EN中文

地理科学进展 >

2011 , Vol. 30 >Issue 6: 643 - 651

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001

研究进展

ICT对居民时空行为影响研究进展

展开
  • 1. 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871;
    2. 香港浸会大学地理系,香港
申悦(1987-),女,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为行为地理、城市地理。E-mail: shenyue0519@163.com

收稿日期: 2010-09-01

  修回日期: 2010-12-01

  网络出版日期: 2011-06-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(41071102);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20090001110054)。

收起

Reviews on Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Human Spatial-temporal Behavior

Expand
  • 1. Department of Urban and Economic Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
    2. Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong

Received date: 2010-09-01

  Revised date: 2010-12-01

  Online published: 2011-06-25

Fold

摘要

以计算机为核心的ICT凭借网络飞速发展,渗透到社会生活的各个领域,对居民日常生活产生了巨大影响,引发了地理、交通、规划学者的关注。本文对国内外ICT 对居民时空行为的影响研究进行综述。从地理学的视角出发,分别从时空制约、破碎化、多任务以及ICT 活动的可视化与数据管理几个角度,论述了国外ICT 对居民时空利用的影响研究。从交通视角出发,分别从ICT与出行及实体活动、远程办公与通勤行为、网上购物与实体购物及购物出行、网上娱乐与休闲娱乐及休闲出行4 组关系方面,对国外研究进行综述。对目前国内ICT 研究的现状进行了论述,认为中国的ICT 研究尚处于起步阶段,地理学者的研究多集中于宏观尺度,基于微观个体行为视角的ICT研究极为不足。指出数据搜集是基于微观个体行为的ICT影响研究的关键,国内学者应对空间与行为视角的ICT研究给予足够的关注。

关键词： ICT; 活动—移动行为; 可视化; 破碎化; 时空制约; 网上活动

本文引用格式

申悦, 柴彦威, 王冬根 . ICT对居民时空行为影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011 , 30(6) : 643 -651 . DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.06.001

Abstract

With the rapid development of web services, information and communication technologies (ICT) which are based on computer science have infiltrated into people's life in all the fields and made a great impact on human daily life, which have attracted increased attention from geographic, transportation and planning researchers. This paper reviews the previous literatures and analyzes the findings regarding to the role of ICT in personal spatial-temporal behavior. Foreign scholars combine ICT with spatial-temporal concept which is developed by time geography researchers and discuss the impacts of ICT on human space-time activities which is sometimes called"new time geography". They introduce the core concept of space-time constraints and study the interaction between ICT and them. They also use the notion of fragmentation and multitasking which are original in the field of time use and can be distinctive perspective in ICT research. They use 3D GIS to visualize and help to understand physical activities, virtual activities and the process of their interaction, and carry out data management.

Key words： activity-travel behavior; fragmentation; ICT; online activity; space-time constraints; visualization

参考文献

[1] Cairncross F. The death of distance: A survey of telecommunications.The Economist, 1995, 336: 5-28.



[2] Cairncross F. The Death of Distance: How the CommunicationRevolution will Change our Lives. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press, 1997



[3] Hagerstrand T. What about people in regional science?Paper and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association,1970(24): 7-21.



[4] 柴彦威, 刘志林, 李峥嵘, 等. 中国城市的时空间结构.北京: 北京大学出版社, 2002.



[5] Schwanen T, Kwan M P. The Internet, mobile phone andspace-time constraints.Geoforum,2008, 39(3):1362-1377.



[6] Couclelis H. From sustainable transportation to sustainableaccessibility: Can we avoid a new tragedy of thecommons?//Janelle D G., Hodge D C. Information, Placeand Cyberspace. Berlin: Springer, 2000: 341-356.



[7] Couclelis H. Pizza over the Internet: E-commerce, thefragmentation of activity, and the tyranny of the region.Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2004, 16(1): 41-54.



[8] Lenz B, Nobis C. The changing allocation of time activitiesin space and time by the use of ICT-fragmentation asa new concept and empirical results. Transportation ResearchPart A, 2007, 41(2): 190-204.



[9] Hubers C, Schwanen T, Dijst M. ICT and temporal fragmentationof activities: An analytical framework and initialempirical findings. Tijdschrift voor Eonomische Ensociale Geografie, 2008, 99(5): 528-546.



[10] Kenyon S, Lyons G. Introducing multitasking to thestudy of travel and ICT: Examining its extent and assessingits potential importance. Transportation Research PartA, 2007, 41(2): 161-175.



[11] Szalai A. The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban andSuburban Populations in Twelve Countries. Hague: Mouton,1972.



[12] Gershuny J, Sullivan O. The sociological uses oftime-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review,1998, 14(1): 69-85.



[13] Bittman M, Wajcman J. The rush hours: the character ofleisure time and gender equity. Social Forces, 2000, 79(1): 165-189.



