“ 中欧班列”陆路运输腹地范围测算与枢纽识别

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.11.002

Abstract

Abstract:

Since the initiative of the Belt and Road strategy, the Chinese government greatly encourages the operation of China Railway Express (CR express), aiming to transform China's traditional international trading transport system. The growth of CR express helps to strength the transport role of the New Eurasian Land Bridge and promotes change of China's transport system for international trading from single maritime transport to a combination of maritime and land transport. The largest barrier for developing CR express, however, is that the freight sources are dispersed and the transport organization is nonstandard. This has led to the disorderly competition for international container transport due to the very recent growth of transport volume, which is brought by subsidies of local governments. This study examined the development history and problems in the last five years since the operation of the first CR express, and pointed out that the Chinese government must understand that the CR express cannot compete with the maritime transport for freight going from China to the EU market. The CR express has its economic transport hinterlands from the border ports and it is necessary to establish a hub-and-spoke transport mode at the national level and build the transport hubs for profiting from the operation of CR express. A model was built to define the economical transport hinterlands of the three border ports in China-Alashankou, Erenhot, and Manzhouli. The result indicates that Northeast China is the hinterlands of Alashankou and Northwest China is the hinterlands of Manzhouli. Other hinterland areas are defined by the traffic rate abroad from Erenhot. Finally, the article identifies the transport hubs for CR express including Chongqing, Urumqi, Harbin, Zhengzhou, among others, and puts forward suggestions and police recommendations to the Chinese government.

Key words: Silk Road, China Railway Express, land transport, rail, border port

Jiaoe WANG, Jingjuan JIAO, Yue JING, Li MA. Transport hinterlands of border ports by China-Europe express trains and hub identification[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1332-1339.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Tab.2

