生命周期视角下建成环境对居民迁居强度的影响——基于武汉市多源数据分析

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2023.01.006

Abstract

Abstract:

With the reform of China's urban housing system, relocation in cities is becoming increasingly more frequent. Analyzing the internal driving forces of residents of different age groups to move provides a basis for the improvement of urban living environment planning and construction. This study used multi-source data such as mobile phone signaling data in Wuhan City in 2019 and 2021 and took the life cycle perspective to identify the relocation frequency of residents of different age groups within the Fourth Ring Road of Wuhan City. This study proposed a model of relationship between the characteristics of built environment factors and the frequency of relocation, and explored the impact of various built environment factors in the residents' living circles on the relocation of residents of multiple ages. The study found that: 1) The moving in and out intensities of residents of different ages varied in different urban locations. Residents aged 19-39 moved more frequently than residents aged over 40. In general, the moving in and out intensity of the traffic areas within the inner ring road is high, and both are larger than those between the outer ring roads. 2) Relevant indicators in the dimensions of public service facilities, transportation convenience, and the living environment are important factors that caused residents' decision to move. Considering the differences in the relocation intensity of residents of different age groups and the characteristics of influencing factors, relevant planning decisions need to incorporate differentiated measures to improve the built environment, scientifically guide residents of different ages to relocate, and optimize urban population distribution.

Key words: residents' relocation intensity, life cycle, built environment, factor characteristics, Wuhan City

LIU Hua, ZHOU Tianyuan, ZHANG Guike, LIU Xuejun, DENG Shaohui. Influence of the built environment on residents’ migration intensity from the life cycle perspective：Based on multi-source data of Wuhan City[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(1): 66-78.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Tab.2

