京津冀生产性服务业关联特征分析

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.02.012

Abstract

Abstract:

As one of the three vital economic regions in China, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region has a sound foundation of producer service. Based on the input-output tables of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province in 2007 and 2012, this study applied the multiregional input-output model to complicate an input-output table of 129 sectors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. By using this table, we then analyzed the regional influence coefficient and induction coefficient, interregional influence coefficient and induction coefficient, and industry connection degree of the region, to reveal the producer service development characteristics and cause of interaction and degree of relevance. The following conclusions were drawn. First, the information service industry and science and technology service industry of Beijing have strong effect on the whole region, while the road and waterway transport industry of Tianjin also has strong effect. But producer service in Hebei is weak and cannot stimulate the economic growth of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Second, the science and technology service industry of Beijing mainly provides local services; likewise, the information service industry of Tianjin is in the same situation. Finally, the division index of the producer services between Beijing and Tianjin is relatively low, and the producer service structures of these cities show a convergence trend. With regard to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development, Beijing should focus on the development of science and technology service industry in order to provide more service to Tianjin and Hebei with the rapid development of information service industry. The industrial structure of Tianjin tends to be high-end, but technology-intensive producer services such as information industry need further development. Hebei needs to enhance the technological level to develop producer services and prepare to undertake the industrial transfer from Beijing and Tianjin.

Key words: producer service, multiregional input-output model, industry relevancy, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

Xiao LI, Yuming SHEN, Ling QIU. Correlation analysis of producer services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(2): 299-307.

