北京城市办公集聚区外部环境的主观评价

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.05.011

Abstract

Abstract:

：Business activities conducted in office buildings are becoming the main driving force of economic development in metropolitan areas. Research on the external environment of office space not only can provide some guidance for office space planning and design, but also can improve the quality of urban built environment and urban construction. This study took the 10 typical office clusters in Beijing as the survey areas and selected safety, accessibility, comfort, and convenience as the key aspects of evaluation to analyze resident satisfaction toward the external environment of office space in Beijing. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The overall subjective evaluation result of external environment of office space is satisfactory. Compared with the high satisfaction level of safety, rail transit and office supporting service network developments lagged behind, which led to a low degree of comfort and convenience. (2) Individual characteristics including gender, age, level of education, and position have important impacts on the perception of the external environment of office clusters. Women demand higher safety. People with higher education level and position have higher demand for better external environment. (3) According to the evaluation result, the 10 office clusters in Beijing can be divided into four categories: mature advanced type, to be improved type, lagged behind type, and uncoordinated type. The evaluation results of office clusters reveal the difference between the actual external environment of the office space and the psychological needs of office employees, which provides a basis for differentiated improvement of such environments.

Key words: external environment, office cluster, quantitative analysis, satisfaction evaluation, subjective perception, Beijing

Maocheng ZHEN, Jingqiu ZHANG, Mengfei LI. Subjective evaluation of external environment of office space in Beijing[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(5): 635-643.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2.