Fig.8

References 50

[1]	张峰瑞, 唐楷, 王宝强, 等. 武汉城市圈空间要素流动特征及治理对策[J]. 规划师, 2022, 38(6): 34-40.
	[Zhang Fengrui, Tang Kai, Wang Baoqiang, et al. Spatial elements flow characteristics and governance countermeasures of Wuhan metropolitan area. Planners, 2022, 38(6): 34-40. ]
[2]	邹静, 邓晓军. 居住社区选择、主观认知和流动人口的城市身份认同[J]. 人口与发展, 2021, 27(3): 2-17.
	[Zou Jing, Deng Xiaojun. Residential neighbourhood choices, subjective cognition and migrants' urban identity. Population and Development, 2021, 27(3): 2-17. ]
[3]	Li S M, Mao S Q. The spatial pattern of residential mobility in Guangzhou, China[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2019, 43(5): 963-982. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12625
[4]	周一星, 王榕勋, 李思名, 等. 北京千户新房迁居户问卷调查报告[J]. 规划师, 2000, 16(3): 86-89, 95.
	[Zhou Yi-xing, Wang Rongxun, Li Siming, et al. Report on the survey of a thousand relocated households in Beijing. Planners, 2000, 16(3): 86-89, 95. ]
[5]	崔璨, 穆学英, 常鹤影, 等. 上海市居民居住迁移的区位选择及其影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 422-432. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.006
	[Cui Can, Mu Xueying, Chang Heying, et al. Patterns and determinants of location choice in residential mobility: A case study of Shanghai. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 422-432. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.006
[6]	Kim S. Intra-regional residential movement of the elderly: Testing a suburban-to-urban migration hypothesis[J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2011, 46(1): 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s00168-009-0325-4
[7]	刘望保, 闫小培, 曹小曙. 广州城市内部居住迁移空间特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 人文地理, 2007, 22(4): 27-32.
	[Liu Wangbao, Yan Xiaopei, Cao Xiaoshu. The spatial characteristics and determinants of intra-urban residential mobility in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2007, 22(4): 27-32. ]
[8]	Gao Q L, Li Q Q, Yue Y, et al. Exploring changes in the spatial distribution of the low-to-moderate income group using transit smart card data[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2018, 72: 68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.02.006
[9]	廖邦固, 徐建刚, 梅安新. 1947—2007年上海中心城区居住空间分异变化: 基于居住用地类型视角[J]. 地理研究, 2012, 31(6): 1089-1102.
	[Liao Banggu, Xu Jiangang, Mei Anxin. Evolution of residential differentiation in central Shanghai City (1947-2007): A view of residential land-use types. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(6): 1089-1102. ]
[10]	孙群郎, 常丹丹. 美国内城街区的绅士化运动与城市空间的重构[J]. 历史研究, 2007(2): 135-148, 192.
	[Sun Qunlang, Chang Dandan. The gentrification movement in American inner city neighbourhoods and the spatial restructuring of urban areas. Historical Research, 2007(2): 135-148, 192. ]
[11]	夏永久, 朱喜钢. 城市绅士化对低收入原住民的负面影响: 以南京市为例[J]. 城市问题, 2014(5): 92-96.
	[Xia Yongjiu, Zhu Xigang. The negative impact of gentrification of cities on low-income aborigines: A case study of Nanjing. Urban Problems, 2014(5): 92-96. ]
[12]	Bolt G, van Kempen R, van Ham M. Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: Spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy[J]. Urban Studies, 2008, 45(7): 1359-1384. doi: 10.1177/0042098008090678
[13]	Lin S N, Huang Y X. Community environmental satisfaction: Its forms and impact on migrants' happiness in urban China[J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2018, 16: 236. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1061-1. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1061-1 pmid: 30563512
[14]	Stokols D, Shumaker S A. The psychological context of residential mobility and weil-being[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38(3): 149-171.
[15]	Rabe B, Taylor M. Residential mobility, quality of neighbourhood and life course events[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2010, 173(3): 531-555. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00626.x
[16]	苏玲玲, 周素红. 居住迁移背景下邻里环境对幸福感的影响: 不同生命历程阶段的差异[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(8): 1344-1354. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.008
	[Su Lingling, Zhou Suhong. Impacts of neighborhood environment on subjective well-being under the background of residential mobility: Difference in people of different life course stages. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(8): 1344-1354. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.008
[17]	Morris T, Manley D, Sabel C E. Residential mobility: Towards progress in mobility health research[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(1): 112-133. doi: 10.1177/0309132516649454 pmid: 30369706
[18]	Wang F L, Wang D G. Changes in residential satisfaction after home relocation: A longitudinal study in Beijing, China[J]. Urban Studies, 2020, 57(3): 583-601. doi: 10.1177/0042098019866378
[19]	Rossi P H. Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility[M]. New York, USA: Free Press, 1955.
[20]	Pfeiffer D. Has exurban growth enabled greater racial equity in neighborhood quality? Evidence from the Los Angeles region[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2012, 34(4): 347-371. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00596.x
[21]	Speare A. Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility[J]. Demography, 1974, 11(2): 173-188. doi: 10.2307/2060556 pmid: 21274806
[22]	Feijten P. Union dissolution, unemployment and moving out of homeownership[J]. European Sociological Review, 2005, 21(1): 59-71. doi: 10.1093/esr/jci004
[23]	Clark W A V. Life course events and residential change: Unpacking age effects on the probability of moving[J]. Journal of Population Research, 2013, 30(4): 319-334. doi: 10.1007/s12546-013-9116-y
[24]	杜德斌, 崔裴, 刘小玲. 论住宅需求、居住选址与居住分异[J]. 经济地理, 1996, 16(1): 82-90.
	[Du Debin, Cui Pei, Liu Xiaoling. Housing demand, residential location and residential differentiation. Economic Geography, 1996, 16(1): 82-90. ]
[25]	Seko M, Sumita K. Effects of government policies on residential mobility in Japan: Income tax deduction system and the Rental Act[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2007, 16(2): 167-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2007.06.001
[26]	Krysan M, Couper M P, Farley R, et al. Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2009, 115(2): 527-559. doi: 10.1086/599248 pmid: 20614764
[27]	Clark W A V. Residential mobility and the housing market[M]// Clapham D F, Clark W A V, Gibb K. The SAGE handbook of housing studies. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd., 2012: 66-83.
[28]	Clark W A V, Burt J E. The impact of workplace on residential relocation[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1980, 70(1): 59-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01297.x