[14] Kitterod R H. Does the recording of parallel activities intime use diaries affect the way people report their mainactivities? Social Indicators Research, 2001, 56(2):145-178.



[15] Robinson J P, Kestnbaum M, Neustadtl A, et al. The internetand other uses of time//Wellman B, HaythornthwaiteC. The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell,2002: 244-262.



[16] Kenyon S. Internet use and time use: The importance ofmultitasking. Time & Society, 2008, 17(2/3): 283-318.



[17] 赵莹, 柴彦威, 陈洁, 等. 时空行为数据的GIS 分析方法.地理与地理信息科学, 2009, 25(5): 1-5.



[18] Janelle D G. Metropolitan expansion, telecommuting andtransportation//Hanson S. The Geography of Urban Transportation.New York: Guilford, 1995: 407-34.



[19] Harvey A, Macnab P A. Who's up? Global interpersonaltemporal accessibility//Janelle D G, Hodge D C. Information,Place and Cyberspace: Issues in Accessibility. Berlin:Springer, 2000: 147-170.



[20] Miller H J. Tober's first law and spatial analysis. Annalsof the Association of American Geographers, 2004, 94(2): 284-289.



[21] Kwan M P. Human extensibility and individual hybrid accessibilityin space-time: A multi- scale representation usingGIS//Janelle D G, Hodge D C. Information, Place andCyberspace: Issues in Accessibility. Berlin: Springer,2000: 241-256.



[22] Yu H B, Shaw S L. Exploring potential human activitiesin physical and virtual spaces: A spatio-temporal GIS approach.International Journal of Geographical InformationScience, 2007, 22(4): 409-430.



[23] Shaw S L, Yu H B. A GIS-based time-geographic approachof studying individual activities and interactionsin a hybrid physical-virtual space. Journal of TransportGeography, 2009, 17(2): 141-149.



[24] 张文佳, 柴彦威. 时空制约下的城市居民活动—移动系统: 活动分析法的理论和模型进展. 国际城市规划,2009, 24(4): 60-68.



[25] Mokhtarian P L. Telecommunications and travel: Thecase for complementarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2003, 6(2): 43-57.



[26] Kwan M P, Dijst M, Schwanen T. The interaction betweenICT and human activity-travel behavior. TransportationResearch Part A, 2007, 41(2): 121-124.



[27] Claisse G. Transport and telecommunications. ECMT round table 59. Paris: European Conference of Ministersof Transport, 1983.



[28] Mokhtarian P L, Salomon I. Emerging travel patterns: Dotelecommunications make a difference?//Mahmassani HS. Perpetual motion: Travel Behaviour Research Opportunitiesand Application Challenges. Oxford: PergamonPress/Elsevier, 2002.



[29] Niles J. Beyond telecommuting: A new paradigm for theeffect of telecommunications on travel. Report DOE/ER-0626. Washington DC: National Technical InformationService (NTIS), 1994.



[30] Salomon I. Telecommunications and travel: Substitutionor modified mobility? Journal of Transport Economicsand Policy, 1985, 19(3): 219-235.



[31] Salomon I. Telecommunications and travel relationships:A review. Transportation Research A, 1986, 20(3):223-238.



[32] Andreev P, Salomon I, Pliskin N. Review: State of teleactivities.Transportation Research Part C, 2010, 18(1):3-20.



[33] Mokhtarian P L. Defining telecommuting. TransportationResearch Record 1305, 1991: 273-281.



[34] Pendyala R M, Goulias K., Kitamura R. Impact of telecommutingon spatial and temporal patterns of householdtravel. Transportation,1991, 18(4): 383-409.



[35] Koenig B E, Henderson D K, Mokhtarian P L. The traveland emissions impacts of telecommuting for the State ofCalifornia Telecommuting Pilot Project. TransportationResearch C, 1996, 4(1): 13-32.



[36] Saxena S, Mokhtarian P L. The impact of telecommutingon the activity spaces of participants. Geographical Analysis,1997, 29(2): 124-144.



[37] Balepur P N, Varma K V, Mokhtarian P L. Transportationimpacts of center-based telecommuting: Interim findingsfrom the neighborhood telecenters project. Transportation,1998, 25(3): 287-306.



[38] Gould J, Golob T. Shopping without travel or travel withoutshopping? An investigation of electronic home shopping.Transport Reviews, 1997, 17(4): 355-376.



[39] Salomon I, Koppelman F S. A framework for studyingteleshopping versus store shopping. Transportation ResearchPart A, 1988, 22 (1): 247-255.



[40] Salomon I, Koppelman F S. Teleshopping or going shopping?An information acquisition perspective. Behaviourand Information Technology, 1992, 11(4): 189-198.



[41] Koivum?ki T, Svento R, Perttunen J, et al. Consumerchoice behavior and electronic shopping systems: A theoreticalnote. Netnomics, 2002, 4(2): 131-144.