Figures/Tables 7

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.2

Tab.3

References 1

[1]	[Bi J.2016. Research on factors of science and technology synergy innovation between Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 33(8): 49-54.] doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2015100116
[2]	曹毅, 申玉铭, 邱灵. 2009. 天津生产性服务业与制造业的产业关联分析[J]. 经济地理, 29(5): 771-776.
	[Cao Y, Shen Y M, Qiu L.2009. Industry relevancy analysis of producer services and manufacturing in Tianjin City[J]. Economic Geography, 29(5): 771-776.]
[3]	付承伟, 唐志鹏, 李玉成. 2013. 基于投入产出法的京沪生产性服务业比较[J]. 地理研究, 32(9): 1699-1707.
	[Fu C W, Tang Z P, Li Y C.2013. Comparative research on producer services between Beijing and Shanghai based on input-output analysis[J]. Geographical Research, 32(9): 1699-1707.]
[4]	韩斌, 刘朝明, 汪涛. 2008. 川渝地区产业关联与产业合作政策研究[J]. 经济学家, (6): 64-69.
	[Han B, Liu C M, Wang T.2008. Research on industrial linkage and cooperation policies in Sichuan-Chongqing region[J]. Economist, (6): 64-69.]
[5]	姜昳芃. 2013. 基于产业关联的环渤海地区工业结构调整效应研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学.
	[Jiang D P.2013. The research of Bohai Rim industrial structure adjustment based on industry association[D]. Dalian, China: Dalian Maritime University.]
[6]	李铁成, 刘力. 2014. 区域间投入产出模型(IRIO)的我国会展业经济影响分析[J]. 旅游学刊, 29(6): 35-45.
	[Li T C, Liu L.2014. An empirical study of the economic impact of the MICE industry in China using interregional input-output models (IRIO)[J]. Tourism Tribune, 29(6): 35-45.]
[7]	李晓, 张建平. 2010. 东亚产业关联的研究方法与现状: 一个国际、国家间投入产出模型的综述[J]. 经济研究, (4): 147-160.
	[Li X, Zhang J P.2010. The methodology and current situation of industrial linkages in East Asia: A review on the international, inter-country input-output model[J]. Economic Research Journal, (4): 147-160.]
[8]	刘彩霞. 2014. 河北与京津产业发展对接研究[D]. 保定: 河北大学.
	[Liu C X.2014. The research of industry connection of Hebei-Beijing-Tianjin[D]. Baoding, China: Hebei University.]
[9]	刘红光, 刘卫东, 刘志高. 2011. 区域间产业转移定量测度研究: 基于区域间投入产出表分析[J]. 中国工业经济, (6): 79-88.
	[Liu H G, Liu W D, Liu Z G.2011. The quantitative study on inter-regional industry transfer[J]. China Industrial Economics, (6): 79-88.]
[10]	刘伟, 苏剑. 2014. “新常态”下的中国宏观调控[J]. 经济科学, (4): 5-13.
	[Liu W, Su J.2014. "Xinchangtai" xia de Zhongguo hongguan tiaokong[J]. Economic Science, (4): 5-13.]
[11]	刘新争. 2016. 基于产业关联的区域产业转移及其效率优化: 投入产出的视角[J]. 经济学家, (6): 43-50.
[12]	[Liu X Z.2016. Regional industrial transfer based on industrial co-relation and its efficiency optimization: Perspectives on input and output[J]. Economist, (6): 43-50.]
[13]	彭鹏. 2009. 成渝经济区产业关联与协调发展研究[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学.
	[Peng P.2009. Research on industrial relationship and harmonious development of Chengdu-Chongqing economic zone[D]. Chengdu, China: Southwest Jiaotong University.]
[14]	邱灵, 申玉铭, 任旺兵. 2008. 北京生产性服务业与制造业的关联及空间分布[J]. 地理学报, 63(12): 1299-1310. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2008.12.007
	[Qiu L, Shen Y M, Ren W B.2008. Industrial relevancy and spatial distribution between producer services and manufacturing in Beijing City[J]. Acta Geographica Sinca, 63(12): 1299-1310.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2008.12.007
[15]	申玉铭, 邱灵, 王茂军, 等. 2007. 中国生产性服务业产业关联效应分析[J]. 地理学报, 62(8): 821-830. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.08.004
	[Shen Y M, Qiu L, Wang M J, et al.2007. Industry relevancy analysis of producer services in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinca, 62(8): 821-830.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.08.004
[16]	宋玉婧. 2009. 河北省生产性服务业产业关联及空间分布特征分析[D]. 北京: 首都师范大学.
	[Song Y J.Industrial relevancy and spatial distribution between producer services and manufacturing in Hebei Province[D]. Beijing, China: Capital Normal University.]
[17]	王德利, 方创琳. 2010. 中国跨区域产业分工与联动特征[J]. 地理研究, 29(8): 1392-1406. doi: 10.11821/yj2010080005
	[Wang D L, Fang C L.2010. Industrial division and linkage among regions of China[J]. Geographical Research, 29(8): 1392-1406.] doi: 10.11821/yj2010080005
[18]	吴福象, 朱蕾. 2010. 中国三大地带间的产业关联及其溢出和反馈效应: 基于多区域投入—产出分析技术的实证研究[J]. 南开经济研究, (5): 140-152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4691.2010.05.011
	[Wu F X, Zhu L.2010. Industry linkages and its spillover and feedback effect among three regions in China: An empirical study based on multi-regional input-output analysis technology[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, (5): 140-152.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4691.2010.05.011
[19]	吴三忙, 陈炜明, 李善同. 2016. 京津冀经济区内外部经济关联研究: 基于地区间投入产出模型的分析[J]. 区域经济评论, (3): 61-68.
	[Wu S M, Chen W M, Li S T.2016. Internal and external economic relations in Jing-Jin-Ji economic region: Analysis based on multi-regional input-output model[J]. Regional Economic Review, (3): 61-68.]
[20]	席强敏, 李国平. 2015. 京津冀生产性服务业空间分工特征及溢出效应[J]. 地理学报, 70(12): 1926-1938. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512006
	[Xi Q M, Li G P.2015. Characteristics and spillover effects of space division of producer service in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region: Based on spatial panel model[J]. Acta Geographica Sinca, 70(12): 1926-1938.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201512006
[21]	张敏, 顾朝林. 2002. 近期中国省际经济社会要素流动的空间特征[J]. 地理研究, 21(3): 313-323. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2002.03.006
	[Zhang M, Gu C L.2002. Spatial characteristics of the recent inter-provincial flow of social-economic elements in China[J]. Geographical Research, 21(3): 313-323.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2002.03.006
[22]	张旺, 申玉铭. 2012. 京津冀都市圈生产性服务业空间集聚特征[J]. 地理科学进展, 31(6): 742-749. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.010
	[Zhang W, Shen Y M.2012. The spatial characteristics of producer service agglomeration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan region[J]. Preogress in Geography, 31(6): 742-749.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.06.010
[23]	张卓颖, 石敏俊. 2011. 中国省区间产业内贸易与产业结构同构分析[J]. 地理学报, 66(6): 732-740. doi: 10.11821/xb201106002
	[Zhang Z Y, Shi M J.2011. Intra-industrial trade and interregional structural isomorphism of manufacturing industry based on China-IRIO2002[J]. Acta Geographica Sinca, 66(6): 732-740.] doi: 10.11821/xb201106002
[24]	朱婷. 2009. 京津区域空间经济联系的投入产出分析[D]. 天津: 天津财经大学.
	[Zhu T.2009. Research on Interregional input-output model based on spatial linkage of the Jingjin-regional economies[D]. Tianjin, China: Tianjin University of Finance and Economics.]
[25]	Ichimura S, Wang H J.2003. Interregional input-output analysis of the Chinese economy[M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
[26]	Isard W.1960. Methods of regional analysis: An introduction to regional science[M]. New York: The Technology Press of MIT, John Wiley and Sons.
[27]	Miller R E, Blair P D.1985. Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[28]	Polenske K R.1980. The Multiregional Input-output (MRIO) Model of the United States[M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
[29]	Wonglimpiyarat J.2005. What are the mechanisms driving the success of the US Silicon Valley[J]. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 5(2): 200-213. doi: 10.1504/IJTPM.2005.007521
[1]	毕娟. 2016. 京津冀科技协同创新影响因素研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 33(8): 49-54. doi: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2015100116

	2007				2012
	北京		天津	河北	北京	天津	河北
北京	5.7080	5.2015	1.4550		4.6333	3.1682	1.9656
天津	9.3234	2.1549	1.6179		0.6368	14.0842	1.5258
河北	4.4425	4.6854	2.6619		7.3235	4.7576	2.1547

行业	2007							2012
行业	京津		津京	京冀	冀京	津冀	冀津	京津	津京	京冀	冀京	津冀	冀津
1	0.717	0.229	0.687	0.472	0.230	0.471		0.896	0.483	0.966	0.628	0.482	0.661
2	0.939	8.106	0.955	0.557	8.149	0.551		0.872	1.155	0.960	0.510	1.143	0.524
3	0.751	1.417	0.735	0.316	1.423	0.318		1.006	1.950	1.098	0.356	1.932	0.335
4	1.157	0.935	1.144	0.547	0.956	0.545		1.116	0.814	1.110	0.374	0.803	0.435
5	0.293	0.268	0.290	0.512	0.281	0.529		0.314	0.917	0.310	0.629	0.914	0.667
6	1.272	0.949	1.216	0.502	0.974	0.501		1.034	1.717	1.070	0.713	1.700	0.655
7	1.416	1.504	1.360	1.333	1.495	1.321		0.635	1.303	0.759	0.737	1.293	0.729
8	0.834	1.220	0.856	0.763	1.240	0.749		0.875	0.944	0.886	0.332	0.935	0.346
9	0.857	0.285	0.899	0.473	0.292	0.472		0.772	0.650	0.732	0.305	0.645	0.328
10	2.351	0.621	2.667	0.356	0.631	0.345		1.576	0.968	1.291	0.449	0.958	0.522
11	0.607	0.116	0.638	0.349	0.122	0.345		0.464	0.270	0.466	0.294	0.269	0.314
12	0.904	1.850	0.922	0.849	1.944	0.834		0.815	0.516	0.924	0.426	0.513	0.436
13	0.668	1.121	0.683	0.326	1.129	0.336		0.602	0.621	0.669	0.377	0.619	0.367
14	1.339	0.681	1.417	0.635	0.697	0.632		0.619	0.802	0.637	0.434	0.796	0.461
15	1.379	0.550	1.430	0.636	0.564	0.622		0.906	0.651	0.924	0.447	0.646	0.429
16	1.485	0.657	1.554	0.611	0.673	0.603		0.924	0.743	0.977	0.489	0.737	0.543
17	1.679	0.751	1.801	0.514	0.773	0.511		1.050	0.878	1.007	0.741	0.872	0.696

