人地系统远程耦合的研究进展与展望

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.02.012

Abstract

Abstract:

Achieving sustainable development in an increasingly interconnected globalized world requires cross-system thinking and more integrated regional policy. First, it requires disciplines devoted to sustainable development research to improve their insights into trans-regional resource and environmental issues. Accordingly, it is necessary to promote the adaptive innovation and transformation of the traditional research framework of geography. Telecoupling, as a theoretical framework focusing on socioeconomic and environmental interactions among coupled human and natural systems over distances, has great potential and advantages to facilitate the process of theoretical innovation. In order to narrow the gap between Chinese and international research in the field of telecoupling, we introduce the telecoupling framework and its application progress from theoretical construction, empirical evidence, key research areas, and research methods based on literature review, document analysis, and our own understanding of telecoupling, and further give some suggests. The review shows that there is a large amount of empirical evidence of telecoupling in the dimensions of teleconnection, globalization, and urbanization due to the continuous growth of long-distance human activities and their interaction with large-scale natural processes. Currently, the application of the telecoupling framework in academia mainly focuses on three aspects: ecosystem services, the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of telecoupling, and land change science. Due to the progress in operationalizing the theories, current telecoupling research has been well supported methodologically. We further argue that geographical research based on the telecoupling framework should make breakthroughs in the theoretical innovation of Human-Earth relationship network system, telecoupling mechanism, and telecoupling regulatory tool sets, so that scientific research can keep up with the latest trends and solve the emerging real world problems.

Key words: Human-Earth system, telecoupling, empirical evidence, ecosystem services, telecoupling effects, land change science

MA Enpu, CAI Jianming, HAN Yan, LIAO Liuwen, LIN Jing. Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 310-326.

Figures/Tables 5

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.2

Applicability and advantages and disadvantages of different research methods"

方法名称	方法(工具)简介及适用性	优点	缺点
远程耦合工具箱	是在ArcGIS环境下开发的软件工具,能够映射和量化远程耦合框架的5个组件,可用于空间显式的多种远程耦合研究,如农产品贸易、生态系统服务付费计划和国际旅游等^[99]	空间明确,远程耦合框架的各组件均与特定位置相关联;能够进行多尺度分析和可视化表达;模块化、可扩展;允许整合现有工具和软件^[99]	对于更广泛的远程耦合过程仍缺乏相应的分析工具;对因果关系等机理性问题的研究效果有限^[99]
Telecoupling GeoApp	是基于远程耦合工具箱的Web应用程序,用于快速可视化和量化远程耦合组件及其结果^[100]	无需安装软件或许可,使用灵活方便^[100]	定量化功能不足;在揭示社会影响和溢出效应方面存在明显缺陷^[100]
多区域投入产出模型(MRIO)	通过双边贸易流连接多个国家或地区的物流网络,能够利用国家特定的生产技术和经济结构信息跟踪全球供应链^[104,105]	可以考虑到各国具体的资源强度^[106];覆盖面广,能够跟踪国际供应链上的复杂流动^[107]	模型所能决定的货物和区域细节有限^[108];货币流与具体土地之间未必相称,“分配逻辑”可能导致结果扭曲;数据存在时滞^[103]
物质流分析 (MFA)	通过评估时空上定义的任何宏观系统,如城市、区域、国家中货物的总存量和流动来提供有关能源和物质资源在相关系统内移动、消耗和储备情况的完整、一致的信息^[7]	可以应用更详细的货物信息,并根据报告的生物质流量和技术转化率分配土地^[103];可以促进对环境负荷和资源耗竭等具体问题的早期识别^[109]	在高度加工的生物制品特别是纺织品等非食物产品的供应链方面存在局限性^[103]
环境投入产出分析(EIOA)	使用部门货币交易矩阵来解释现代经济中部门之间复杂的相互依赖关系^[110],EIOA通过估算材料和能源投入,以及不同规模(从特定商品到整个行业)的经济活动产生的环境排放产出,扩展了传统的货币投入产出分析(MIOA)^[7]	可以将货币价值与实物和环境成本联系起来^[7],计算简便、快捷,不存在截断偏误^[111]	由于很少有城市编制投入产出表,因而限制了该方法在城市一级的应用;EIOA方法的“纯部门假设”在合并具有不同环境影响的部门后会导致计算偏差;数据处理时间长、更新频率低等^[111]
生命周期评估 (LCA)	评估产品从原材料到生产、使用直至废弃整个生命周期的投入、产出和潜在的环境影响,该方法对特定产品生产所需的不同材料和能源投入进行了量化^[7]	LCA能够确定与主题产品生命周期相关的一些环境影响,从而有助于提高材料和能源使用效率,或制定产品生命周期中减少污染负荷的干预措施^[7]	数据跟踪周期长,调查过程繁琐;只适用于单个或数个产品的投入产出与环境影响分析,当扩大对象范围时工作量会剧增