Tab1

Fig.3

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig.4

References 32

[1]	柴彦威, 塔娜. 2011. 中国行为地理学研究近期进展[J]. 干旱区地理, 34(1): 1-11.
	[Chai Y W,Ta N.2011. Recent progress of behavioral geographic research in china[J]. Arid Land Geography, 34(1): 1-11.]
[2]	李翠敏, 吕迅. 2005. 上海办公楼区位研究初探[J]. 上海师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 34(1): 97-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5137.2005.01.017
	[Li C M, Lv X.2005. An inquiry into the locating of office buildings in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Shanghai Normal University: Natural Sciences, 34(1): 97-101.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5137.2005.01.017
[3]	李敏. 2013. 满足环境心理需求的办公空间室内设计的研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学.
	[Li M.2013. Study of environmental psychology in office interior space[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University.]
[4]	孟斌, 尹卫红, 张景秋, 等. 2009. 北京宜居城市满意度空间特征[J]. 地理研究, 28(5): 1318-1326. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.018
	[Meng B, Yin W H, Zhang J Q, et al.2009. The spatial characteristics of the livable city satisfaction degree index in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 28(5): 1318-1326.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2009.05.018
[5]	王丹丹, 张景秋, 孙蕊. 2014. 北京城市办公空间通达性感知研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(12): 1676-1683. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.12.011
	[Wang D D, Zhang J Q, Sun R.2014. Perception of office space accessibility in Beijing urban area[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(12): 1676-1683.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.12.011
[6]	王晶, 甄峰, 冯静. 2015. 信息时代联合办公空间的发展及其对创新的影响研究[J]. 西部人居环境学刊, 30(6): 48-52. doi: 10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20150611
	[Wang J, Zhen F, Feng J.2015. Research on the development of co-working space and its impact on innovation in the information era[J]. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 30(6): 48-52.] doi: 10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20150611
[7]	王茂军, 张学霞, 栾维新. 2003. 大连城市居住环境评价构造与空间分析[J]. 地理科学, 23(1): 87-94.
	[Wang M J, Zhang X X, Luan W X.2003. Structure and spatial analysis of evaluation of residential environment in Dalian City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 23(1): 87-94.]
[8]	王颖. 2010. 开放式办公空间物理环境满意度与环境心理品质研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学.
	[Wang Y.2010. Study on physical environment satisfaction and mental quality of open-plan office[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University.]
[9]	温锋华, 李立勋. 2010. 广州市商务办公空间区划及其功能分异研究[J]. 热带地理, 30(5): 528-533.
	[Wen F H, Li L X.2010. On zoning and functional differentiation of the business office space in Guangzhou[J]. Tropical Geography, 30(5): 528-533.]
[10]	温锋华, 许学强. 2010. 基于分形理论的特大城市新型产业空间发展演变研究: 以广州商务办公空间为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 17(5): 23-29.
	[Wen F H, Xu X Q.2010. A research on the metropolitan new industry space evolution basing on the fractal theory: A case study of Guangzhou business space[J]. Urban Studies, 17(5): 23-29.]
[11]	温锋华, 许学强. 2011. 广州商务办公空间发展及其与城市空间的耦合研究[J]. 人文地理, 26(2): 37-43.
	[Wen F H, Xu X Q.2011. The development of business office space of Guangzhou and its coupling relationship with the urban space[J]. Human Geography, 26(2): 37-43.]
[12]	温锋华, 许学强, 李立勋. 2008. 西方国家办公空间研究综述[J]. 世界地理研究, 17(2): 85-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2008.02.012
	[Wen F H, Xu X Q, Li L X.2008. Review of the research on office space in Western countries[J]. World Regional Studies, 17(2): 85-94.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2008.02.012
[13]	湛东升, 孟斌, 张文忠. 2014. 北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究[J]. 地理研究, 33(2): 336-348. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402012
	[Zhan D S, Meng B, Zhang W Z.2014. A study on residential satisfaction and its behavioral intention in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 33(2): 336-348.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201402012
[14]	张景秋, 蔡晶. 2006. 北京城市办公业发展与城市变化阶段分析[J]. 城市发展研究. (3):79-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2006.03.016
	[Zhang J Q, Cai J.2006. Study on office industry development and urban change stages in Beijing[J]. Urban Studies, (3): 79-85.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2006.03.016
[15]	张景秋, 陈叶龙, 张宝秀. 2010. 北京市办公业的空间格局演变及其模式研究[J]. 城市发展研究,17(10): 78-91.
	[Zhang J Q, Chen Y L, Zhang B X.2010. Analysis on spatial pattern and evolution trend of office industry in Beijing[J]. Urban Studies, 17(10): 78-91.]
[16]	张景秋, 郭捷. 2011. 北京城市办公活动空间满意度分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 30(10): 1225-1232. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.10.004
	[Zhang J Q, Guo J.2011. Satisfaction evaluation of office activities in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 30(10): 1225-1232.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2011.10.004
[17]	张文忠. 2007a. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法[J]. 地理科学, 27(1): 17-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2007.01.003
	[Zhang W Z.2007. Index system and method of residential environmental evaluation in inner cities[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 27(1): 17-23.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.2007.01.003
[18]	张文忠. 2007b. 宜居城市的内涵及评价指标体系探讨[J]. 城市规划学刊, (3): 30-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2007.03.007
	[Zhang W Z.2007. Study on intrinsic meanings of the livable city and the evaluation system of livable city[J]. Uraban Plannning Forum, (3): 30-34.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2007.03.007
[19]	赵伟, 谢晖, 熊婷. 2014. 宁波城市商务办公空间格局及其演化机制探讨[J]. 宁波经济(三江论坛),(7): 13-17, 29.
	[Zhao W, Xie H, Xiong T.2014. Ningbo chengshi shangwu bangong kongjian geju jiqi yanhua jizhi tantao[J]. Ningbo Economy (Sanjiang Forum),(7): 13-17, 29.]
[20]	张晓平, 封强, 李媛芳. 2013. 北京市办公用地投标租金空间分异与影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 33(3): 73-78, 92.
	[Zhang X P, Feng Q, Li Y F.2013. Spatial heterogeneity and locational determinants of bid-rent of office land in Beijing[J]. Economic Geography. 33(3): 73-78, 92.]
[21]	张志斌, 巨继龙, 陈志杰. 2014. 兰州城市宜居性评价及其空间特征[J]. 生态学报, 34(12): 6379-6388. doi: 10.5846/stxb201312313074
	[Zhang Z B, Ju J L, Chen Z J.2014. The evaluation and spatial characteristics of the urban livable in Lanzhou City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34(12): 6379-6388.] doi: 10.5846/stxb201312313074
[22]	甄茂成, 张景秋, 朱海勇. 2014. 北京轨道交通换乘站点对办公空间集聚的影响[J]. 地理科学进展, 33(4): 499-507. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.007
	[Zhen M C, Zhang J Q, Zhu H Y.2014. Effect of metro transfer stations on office space agglomeration in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 33(4): 499-507.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.04.007
[23]	Cervero R.2006. Office development, rail transit, and commuting choices[J]. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(5): 41-55. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.9.5.3
[24]	Daniels P W.1982. An exploratory study of office location behavior in Greater Seattle[J]. Urban Geography, 3(1): 58-78. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.3.1.58
[25]	Drennan M P, Kelly H F.2011. Measuring urban agglomeration economies with office rents[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(3): 481-507. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp066
[26]	Goddard J B.1973 Office linkages and location: A study of communications and spatial patterns in central London[J]. Progress in Planning, 1(2): 109-232. doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(73)90001-9
[27]	Horr Y A, Arif M, Kaushik A.2016. Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature[J]. Building and Environment, 105: 369-389. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.001
[28]	Lang R E, Sanchez T W, Oner A C.2009. Beyond edge city: Office geography in the new metropolis[J]. Urban Geography, 30(7): 726-755. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.30.7.726
[29]	Marshall J N, Phil M.1984. Information technology changes corporate office activity[J]. GeoJournal, 9(2): 171-178. doi: 10.1007/BF00174494
[30]	Phelps N A.2004. Clusters, dispersion and the spaces in between: For an economic geography of the Banal[J]. Urban Studies, 41: 971-989. doi: 10.1080/00420980410001675887
[31]	Wolfeld L D.2010. Effects of office layout on job satisfaction, productivity and organizational commitment as transmitted through face-to-face interactions[J]. Colonial Academic Alliance Undergraduate Research Journal, 1:1-21.
[32]	Yannopoulos G.1973. Local income effects of office relocation[J]. Regional Studies, 7(1): 33-46. doi: 10.1080/09595237300185031

