Humanistic geography and behavioral geography represent two pivotal schools of thought within human geography, each possessing distinct theoretical and methodological foundations. Despite their significant potential for mutual enrichment, scholarly discourse, particularly within some regional academic contexts, has not fully explored the inherent complementarity between these two paradigms. This article offers a comparative study of their leading proponents, Yi-Fu Tuan for Humanistic Geography and Torsten Hägerstrand for Behavioral Geography, whose seminal works have profoundly influenced geography and cognate disciplines. Employing a tripartite analytical framework that examines representative figures-school characteristics-methodological system, this study meticulously compared their academic trajectories, core theoretical propositions, and methodological approaches. It specifically endeavored to uncover the humanistic undercurrents within Hägerstrand's time geography and to scrutinize the behavioral dimensions underpinning Tuan's experiential perspective. This comparative lens allowed for a nuanced analysis of each school's characteristics, thereby elucidating their critical distinctions and, more importantly, their areas of convergence. Both schools emerged from a shared critique of the "rational economic man" assumption prevalent during the quantitative revolution, instead emphasizing the intricate interplay of human behavior, emotion, and lived experience of place. In doing so, they introduced vital human-centered dimensions to geographical inquiry. A multi-dimensional analysis—encompassing ontological foci, philosophical foundations, epistemological stances, research methodologies, and practical applications—reveals significant compatibilities and potential synergies. The concept of "home", a profound concern for both scholars, serves as a compelling unifying thread, highlighting their shared commitment to understanding the deep meanings of place and human dwelling. This dialogue between Humanistic and Behavioral Geography not only facilitates theoretical cross-fertilization but also promises to stimulate new theoretical innovations. The article concludes by advocating for continued and strengthened exchanges among diverse schools within geography. Such inter-paradigmatic dialogues are essential for identifying the unique methodological value of each school, exploring fruitful integrations of ideas, theories, and methods, and ultimately propelling the ongoing development of the geographical discipline.