PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 784-797.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.05.006
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Caihong1,2(), YUAN Qianying1, WEN Qi1,2,*(
), LI Xuemei3
Received:
2020-11-16
Revised:
2020-12-17
Online:
2021-05-28
Published:
2021-07-28
Contact:
WEN Qi
E-mail:mchyanni@163.com;wenq98@163.com
Supported by:
MA Caihong, YUAN Qianying, WEN Qi, LI Xuemei. Impact of agriculture industrial development on farmers’ livelihood:Based on the research of four migrant villages in Hongsibu District, Ningxia[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(5): 784-797.
Tab.1
Livelihood capital evaluation indicator system for Hongsibu District"
资本类型 | 指标代码 | 指标名称 | 权重 | 计算方式(单位) |
---|---|---|---|---|
自然资本 | 1 | 人均耕地面积 | 0.0729 | 亩 |
2 | 耕地质量 | 0.0797 | 家庭经营耕地非常好为1;较好为0.75;一般为0.5;差为0.25;非常差为0 | |
人力资本 | 3 | 户主年龄 | 0.0203 | 40~49岁为1;30~39岁、50~59岁为0.8;20~29岁、60~69岁为0.6;20岁以下、70岁以上为0.4 |
4 | 户主受教育程度 | 0.0402 | 技校、大专及以上为1;高中为0.8;初中为0.6;小学为0.4;未受教育为0.2 | |
5 | 家庭人口数 | 0.0249 | 人数 | |
6 | 家庭劳动力数量 | 0.0505 | 人数 | |
7 | 男性劳动力数量 | 0.0412 | 人数 | |
8 | 家庭人口健康程度 | 0.0308 | 家庭成员有重病、残疾、慢性病等,1人计-0.3,每增加1人累计-0.2 | |
9 | 技能培训 | 0.0372 | 次数 | |
物质资本 | 10 | 住房类型 | 0.0231 | 楼房记为1;砖瓦房记为0.6;其他记为0.4 |
11 | 住房面积 | 0.0280 | 人均住房面积(m2/人) | |
12 | 交通工具 | 0.0452 | 私家车记为1;农用车记为0.4;班车记为0.1 | |
13 | 生产机械条件 | 0.0393 | 农业车、手推车、铡草机、苞米机等,每1件记为0.1 | |
14 | 牲畜/禽类数量 | 0.0473 | 牛记为1;猪记为0.6;羊记为0.4;禽类记为0.1 | |
15 | 家庭耐用消费品 | 0.0347 | 拥有一件生产机械记为0.1,依次累加 | |
金融资本 | 16 | 家庭人均纯收入 | 0.0828 | 元 |
17 | 是否有信贷机会 | 0.0649 | 是记为1;否记为0 | |
18 | 是否能筹到钱 | 0.0376 | 是记为1;否记为0 | |
社会资本 | 19 | 家庭领导潜力 | 0.0418 | 家中有公职人员有记为1;没有记为0 |
20 | 邻里关系 | 0.0204 | 非常好为1;较好为0.75;一般为0.5;不好为0.25;非常不好为0 | |
21 | 外出务工人数 | 0.0437 | 人数 | |
22 | 家庭通讯支出 | 0.0265 | 元 | |
23 | 社会保障程度 | 0.0240 | 家中享有的社会保障项目数,有1项记为0.1,每增加1项累计0.1 | |
24 | 交通便利程度 | 0.0430 | 到达县城的便捷程度,便捷记为0.3;一般记为0.2;偏远记为0.1 |
Tab.3
Input-output of daylily production"
时间 | 生命 周期/a | 苗木费/(元/亩) | 栽苗费/(元/亩) | 化肥投入 /(元/亩) | 水费 /(元/亩) | 单产(鲜)/(kg/亩) | 采摘费/(元/亩) | 干黄花产出系数 | 均价 /(元/kg) | 纯收益 /(元/亩) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009年 | 1 | 600 | 120 | 230 | 88 | 0 | 1.6 | 0.17 | 16 | -1038 |
2010年 | 2 | — | — | 230 | 88 | 60 | 1.6 | 0.17 | 30 | 116 |
2011年 | 3 | — | — | 230 | 88 | 210 | 1.6 | 0.17 | 32 | 696 |
2012年 | 4 | — | — | 230 | 88 | 300 | 1.6 | 0.17 | 35 | 1182 |
2013—2018年 | 5~10 | — | — | 230 | 88 | 1380 | 3.2 | 0.17 | 46 | 6076 |
Tab.5
Input-output of Lycium barbarum production"
时间 | 生命 周期 | 苗木费 /(株/亩) | 单价 /(元/株) | 化肥投入 /(元/亩) | 水费 /(元/亩) | 鲜果 /(kg/亩) | 采摘 /(元/kg) | 干果 系数 | 夏果 /(元/kg) | 秋果 /(元/kg) | 纯收益 /(元/亩) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000年 | 第1年 | 230* | 0.7 | 160 | 65 | 0.2 | 20 | 10 | -357.1 | ||
2001年 | 第2年 | 160 | 65 | 625 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 20 | 10 | 1213.0 | ||
2002—2007年 | 盛果期 | 160 | 65 | 1250 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 20 | 10 | 2650.0 | ||
2008—2009年 | 盛果期 | 160 | 65 | 1250 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 20 | 10 | 2025.0 | ||
2010—2011年 | 盛果期 | 160 | 65 | 1250 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 36 | 4 | 2725.0 | ||
2012年 | 第1年 | 260** | 5.0 | 160 | 75 | 11.25 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 36 | 4 | -1507.0 |
2012年 | 第1年 | 130*** | 5.0 | 160 | 75 | 11.25 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 36 | 4 | -856.5 |