Tab.2

References 111

[1]	吴传钧 . 论地理学的研究核心: 人地关系地域系统[J]. 经济地理, 1991,11(3):1-6.
	[ Wu Chuanjun . On the research core of geography: The regional system of human-earth relations. Economic Geography, 1991,11(3):1-6. ]
[2]	Dicken P . Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy[M]. 7th Edition. Los Angeles, USA: Sage, 2015.
[3]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Panel . Ecosystem and human well-being: Synthesis [M]. Washington D C, USA: Island Press, 2005.
[4]	Liu Jianguo, Dietz T, Carpenter S R , et al. Coupled human and natural systems[J]. AMBIO, 2007,36(8):593-596.
[5]	Kissinger M, Rees W E, Timmer V . Interregional sustainability: Governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2011,14:965-976.
[6]	Fridman D, Kissinger M . An integrated biophysical and ecosystem approach as a base for ecosystem services analysis across regions[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:242-254.
[7]	Kissinger M, Rees W E . An interregional ecological approach for modelling sustainability in a globalizing world: Reviewing existing approaches and emerging directions[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2010,221:2615-2623.
[8]	Gould J . Nutrition: A world of insecurity[J]. Nature, 2017,544(4):S6-S7.
[9]	Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Batistella M , et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(2):26. doi: 10.5751/ES-05873-180226.
[10]	方恺 . 足迹家族研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(24):7974-7986.
	[ Fang Kai . Footprint family: Current practices, challenges and future prospects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015,35(24):7974-7986. ]
[11]	Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstrom J , et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet[J]. Science, 2015,347:1259855. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855.
[12]	Ostrom E . A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 2009,325:419-422.
[13]	Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Godfray H C J , et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018,1(9):466-476.
[14]	Sherbinin A D, Vanwey L, Mcsweeney K , et al. Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008,18(1):38-53.
[15]	Alberti M, Asbjornsen H, Baker L A , et al. Research on Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS): Approach, challenges, and strategies[J]. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 2011,92(2):218-228.
[16]	Turner B L, Kasperson R E, Matson P A , et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. PNAS, 2003,100(14):8074-8079.
[17]	Moran E F . Environmental social science: Human-environment interactions and sustainability[M]. Hoboken, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[18]	Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R , et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in Social-ecological Systems [J/OL]. Ecology and Society 2004, 9(2): 5.
[19]	Liu Jianguo, McConnell W, Baerwald T, et al. Symposium on "Telecoupling of Human and Natural Systems" at the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science [EB/OL]. .
[20]	刘建国, Hull V, Batistella M, 等. 远程耦合世界的可持续性框架[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(23):7870-7885.
	[ Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Batistella M , et al. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(23):7870-7885. ]
[21]	Liu Jianguo . Integration across a metacoupled world[J]. Ecology and Society, 2017,22(4):29. doi: 10.5751/ES-09830-220429.
[22]	方创琳, 周成虎, 顾朝林 , 等. 特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J]. 地理学报, 2016,71(4):531-550.
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Zhou Chenghu, Gu Chaolin , et al. Theoretical analysis of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016,71(4):531-550. ]
[23]	方创琳, 任宇飞 . 京津冀城市群地区城镇化与生态环境近远程耦合能值代谢效率及环境压力分析[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2017,47(7):833-846.
	[ Fang Chuanglin, Ren Yufei . Analysis of emergy-based metabolic efficiency and environmental pressure on the local coupling and telecoupling between urbanization and the eco-environment in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2017,47(7):833-846. ]
[24]	刘海猛, 方创琳, 李咏红 . 城镇化与生态环境“耦合魔方”的基本概念及框架[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(3):1-19.
	[ Liu Haimeng, Fang Chuanglin, Li Yonghong . The Coupled Human and Natural Cube: A conceptual framework for analyzing urbanization and eco-environment interactions. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):1-19. ]
[25]	Liu Jianguo, Yang Wu . Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs[J]. PNAS, 2013,110(41):16297-16298.
[26]	Liu Jianguo, Mooney H, Hull V , et al. Systems integration for global sustainability[J]. Science, 2015,347:963-972.
[27]	Bollmann M, Bosch T, Colijn F , et al. World ocean review: Living with the oceans[M]. Hamburg, Germany: Maribus GmbH, 2010.
[28]	Pichler M, Schaffartzik A, Haberl H , et al. Drivers of society-nature relations in the Anthropocene and their implications for sustainability transformations [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 26-27:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.017.
[29]	Steffen W, Persson A, Deutsch L , et al. The anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship[J]. AMBIO, 2011,40:739-761.