References 16

[16]	[Zheng L, Liu Z G.2015. Spatial pattern of Chinese outward direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative area[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 563-570.]
[17]	邹嘉龄, 刘春腊, 尹国庆, 等. 2015. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易格局及其经济贡献[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 598-605. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.008
	[Zou J L, Liu C L, Yin G Q, et al.2015. Spatial patterns and economic effects of China's trade with countries along the Belt and Road[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 598-605.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.008
[18]	Lee J Y.2004. Iron Silkroad: Prospects for a landbridge through Russia from Korea to Europe[J]. Post-Soviet Affairs, 20(1): 83-105. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.20.1.83
[19]	Otsuka S.2001. Central Asia's rail network and the Eurasian land bridge[J]. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 28: 42-49.
[20]	Rodrigue J P, Comtois C, Slack B.2013. The geography of transport systems[M]. 3rd ed. London & New York: Routledge.
[21]	Wang J E, Cheng Y, Mo H H.2014. The spatio-temporal distribution and development modes of border ports in China[J]. Sustainability, 6(10): 7089-7106. doi: 10.3390/su6107089
[22]	Xu S.1997. The new Asian-Europe land bridge: Current situation and future prospects[J]. Japan Railway & Transport Review, 14: 30-33.
[1]	陈蓉, 石国进. 2015. 打造“一带一路”中欧班列品牌的思考[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 37(11): 71-74. doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2015.11.14
	[Chen R, Shi G J.2015. Thoughts on creating China-Europe block train with concept of "One Economic Belt, One Silk Road"[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 37(11): 71-74] doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2015.11.14
[2]	付新平, 张雪, 邹敏, 等. 2016. 基于价值量模型的中欧班列经济性比较分析[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 38(11): 1-5, 11. doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2016.11.01
	[Fu X P, Zhang X, Zou M, et al.2016. Analysis on economics of China-Europe block trains based on the value model[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 38(11): 1-5, 11.] doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2016.11.01
[3]	公丕萍, 宋周莺, 刘卫东. 2015. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家贸易的商品格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 571-580. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.005
	[Gong P P, Song Z Y, Liu W D.2015. Commodity structure of trade between China and countries in the Belt and Road Initiative area[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 571-580.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.005
[4]	胡鞍钢, 马伟, 鄢一龙. 2014. “丝绸之路经济带”: 战略内涵、定位和实现路径[J]. 新疆师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 35(2): 1-11.
	[Hu A G, Ma W, Yan Y L.2014. Connotation, definition and passage of "Silk-Road Economic Belt" strategy[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University: Edition of Philosophy and Social Sciences, 35(2): 1-11.]
[5]	金凤君, 王成金. 2005. 轴—辐侍服理念下的中国航空网络模式构筑[J]. 地理研究, 24(5): 774-784. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.05.015
	[Jin F J, Wang C J.2005. Hub- and- Spoke system and China aviation network organization[J]. Geographical Research, 24(5): 774-784.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2005.05.015
[6]	李佳峰. 2016. “一带一路”战略下中欧班列优化对策研究[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 38(5): 41-45. doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2016.05.09
	[Li J F.2016. Study on countermeasures of optimizing China-Europe block trains under "the Belt and Road" strategy[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 38(5): 41-45.] doi: 10.16668/j.cnki.issn.1003-1421.2016.05.09
[7]	刘卫东. 2015. “一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 538-544. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
	[Liu W D.2015. Scientific understanding of the Belt and Road Initiative of China and related research themes[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 538-544.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.001
[8]	吕承超, 徐倩. 2015. 新丝绸之路经济带交通基础设施空间非均衡及互联互通政策研究[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 17(2): 44-53, 85.
	[Lü C C, Xu Q.2015. Space disequilibrium and interconnection policy for transportation infrastructure in new Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 17(2): 44-53, 85.]
[9]	莫辉辉, 王姣娥, 宋周莺. 2015. 丝绸之路经济带国际集装箱陆路运输的经济适应范围[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 581-588. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.006
	[Mo H H, Wang J E, Song Z Y.2015. Economically suitable areas of China's transnational container transport by land in the Silk Road Economic Belt[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 581-588.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.006
[10]	宋周莺, 车姝韵, 王姣娥, 等. 2015. 中国沿边口岸的时空格局及功能模式[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 589-597. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.007
	[Song Z Y, Che S Y, Wang J E, et al.2015. Spatiotemporal distribution and functions of border ports in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 589-597.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.007
[11]	王成金. 2008. 中国物流企业的空间组织网络[J]. 地理学报, 63(2): 135-146. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2008.02.003
	[Wang C J.2008. Spatial organizational network of logistics company in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(2): 135-146.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2008.02.003
[12]	王姣娥, 景悦, 王成金. 2017. “中欧班列”运输组织策略研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 32(4): 370-376.
	[Wang J E, Jing Y, Wang C J.2017. Study on better organization of China-Europe express train[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(4): 370-376.]
[13]	王姣娥, 王涵, 焦敬娟. 2015. “一带一路”与中国对外航空运输联系[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 554-562. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.003
	[Wang J E, Wang H, Jiao J J.2015. China's international aviation transport to the Belt and Road Initiative area[J]. Progress in Geography, 34(5): 554-562.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.05.003
[14]	王杨堃. 2015. 中欧班列发展现状、问题及建议[J]. 综合运输, 37(S1): 70-75, 89.
	[Wang Y Q.2015. Status, problems and suggestions on development of Sino-Europe block trains[J]. China Transportation Review, 37(S1): 70-75, 89.]
[15]	谢燮. 2016. 中欧铁路运输的经济性分析及趋势展望[J]. 水运管理, 38(7): 14-17.
	[Xie Y.2016. Economic analysis and prospective of Sino-Europe block trains[J]. Shipping Management, 38(7): 14-17.]
[16]	郑蕾, 刘志高. 2015. 中国对“一带一路”沿线直接投资空间格局[J]. 地理科学进展, 34(5): 563-570.