2013年 | 第2年 | 160 | 75 | 625 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 36 | 4 | 615.0 | ||
2014年 | 盛果期 | 160 | 75 | 1250 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 36 | 4 | 1465.0 | ||
2015—2018年 | 盛果期 | 160 | 75 | 1250 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 55 | 30 | 7265.0 |
Tab.6
Relationship between farmers' income and engagement in specialized agricultural industries in the sample villages"
样本村 | 高收入组(≥15000元/人) | 中收入组(6000~15000元/人) | 低收入组(<6000元/人) | 人均 纯收入/元 | 变异 系数/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
产业 | 数量/户 | 比例/% | 产业 | 数量/户 | 比例/% | 产业 | 数量/户 | 比例/% | |||||
兴民村 | 黄花菜 | 35 | 63.64 | 黄花菜 | 18 | 32.73 | 黄花菜 | 2 | 3.64 | 21048.62 | 66.14 | ||
中圈塘村 | 葡萄 | 8 | 13.79 | 葡萄+玉米 | 31 | 53.45 | 玉米 | 19 | 32.76 | 8923.70 | 68.92 | ||
光彩村 | 枸杞 | 7 | 11.67 | 枸杞+玉米 | 40 | 66.67 | 玉米 | 13 | 21.67 | 10142.92 | 50.12 | ||
开元村 | 草畜 | 6 | 9.23 | 草畜 | 41 | 63.08 | 玉米 | 18 | 27.69 | 9192.22 | 49.46 |
Tab.7
Changes in the type of rural households in the early stage of migration and in 2018 (%)"
类型 | 兴民村 | 中圈塘村 | 光彩村 | 开元村 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
移民初期 | 2018年 | 移民初期 | 2018年 | 移民初期 | 2018年 | 移民初期 | 2018年 | ||||
纯农型 | 34.55 | 32.73 | 34.48 | 18.97 | 53.33 | 8.33 | 41.54 | 20.00 | |||
农业主导型 | 3.64 | 38.18 | 3.45 | 24.14 | 0 | 21.67 | 12.31 | 20.00 | |||
兼业型 | 5.45 | 23.64 | 3.45 | 41.38 | 26.67 | 63.33 | 3.08 | 56.92 | |||
非农型 | 56.36 | 5.45 | 58.62 | 15.52 | 20.00 | 6.67 | 43.08 | 3.08 |
[1] |
文琦, 郑殿元, 施琳娜. 1949—2019年中国乡村振兴主题演化过程与研究展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2019,38(9):1272-1281.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.001 |
[Wen Qi, Zheng Dianyuan, Shi Linna. Themes evolution of rural revitalization and its research prospect in China from 1949 to 2019. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(9):1272-1281. ] | |
[2] | 李冬慧, 乔陆印. 从产业扶贫到产业兴旺: 贫困地区产业发展困境与创新趋向 [J]. 求实, 2019(6): 81-91, 109-110. |
[Li Donghui, Qiao Luyin. From industrial poverty alleviation to thriving business: The dilemma of industrial development and the trend of innovation in poverty-stricken areas. Truth Seeking, 2019(6): 81-91, 109-110. ] | |
[3] | 涂圣伟. 脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接: 目标导向、重点领域与关键举措[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(8):2-12. |
[Tu Shengwei. The organic integration of poverty alleviation and rural revitalization strategies: Goal orientation, key areas and measures. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(8):2-12. ] | |
[4] | 李玉山, 陆远权. 产业扶贫政策能降低脱贫农户生计脆弱性吗? 政策效应评估与作用机制分析[J]. 财政研究, 2020(5):63-77. |
[Li Yushan, Lu Yuanquan. Can industrial poverty alleviation policies reduce the livelihood vulnerability of out-of-poor farmers? Policy effect evaluation and mechanism analysis. Public Finance Research, 2020(5):63-77. ] | |
[5] | 刘卫柏, 于晓媛, 袁鹏举. 产业扶贫对民族地区贫困农户生计策略和收入水平的影响[J]. 经济地理, 2019,39(11):175-182. |
[Liu Weibai, Yu Xiaoyuan, Yuan Pengju. The impact of industrial poverty alleviation on livelihood strategies and income levels of poor farmers in ethnic areas. Economic Geography, 2019,39(11):175-182. ] | |
[6] | 沈宏亮, 张佳, 郝宇彪. 乡村振兴视角下产业扶贫政策的增收效应研究: 基于入户调查的微观证据[J]. 经济问题探索, 2020(4):173-183. |
[Shen Hongliang, Zhang Jia, Hao Yubiao. The income effects of industrial poverty alleviation policies from the perspective of rural revitalization: Based on microscopic evidence from household survey. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2020(4):173-183. ] | |
