中国城乡融合时空演化及驱动因素

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.04.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Urban-rural integration (URI) is a new idea to guide the urban-rural transformation in China, and exploring the spatio-temporal characteristics and driving mechanism of URI in China is an urgent need to overcome the dilemmas of insufficient rural development and unbalanced urban and rural development. Based on the process framework of "foundation-motivation-result" of URI, an evaluation indicator system was constructed. The improved entropy evaluation model and the kernel density estimation method were used to quantitatively measure the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of URI level of 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in China's mainland from 2000 to 2020. This study further used the Geodetector to explore the heterogeneous evolution of driving factors for URI level in different regions of China. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) From 2000 to 2020, the URI level in China decreased first and then increased, showing a √-shaped trend, and its spatial differences narrowed. 2) The URI level in China presented a spatial pattern of high in the east and low in the west, divided by the Hu Huanyong Line. The high-value centers showed prominent polarization characteristics and presented a zonal aggregation trend. The medium-value areas were clustered but weakened，and showed a spreading trend from the eastern to the central and western parts. 3) At the national scale, the core influencing factors of URI level were population mobility, economic development level, urban-rural income gap, and educational supports, potential factors were the optimization of industrial structure and the opening-up level, and threshold effect existed in investment benefit and government intervention. At the regional scale, the core driving forces of URI level in China showed obvious spatial heterogeneity, and in 2020 they were economic development level, investment benefit, and government intervention in the eastern region, investment benefit, opening-up level, and urban-rural income gap in the central region, are educational supports, government intervention, and the optimization of industrial structure in the western region. The interaction of driving factors had far more influence on URI level in China than individual factors, and the interaction between traffic accessibility and other socioeconomic factors had been significantly enhanced. Research on the spatio-temporal evolution and mechanism of URI in China can provide theoretical basis for rural revitalization and high-quality urban and rural development.

Key words: urban-rural integration, urban-rural relationship, rural revitalization, Geodetector, China

LUO Wanlu, WANG Wulin, LIN Zhen, ZHOU Weijian. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of urban-rural integration in China[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(4): 629-643.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Evaluation indicator system of URI level

目标	一级指标	二级指标	三级指标	指标计算	类型	效应
城乡融合水平	基础	人口融合	A₁人口城镇化率(%)	城镇人口/总人口	综合	+
			A₂非农与农业就业比(%)	第二、三产业从业人员数/第一产业从业人员数	对比	+
			A₃城乡就业反差系数(%)	城镇居民就业比重-农村居民就业比重	对比	-
		土地流动	A₄土地城镇化率(%)	建成区面积/土地总面积	综合	+
		土地流动	A₅城乡土地配置(%)	农作物播种面积/建成区面积	动力	+
		资金技术	A₆科技占财政支出比(%)	科技支出/财政总支出	综合	+
			A₇农业机械化水平(万kW/10³ hm²)	农业机械总动力/耕地灌溉面积	动力	+
			A₈农林水务占财政支出比(%)	农林水务支出/财政总支出	动力	+
		产业互动	A₉非农产值与农业产值比(%)	第二、三产业增加值/第一产业增加值	对比	+
		产业互动	A₁₀二元生产效率比(%)	(第一产业增加值/第一产业从业人员数)/(第二、三产业增加值/第二、三产业从业人员数)	对比	+
	动力	交通信息网	B₁₁交通网密度(km/km²)	(公路运营里程+铁路运营里程)/土地总面积	综合	+
		交通信息网	B₁₂互联网普及率(%)	互联网上网人数/总人口	综合	+
		环境承载力	B₁₃每千公顷化肥施用量(万t/10³ hm²)	化肥使用量/耕地灌溉面积	动力	-
			B₁₄建成区绿化覆盖率(%)	建成区绿化面积/建成区面积	综合	+
			B₁₅每万人拥有公共厕所数(个/万人)	公共厕所数/万人口数	综合	+
	结果	收入消费水平	C₁₆地均GDP(元/km²)	GDP/土地总面积	综合	+
			C₁₇城乡居民人均收入比(%)	城镇居民家庭人均可支配收入/农村居民家庭人均可支配收入	对比	-
			C₁₈城乡居民人均工资性收入比(%)	城镇居民人均工资性收入/农村居民人均工资性收入	对比	-
			C₁₉城乡居民家庭人均消费比(%)	城市家庭人均消费/农村家庭人均消费	对比	-
			C₂₀城乡居民人均社会消费品零售额(万元/人)	社会消费品零售额/总人口	综合	+
		公共服务水平	C₂₁城乡基础教育师生比之比(%)	(城镇基础教育教师数/学生数)/(农村基础教育教师数/学生数)	对比	-
			C₂₂城乡人均拥有公共图书馆藏量(册/人)	公共图书馆藏量/总人口	综合	+
			C₂₃城乡每千人拥有医院卫生院床位数之比(%)	城镇每千人拥有医院卫生院床位数/农村每千人拥有医院卫生院床位数	对比	-
			C₂₄城乡每千人拥有卫生技术人员数比(%)	城镇每千人拥有卫生技术人员数/农村每千人拥有卫生技术人员数	对比	-
			C₂₅城乡人均用电量比(%)	城镇人均用电量/农村人均用电量	对比	-
			C₂₆城乡居民养老保险覆盖率(%)	(城乡居民基本养老保险投保人数+城镇职工基本养老保险人数)/总人口	综合	+