[30]	National Geographic Society. Great Pacific garbage patch-Pacific trash vortex [EB/OL]. .
[31]	Stokols D. Social ecology in the digital age: Solving complex problems in a globalized world [M]. San Diego, USA: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc, 2017: 265-317.
[32]	Ti B, Li L, Liu J , et al. Global distribution potential and regional environmental risk of F-53B [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 640-641:1365-1371.
[33]	Prospero J M, Mayol-Bracero O L. Understanding the transport and impact of African dust on the Caribbean Basin[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2013,94(9):1329-1337.
[34]	Griffin D W, Kellogg C A, Garrison V H , et al. The global transport of dust[J]. American Scientist, 2002,90(3):228-235.
[35]	香宝, 刘纪远 . 东亚土地覆盖对ENSO事件的响应特征[J]. 遥感学报, 2003,7(4):316-320.
	[ Xiang Bao, Liu Jiyuan . Characteristic of East Asia land cover's response to ENSO events. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003,7(4):316-320. ]
[36]	Hawkins E, Smith R S, Allison L C , et al. Bistability of the Atlantic overturning circulation in a global climate model and links to ocean freshwater transport[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011,38(10):415-421.
[37]	Verburg P H, Dearing J A, Dyke J G , et al. Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016,39:328-340.
[38]	David H, Anthony M, David G , et al. Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture [M]. California, USA: Stanford University Press, 1999.
[39]	马恩朴, 蔡建明, 林静 , 等. 远程耦合视角下的土地利用/覆被变化解释[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(3):421-431.
	[ Ma Enpu, Cai Jianming, Lin Jing , et al. Explanation of land use/cover change from the perspective of tele-coupling. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):421-431. ]
[40]	杜国明, 匡文慧, 孟凡浩 , 等. 巴西土地利用/覆盖变化时空格局及驱动因素[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(1):73-82.
	[ Du Guoming, Kuang Wenhui, Meng Fanhao , et al. Spatiotemporal pattern and driving forces of land use/cover change in Brazil. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(1):73-82. ]
[41]	Yao G, Hertel T W, Taheripour F . Economic drivers of telecoupling and terrestrial carbon fluxes in the global soybean complex[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2018,50:190-200.
[42]	Wu X D, Guo J L, Han M Y , et al. An overview of arable land use for the world economy: From source to sink via the global supply chain[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,76:201-214.
[43]	Dittrich M, Bringezu S . The physical dimension of international trade: Part 1: Direct global flows between 1962 and 2005[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(9):1838-1847.
[44]	Schaffartzik A, Mayer A, Gingrich S , et al. The global metabolic transition: Regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950-2010[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,26:87-97.
[45]	Infante-Amate J, Aguilera E, Palmeri F , et al. Land embodied in Spain's biomass trade and consumption (1900-2008): Historical changes, drivers and impacts[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,78:493-502.
[46]	Behrman J, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A . The gender implications of large-scale land deals[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012,39(1):49-79.
[47]	Schutter O D . How not to think of land-grabbing: Three critiques of large-scale investments in farmland[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2011,38(2):249-279.
[48]	Li T M . Centering labor in the land grab debate[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2011,38(2):281-298.
[49]	Margulis M E, McKeon N, Borras S M. Land grabbing and global governance: Critical perspectives[J]. Globalizations, 2013,10(1):1-23.
[50]	White B, Borras S M, Hall R , et al. The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012,39(3-4):619-647.
[51]	Newton P, Agrawal A, Wollenberg L . Enhancing the sustainability of commodity supply chains in tropical forest and agricultural landscapes[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(6):1761-1772.
[52]	Zimmerer K S, Lambin E F, Vanek S J . Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability[J]. Ecology and Society, 2018,23(1):30. doi: 10.5751/ES-09935-230130.
[53]	Liu Jianguo, Hull V, Luo J , et al. Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships[J]. Ecology and Society, 2015,20(3):44. doi: 10.5751/ES-07868-200344.
[54]	Schröter M, Koellner T, Alkemade R , et al. Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.003.
[55]	陈明星 . 城市化领域的研究进展和科学问题[J]. 地理研究, 2015,34(4):614-630.
	[ Chen Mingxing . Research progress and scientific issues in the field of urbanization. Geographical Research, 2015,34(4):614-630. ]
[56]	Cumming G S, Buerkert A, Hoffmann E M , et al. Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services[J]. Nature, 2014,515(11):50-57.
[57]	Seto K C, Reenberg A, Boone C G , et al. Urban land teleconnections and sustainability[J]. PNAS, 2012,109(20):7687-7692.
[58]	周伟奇, 王坤, 虞文娟 , 等. 城市与区域生态关联研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(15):5238-5245.