出境口岸	运价率	出境口岸	运价率
出境口岸	运价率	出境口岸	高方案	中方案	低方案
阿拉山口	国内：0.6	二连浩特	国内：0.6	国内：0.6	国内：0.6
	俄罗斯：0.7		俄罗斯：0.6	俄罗斯：0.5	俄罗斯：0.4
	哈萨克斯坦：0.94		蒙古国：0.6	蒙古国：0.5	蒙古国：0.4
满洲里	国内：0.6
满洲里	俄罗斯：0.4

铁路口岸	城市	铁路编组站	站点
一般性口岸	东莞、广州、深圳、佛山、肇庆、凭祥、郑州、绥芬河、哈尔滨、图们、珲春、吉安、丹东、满洲里、二连浩特、阿拉山口、河口、北京、上海和霍尔果斯等20个口岸	路网性	哈尔滨南、沈阳西、沈阳南、山海关、长春、石家庄、济南西、徐州北、阜阳北、南京东、南翔、鹰潭、郑州北、株洲北、襄樊北等
临时对外开放口岸	重庆、成都、西安、乌鲁木齐、武汉、东莞、义乌、赣州等8个口岸	区域性	三间房、四平、哈尔滨、南仓、大同西、向塘西、江岸西、武昌南、衡阳北、广州北、柳州南、西安东、宝鸡东、兰州西成都东、重庆西、贵阳南等
		地方性	牡丹江、通辽南、梅河口、太原北、乔司、艮山门、淮南西、青岛西、来舟、怀化南包头西、迎水桥、武威南、乌鲁木齐西、昆明东、安康东等

Transport hinterlands of border ports by China-Europe express trains and hub identification

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 16

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737.
[2]	Nanchen CHU, Pingyu ZHANG, He LI. High-speed rail impact on regional accessibility and its spatial effects:A case study of the Blagoveshchensk-Vladivostok railway [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 988-997.
[3]	Lifan SHEN, Chun ZHANG, He LI, Ye WANG, Zijia WANG. Relationship between urban rail transit commuting and jobs-housing balance: An empirical analysis from Beijing based on big data methods [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 791-806.
[4]	WANG Shaobo, GUO Jianke, LUO Xiaolong, GU Zongni. Spatial differentiation of the impact of high-speed rail on aviation passenger market in central cities of China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1665-1674.
[5]	Yinfeng XU, Degen WANG. Research progress and prospects of high-speed rail effects on urban spatial structure in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(9): 1216-1230.
[6]	Deyou MENG, Xiaojian LI. Spatial pattern of cost accessibility of provincial capital cities by high-speed rail and consumption in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(8): 1055-1065.
[7]	Zhixin HAO, Yani LIANG, Yang LIU, Xiu GENG, Jingyun ZHENG. Characteristics of temperature changes during the past millennium along the Ancient Silk Road [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(4): 485-494.
[8]	Jie HUANG, Jiaoe WANG, Haitao JIN, Fengjun JIN. Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of passenger flows in the Beijing metro system from smart card data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(3): 397-406.
[9]	P. Y. LOO Becky, Bo WANG. The importance of integrated transport in fostering the formation of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(12): 1623-1632.
[10]	Cheng WANG, Maojun WANG, Yi WANG. Identification of Chinese key nodes in the shipping network of the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(11): 1485-1498.
[11]	Yu HUANG, Yuejing GE, Teng MA, Xiaofeng LIU. Geopolitical space of China's high-speed railway diplomacy [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(12): 1489-1499.
[12]	Kaiyang ZHANG, Xiaochen MENG. “Involuntary high-speed railway travel”: A case study based on the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(4): 496-504.
[13]	Jianke GUO, Shaobo WANG, Hui WANG, Tianbao LIU. Impact of Harbin-Dalian high-speed railway on the spatial distribution of tourism supply and demand markets in Northeast China cities: Based on the accessibility of the scenic spots [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(4): 505-514.
[14]	Yang SUN, Shimou YAO, Luocheng ZHANG. Functional structure of spatial flow in the Yangtze River Delta: Analysis of passenger based data for the high speed railway [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(11): 1381-1387.
[15]	Xiaoshu CAO, Tao LI, Wenyue YANG, Xiaoyan HUANG, Jiangbin YIN, Yongwei LIU, Feiwen LIANG, Wulin WANG, Miaomiao WANG, Huiling CHEN, Baixian ZHANG. Accessibility and urban spatial connections of cities in the Silk Road Economic Belt based on land transportation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(6): 657-664.