Tab.1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.7

References 40

[1]	刘守英, 龙婷玉. 城乡融合理论: 阶段、特征与启示[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(3): 21-34.
	[ Liu Shouying, Long Ting-yu. The theory of urban-rural integration: Stages, characteristics and enlightenment. Economic Perspectives, 2022(3): 21-34. ]
[2]	刘彦随. 中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
	[ Liu Yansui. Research on the urban-rural integration and rural revitalization in the new era in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 637-650. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201804004
[3]	何仁伟. 城乡融合与乡村振兴: 理论探讨、机理阐释与实现路径[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811001
	[ He Renwei. Urban-rural integration and rural revitalization: Theory, mechanism and implementation. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11): 2127-2140. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201811001
[4]	刘春芳, 张志英. 从城乡一体化到城乡融合: 新型城乡关系的思考[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(10): 1624-1633. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.10.006
	[ Liu Chunfang, Zhang Zhiying. From town-country integration to urban-rural integration: New thinking on the relationship between urban and rural areas. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(10): 1624-1633. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.10.006
[5]	贺艳华, 谭惠敏, 康富美. 大都市边缘区城乡融合发展模式及效应评价: 以长沙市望城区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(5): 156-164.
	[ He Yanhua, Tan Huimin, Kang Fumei. Development model and effect evaluation of urban-rural integrated in metropolitan fringe areas: A case study of Wangcheng District, Changsha City. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(5): 156-164. ]
[6]	Yu A T W, Wu Y Z, Zheng B B, et al. Identifying risk factors of urban-rural conflict in urbanization: A case of China[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 44: 177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.007
[7]	Liu Y S, Long H L, Chen Y F, et al. Progress of research on urban-rural transformation and rural development in China in the past decade and future prospects[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(8): 1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1318-8
[8]	叶超, 陈明星. 国外城乡关系理论演变及其启示[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(1): 34-39.
	[ Ye Chao. Chen Mingxing. Review about the theoretical evolvement of rural-urban relations. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2008, 18(1): 34-39. ]
[9]	崔树强, 周国华, 戴柳燕, 等. 基于地理学视角的城乡融合发展研究进展与展望[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(2): 104-113.
	[ Cui Shuqiang, Zhou Guohua, Dai Liuyan, et al. Research progress and prospects of urban-rural integrated development based on geographical perspective. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(2): 104-113. ]
[10]	Seale E. Coping strategies of urban and rural welfare organisations and the regulation of the poor[J]. New Political Economy, 2013, 18(2): 141-170. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2012.664124
[11]	Boudet F, MacDonald G K, Robinson B E, et al. Rural-urban connectivity and agricultural land management across the Global South[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2020, 60: 101982. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101982. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101982
[12]	Zarifa D, Seward B, Milian R P. Location, location, location: Examining the rural-urban skills gap in Canada[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 72: 252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.032
[13]	Rickardsson J. The urban-rural divide in radical right populist support: The role of resident's characteristics, urbanization trends and public service supply[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2021, 67(1): 211-242. doi: 10.1007/s00168-021-01046-1
[14]	Chen K Q, Long H L, Liao L W, et al. Land use, transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China's evidence[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 92: 104465. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.10 4465. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.10 4465
[15]	张文斌, 张志斌, 董建红, 等. 迈向城乡共治: 改革开放以来城乡关系演变解读[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(5): 883-896. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.05.014
	[ Zhang Wenbin, Zhang Zhibin, Dong Jianhong, et al. Toward rural-urban co-governance: An interpretation of the change of rural-urban relationship since the reform and opening up. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(5): 883-896. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.05.014
[16]	刘先江. 马克思恩格斯城乡融合理论及其在中国的应用与发展[J]. 社会主义研究, 2013(6): 36-40.
	[ Liu Xianjiang. Marx and Engels' theory of urban-rural integration and its application and development in China. Socialism Studies, 2013(6): 36-40. ]
[17]	Liu Y S, Li Y H. Revitalize the world's countryside[J]. Nature, 2017, 548: 275-277. doi: 10.1038/548275a
[18]	龙花楼, 陈坤秋. 基于土地系统科学的土地利用转型与城乡融合发展[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
	[ Long Hualou, Chen Kunqiu. Urban-rural integrated development and land use transitions: A perspective of land system science. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 295-309. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102004
[19]	张海朋, 何仁伟, 李光勤, 等. 大都市区城乡融合系统耦合协调度时空演化及其影响因素: 以环首都地区为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(11): 56-67.
	[ Zhang Haipeng, He Renwei, Li Guangqjn, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of coupling coordination degree of urban-rural integration system in metropolitan area and its influencing factors: Taking the Capital Region as an example. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(11): 56-67. ]
[20]	马志飞, 宋伟轩, 王捷凯, 等. 长三角地区城乡融合发展水平、演化及影响因素[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(6): 1467-1480. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220607
	[ Ma Zhifei, Song Weixuan, Wang Jiekai, et al. The development level, evolution and influencing factor of urban-rural integration in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(6): 1467-1480. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20220607