	[ Zhou Weiqi, Wang Kun, Yu Wenjuan , et al. Understanding the social and ecological connections between cities and surrounding regions for urban and regional sustainability. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017,37(15):5238-5245. ]
[59]	López-Hoffman L, Chester C C, Semmens D J , et al. Ecosystem services from transborder migratory species: Implications for conservation governance[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2017,42(1):509-539.
[60]	Semmens D J, Diffendorfer J E, López-Hoffman L , et al. Accounting for the ecosystem services of migratory species: Quantifying migration support and spatial subsidies[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70:2236-2242.
[61]	Semmens D J, Diffendorfer J E, Bagstad K J , et al. Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,31:255-264.
[62]	Austin J E, Miller M R . Northern pintail (Anas acuta)[M] // Poole A, Gill F. The birds of North America. Philadelphia, USA: The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and Washington D C, USA: the American Ornithologists' Union, 1995.
[63]	Mattsson B J, Runge M C, Devries J H , et al. A modeling framework for integrated harvest and habitat management of North American waterfowl: Case-study of northern pintail metapopulation dynamics[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2012,225:146-158.
[64]	Goldstein J H, Thogmartin W E, Bagstad K J , et al. Replacement cost valuation of Northern pintail (Anas acuta) subsistence harvest in Arctic and Sub-Arctic North America[J]. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2014,19(4):347-354.
[65]	Kolosz B W, Athanasiadis I N, Cadisch G , et al. Conceptual advancement of socio-ecological modelling of ecosystem services for re-evaluating brownfield land[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018,33:29-39.
[66]	Fu B J, Wang S, Liu Y , et al. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2017,45:223-243.
[67]	Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S L , et al. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2016,9:38-41.
[68]	Zhao W W, Liu Y, Daryanto S , et al. Metacoupling supply and demand for soil conservation service[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,33:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.011.
[69]	Bagstad K J, Johnson G W, Voigt B , et al. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013,4:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012.
[70]	Zhao Y, Wei Y P, Wu B F , et al. A connectivity-based assessment framework for river basin ecosystem service management[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,33:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.010.
[71]	Arvor D, Meirelles M, Dubreuil V , et al. Analyzing the agricultural transition in Mato Grosso, Brazil, using satellite-derived indices[J]. Applied Geography, 2012,32(2):702-713.
[72]	Zimmerer K S, Carney J A, Vanek S J . Sustainable smallholder intensification in global change? Pivotal spatial interactions, gendered livelihoods, and agrobiodiversity[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015,14:49-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.004.
[73]	GRAIN. Seized: The 2008 land grab for food and financial security [R]. Barcalona, Spain: GRAIN, 2008.
[74]	Yang H, Lupi F, Zhang J , et al. Feedback of telecoupling: The case of a payments for ecosystem services program[J]. Ecology and Society, 2018,23(2):45. doi: 10.5751/ES-10140-230245.
[75]	Oberlack C, Tejada L, Messerli P , et al. Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016,41:153-171.
[76]	Crona B I, Holt T V, Petersson M , et al. Using social-ecological syndromes to understand impacts of international seafood trade on small-scale fisheries[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2015,35:162-175.
[77]	Chaudhary A, Kastner T . Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016,38:195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.013.
[78]	Chaudhary A, Carrasco L R, Kastner T . Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017,586:985-994. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.078.
[79]	张晋东, 罗欢 . 道路在保护区远程耦合系统中的重要性分析: 以地震后的卧龙大熊猫保护区为例 [R]. 2018世界交通运输大会. 北京, 2018.
	[ Zhang Jindong, Luo Huan . Analysis of the importance of roads in tele-coupling system of the reserve: A case study of Wolong giant panda reserve after the earthquake. World Transport Congress 2018. Beijing, China, 2018. ]
[80]	Ibisch P L, Hoffmann M T, Kreft S , et al. A global map of roadless areas and their conservation status[J]. Science, 2016,354:1423-1427.
[81]	Koemle D, Zinngrebe Y, Yu X . Highway construction and wildlife populations: Evidence from Austria[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,73:447-457. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.021.
[82]	Schierhorn F, Meyfroidt P, Kastner T , et al. The dynamics of beef trade between Brazil and Russia and their environmental implications[J]. Global Food Security, 2016,11:84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.001.
[83]	Chen X, Lupi F, Vina A , et al. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services[J]. Conservation Biology, 2010,24(6):1469-1478.
[84]	Zhang J, Connor T, Yang H , et al. Complex effects of natural disasters on protected areas through altering telecouplings[J]. Ecology and Society, 2018,23(3):17. doi: 10.5751/ES-10238-230317.
