乡镇作为中国城镇体系的基本单元，是实现乡村振兴和城乡融合战略的关键载体，其高质量发展需对标乡村振兴愿景。论文基于“生态—人居—产业”权衡协同模型的理论框架，通过1 km×1 km格网、行政村和产业群三个分析尺度，探究乡镇多目标管理复杂交织的权衡协同关系，并以山东省枣庄市冯卯镇为例，探讨乡镇高质量发展中的挑战及实现路径。研究结论如下：① 从单维度来看，冯卯镇的生态、人居与产业三个维度存在显著差异，生态高值区主要集中在镇中部，人居环境较好的区域分布在西南部，而产业发展呈现结构单一、空间分布非均衡的特点。② 从多维跨尺度评估结果来看，生态、人居和产业重要性高与较高的区域分别占比为10.16%、10.73%和20.00%，重要性低与较低的区域分别占比为89.84%、89.27%和80.00%。在空间分布上存在相似性与变异性的双重特征，面对不同的治理对象和治理单元需求，亟须优化不同功能的协调布局。③ 基于多目标权衡协同分类表明，各尺度的分类存在显著差异。综合协调区在各尺度中占主导地位，产业优势区在格网和产业群尺度表现突出，生态优势区集中在行政村尺度，而人居优势区处于劣势。产业优势区扩展与生态保护之间的矛盾，有限的人居优势区分布导致生活质量提升困难，空间协调面临中心化与去中心化的双重挑战，跨尺度协同管理的复杂性增加。针对这些问题，需采取灵活精细且具有及时反馈机制的管理策略，以平衡生态保护、产业发展和人居环境，从而推动乡镇高质量发展。

Townships, as the fundamental units of China's urban system, are crucial carriers for implementing rural revitalization and urban-rural integration strategies, and their high-quality development needs to align with the vision of rural revitalization. Based on an analytical framework of ecology, human settlement, and industry synergy, this research explored the complex relationships of township multi-objective management through three analytical scales: grid, administrative village, and industrial cluster. Taking Fengmao Town in Zaozhuang City as a case, this study explored the challenges and implementation pathways for high-quality township development. The research findings are as follows: 1) From the single-dimensional perspective, Fengmao shows significant differences across ecological, human settlement, and industrial dimensions. High ecological value areas are mainly concentrated in the central part of the town, areas with better living environments are distributed in the southwest, while industrial development shows characteristics of structural simplicity and spatial imbalance. 2) The multi-dimensional assessment results indicate that areas of high and relatively high importance in ecology, human settlement, and industry account for 10.16%, 10.73%, and 20.00% respectively, while areas of low and relatively low importance account for 89.84%, 89.27%, and 80.00% respectively. Their spatial distribution exhibits dual characteristics of similarity and variability, urgently requiring optimization of coordinated layout for different functions to meet the needs of various governance objects and units. 3) Based on the multi-objective trade-off and synergy classification, significant differences exist across scales. Comprehensive coordination areas dominate at all scales, industrial advantage areas are prominent at the grid and industrial cluster scales, ecological advantage areas are concentrated at the administrative village scale, while human settlement advantage areas are at a disadvantage. The expansion of industrial advantage areas conflicts with ecological protection, while the limited distribution of human settlement areas hinders improvement of the quality of life. Spatial coordination grapples with centralization and decentralization, complicating cross-scale collaborative management. Addressing these challenges requires flexible, refined strategies with timely feedback mechanisms to balance ecological preservation, industrial growth, and human settlement optimization, fostering high-quality coordinated township development.