[29]	周素红, 刘玉兰. 转型期广州城市居民居住与就业地区位选择的空间关系及其变迁[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(2): 191-201.
	[Zhou Suhong, Liu Yulan. The situation and transition of jobs-housing relocation in Guangzhou, China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(2): 191-201. ] doi: 10.11821/xb201002006
[30]	徐婉庭, 张希煜, 龙瀛. 基于手机信令等多源数据的城市居住空间选择行为初探: 以北京五环内小区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26(10): 48-56.
	[Xu Wanting, Zhang Xiyu, Long Ying. A preliminary study on housing choice behavior in urban residential space based on mobile phone data and multi-source data: Taking communities within fifth ring road of Beijing as an example. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26(10): 48-56. ]
[31]	吴志峰, 柴彦威, 党安荣, 等. 地理学碰上“大数据”: 热反应与冷思考[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(12): 2207-2221. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201512001
	[Wu Zhifeng, Chai Yanwei, Dang Anrong, et al. Geography interact with big data: Dialogue and reflection. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(12): 2207-2221. ] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201512001
[32]	王德, 朱查松, 谢栋灿. 上海市居民就业地迁移研究: 基于手机信令数据的分析[J]. 中国人口科学, 2016(1): 80-89, 127.
	[Wang De, Zhu Chasong, Xie Dongcan. Research on intra-city employment mobility in Shanghai: Based on cell phone data. Chinese Journal of Population Science, 2016(1): 80-89, 127. ]
[33]	王德, 李丹, 傅英姿. 基于手机信令数据的上海市不同住宅区居民就业空间研究[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1585-1602. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008003
	[Wang De, Li Dan, Fu Yingzi. Employment space of residential quarters in Shanghai: An exploration based on mobile signaling data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1585-1602. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb202008003
[34]	毛帅永, 焦利民, 许刚, 等. 基于多源数据的武汉市多中心空间结构识别[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(11): 1675-1683. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.11.003
	[Mao Shuaiyong, Jiao Limin, Xu Gang, et al. Identification of the polycentric spatial structure in Wuhan City based on multisource data. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(11): 1675-1683. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.11.003
[35]	焦利民, 李泽慧, 许刚, 等. 武汉市城市空间集聚要素的分布特征与模式[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1432-1443. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708008
	[Jiao Limin, Li Zehui, Xu Gang, et al. The characteristics and patterns of spatially aggregated elements in urban areas of Wuhan. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1432-1443. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708008
[36]	柴彦威, 张雪, 孙道胜. 基于时空间行为的城市生活圈规划研究: 以北京市为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2015(3): 61-69.
	[Chai Yanwei, Zhang Xue, Sun Daosheng. A study on life circle planning based on space time behavioural analysis: A case study of Beijing. Urban Planning Forum, 2015(3): 61-69. ]
[37]	黄慧明, 周岱霖, 王烨. 基于居住形态类型的社区生活圈空间组织模式研究: 以广州为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2021(2): 94-101.
	[Huang Huiming, Zhou Dailin, Wang Ye. An analysis of the spatial organization of community life-cycle under residential morphological categories. Urban Planning Forum, 2021(2): 94-101. ]
[38]	Hou L L, Liu Y G. Life circle construction in China under the idea of collaborative governance: A comparative study of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Review of Japan Series B, 2017, 90(1): 2-16. doi: 10.4157/geogrevjapanb.90.2
[39]	孙道胜, 柴彦威, 张艳. 社区生活圈的界定与测度: 以北京清河地区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(9): 1-9.
	[Sun Daosheng, Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan. The definition and measurement of community life circle: A case study of Qinghe area in Beijing. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(9): 1-9. ]
[40]	柴彦威, 李春江, 张艳. 社区生活圈的新时间地理学研究框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(12): 1961-1971. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.001
	[Chai Yanwei, Li Chunjiang, Zhang Yan. A new time-geography research framework of community life circle. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(12): 1961-1971. ] doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.12.001
[41]	金红. 2018年全国时间利用调查公报解读[J]. 中国统计, 2019(2): 7-9.
	[Jin Hong. Interpretation of 2018 national time use survey bulletin. China Statistics, 2019(2): 7-9. ]
[42]	Mulder C H. Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches[J]. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1996, 11(3): 209-232. doi: 10.1007/BF02496589
[43]	Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice: Toward a normative framework[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2002, 7(4): 265-284. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4
[44]	鲁斐栋, 谭少华. 建成环境对体力活动的影响研究: 进展与思考[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(2): 62-70.
	[Lu Feidong, Tan Shaohua. Built environment's influence on physical activity: Review and thought. Urban Planning International, 2015, 30(2): 62-70. ]
[45]	Rose A. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions[J]. Environmental Hazards, 2007, 7(4): 383-398. doi: 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001
[46]	Eraydin A. Attributes and characteristics of regional resilience: Defining and measuring the resilience of Turkish regions[J]. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(4): 600-614. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1034672
[47]	梁鑫源, 金晓斌, 孙瑞, 等. 多情景粮食安全底线约束下的中国耕地保护弹性空间[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(3): 697-713. doi: 10.11821/dlxb2022003014
	[Liang Xinyuan, Jin Xiaobin, Sun Rui, et al. China's resilience-space for cultivated land protection under the restraint of multi-scenario food security bottom line. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(3): 697-713. ] doi: 10.11821/dlxb2022003014
[48]	章梓雄, 董曾南. 粘性流体力学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1998: 1-13.
	[Zhang Zixiong, Dong Zengnan. Viscous fluid mechanics. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press. 1998: 1-13. ]
[49]	Mieszkowski P, Mills E S. The causes of metropolitan suburbanization[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993, 7(3): 135-147.
[50]	黄烈佳, 代琳, 宋彦. 住宅郊区化进程中居住福利及其差异测度: 以武汉市为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2018, 33(4): 123-129.
	[Huang Liejia, Dai Lin, Song Yan. Living welfare and its change measurement in the process of residential suburbanization: A case study of Wuhan City. Modern Urban Research, 2018, 33(4): 123-129. ]

维度	具体指标	计算方式	数据来源	平均值	标准差
公共服务设施	居家设施	生活圈内各类设施数量/生活圈面积(个/km²)	高德POI
	生活服务设施			95.81	103.34
	休闲设施
	公园			0.38	0.62
	运动场馆			2.15	2.61
	教育设施
	中学			0.52	0.86
	小学			0.71	1.04
	交通设施
	公交站			4.23	2.52
	地铁站			0.43	0.45
	医疗设施
	三甲医院			0.82	3.38
交通便利度	平均职住距离	研究单元内用户职住距离平均值(km)	联通手机信令	8.60	1.39
交通便利度	路网密度	生活圈内路网总长度/生活圈面积(km/km²)	OSM道路网	11.59	5.12
居住环境	建筑密度	居住地建筑占地面积/居住地面积	高德建筑轮廓高德建筑轮廓	0.14	0.11
	容积率	居住地建筑总面积/居住地面积	高德建筑轮廓	0.76	0.66
	平均NDVI	生活圈内NDVI平均值	欧航局遥感影像	0.25	0.08

变量	19~24岁		25~29岁		30~39岁		40~49岁		50~59岁		60岁及以上
变量	迁入	迁出	迁入	迁出	迁入	迁出	迁入	迁出	迁入	迁出	迁入	迁出
常数	35.074^**	12.614	9.926	7.921	3.017	6.710	0.187	-1.248	0.607	1.527	1.967	0.03
生活服务	0.204^***	0.124^***	0.093^***	0.080^***	0.027	0.035^*	0.039^***	0.018	0.017^**	0.010	0.012^***	0.009^**
公园	-8.171^***	-5.739^*	-5.120^***	-4.305^**	-1.710	-3.676^***	-0.287	0.920	0.041	0.268	-0.147	-0.302
运动场馆	3.779^***	2.793^***	2.673^***	3.026^***	2.142^***	2.104^***	0.933^***	0.530^*	0.653^***	0.322	0.302^***	0.070
中学	-8.872^***	-6.899^***	-5.039^***	-1.574^*	-0.801	0.341	2.552^***	2.766^***	-0.463	0.653	0.356	0.659^**
小学	-7.062^***	-7.169^***	-3.780^***	-2.784^*	-0.437	-0.889	-1.618^**	-0.215	0.107	0.697	0.170	0.547^*
公交站	1.213	-0.873	2.591^***	1.169^*	2.466^***	1.952^***	0.792^***	0.918^***	0.880^***	0.860^***	0.370^***	0.672^***
地铁站	-9.883^**	-12.597^**	-5.473^**	-7.107^**	-3.532	-5.155^**	-1.872	-3.385^**	-1.878^**	-2.164^**	-0.806	-1.967^***
三甲医院	-22.331	-25.347	-14.935	-27.285^*	-32.576^***	-33.661^***	-13.218^*	-14.074^*	-1.592	-7.513	0.685	-6.883^**
平均职住距离	-5.189^***	-3.931^***	-0.614	-1.726^*	0.451	-0.179	0.270	0.226	0.407^*	0.183	0.023	0.028
路网密度	0.652	1.793^***	-0.085	0.702^**	-0.073	0.244	0.142	0.301^**	-0.104	-0.018	-0.055	-0.063
建筑密度	-79.959^**	-75.230^*	-28.609	-59.206^**	-21.060	-29.710	-4.860	-20.415	8.353	0.087	-3.556	-2.477
容积率	34.706^***	38.806^***	20.262^***	37.023^***	22.071^***	28.934^***	12.024^***	20.046^***	6.210^***	11.629^***	4.604^***	6.724^***
平均NDVI	81.750^***	116.618^***	20.354	29.289^**	-9.116	-15.741	-2.159	-7.753	-8.065^**	-13.252^***	-6.149^**	-4.618^*
R²	0.455	0.325	0.449	0.538	0.502	0.564	0.561	0.574	0.524	0.552	0.508	0.556
调整R²	0.446	0.313	0.439	0.53	0.493	0.556	0.554	0.567	0.515	0.544	0.500	0.548