[7] | 胡晗, 司亚飞, 王立剑. 产业扶贫政策对贫困户生计策略和收入的影响: 来自陕西省的经验证据[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(1):78-89. |
[Hu Han, Si Yafei, Wang Lijian. The Impact of industrial poverty alleviation strategies on the livelihoods and household incomes of the rural poor: An empirical analysis from Shaanxi Province. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(1):78-89. ] | |
[8] | 宁静, 殷浩栋, 汪三贵, 等. 产业扶贫对农户收入的影响机制及效果: 基于乌蒙山和六盘山片区产业扶贫试点项目的准实验研究 [J]. 中南财经政法大学学报, 2019(4): 58-66, 88, 159-160. |
[Ning Jing, Yin Haodong, Wang Sangui, et al. The influencing mechanism and effect of industrial poverty alleviation on farmers' income: A quasi-experimental study of industrial poverty alleviation pilot project in the Wumeng Mountain and Liupan Mountain area. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2019(4): 58-66, 88, 159-160. ] | |
[9] | 王志涛, 徐兵霞. 产业扶贫降低了贫困脆弱性吗? 基于CLDS的准实验研究[J]. 云南财经大学学报, 2020,36(10):32-44. |
[Wang Zhitao, Xu Bingxia. Does industrial poverty alleviation reduce poverty vulnerability? Quasi-experimental research based on CLDS. Journal of Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, 2020,36(10):32-44. ] | |
[10] | 吴雄周. 产业扶贫农户生计协同响应机制的解构及实践[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2019(4):176-183. |
[Wu Xiongzhou. Deconstruction and practice of the farmers' livelihood collaborative response mechanism in industrial poverty alleviation. Gansu Social Sciences, 2019(4):176-183. ] | |
[11] | 袁明宝. 压力型体制、生计模式与产业扶贫中的目标失灵: 以黔西南L村为例[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018,18(4):19-25. |
[Yuan Mingbao. Target failure in the pressure type system, livelihood mode and the industrial poverty alleviation: A case study of L Village in southwest Guizhou. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2018,18(4):19-25. ] | |
[12] | 范东君. 精准扶贫视角下我国产业扶贫现状、模式与对策探析: 基于湖南省湘西州的分析[J]. 中共四川省委党校学报, 2016(4):74-78. |
[Fan Dongjun. Analysis on the present situation, model and countermeasures of industrial poverty alleviation in China from the perspective of accurate poverty alleviation: Based on the analysis of Xiangxi Prefecture, Hunan Province. Journal of Party College of Sichuan Province Committee of CCP, 2016(4):74-78. ] | |
[13] | 游俊, 李晓冰. 生计响应视域下的产业扶贫益贫机制研究: 以贵州省瓮安县为例[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), 2019,40(10):185-192. |
[You Jun, Li Xiaobing. Study on the mechanism of industrial poverty alleviation and poverty in the perspective of livelihood response: Taking Weng'an County of Guizhou Province as an example. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 2019,40(10):185-192. ] | |
[14] | 王君涵, 李文, 冷淦潇, 等. 易地扶贫搬迁对贫困户生计资本和生计策略的影响: 基于8省16县的3期微观数据分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020,30(10):143-153. |
[Wang Junhan, Li Wen, Leng Ganxiao, et al. Impact of poverty alleviation relocation on livelihood capital and livelihood strategy of poor households: Analysis based on three waves of microdata from 16 counties in 8 provinces. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(10):143-153. ] | |
[15] | 赵雪雁. 生计资本对农牧民生活满意度的影响: 以甘南高原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2011,30(4):687-698. |
[Zhao Xueyan. The impact of livelihood capital on the life satisfaction of peasants and herdsmen: A case of Gannan Plateau. Geographical Research, 2011,30(4):687-698. ] | |
[16] |
赵雪雁, 刘江华, 王伟军, 等. 贫困山区脱贫农户的生计可持续性及生计干预: 以陇南山区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020,39(6):982-995.
doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.06.009 |
[Zhao Xueyan, Liu Jianghua, Wang Weijun, et al. Livelihood sustainability and livelihood intervention of out-of-poverty farming households in poor mountainous areas: A case of Longnan mountainous area. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(6):982-995. ] | |
[17] |
陈秧分, 刘玉, 李裕瑞. 中国乡村振兴背景下的农业发展状态与产业兴旺途径[J]. 地理研究, 2019,38(3):632-642.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj020181026 |
[Chen Yangfen, Liu Yu, Li Yurui. Agricultural development status and industrial prosperity path under the background of rural revitalization in China. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):632-642. ] | |
[18] | 陈莉, 钟玲. 农民合作社参与扶贫的可行路径: 以小农为基础的农业产业发展为例[J]. 农村经济, 2017(5):116-122. |
[Chen Li, Zhong Ling. A feasible way for farmers' cooperatives to participate in poverty alleviation: A case study of the development of agricultural industry based on small farmers. Rural Economy, 2017(5):116-122. ] | |
[19] | 吴重庆, 张慧鹏. 小农与乡村振兴: 现代农业产业分工体系中小农户的结构性困境与出路[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(1):13-24, 163. |
[Wu Chongqing, Zhang Huipeng. Small farmers and rural revitalization: Structural dilemma and outlet of small farmers in modern agricultural industry division system. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019,19(1):13-24, 163. ] | |
[20] | 王睦欣, 庞德良. 乡村经济多元化发展及其推进路径研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(12):116-123. |
[Wang Muxin, Pang Deliang. A study on the diversified development of rural economy and its promotion path. Economic Review Journal, 2019(12):116-123. ] | |
[21] | 覃志敏. 社会网络与移民生计的分化发展: 以桂西北集中安置扶贫移民为例[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2014. |
[Qin Zhimin. The social network and migrants livelihood development of differentiation: A case study to centralizing migration induced by poverty alleviation in northwest Guangxi. Wuhan, China: Central China Normal University, 2014. ] | |
[22] | 苏芳, 蒲欣冬, 徐中民, 等. 生计资本与生计策略关系研究: 以张掖市甘州区为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009,19(6):119-125. |
[Su Fang, Pu Xindong, Xu Zhongmin, et al. Analysis about the relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies: Take Ganzhou in Zhangye City as an example. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009,19(6):119-125. ] | |
[23] |
Su F, Yin Y J. Optimal livelihood strategy for different poverty groups among farmers: A case study of the Qin-Ba Mountain area in South-Shaanxi, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2020,17(5):1206-1220.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-019-5566-9 |
[24] | 陈良敏, 丁士军, 陈玉萍. 农户家庭生计策略变动及其影响因素研究: 基于 CFPS 微观数据[J]. 财经论丛, 2020(3):12-21. |
[Chen Liangmin, Ding Shijun, Chen Yuping. Study on dynamics of rural household livelihood strategy and its influencing factors: Based on CFPS micro data. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 2020(3):12-21. ] | |
[25] |
Zhang J, Mishra A K, Zhu P X. Identifying livelihood strategies and transitions in rural China: Island holding an obstacle?[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,80:107-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.042 |
[26] | 李雪萍, 魏爱春. 摆动型生计: 生计能力视域下的生存策略选择: 以重庆市M镇易地扶贫搬迁安置点为例[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2020,41(4):65-74. |
[Li Xueping, Wei Aichun. Livelihood of pendulum mobility: The choice of survival strategies from the perspective of livelihood capacity: A case study of the relocation site of poverty alleviation in Town M of Chongqing. Journal of Jishou University (Social Sciences), 2020,41(4):65-74. ] |
|