基于农户访谈和问卷调查,对新疆三工河流域生态移民前后农户生产生活和土地利用等问题进行调查,以 了解生态移民政策的成效,并探讨政策执行中存在的相关问题,对该区域及其他地区继续实施生态移民提供借 鉴。研究结果显示:① 2007 年前后搬迁农户的类型具有一定差异性,农户生态移民意愿与户主文化程度无关,与 户主年龄和家庭人口数有一定关系,家庭人口较少的农户趋于先搬迁,后迁农户则更趋于年轻化;② 搬迁后农户 主要经济来源有所变化,从事种植业与经商的农户数量变化不大,畜牧业农户略有减少,旅游业农户比重大幅下 降;③ 因耕地质量差异,农户耕种结构也有所变化,由种植玉米为主变为以小麦为主,搬迁后政府给予一定程度 的补助;④ 从事畜牧业农户数量有所下降,牲畜饲养方式也发生了变化,放养率大幅下降,圈养时间显著延长,草 场超载情况明显改善。总体而言,生态移民后三工河谷生态环境得到明显改善,但由于管理制度与政策落实不到 位,移民农户经济收入难以保障,其移民态度不够积极。政府应该做好相关稳民政策,提供扶持措施,以提高农户 移民的积极性。
Based on questionnaire and farm household interview survey, the article investigates about farmer's production and lives and land use change, discusses problems in the process of policy implementation and provides experience for continuing to implement eco-immigration policy. This investigation helps to understand the effects of eco-immigration policy. The results show that: (1) the will of farm households'eco-immigration is relative to the age of the householders and family's size, but not to the householders'educational attainments. (2) The main pocketbook of farm households has been changed after migration. The number of farmers engaged in stockbreeding reduces slightly, and the number of farmers engaged in tourism reduces greatly. (3) Because of the difference in cultivated land quality, cropping is changed from corn to wheat. (4) The way of livestock breeding has been changed. Scattering rate is declined greatly, captive period is expanded, and grass overloading is improved notably. On the whole, the environment in Sangong River Basin has been improved notably after eco-immigration, but management system and policies have not been carried out well, so the farm households'income level is not stable and immigrant attitude is not actively enough. In the future, the government should implement proper policies and provide support to promote migration positivity of farm households.
[1] 芦清水, 赵志平. 应对草场退化的生态移民政策及牧户响应分析: 基于黄河源区玛多县的牧户调查. 地理研究, 2009, 28(1): 143-153.
[2] 贾晓娟, 常庆瑞, 薛阿亮, 等. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区退耕还林生态效应评价. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(3):182-185.
[3] 任玉平, 兰吉勇. 草地生态置换理论在天山天池风景区实践与示范. 草食家畜, 2008, 139(2): 47-49.
[4] 洪睿, 李波, 崇洁, 等. 农户调查方法在退耕还林(草)工程研究中的应用: 以皇普川流域为例. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(4): 995-999.
[5] 朱丹, 张自和, 刘华. 黄土高原退耕还林还草生态经济可持续发展模式初探. 草业科学, 2007, 24(12): 3-8.
[6] 刘志超, 杜英, 徐丽萍, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕还林(草)工程的经济效应: 以安塞县为例. 生态学报, 2008,28(4): 1476-1482.
[7] 刘佳, 王继军. 黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域“退耕还林”工程实施后生态足迹变化分析. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(5):161-165.
[8] 曹世雄, 陈莉, 余新晓. 陕北农民对退耕还林的意愿评价. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(2): 426-434.
[9] 孟晓军, 刘志辉, 胡祚均. 新疆干旱区生态系统的恢复机制. 草业科学, 2008, 25(3): 1-5.
[10] 盖志毅, 宋维明, 陈建成. 草原牧区生态移民及其对策.北京林业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2005, 4(3): 55-58.
[11] 朱自安, 张小雷. 干旱区生态移民的临界值理论曲线与驱动力构成. 科学通报, 2006, 51(增刊Ⅰ): 162-167.
[12] 钟太洋, 黄贤金, 翟文侠.“退耕还林”政策驱动下的农户土地转用决策及其土地利用变化影响研究. 亚热带水土保持, 2006, 18(3): 8-11.
[13] 钟太洋, 黄贤金. 农户层面土地利用变化研究综述. 自然资源学报, 2007, 22(3): 341-352.
[14] Goujard B, Sakout A, Valeau V. Acoustic comfort onboard ships: An evaluation based on a questionnaire. AppliedAcoustics, 2005, 66: 1063-1073.
[15] 张文忠, 刘旺, 李业锦. 北京城市内部居住空阃分布与居民居住区位偏好. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 751-759.
[16] 马清裕, 张文尝. 北京市居住郊区化分布特征及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 121-130.
[17] 徐海量, 王小平, 叶茂, 等. 塔里木河下游生态输水效益的民意调查. 地理研究, 2007, 26(2): 246-254.
[18] 阜康市牧业局. 牧区经济发展及牧民定居工作调研报告[2010-01-06]. http://www.fk.gov.cn /10059/10059/00004/2010/92666.htm.