玲, 程杨,
[
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
赵晓龙, 王敏聪, 赵巍, 等. 公共健康和福祉视角下英国城市公园发展研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021, 36(1): 47-57.
[
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
宋菊芳, 李坤林, 张军, 等. 供需视角下城市蓝绿空间健康性服务的空间智慧研究: 以武汉市长江主轴为例[J]. 城市建筑, 2020, 17(28): 70-74.
[
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
庄春萍, 张建新. 地方认同: 环境心理学视角下的分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(9): 1387-1396.
[
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
孙国东. “生态天下主义”视角下的可持续发展[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 74(5): 122-134.
[
|
[33] |
徐芮韵, 龚道程, 孟鑫鑫, 等. 海南热带雨林空气负离子的时空变化规律、影响因素及环境健康评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2025, 45(2): 657-670.
[
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
黄涛, 刘晶岚, 张琼锐. 旅游地文化氛围对游客文明行为意向的影响: 以长城国家公园试点为例[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版), 2018, 45(4): 497-505.
[
|
[37] |
李珊, 张林, 李建军, 等. 建成环境影响公共健康的国内外比较研究及启示[J]. 热带地理, 2024, 44(4): 569-582.
[
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
蔡礼彬, 朱晓彤. 旅游者—环境契合度会影响环境责任行为吗? 以难忘的旅游体验、地方依恋为中介[J]. 旅游学刊, 2021, 36(7): 119-131.
[
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
詹颖. 交互性景观设计理论与方法初探[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2017.
[
|
[52] |
戴安荻, 李晓策, 臧亭, 等. 公园城市背景下口袋公园及其景观互动性研究进展与展望[J]. 园林, 2023, 40(7): 51-58.
[
|
[53] |
李涛, 蔡碧凡, 陶卓民. 城市群休闲农业旅游开发环境健康评价研究: 以中国沿海六大城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(11): 2125-2138.
[
|
[54] |
王积龙, 吴馨竹, 罗杰. 我国居民的媒体使用、具身认知与环保政策支持: 基于CGSS2021的实证研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 44(12): 50-58.
[
|
[55] |
粟路军, 黄福才. 旅游地社会责任、声誉、认同与旅游者忠诚关系[J]. 旅游学刊, 2012, 27(10): 53-64.
[
|
[56] |
窦璐. 感官体验对生态旅游景区游客焦虑感的作用机制研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 44(10): 41-54.
[
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
陈晓亮, 蔡晓梅, 朱竑. 基于“地方场域”视角的中国旅游研究反思[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(11): 2578-2594.
[
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
陈希镇. 现代统计分析方法的理论和应用[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2016: 221-223.
[
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
李灿, 辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2008(5): 541-544.
[
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
陈钢华, 赵丽君. 旅游领域量表开发研究进展: 基于国内外六本旅游学术刊物的分析[J]. 旅游导刊, 2017, 1(6): 66-85, 109.
[
|
[73] |
杨洋, 周星, 徐颖儿, 等. 身体现象学视角下徒步旅游者Flow体验的生成与意义[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(2): 120-129.
[
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
刘溧湛, 明庆忠, 史鹏飞. 山地旅游者—环境契合度对积极情绪的影响机制研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2024, 38(4): 199-208.
[
|
[76] |
刘佳, 张静, 申明哲, 等. 境之所至, 心之所向: 恢复性环境感知视角下海洋康养旅游产品的游客选择偏好研究[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, 2024-11-15 [2024-12-11]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.F.20241113.2224.004.html.
[
|
[77] |
周晓冰, 王伟, 蔡欢欢. 基于文本挖掘的山岳型景区旅游形象感知研究: 以云台山景区为例[J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 59(3): 37-43.
[
|
[78] |
苏强俊, 安健吉, 员学锋. 黄河中下游城市土地绿色利用效率时空格局及其影响因素分析[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(3): 58-67.
[
|
[79] |
杨春, 谭少华, 李梅梅, 等. 健康城市主动式规划干预途径研究[J]. 城市规划, 2022, 46(11): 61-76.
[
|
[80] |
王甫园, 许春晓, 王开泳. 旅游者与目的地契合的概念与测量[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(3): 441-453.
[
|
[81] |
王鹏宇, 蒲希希, 陈静, 等. 西南喀斯特地区景观格局演变及其驱动力分析: 以贵阳市花溪区为例[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 41(6): 29-41, 61.
[
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |