基于POI数据的建设用地多功能混合利用空间分异研究

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.02.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Mixed land use is of great significance for improving the efficiency of use of regional land and territorial space. A framework for analyzing and optimizing multi-functional mixed use of construction land based on production-living-ecological space was developed in this study. Based on the point of interest (POI) data, entropy model, landscape pattern analysis, and association rules mining were applied to explore the spatial differentiation of mixed land use, taking Jinan City as the study area. The results show that the main types of mixed use of construction land in the city are production space, production-living space, and living space. The degree of mixed utilization of the core urban area is high, the production and living spaces are concertrated and connected, however, the ecological space is not embedded enough. The landscape fragmentation in the rural areas is obvious, and the mixed use led by production and living space is weak. The living-ecological space in the industrial parks is in a very marginal position in the network. Strengthening the internal planning of the parks or forming a complementary living and ecological space with the surrounding areas is the key to realize the sustainable development of the parks. The research of association rules shows that reasonable production space planning is an important way to guide and optimize the mixed land use. At the same time, strengthening the rational use of ecological space plays an important role in promoting mixed land use. Based on the POI data, this study explored the patterns of multi-functional combination of construction land from the perspective of behavioral spatial interaction theory, which enriches the existing land mixed use theory and methods and provides a theoretical basis for land use policy making and spatial pattern optimization.

Key words: construction land, mixed used, point of interest, grid-based evaluation, landscape ecology, Jinan City

LI Jianchun, QI Xiaoxing, YUAN Wenhua. Spatial differentiation of multi-functional mixed use of construction land based on points of interest[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(2): 239-250.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Tab.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.3