[85]	Easter T S, Killion A K, Carter N H . Climate change, cattle, and the challenge of sustainability in a telecoupled system in Africa[J]. Ecology and Society, 2018,23(1):10. doi: 10.5751/ES-09872-230110.
[86]	Liu Jianguo, Dou Y, Batistella M , et al. Spillover systems in a telecoupled Anthropocene: Typology, methods, and governance for global sustainability[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,33:58-69.
[87]	Verburg P H, Crossman N, Ellis E C , et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the earth system: A global land project perspective[J]. Anthropocene, 2015,12:29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ancene.2015.09.004.
[88]	Verburg P H, Erb K H, Mertz O , et al. Land System Science: Between global challenges and local realities[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5:433-437.
[89]	Boillat S, Scarpa F M, Robson J P , et al. Land system science in Latin America: Challenges and perspectives [J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 26-27:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.015.
[90]	Erb K H, Haberl H, Jepsen M R , et al. A conceptual framework for analysing and measuring land-use intensity[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5:464-470.
[91]	Kuemmerle T, Erb K, Meyfroidt P , et al. Challenges and opportunities in mapping land use intensity globally[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5:484-493.
[92]	Crossman N D, Bryan B A, Groot R S , et al. Land science contributions to ecosystem services[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5:509-514.
[93]	Messerli P, Heinimann A, Giger M , et al. From 'land grabbing' to sustainable investments in land: Potential contributions by land change science[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013,5:528-534.
[94]	Turner II B L, Lambin E F, Reenberg A . The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability[J]. PNAS, 2007,104(52):20666-20671.
[95]	Arvor D, Tritsch I, Barcellos C , et al. Land use sustainability on the South-Eastern Amazon agricultural frontier: Recent progress and the challenges ahead[J]. Applied Geography, 2017,80:86-97.
[96]	Friis C, Nielsen J Ø, Otero I , et al. From teleconnection to telecoupling: Taking stock of an emerging framework in land system science[J]. Journal of Land Use Science, 2016,11(2):131-153. doi: 10.1080/1747423X.2015.1096423.
[97]	Global Land Programme (GLP). Global land programme: Science plan and implementation strategy 2016-2021 [EB/OL]. . Bern, Switzerland: Global Land Programme, 2016.
[98]	Millington J D A, Xiong H, Peterson S , et al. Integrating modelling approaches for understanding telecoupling: Global food trade and local land use[J]. Land, 2017,6(3):56-74.
[99]	Tonini F, Liu J . Telecoupling Toolbox: Spatially explicit tools for studying telecoupled human and natural systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2017,22(4):11. doi: 10.5751/ES-09696-220411.
[100]	McCord P, Tonini F, Liu J . The Telecoupling GeoApp: A Web-GIS application to systematically analyze telecouplings and sustainable development[J]. Applied Geography, 2018,96:16-28.
[101]	Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K , et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations[J]. Nature, 2012,486(6):109-112.
[102]	Haberl H, Kastner T, Schaffartzik A , et al. Global effects of national biomass production and consumption: Austria's embodied HANPP related to agricultural biomass in the year 2000[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012,84:66-73.
[103]	Bruckner M, Fischer G, Tramberend S , et al. Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,114:11-21.
[104]	Wiedmann T . A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,69:211-222.
[105]	Wiedmann T, Wilting H C, Lenzen M , et al. Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input-output analysis[J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70:1937-1945.
[106]	Tukker A, Dietzenbacher E . Global multiregional input-output frameworks: An introduction and outlook[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2013,25(1):1-19.
[107]	Chen Z M, Chen G Q . Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: National water footprint and international virtual water trade[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013,28:142-149.
[108]	Bruckner M, Giljum S, Lutz C , et al. Materials embodied in international trade-Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012,22:568-576.
[109]	Brunner P H, Rechberger H . Practical handbook of material flow analysis[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2004,9(5):337-338.
[110]	Munksgaard J, Wier M, Lenzen M , et al. Using input-output analysis to measure the environmental pressure of consumption at different spatial levels[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2005,9(1-2):169-185.
[111]	丛建辉, 刘学敏, 赵雪如 . 城市碳排放核算的边界界定及其测度方法[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014,24(4):19-26.
	[ Cong Jianhui, Liu Xuemin, Zhao Xueru . Demarcation problems and the corresponding measurement methods of the urban carbon accounting. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(4):19-26. ]

