EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2010 , Vol. 29 >Issue 12: 1590 - 1596

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.12.017

旅游地理

旅游目的地意象三维耦合结构——基于江南水乡古镇旅游者的实证分析

展开
  • 1. 南京师范大学地理科学学院|南京210097;
    2. 无锡商业职业技术学院旅游系|无锡214153;
    3. 三江学院旅游学院|南京210012
周永博(1982-)|男|山东人|博士研究生|讲师|研究方向为旅游营销、旅游文化、旅游景观。 E-mail: zhouyongbo@live.cn

收稿日期: 2010-01-01

  修回日期: 2010-07-01

  网络出版日期: 2010-12-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(40901064)；教育部人文社科研究项目(10YJCZH246)；江苏省文化科研课题(09YB11)。

收起

Structure of the Tourism Destination Image

Expand
  • 1. School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China;
    2. Tourism Management Department, Institute of Commerce,Wuxi 214153, China;
    3. College of Tourism, Sanjiang University, Nanjing 210012, China

Received date: 2010-01-01

  Revised date: 2010-07-01

  Online published: 2010-12-25

Fold

摘要

旅游目的地意象(Tourism Destination Image, TDI)研究中对旅游目的地意象内涵的争论仍未休止。造成当前研究中旅游目的地意象概念混乱的根本原因在于：旅游目的地意象这一抽象概念的操作化(Operationalization)方法不尽合理。现有研究普遍采纳的一维连续体理论虽有助于对旅游目的地意象概念的理解，但在旅游目的地意象概念的操作化使用方面仍显不足。本文进一步研究了旅游目的地意象的基本属性，提出了一种基于文脉属性、地脉属性及功能属性的旅游目的地意象结构，这一耦合结构更加清晰地界定旅游目的地意象的属性维度，从而为旅游目的地意象概念应用提供更合理的操作化方法。

关键词： 连续体; 旅游目的地; 耦合结构; 意象

本文引用格式

周永博, 沙润, 余子萍 . 旅游目的地意象三维耦合结构——基于江南水乡古镇旅游者的实证分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010 , 29(12) : 1590 -1596 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.12.017

Abstract

Over the past, tourism destination image (TDI) studies generally considered that the functional-psychological continuum theory could be a reasonable explanation of TDI structure. However, due to the absence of further analysis of the psychological attributes, this continuum theory is also flawed in the measurement and evaluation of TDI. In this paper, the psychological properties of TDI were further analyzed in order to improve the operability of TDI’s abstract concept in actual research.
According to the findings from group interviews and content analysis, the researchers designed a questionnaire survey of 291 random tourists in Zhouzhuang and Wuzhen, and the topics covered included TDI experience level and demographic characteristics. Then, this paper used SPSS16.0 for exploratory factor analysis, and used LISREL8.70 for a confirmatory factor analysis, revealing that the fitting degree with three factors was much better than that with two factors. Empirical study concluded that: firstly, the original functional-psychological continuum should be further deconstructed to form a function-time-space coupling structure; secondly, the coupling structure contains three basic dimensions of time characteristics, space characteristics and functional characteristics; thirdly, each dimension contains either cognitive components or affective components of TDI and should be a part of cognitive-affective continuum of the TDI structure. In this paper, psychology, geography and marketing theory were applied to TDI research. In the 291 samples analyzed, this paper concluded that tourism destination image had a tourist-centered coupling structure, in particular, it contained three basic dimensions, and each dimension was a part of the cognitive-affective continuum. Therefore, the tourism destination image structure is the unity of the function-time-space coupling structure and the cognitive-affective continuum.

Key words： continuum; coupling structure; image; tourism destination

参考文献


[1] 李宏. 对旅游目的地形象概念的两种理解. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(6): 9.

[2] Hunt J D. Image: A factor in tourism. 1971//TelismanKosuta N. Tourism Destination Image. Tourism Marketing and Management Handbook, Cambridge: Prentice Hall, 1989: 557-561.

[3] Gallarza M G, Saura I G, Garc?′a H C. Destination image: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(1): 56-78.