Fig.7

Tab.4

References 35

[1]	周国华, 彭佳捷. 空间冲突的演变特征及影响效应: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(6):717-723.
	[ Zhou Guohua, Peng Jiajie. The evolution characteristics and influence effect of spatial conflict: A case study of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration. Progress in Geography, 2012, 31(6):717-723. ]
[2]	Liberty R L. Abolishing exclusionary zoning: A natural policy alliance for environmentalists and affordable housing advocates[J]. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 2003, 30(3):581-603.
[3]	宋志军, 刘黎明. 1979—2009年间北京多种发展功能的异速生长: 以社会经济功能为主的分析[J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(1):53-60.
	[ Song Zhijun, Liu Liming. Allometric growth of Beijing development functions from 1979 to 2009: Based on the analysis of the social economy functions. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(1):53-60. ]
[4]	Kusumastuti D, Nicholson A. Mixed-use development in Christchurch, New Zealand: Do you want to live there?[J]. Urban Studies, 2018, 55(12):2682-2702. doi: 10.1177/0042098017725475
[5]	Hoppenbrouwer E, Louw E. Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands[J]. European Planning Studies, 2005, 13(7):967-983. doi: 10.1080/09654310500242048
[6]	Rowley A. Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking?[J]. Planning Practice & Research, 1996, 11(1):85-98.
[7]	Hirt S A. Rooting out mixed use: Revisiting the original rationales[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 50:134-147. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.009
[8]	Shao J Z, Hu Z Y, Li B H, et al. A sustainable urban design framework for the suburbanization of coastal southeaster Australia[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2019, 26(14):13931-13947. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04879-8
[9]	Rehman A, Asghar Z. Mixed use of land in big cities of Pakistan and its impact on reduction in commuting and congestion cost[J]. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 2016, 21(2):17-28.
[10]	党云晓, 董冠鹏, 余建辉, 等. 北京土地利用混合度对居民职住分离的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(6):919-930. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201506006
	[ Dang Yunxiao, Dong Guanpeng, Yu Jianhui, et al. Impact of land-use mixed degree on resident's home-work separation in Beijing. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(6):919-930. ]
[11]	Niemira P. The concept and drivers of mixed-use development: Insights from a cross organizational membership survey[J]. Research Review, 2007, 4(1):53-56.
[12]	Manaugh K, Kreider T. What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2013, 6(1):63-72. doi: 10.5198/jtlu.v6i1
[13]	Abdullahi S, Pradhan B, Mansor S, et al. GIS-based modeling for the spatial measurement and evaluation of mixed land use development for a compact city[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2015, 52(1):18-39.
[14]	张佰林, 钱家乘, 蔡为民. 论农村居民点用地混合利用的研究框架[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(12):2929-2941.
	[ Zhang Bailin, Qian Jiacheng, Cai Weimin. Discussion on mixed use of rural residential land research framework. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(12):2929-2941. ]
[15]	龙花楼, 李秀彬. 长江沿线样带农村宅基地转型[J]. 地理学报, 2005, 60(2):179-188.
	[ Long Hualou, Li Xiubin. Rural housing land transition in transect of the Yangtse River. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2005, 60(2):179-188. ]
[16]	Qu Y B, Jiang G H, Li Z T, et al. Understanding the multidimensional morphological characteristics of urban idle land: Stage, subject, and spatial heterogeneity[J]. Cities, 2020, 97:102492. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102492. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102492
[17]	陈彦光. 城市形态的分维估算与分形判定[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(5):529-539. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.05.001
	[ Chen Yanguang. Approaches to estimating fractal dimension and identifying fractals of urban form. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(5):529-539. ]
[18]	Escamilla J M, Cos C C, Cárdenas J S. Contesting Mexico City's alleged polycentric condition through a centrality-mixed land-use composite index[J]. Urban Studies, 2016, 53(11):2380-2396. doi: 10.1177/0042098015588685
[19]	曹根榕, 顾朝林, 张乔扬. 基于POI数据的中心城区“三生空间”识别及格局分析: 以上海市中心城区为例[J]. 城市规划学刊, 2019(2):44-53.
	[ Cao Genrong, Gu Chaolin, Zhang Qiaoyang. Recognition of "ecological space, living space, and production space" in the urban central area based on POI data: The case of Shanghai. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(2):44-53. ]
[20]	黄安, 许月卿, 卢龙辉, 等. “生产—生活—生态”空间识别与优化研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3):503-518. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.03.014
	[ Huang An, Xu Yueqing, Lu Longhui, et al. Research progress of the identification and optimization of production-living-ecological spaces. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3):503-518. ]
[21]	李广东, 方创琳. 城市生态—生产—生活空间功能定量识别与分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(1):49-65. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201601004
	[ Li Guangdong, Fang Chuanglin. Quantitative function identification and analysis of urban ecological-production-living spaces. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(1):49-65. ]
[22]	赵旭, 汤峰, 张蓬涛, 等. 基于CLUE-S模型的县域生产—生活—生态空间冲突动态模拟及特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(16):5897-5908.
	[ Zhao Xu, Tang Feng, Zhang Pengtao, et al. Dynamic simulation and characteristic analysis of county production-living-ecological spatial conflicts based on CLUE-S model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(16):5897-5908. ]
[23]	陈龙, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 基于主导功能的江苏省土地利用转型特征与驱动力[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2):155-162.
	[ Chen Long, Zhou Shenglu, Zhou Bingbing, et al. Characteristics and driving forces of regional land use transition based on the leading function classification: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(2):155-162. ]
[24]	朱媛媛, 余斌, 曾菊新, 等. 国家限制开发区“生产—生活—生态”空间的优化: 以湖北省五峰县为例[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(4):26-32.
	[ Zhu Yuanyuan, Yu Bin, Zeng Juxin, et al. Spatial optimization from three spaces of production, living and ecology in national restricted zones: A case study of Wufeng County in Hubei Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(4):26-32. ]
[25]	张磊, 陈晓琴, 董晓翠, 等. 三生互斥视角下工业用地空间布局优化: 以天津市为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2019, 35(3):112-119.
	[ Zhang Lei, Chen Xiaoqin, Dong Xiaocui, et al. Research on spatial layout optimization of industrial land based on mutual exclusion of ecological-production-living spaces in Tianjin. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2019, 35(3):112-119. ]
[26]	程婷, 赵荣, 梁勇. 国土“三生空间”分类及其功能评价[J]. 遥感信息, 2018, 33(2):114-121.
	[ Cheng Ting, Zhao Rong, Liang Yong. Production-living-ecological space classification and its functional evaluation. Remote Sensing Information, 2018, 33(2):114-121. ]
[27]	柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间—行为互动理论构建的基本思路[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201710012
	[ Chai Yanwei, Tan Yiming, Shen Yue, et al. Space-behavior interaction theory: Basic thinking of general construction. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(10):1959-1970. ]
[28]	刘沛林, 刘春腊, 邓运员, 等. 中国传统聚落景观区划及景观基因识别要素研究[J]. 地理学报, 2010, 65(12):1496-1506. doi: 10.11821/xb201012006
	[ Liu Peilin, Liu Chunla, Deng Yunyuan, et al. Landscape division of traditional settlement and effect elements of landscape gene in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010, 65(12):1496-1506. ]
[29]	Xu F L, Zhao S S, Dawson R W, et al. A triangle model for evaluating the sustainability status and trends of economic development[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2006, 195(3/4):327-337. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.11.023
[30]	Peng J, Liu Z C, Liu Y X, et al. Multifunctionality assessment of urban agriculture in Beijing City, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 537:343-351. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.136
[31]	赵越, 罗志军, 李雅婷, 等. 赣江上游流域景观生态风险的时空分异: 从生产—生活—生态空间的视角[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13):4676-4686.
	[ Zhao Yue, Luo Zhijun, Li Yating, et al. Study of the spatial-temporal variation of landscape ecological risk in the upper reaches of the Ganjiang River Basin based on the "production-living-ecological space". Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(13):4676-4686. ]
[32]	梁发超, 刘黎明. 景观格局的人类干扰强度定量分析与生态功能区优化初探: 以福建省闽清县为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(6):1138-1144.
	[ Liang Fachao, Liu Li-ming. Quantitative analysis of human disturbance intensity of landscape patterns and preliminary optimization of ecological function regions: A case of Minqing County in Fujian Province. Resources Science, 2011, 33(6):1138-1144. ]
[33]	柴彦威, 李春江. 城市生活圈规划: 从研究到实践[J]. 城市规划, 2019, 43(5):9-16, 60.
	[ Chai Yanwei, Li Chunjiang. Urban life cycle planning: from research to practice. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(5):9-16, 60. ]
[34]	龙花楼, 戈大专, 王介勇. 土地利用转型与乡村转型发展耦合研究进展及展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559.
	[ Long Hualou, Ge Dazhuan, Wang Jieyong. Progress and prospects of the coupling research on land use transitions and rural transformation development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12):2547-2559. ]
[35]	Rewati R, Uttam R. Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 88:104102. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102