[21]	张新林, 仇方道, 朱传耿. 时空交互视角下淮海经济区城乡融合发展水平演化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1867-1880. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200809
	[ Zhang Xinlin, Qiu Fangdao, Zhu Chuangeng. Evolution of urban-rural integration in Huaihai Economic Zone from the perspective of spatio-temporal interaction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1867-1880. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200809
[22]	周佳宁, 邹伟, 秦富仓. 等值化理念下中国城乡融合多维审视及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(8): 1836-1851. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190572
	[ Zhou Jianing, Zou Wei, Qin Fucang. Review of urban-rural multi-dimensional integration and influencing factors in China based on the concept of equivalence. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(8): 1836-1851. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190572
[23]	郭远智, 王介勇. 中国城乡转型的时空格局及其优化决策[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(11): 1799-1811. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.001
	[ Guo Yuanzhi, Wang Jieyong. Spatio-temporal patterns of urban-rural transformation and optimal decision-making in China. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(11): 1799-1811. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.11.001
[24]	赵德起, 陈娜. 中国城乡融合发展水平测度研究[J]. 经济问题探索, 2019(12): 1-28.
	[ Zhao Deqi, Chen Na. Research on measurement of urban-rural integration development level. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2019(12): 1-28. ]
[25]	Long H L, Tu S S, Ge D Z, et al. The allocation and management of critical resources in rural China under restructuring: Problems and prospects[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 47: 392-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.03.011
[26]	车冰清, 朱传耿, 仇方道. 淮海经济区城乡空间融合格局及形成机制[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200811
	[ Che Bingqing, Zhu Chuangeng, Qiu Fangdao. Regional differential characteristics of urban-rural space integration development in Huaihai Economic Zone and its formation mechanism. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1897-1907. ] doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200811
[27]	徐维祥, 郑金辉, 徐志雄, 等. 中国城乡一体化水平的时空特征与门槛效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(5): 1051-1063.
	[ Xu Weixiang, Zheng Jinhui, Xu Zhixiong, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and threshold effect of urban-rural integration in China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(5): 1051-1063. ]
[28]	王颖, 孙平军, 李诚固, 等. 2003年以来东北地区城乡协调发展的时空演化[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(7): 59-66.
	[ Wang Ying, Sun Pingjun, Li Chenggu, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution features of urban and rural harmonious in Northeast China since 2003. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(7): 59-66. ]
[29]	徐俊峰, 葛扬. “城乡共富”: “共同富裕”的内涵要义与实践遵循[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(6): 20-28.
	[ Xu Junfeng, Ge Yang. "Urban and rural common prosperity": The practice connotation of "common prosperity". Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2022, 22(6): 20-28. ]
[30]	李宁. 城乡融合发展驱动共同富裕的内在机理与实现路径[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2022, 21(4): 473-480.
	[ Li Ning. Internal mechanism and realization path of urban-rural integration development driving common prosperity. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2022, 21(4): 473-480. ]
[31]	刘合光. 以共同富裕为目标推进城乡融合发展的逻辑与路径[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(1): 149-157.
	[ Liu Heguang. The logic and path of promoting integrated development between rural and urban areas with the goal of common prosperity. Social Science Journal, 2022(1): 149-157. ]
[32]	Long H L, Liu Y S, Li X B, et al. Building new countryside in China: A geographical perspective[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(2): 457-470. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.06.006
[33]	胡书玲, 余斌, 王明杰. 乡村重构与转型: 西方经验及启示[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(12): 2833-2845. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181133
	[ Hu Shuling, Yu Bin, Wang Mingjie. Rural restructuring and transformation: Western experience and its enlightenment to China. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(12): 2833-2845. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181133
[34]	Yang Y Y, Bao W K, Wang Y S, et al. Measurement of urban-rural integration level and its spatial differentiation in China in the new century[J]. Habitat International, 2021, 117: 102420. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102420. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102420
[35]	蔡绍洪, 谷城, 张再杰. 西部新型城镇化与乡村振兴协调的时空特征及影响机制[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(12): 202-213.
	[ Cai Shaohong, Gu Cheng, Zhang Zaijie. Spatial and temporal characteristics and influence mechanism of coordination between new-type urbanization and rural revitalization in Western China. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(12): 202-213. ]
[36]	Nguyen C V, Van den Berg M, Lensink R. The impact of work and non-work migration on household welfare, poverty and inequality[J]. Economics of Transition, 2011, 19(4): 771-799. doi: 10.1111/ecot.2011.19.issue-4
[37]	赵华, 丁凡. 新时代城乡融合发展水平的测度研究: 基于新发展理念的视角[J]. 南大商学评论, 2019(4): 26-42.
	[ Zhao Hua, Ding Fan. A study on the measurement of urban-rural integration in the New Era: Based on the new development concept. Nanjing Business Review, 2019(4): 26-42. ]
[38]	黄禹铭. 东北三省城乡协调发展格局及影响因素[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(8): 1302-1311. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.012
	[ Huang Yuming. Spatial pattern of urban-rural coordination development in Northeast China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8): 1302-1311. ] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2019.08.012
[39]	杨丽, 孙之淳. 基于熵值法的西部新型城镇化发展水平测评[J]. 经济问题, 2015(3): 115-119.
	[ Yang Li, Sun Zhichun. Evaluation of the development level of new urbanization in Western China based on entropy method. On Economic Problems, 2015(3): 115-119. ]
[40]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	[ Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010