Influence of the built environment on residents’ migration intensity from the life cycle perspective：Based on multi-source data of Wuhan City

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 50

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WANG Chenggang, WANG Bo, WANG Qizhi, LEI Yaqin. Nonlinear associations between urban vitality and built environment factors and threshold effects: A case study of central Guangzhou City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(1): 79-88.
[2]	WEI Yue, YANG Dongfeng. Impact of neighborhood destination built environments on daily activity opportunities of the elderly population: Based on perception and participation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(1): 89-103.
[3]	NIU Qiang, ZHANG Hao, WU Lei, ZOU Wenjun. Urban-suburban heterogeneity of mobile office development in recent years: Based on mobile office app usage big data of China Unicom users in Wuhan in 2019 and 2021 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(8): 1428-1439.
[4]	GAO Zhe, QIU Jiayi, YU Jiayi, ZHU Yuanyuan. Influence of school districts on housing prices and the effect on socio-spatial restructuring: Taking Wuchang District of Wuhan City as a case [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 609-620.
[5]	WANG Zilin, LI Zhigang, CHENG Hanbei. The equity of urban park green space accessibility in large Chinese cities: A case study of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(4): 621-635.
[6]	LIU Jixiang, XIAO Longzhu, ZHOU Jiangping, GUO Yuanyuan, YANG Linchuan. Non-linear relationships between the built environment and walking to school: Applying extreme gradient boosting method [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(2): 251-263.
[7]	GAN Yilin, ZHU Yuanyuan, LUO Jing, GAO Zhe. Spatiotemporal variation and influencing factors of urban consumer service space in the consumption upgrading era: A case study of Wuhan food markets [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(1): 118-130.
[8]	WANG Anqi, PENG Jiandong, REN Peng, YANG Hong, DAI Qi. Impact of the built environment of rail transit stations on the travel behavior of persons with disabilities: Taking 189 rail transit stations in Wuhan City as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(7): 1127-1140.
[9]	XIE Bo, WANG Xiao, WU Lei. Exploring the effect of urban greenspace on residents’ mental health using a quasi-natural experiment: Taking Wuhan East Lake Greenway as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(7): 1141-1153.
[10]	XU Jingxue, CHEN Li, ZHANG Wenzhong. Does the built environment impact residents’ healthy lifestyle? Empirical analysis based on 22 communities in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 660-670.
[11]	ZHANG Xue, ZHOU Suhong, CHEN Fei. Impact of the built environment on residents’ car commuting based on trip chain [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 671-680.
[12]	LU Xinhai, CAI Dawei, ZENG Chen. Influencing factors of housing price differentiation based on the spatial quantile model: A case study of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 283-292.
[13]	ZHANG Peng, HU Shougeng, YANG Shengfu, CHENG Peikun. Modeling urban residential land price distribution using multi-source data and ensemble learning: A case of Wuhan City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(10): 1664-1677.
[14]	LIU Ye, XIAO Tong, LIU Yuqi, QIU Yingzhi, LIU Yi, LI Zhigang. Impacts of urban built environments on residents’ subjective well-being: An analysis based on 15-minute walking distance [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1270-1282.
[15]	ZHANG Chunxia, ZHOU Suhong, LIU Lin, XIAO Luzi. Relationship between the built environment and theft cases in star hotels in ZG central city [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 829-840.