类型	大类	中类	对应的POI分类	相关度α	范围度β	综合权重λ
生产空间 (P)	生产性服务业空间	公司企业P₁	电子商务、广告装修、商业贸易等	0.340	0.300	0.102
	生产性服务业空间	金融保险P₂	银行、保险公司、证券公司等	0.150	0.300	0.045
	农业空间	农林基地P₃	农林牧渔等生产基地	0.240	0.600	0.144
	工业空间	工厂园区P₄	工厂、工业村、产业园等	0.370	0.700	0.259
	工业空间	仓储物流P₅	仓库、仓储区、物流园等	0.110	0.300	0.033
	管理空间	政府机构P₆	政府机关、社会团体、行业协会等	0.060	0.300	0.018
	交通空间	交通设施P₇	公交车站、地铁站、停车场等	0.050	0.150	0.008
生活空间(L)	生活性服务业空间	餐饮服务L₁	餐馆、小吃店、饮品店等	0.100	0.100	0.010
		购物服务L₂	便利店、超市、商场等	0.110	0.150	0.017
		生活服务L₃	美容美发、摄影冲印、电信营业厅等	0.110	0.100	0.011
		医疗保健L₄	医院、医疗保健服务场所、动物医疗场所等	0.210	0.200	0.042
		科教文化L₅	学校、科研机构、培训机构等	0.120	0.300	0.036
		娱乐休闲L₆	运动场馆、娱乐场所、休闲场所等	0.070	0.100	0.007
		住宿服务L₇	酒店、旅馆、招待所等	0.140	0.100	0.014
	居住空间	居住区L₈	住宅、公寓、家属区等	0.550	0.500	0.275
生态空间(E)	绿地空间	公园绿地E₁	公园、绿地广场、植物园等	0.600	0.900	0.540
		风景名胜E₂	旅游景点、宗教寺庙、风景名胜等	0.390	0.800	0.312
		户外绿地E₃	露天足球场、高尔夫球场等	0.270	0.450	0.122

类型	大类	中类	数量/个	比例/%
生产空间	生产性服务业空间	公司企业	25767	18.70
	生产性服务业空间	金融保险	3580	2.60
	农业空间	农林基地	119	0.09
	工业空间	工业园区	1351	0.98
	工业空间	仓储物流	138	0.10
	管理空间	政府机构	12063	8.76
	交通空间	交通设施	10760	7.81
生活空间	生活性服务业空间	餐饮服务	27221	19.76
		购物服务	2531	1.84
		生活服务	15238	11.06
		医疗保健	11474	8.33
		科教文化	13210	9.59
		娱乐休闲	3055	2.22
		住宿服务	5558	4.03
	居住空间	居住区	4624	3.36
生态空间	绿地空间	公园绿地	277	0.20
		风景名胜	495	0.36
		户外绿地	299	0.22

景观指数	区域范围	生产空间	生活空间	生态空间	生产—生活	生活—生态	生产—生态	复合利用
斑块面积 (CA)/hm²	城市	29358	5629	779	44687	606	2685	2252
	乡村	95090	32822	2944	47631	346	2425	1126
	产业园区	14722	3464	173	6668	260	346	346
	全市	139170	41916	3897	98987	1212	5456	3724
斑块数量 (NP)/个	城市	97	50	5	68	7	28	20
	乡村	548	305	33	347	4	25	13
	产业园区	115	36	2	62	3	4	4
	全市	760	391	40	477	14	57	37
平均斑块面积(MPS) /(hm²/个)	城市	302.66	112.58	155.88	657.16	86.60	95.88	112.58
	乡村	173.52	107.61	89.23	137.27	86.60	96.99	86.60
	产业园区	128.02	96.23	86.60	107.55	86.60	86.60	86.60
	全市	183.12	107.20	97.43	207.52	86.60	95.72	100.65
平均斑块形状指数 (MSI)	城市	1.30	1.10	1.09	1.36	1.05	1.07	1.10
	乡村	1.19	1.09	1.06	1.14	1.05	1.07	1.05
	产业园区	1.12	1.07	1.05	1.09	1.05	1.05	1.05
	全市	1.19	1.09	1.06	1.17	1.05	1.07	1.07