代码	探测因子	2000年		2005年		2010年		2015年		2020年
代码	探测因子	q	排序	q	排序	q	排序	q	排序	q	排序
X₁	地形起伏度	0.154^**	8	0.412^**	9	0.439^**	6	0.551^**	6	0.255^**	9
X₂	经济发展水平	0.494^**	3	0.548^**	4	0.588^**	4	0.485^**	7	0.480^**	4
X₃	产业结构优化	0.260^**	5	0.385^**	10	0.320^**	8	0.142^**	12	0.584^**	2
X₄	投资成效	0.116^**	10	0.514^**	5	0.398^**	7	0.176^**	11	0.151^**	12
X₅	对外开放水平	0.328^**	4	0.475^**	7	0.164^**	10	0.295^**	9	0.459^**	5
X₆	交通通达性	0.016^*	12	0.094^**	12	0.153^**	11	0.279^**	10	0.199^**	11
X₇	城乡收入差距	0.668^**	1	0.607^**	2	0.770^**	1	0.612^**	4	0.398^**	6
X₈	人口流动	0.505^**	2	0.745^**	1	0.700^**	2	0.762^**	2	0.590^**	1
X₉	信息互联	0.146^**	9	0.427^**	8	0.237^**	9	0.313^**	8	0.349^**	7
X₁₀	政府干预	0.077^**	11	0.477^**	6	0.458^**	5	0.679^**	3	0.248^**	10
X₁₁	农业保障	0.251^**	6	0.230^**	11	0.114^**	12	0.587^**	5	0.305^**	8
X₁₂	教育支持	0.192^**	7	0.594^**	3	0.628^**	3	0.789^**	1	0.561^**	3