变量	数量	比例/%
性别
男	347	47.40
女	385	52.60
年龄
25岁以下	156	21.30
26~30岁	241	32.90
31~40岁	230	31.40
41~50岁	83	11.40
51~60岁	20	2.70
60岁以上	2	0.30
教育程度
小学及以下	11	1.50
初中	48	6.56
高中	34	4.64
大学	573	78.28
研究生及以上	66	9.02
职位
普通职员(公务员)	513	70.08
业务主管(科级干部)	166	22.68
高级经理(处级干部)及以上	42	5.74
临时(兼职)	11	1.50

属性	赋值
性别	1=男;2=女
年龄	1=25岁以下;2=26~30岁;3=31~40岁;4=41~50岁;5=51~60岁;6=60岁以上
教育程度	1=小学及以下;2=初中;3=高中;4=大学;5=研究生及以上
职位	0=临时(兼职);1=普通职员(公务员);2=业务主管(科级干部);3=高级经理(处级干部)及以上

	安全性	通达性	舒适度	便利度	总得分
性别	-0.087^*	-0.045	-0.05	-0.004	-0.082^*
年龄	0.048	-0.018	-0.03	-0.003	0.013
教育程度	0.01	0.121^**	0.057	0.145^**	0.096^**
职位	0.106^**	0.066	0.064	0.079^*	0.124^**

序号	办公集聚区	安全性	通达性	舒适度	便利度	总得分
1	CBD	79.9	72.0	39.1	57.6	65.8
2	金融街	72.8	70.9	40.4	45.9	61.2
3	奥运村+亚运村	78.9	58.0	37.9	53.5	59.7
4	三元桥+燕莎	45.4	57.1	29.1	45.5	46.6
5	中关村	57.5	67.7	34.2	47.2	54.9
6	望京	60.2	58.7	31.1	46.3	51.9
7	亦庄	94.3	67.1	26.0	34.2	61.3
8	上地	58.5	54.9	39.5	44.6	51.2
9	总部基地	69.2	52.1	35.6	35.6	50.8
10	鲁谷	53.8	44.8	23.7	40.2	42.9

序号	办公集聚区	安全性	通达性	舒适度	便利度	总得分
1	CBD	0.88	1.32	0.92	1.74	1.54
2	金融街	0.39	1.19	1.14	0.12	0.90
3	奥运村+亚运村	0.80	-0.26	0.72	1.17	0.70
4	三元桥+燕莎	-1.47	-0.36	-0.77	0.06	-1.11
5	中关村	-0.65	0.83	0.09	0.30	0.04
6	望京	-0.47	-0.19	-0.44	0.17	-0.38
7	亦庄	1.86	0.77	-1.29	-1.51	0.92
8	上地	-0.58	-0.62	0.98	-0.06	-0.47
9	总部基地	0.14	-0.93	0.32	-1.31	-0.52
10	鲁谷	-0.90	-1.75	-1.68	-0.67	-1.62

Subjective evaluation of external environment of office space in Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 32

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHU Guanyu, CHEN Peng. Spatial evolution and influencing factors of criminals’ cross-area co-offending network: An example of fraud in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 792-803.
[2]	GUO Yaqi, CHEN Peng. Formation and feature analyses of crime hotspots using near repeat principle: A case study of robbery in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 804-814.
[3]	ZHANG Feng, CHEN Yanguang, LIU Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 377-388.
[4]	LU Minghua, ZHOU Yueyan, LIU Hanchu, XU Xin. Spatiotemporal dynamics and influencing factors of direct investment in Hebei Province by Beijing’s enterprises [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 389-401.
[5]	LI Xiaoli, SONG Weixuan, WU Wei, MA Yuzhu. Beijing urban spatial cognition based on follow-up investigations:Take graduate students in the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 276-285.
[6]	LUO Kui, LI Guangdong, LAO Xin. Spatial reconstruction and optimization of industrial development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 179-194.
[7]	LIU Xiaoxiao, WU Kang. Change of industrial investment networks in the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of non-capital function dispersal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1972-1984.
[8]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[9]	WANG Bei, WANG Liang, LIU Yanhua, YANG Bo, HUANG Xiaochun, YANG Ming. Characteristics of jobs-housing spatial distribution in Beijing based on mobile phone signaling data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2028-2042.
[10]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[11]	Chunjiang LI, Jing MA, Yanwei CHAI, Mei-Po KWAN. Influence of neighborhood environment and noise pollution on residents’ mental health in Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1103-1110.
[12]	Xiaoxue SHI, Daoyi GONG, Yihong HU. Regional strong winter wind events over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the associated atmospheric circulation changes during 1979-2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1069-1079.
[13]	Lifan SHEN, Chun ZHANG, He LI, Ye WANG, Zijia WANG. Relationship between urban rail transit commuting and jobs-housing balance: An empirical analysis from Beijing based on big data methods [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 791-806.
[14]	Bingchun LIU, Xin QI, Qingshan WANG. Urban metabolism prediction of Beijing City based on long short-term memory neural network [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 851-860.
[15]	Xing HUANG, Yuting LIU. Exploring new-build gentrification in urban China from the demand side: A case of the ZS neighborhood in Xuanwumen, Beijing [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 577-587.