[42] Koufaris M. Applying the technology acceptance modeland flow theory to online consumer behavior. InformationSystems Research, 2002, 13 (2): 205-223.



[43] Mokhtarian P L. A conceptual analysis of the transportationimpacts of B2C e-commerce. Transportation, 2004,31(3): 257-284.



[44] Zmud J, Bricka S, Casas J. Impact of shopping via interneton travel for shopping purposes. Washington DC:Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting,2001.



[45] Farag S, Krizek K J, Dijst M. E-shopping and its relationshipwith in-store shopping: Empirical evidence from theNetherlands and the USA. Transport Reviews, 2006, 26(1) : 43-61.



[46] Farag S, Schwanen T, Dijst M, et al. Shopping online and/or in store? A structural equation model of the relationshipsbetween e-shopping and in-store shopping. Transport.Research Part A, 2007, 41(2): 125-141.



[47] Lenz B. Will electronic commerce help to reduce trafficin agglomeration areas? Transportation Research Record2003, 1858: 39-46.



[48] Luley T, Bitzer W, Lenz B. Travel substitution by electronicCommerce? A simulation model for the Stuttgartregion (in German). Zeitschrift für Verkehrswissenschaft,2002, 73: 133-155.



[49] Handy S, Yantis T. The impacts of telecommunicationstechnologies on nonwork travel behavior. R. R. SWUTC/97/721927-1F, Southwest Region University TransportationCenter, The University of Texas at Austin, 1997.



[50] Senbil M, Kitamura R. Simultaneous relationships betweentelecommunications and activities. Lucerne: TenthInternational Conference on Travel Behaviour Research,2003.



[51] Mokhtarian P L, Salomon I, Handy S. A taxonomy of leisureactivities: The role of ICT. Research Report, Instituteof Transportation Studies. Davis: University of California,2004.



[52] Mokhtarian P L, Handy S, Salomon I. The impacts ofICT on leisure activities and travel: a conceptual exploration.Transportation, 2006, 33(3): 263-289.



[53] 乌家培. 网络经济及其对经济理论的影响.学术研究,2000(1): 5-11.



[54] 孙健, 林则夫, 王稳. 试论电子商务对企业管理的挑战.中国软科学, 2000(8): 106-109.



[55] 李卓钧, 陈蓉. 网络文化: 一种新型的媒介文化. 南京邮电学院学报, 2005, 7(1): 33-37.



[56] 王全弟, 赵丽梅. 论网络隐私权的法律保护. 复旦学报,2002(1): 107-112.



[57] 彭小川, 毛晓丹. BBS 群体特征的社会网络分析. 青年研究, 2004(4): 39-44.



[58] 李庆文. 消费者网上购物的风险感知实证研究. 经济与社会发展, 2007, 5(12): 55-57.



[59] 李双双, 陈毅文, 李江予. 消费者网上购物决策模型分析. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(2): 294-299.



[60] 蒋录全, 邹志仁, 刘荣增, 等.国外赛博地理学研究进展.世界地理研究, 2002, 11(3): 92-98.



[61] 甄峰. 信息时代新空间形态研究. 地理科学进展, 2004,23(3): 16-26.



[62] 甄峰, 顾朝林. 信息时代空间结构研究新进展. 地理研究, 2002, 21(2): 257-266.



[63] 甄峰, 朱传耿, 赵勇. 信息时代空间结构影响要素分析.地理与地理信息科学, 2004, 20(5): 98-103.



[64] 汪明峰, 宁越敏. 互联网与中国信息网络城市的崛起.地理学报, 2004, 59(3): 446-454.



[65] 汪明峰. 浮现中的网络城市的网络: 互联网对全球城市体系的影响. 城市规划, 2004, 28(8): 26-32.



[66] 刘卫东, 甄峰. 信息化对社会经济空间组织的影响研究. 地理学报, 2004, 59(增刊): 67-76.



[67] 汪明峰. 技术、产业和地方: 互联网的经济地理学. 人文地理, 2005, 20(5): 90-94.



[68] 汪明峰, 李健. 互联网、产业集群与全球生产网络新的信息和通信技术对产业空间组织的影响. 人文地理,2009, 24(2): 17-22.



[69] 真虹, 朱云仙. 信息技术发展对铁路旅客出行影响的调查及分析. 上海海运学院学报, 1999, 20(3): 11-15.



[70] 甄峰, 魏宗财, 杨山, 等. 信息技术对城市居民出行特征的影响: 以南京为例. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5):1307-1317.



[71] 刘卫东. 论我国互联网的发展及其潜在空间影响. 地理研究, 2002, 21(3): 347-356.



[72] 孙志群, 柴彦威, 王冬根. 深圳市民网上购物行为的空间特征. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16(6): 106-112.



[73] 柴彦威, 赵莹. 时间地理学研究最新进展. 地理科学,2009, 29(4): 593-600.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