代码	探测因子	东部		中部		西部
代码	探测因子	2000年	2020年	2000年	2020年	2000年	2020年
X₁	地形起伏度	0.033^*	0.052^*	0.306^**	0.382^**	0.202^**	0.131^**
X₂	经济发展水平	0.525^**	0.751^**	0.561^**	0.535^**	0.906^**	0.421^**
X₃	产业结构优化	0.221^**	0.428^**	0.796^**	0.607^**	0.674^**	0.775^**
X₄	投资成效	0.618^**	0.735^**	0.993^**	0.854^**	0.573^**	0.709^**
X₅	对外开放水平	0.665^**	0.406^**	0.443^**	0.785^**	0.817^**	0.400^**
X₆	交通通达性	0.496^**	0.444^**	0.577^**	0.573^**	0.432^**	0.367^**
X₇	城乡收入差距	0.568^**	0.585^**	0.921^**	0.722^**	0.920^**	0.099^**
X₈	人口流动	0.524^**	0.408^**	0.990^**	0.364^**	0.870^**	0.766^**
X₉	信息互联	0.478^**	0.453^**	0.833^**	0.287^**	0.665^**	0.384^**
X₁₀	政府干预	0.426^**	0.691^**	0.346^**	0.535^**	0.363^**	0.848^**
X₁₁	农业保障	0.540^*	0.090^*	0.678^**	0.349^**	0.873^**	0.654^**
X₁₂	教育支持	0.467^**	0.222^**	0.314^**	0.492^**	0.418^**	0.948^**

Spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of urban-rural integration in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 40

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	TANG Mingxiu, ZHU Xiufang, LIU Tingting, GUO Chunhua, ZHANG Shizhe, XU Kun. Future global socioeconomic risk changes to rainstorms based on the different return periods of CMIP6 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(3): 531-542.
[2]	PENG Baoyu, ZHANG Bo, SUN Wei. Evolution and prospect of financial inclusion research in China from the perspective of financial geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(2): 406-416.
[3]	ZHANG Pei, WANG Jiao'e, XIAO Fan. Spatial evolution and determinants of new infrastructure development in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(2): 209-220.
[4]	GONG Qinlin, ZOU Donghan, ZHOU Yi, ZHU Shengjun. Influence of high-level scenic spots on tourism development and its spatial effect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(8): 1364-1377.
[5]	WANG Rong, ZHAO Xueyan, LAN Haixia. Evaluation of the foundation of rural revitalization in out-of-poverty mountainous areas and its influencing factors： A case study of the Longnan mountainous areas [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(8): 1389-1402.
[6]	SUN Pingjun, ZHANG Keqiu, HE Tian. Shrinkage effect of urban-rural integration on shrinking cities in the three provinces of Northeast China and mechanism [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(7): 1213-1225.
[7]	LI Zhuowei, WANG Shijun, CHENG Lisha, SHI Xiang, GUAN Haoming, SHU Chang. Differences and relationship between population flow and transportation networks in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 985-998.
[8]	LI Bo, CAO Gai. Structural resilience change of China’s marine economic network based on the data of sea-related A-share listed companies [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 945-955.
[9]	CHEN Man, HUANG Baishi, LIU Ye. Effects of PM_2.5 concentration on mortality in China: A study based on city-level panel data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 1028-1040.
[10]	CHEN Haixi. Progress and review of research on China-Europe Railway Express in China from the geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(6): 1136-1144.
[11]	JIANG Sheng, HE Canfei. Effects of related variety and unrelated variety on China’s export market diversification [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(5): 770-784.
[12]	ZHANG Chunyan, ZI Minggui, ZHOU Meng, LUO Jing. Measurement of rural tourism integration and influencing factors: A case study of Qianshan City in the Dabie Mountains [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 595-608.
[13]	LIU Fengshan, GE Quansheng, TAO Fulu, CAI Yangxing, BU Jianchao, BAI Nini. Impacts of maize planting date and variety on canopy temperature on the North China Plain and surface biophysical mechanism [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 682-692.
[14]	LI Fengjiao, LIU Jiaming, JIANG Lili. Spatiotemporal change of strategic emerging industries in Northeast China and influencing factors [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 541-553.
[15]	SUN Bindong, WANG Yanyan, ZHANG Zhiqiang, LI Wan. The form and evolution of city size distribution and urban growth model in China: An analysis based on Zipf’s Law and Gibrat’s Law [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(3): 361-370.