文献类型	综述	学术论文	百科全书	书籍章节	会议摘要	书评	会议信息
数量/篇	55	204	11	122	41	1	5
百分比/%	10.00	37.09	2.00	22.18	7.46	0.18	0.91
文献类型	通信	讨论稿	社论	勘误表	新闻	短篇报道	其他
数量/篇	1	4	3	2	2	4	95
百分比/%	0.18	0.73	0.55	0.36	0.36	0.73	17.27

Research progress and prospect of telecoupling of Human-Earth system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 111

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHENG Chaonan, HU Yang, ZHAO Ming. Progress and prospect of the spatiotemporal change and ecosystem services evaluation of urban green space pattern [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1770-1782.
[2]	Ziwen LIU, Dan YIN, Qingxu HUANG, Chunyang HE, Fei XUE. Research and application progress of ecosystem services in land use planning: A bibliometric and textual analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 236-247.
[3]	Wenwu ZHAO, Yue LIU, Qiang FENG, Yaping WANG, Siqi YANG. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 139-151.
[4]	Erfu DAI, Liang MA. Review on land change modeling approaches [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(1): 152-162.
[5]	Chuanzhun SUN, Lin ZHEN, Chao WANG, Jie HU, Bingzhen DU. Assessment of the ecological effects of the first-phase natural forest protection project in the Xiaolongshan region, Gansu Province [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(6): 732-740.
[6]	Weihua XU, Yanying YANG, Lu ZHANG, Yi XIAO, Xiaoke WANG, Zhiyun OUYANG. Evaluation methods and case study of regional ecological carrying capacity for early-warning [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 306-312.
[7]	Wenhuan WU, Jian PENG, Yanxu LIU, Yi'na HU. Tradeoffs and synergies between ecosystem services in Ordos City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1571-1581.
[8]	Zhe FENG, Xuegong XU, Jian ZHOU, Yang GAO. Land sparing versus sharing framework from ecosystem service perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(9): 1100-1108.
[9]	Yuchen DING, Changchun FENG, Liwei WANG. Determination of ecological red line of mountainous areas: A case study of Yihe Town in Chongqing Municipality [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(7): 851-859.
[10]	FU Bojie, ZHANG Liwei. Land-use change and ecosystem services：concepts, methods and progress [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 33(4): 441-446.
[11]	DAI Junhu, WANG Huanjiong, WANG Hongli, CHEN Chunyang. An Introduction to Framework of Assessment of the Value of Ecosystem Services [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(7): 963-969.
[12]	CHEN Chunyang, TAO Zexing, WANG Huanjiong, DAI Junhu. Ecosystem Service Assessment of Grasslands in the Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(7): 978-984.
[13]	CHEN Chunyang, DAI Junhu, WANG Huanjiong, LIU Yachen. Changes of the Value of Ecosystem Services in the Sanjiangyuan Region Based on Land Use Data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(7): 970-977.
[14]	QIAO Xuning, YANG Yongju, YANG Degang. Review of Payments for Ecosystem Services and the Key Issues in a Watershed [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(4): 395-402.
[15]	LI Huimei, ZHANG Anlu, GAO Zebing, ZHUO Macuo. Quantitative Analysis of the Impacts of Climate and Socio-economic Driving Factors of Land Use Change on the Ecosystem Services Value in the Qinghai Lake Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 31(12): 1747-1754.