行业	2007							2012
行业	京津		津京	京冀	冀京	津冀	冀津	京津	津京	京冀	冀京	津冀	冀津
1	2.800	1.801	1.674	1.799	1.689	2.846		0.943	1.134	1.070	0.997	1.281	1.003
2	3.967	2.747	3.741	2.974	3.369	3.582		3.014	3.052	4.342	3.333	3.831	3.220
3	2.876	1.332	1.823	1.695	1.578	2.714		1.541	0.753	0.685	0.550	0.809	1.636
4	0.861	1.224	0.515	1.112	0.554	0.894		0.816	1.161	0.565	1.313	0.456	0.862
5	0.875	1.201	0.831	0.965	1.087	0.848		0.148	0.169	0.152	0.212	0.103	0.156
6	3.329	2.663	1.843	2.408	1.911	3.195		2.194	1.708	1.198	0.752	2.142	2.319
7	3.313	1.034	1.815	1.684	1.156	3.090		0.269	0.146	0.227	0.392	0.148	0.292
8	0.501	0.205	0.273	0.318	0.153	0.525		0.066	0.074	0.055	0.114	0.050	0.069
9	0.592	1.176	0.577	1.148	0.570	0.605		0.280	0.454	0.337	0.669	0.296	0.298
10	0.108	0.270	0.086	0.297	0.083	0.113		0.316	0.570	0.322	0.627	0.227	0.331
11	2.679	3.001	2.168	3.277	2.112	2.860		3.615	4.187	4.024	4.398	3.919	3.775
12	0.904	0.247	0.499	0.581	0.244	0.947		0.586	0.714	0.536	0.778	0.539	0.617
13	2.250	1.006	1.074	1.271	1.082	2.256		1.302	0.586	0.408	0.307	0.563	1.377
14	2.231	4.067	1.966	3.900	2.101	2.181		2.940	2.366	2.116	4.164	1.482	3.097
15	0.436	0.961	0.379	0.937	0.420	0.441		0.246	0.274	0.226	0.651	0.066	0.261
16	0.523	1.084	0.617	1.090	0.655	0.509		0.403	0.431	0.597	0.822	0.252	0.421
17	0.540	1.020	0.437	0.905	0.528	0.545		0.148	0.260	0.192	0.327	0.126	0.155

Correlation analysis of producer services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 1

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596.
[2]	ZHANG Feng, CHEN Yanguang, LIU Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 377-388.
[3]	LIU Xiaoxiao, WU Kang. Change of industrial investment networks in the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of non-capital function dispersal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1972-1984.
[4]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[5]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[6]	Xiaoxue SHI, Daoyi GONG, Yihong HU. Regional strong winter wind events over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the associated atmospheric circulation changes during 1979-2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1069-1079.
[7]	Dan CUI, Hao WU, Dianting WU. A review and prospect of regional governance in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 1-14.
[8]	Linshan HUANG, Yanguang CHEN, Shuangcheng LI. Multifractal spectral analysis of land use structure of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 50-64.
[9]	Feng ZHANG, Yanguang CHEN, Xiaosong LI. Radial dimension analysis of growth and form of cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 65-76.
[10]	Jingtian ZHAO, Yanguang CHEN, Shuangcheng LI. Bi-fractal structure and evolution of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region urban land-use patterns [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 77-87.
[11]	Yuqing LONG, Yanguang CHEN. Multi-scaling allometric analysis of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban system based on nighttime light data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 88-100.
[12]	Lixin SU, Changchun FENG. A comparative study on the regional governance models of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and several foreign metropolitans [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 15-25.
[13]	Qian LI, Haiyang YU, Ting LI, Shuang LONG, Wei SHAO, Ying WANG, Yingjun XU. Hazard assessment of typhoons affecting the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on Gumbel distribution [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(7): 933-945.
[14]	Fan YANG. Progress of research on the growth dynamics and spatial effects of producer services [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(6): 750-760.
[15]	Yong XU, Xuefei ZHANG, Kan ZHOU, Chuansheng WANG, Xiaoren XU. Method and application of cause analysis for early-warning of resource and environmental system overloading [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(3): 277-285.