序号	后项	前项	支持度/%	置信度/%
1	生产—生活(PL)	复合利用(PLE)	6.71	93.42
2	生产—生活(PL)	生活—生态(LE)	2.15	86.30
3	生产—生活(PL)	生产—生态(PE)	9.15	80.06
4	生产空间(P)	生产—生活(PL)	71.11	78.98
5	生产空间(P)	生产—生态(PE)	9.15	75.24
6	生产空间(P)	生活空间(L)	79.34	74.57
7	生产空间(P)	生态空间(E)	4.21	72.73
8	生产—生活(PL)	生产空间(P)	81.88	68.60
9	生产空间(P)	复合利用(PLE)	6.71	66.23
10	生产—生活(PL)	生活空间(L)	79.21	66.04
11	生产空间(P)	生活—生态(LE)	2.15	64.38
12	生产—生活(PL)	生态空间(E)	4.21	60.84
13	生活空间(L)	生态空间(E)	4.21	59.86
14	生活空间(L)	生产—生活(PL)	61.11	56.53

Spatial differentiation of multi-functional mixed use of construction land based on points of interest

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 35

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	XU Kai, FANG Yangang, ZHOU Yuhang. Spatial differentiation of rural functions from the perspective ofproduction-living-ecological functions at the township level:A case study of Shandong Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(4): 644-656.
[2]	GUO Yuanzhi, LI Xuhong. Spatiotemporal changes of urban construction land structure and driving mechanism in the Yellow River Basin based on random forest model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 42(1): 12-26.
[3]	WANG Cheng, JI Mengzhu, DAI Ruilian, CHEN Jing, SHEN Yue. Coupling and coordination pattern and type division of village and town construction land expansion and ecological environment effect: A case study of Rongchang District, Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 41(3): 409-422.
[4]	XU Huixiao, LIU Yanjun. Spatiotemporal differentiation and influencing mechanism of construction land use efficiency of shrinking cities： A case study of Yichun City of Heilongjiang Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(6): 937-947.
[5]	XU Xiaoren, WANG Liang, XU Yong, DUAN Jian. Evaluation of reserve available land resources based on three types of territorial space: A case study of Jiexiu City in Shanxi Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 272-282.
[6]	WANG Chenxu, LIU Yanxu, YU Chaoyue, LIU Xiaoqian. Research progress on the arrangement of territorial ecological restoration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(11): 1925-1941.
[7]	YANG Ren, ZHANG Jing, XU Qian, LUO Xiuli. Capitalization effect of rural land reclamation from the perspective of rural-urban integration: A case study of Guangdong Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 114-123.
[8]	HU Xu, NIE Yong, XU Xia, JIANG Sheng, ZHANG Yili. Monitoring land-use change in Hetian Tarim Basin, China using satellite remote sensing observation between 1990 and 2016 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 577-590.
[9]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[10]	YANG Zhiwei, CHEN Yingbiao, WU Zhifeng, QIAN Qinglan, HUANG Qingyao. Spatial variability of urban thermal environment based on natural blocks [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1944-1956.
[11]	Zhibang XU, Liang ZHOU, Ting LAN, Zhonghui WANG, Li SUN, Rongwei WU. Spatial optimization of mega-city fire station distribution based on Point of Interest data: A case study within the 5th Ring Road in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 535-546.
[12]	Kangmin WU, Hongou ZHANG, Yang WANG, Qitao WU, Yuyao YE. Identify of the multiple types of commercial center in Guangzhou and its spatial pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(8): 963-974.
[13]	Zhonglei YU, Wenxin ZHANG, Jinshe LIANG, Li ZHUANG. Progress in evaluating suitability of spatial development and construction land [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(9): 1107-1122.
[14]	ZHANG Leqin, CHEN Suping, WANG Wenqin, XU Xinwang. Research on the Driving Factor Measurement of the Construction Land Expansion in Chizhou City, Anhui Province: Based on the STIRPAT Model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(9): 1235-1242.
[15]	CHEN Yufu, XIE Qingheng, LIU Yansui. Construction Land Area Changes and Their Influencing Factors of China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(8): 1050-1054.