[4] 毛端谦，刘春燕. 旅游目的地映象研究述评. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(8): 40-44

[5] 白凯. 旅游目的地意象定位研究述评: 基于心理学视角的分析. 旅游科学, 2009, 23(2): 9-15.

[6] Boulding K. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Chicago: University of Michigan Press, 1956: 1-6.

[7] Martineau P. The personality of the retail store. Journal of Retailing, 1958, 52(3): 37-46.

[8] Beerli A, Mart?′n J D. Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004,31(3): 657-681.

[9] O'Leary S, Deegan J. People, pace, place: Qualitative and quantitative images of Ireland as a tourism destination in France. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 2003, 9(3): 213-226.

[10] Buhalis D. Marketing the competitive destination of the future. Tourism Management, 2000, 21: 97-116.

[11] Chen P, Kerstetter D. International students’image of rural Pennsylvania as a travel destination. Journal of Travel Research, 1999, 37: 256-266.

[12] Chon K S. The role of destination image in tourism: A review and discussion. The Tourist Review, 1990, 45(2): 2-9.

[13] Chon K S. Tourism destination image modification process: Marketing implications. Tourism Management, 1991, 12: 68-72.

[14] Echtner C, Ritchie J. The meaning and measurement of destination image. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 1991, 2(2): 2-12.

[15] Baloglu S. Image variations of Turkey by familiarity index: informational and experiential dimensions. Tourism Management, 2001, 22(2): 127-133.

[16] Baloglu S, McCleary K W. A model of destination image formation. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26(4): 868-897.

[17] Gartner W C. Image formation process. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 1993, 2(2/3): 191-215.

[18] Govers R, Go F M, Kumar K. Virtual destination image: A new measurement approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007, 34(4): 977-997.

[19] Hsu C H C, K Wolfe, Kang S K. Image assessment for a destination with limited comparative advantages. Tourism Management, 2004, 25(1): 121-126.

[20] San Mart?′n H, I A Rodr?′guez del Bosque. Exploring the cognitive-affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(2): 263-277.

[21] Fr?′as D M, et al. Internet vs. travel agencies on pre-visit destination image formation: An information processing view. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(1): 163-179.

[22] Echtner C, Ritchie J. The measurement of destinations image: An empirical assessment. Journal of Travel Research, 1993, 31(4): 3-13.

[23] Bignon V N, Hammit W E, Norman W C. French perceptions and images of the United States as a destination country. Tourism Analysis, 1998, 3(3/4): 159-171.

[24] Grosspietsch M. Perceived and projected images of Rwanda: visitor and international tour operator perspectives. Tourism Management, 2006, 27(2): 225-234.

[25] Kim H, Richardson S L. Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003, 30(1): 216-237.

[26] Pike S, Ryan C. Destination positioning analysis through a comparison of cognitive, affective, and conative perceptions. Journal of Travel Research, 2004, 42(4): 333-342.

[27] Baloglu S , Brinberg D. Affective images of tourism destination. Journal of Travel Research, 1997, 30: 11-15.

[28] Hong S K, Kim J H, Jang H, et al. The roles of categorization, affective image and constraints on destination choice: An application of the NMNL model. Tourism Management, 2006, 27(5): 750-761.

[29] 李宏. 旅游目的地形象测量的内容与工具研究. 人文地理, 2007, 22(2): 48-52.

[30] D. 麦坎奈尔. 旅游者: 休闲阶层新论. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2008.

[31] Pike S. Destination image analysis-a review of 142 papers from 1973 to 2000. Tourism Management, 2002,23 (5): 541-549.

[32] Alcan? iz E B, Garc?′a I S, Castan? eda J A, et al. The functional-psychological continuum in the cognitive image of a destination: A confirmatory analysis. Tourism Management, 2009, 30(5): 715-723.

[33] Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 2006, 6(1): 97-113.

[34] Merleau-Ponty M. The Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routeledge and Kegan Paul,1962: 5-49.

[35] 彭继红. 论人的心理空间. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 1989(4): 40-45.

[36] 阿诺德.伯林特. 环境美学. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2006: 4-25.

[37] 王晋生. 柏格森绵延概念探讨. 山东大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2003(6): 108-111.

[38] 柏格森. 时间与自由意志. 吴士栋, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