中国主要城市群新增制造业用地特征及城镇体系耦合分析

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.12.005

Abstract

Abstract:

China has experienced rapid industrial development, especially in manufacturing. Formation of China's emerging urban agglomerations has relied on this development along with the expansion of manufacturing land. In order to explore the structure and layout conditions of new manufacturing land as well as functional division status, based on the data of manufacturing land transaction collected from China's land market from 2009 to 2013, this study analyzes the characteristics and development of new manufacturing land in five major urban agglomerations—the Yangtze River Delta, the Pearl River Delta, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the middle reach of the Yangtze River, and the Chengdu-Chongqing area. The location entropy method was used to explore land distribution characteristics at the city level. Coupled with urban system, three evaluation indicators—price level, level of activity, and scale were selected to analyze the development discrepancies at the county level. Pearson correlation coefficient method was further adopted for quantitative analysis. The results show that: (1) New manufacturing land differed significantly among the urban agglomerations. Development in the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta is balanced. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the middle reach of the Yangtze River, and the Chengdu-Chongqing area showed poor coordination. (2) Each industrial category presents the characteristics of spatial clustering in all urban agglomerations. The raw materials industry is mostly concentrated in the peripheral cities of urban agglomerations and the low-grade land areas within cities, while electronic information industry tends to distribute in the core cities of urban agglomeration and the high-grade land areas within cities. (3) Market mechanism is present in new manufacturing land acquisition, where land price follows the value (grade) of land. There has been very limited manufacturing land transaction in the core urban areas, and the most active market transaction generally occurred immediately outside the core urban areas. The conclusions could provide some references for adjusting and optimizing industrial layout, and coordinate development strategies in regions of different industrial development levels.

Key words: land transaction, manufacturing, new manufacturing land, coupling characteristics, urban agglomeration, China

Wei SUN, Xiaobin JIN, Zhihong ZHANG, Juan HAN, Xiaomin XIANG, Yinkang ZHOU. Characteristics of new manufacturing land and coupling analysis with urban system in Chinese major urban agglomerations[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(12): 1483-1493.

Figures/Tables 7

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.2

Evaluation indicators of new manufacturing land development"

指标	指标名称	计算公式	说明
X₁	价格水平/(元/m²)	$∑ P ij N ij$	表征制造业用地出让价格平均水平。其中 $P ij$ 表示研究期内第 $j$ 个城市群内研究单元 $i$ 各宗地的成交地价; $N ij$ 表示研究期内第 $j$ 个城市群内研究单元 $i$ 的总交易宗数。
X₂	活跃水平/宗	$N ij$	表征制造业用地出让的数量,代表市场活跃水平。其中 $N ij$ 表示研究期内第 $j$ 个城市群内研究单元 $i$ 的总交易宗数。
X₃	规模水平/(hm²/宗)	$∑ S ij N ij$	表征制造业用地出让的平均规模。其中 $S ij$ 表示研究期内第 $j$ 个城市群内研究单元 $i$ 各宗地的出让规模; $N ij$ 表示研究期内第 $j$ 个城市群内研究单元 $i$ 的总交易宗数。
X₄	工业最低出让价格/(元/m²)	/	根据《全国工业用地出让最低价标准》(国土资发(2009)56号),将全国分为15个级别,确定各县区工业用地最低出让价格。

Tab.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.3

References 25

[1]	陈曦, 席强敏, 李国平. 2015. 城镇化水平与制造业空间分布: 基于中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J]. 地理科学, 35(3): 259-267.
	[Chen X, Xi Q M, Li G P.2015. Urbanization level and spatial distribution of manufacturing industry: An empirical research based on provincial panel data[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 35(3): 259-267.]
[2]	党兴华, 郭子彦, 赵璟. 2007. 基于区域外部性的城市群协调发展[J]. 经济地理, 27(3): 463-466, 475. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2007.03.025
	[Dang X H, Guo Z Y, Zhao J.2007. Research on congruous development of urban agglomeration based on regional externalities[J]. Economic Geography, 27(3): 463-466, 475.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2007.03.025
[3]	方创琳, 姚士谋, 刘盛和, 等. 2011. 2010中国城市群发展报告[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Fang C L, Yao S M, Liu S H, et al.2011. 2010 Zhongguo chengshiqun fazhan baogao[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
[4]	傅元海, 叶祥松, 王展祥. 2014. 制造业结构优化的技术进步路径选择: 基于动态面板的经验分析[J]. 中国工业经济, (9): 78-90.
	[Fu Y H, Ye X S, Wang Z X.2014. The selection of technology progress path of manufacturing structure optimization: An empirical analysis based on dynamic panel data model[J]. China Industrial Economics, (9): 78-90.]
[5]	顾朝林. 2011. 城市群研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 30(5): 771-784. doi: 10.11821/yj2011050001
	[Gu C L.2011. Study on urban agglomeration: Progress and prospects[J]. Geographical Research, 30(5): 771-784.] doi: 10.11821/yj2011050001
[6]	国家发改委国地所课题组. 2009. 我国城市群的发展阶段与十大城市群的功能定位[J]. 改革, (9): 5-23.
	[The Academic Group of Territorial Development and Regional Economic Development Institution in National Development and Reform Commission.2009. The developing stage of and function orientation of ten Chinese urban cluster[J]. Reform, (9): 5-23.]
[7]	贺灿飞, 潘峰华, 孙蕾. 2007. 中国制造业的地理集聚与形成机制[J]. 地理学报, 62(12): 1253-1264. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.12.003
	[He C F, Pan F H, Sun L.2007. Geographical concentration of manufacturing industries in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(12): 1253-1264.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.12.003
[8]	贺灿飞, 朱彦刚, 朱晟君. 2010. 产业特性、区域特征与中国制造业省区集聚[J]. 地理学报, 65(10): 1218-1228. doi: 10.11821/xb201010007
	[He C F, Zhu Y G, Zhu S J.2010. Industrial attributes, provincial characteristics and industrial agglomeration in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(10): 1218-1228.] doi: 10.11821/xb201010007
[9]	黄大全, 洪丽璇, 梁进社. 2009. 福建省工业用地效率分析与集约利用评价[J]. 地理学报, 64(4): 479-486. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.04.010
	[Huang D Q, Hong L X, Liang J S.2009. Analysis and evaluation of industrial land efficiency and intensive use in Fujian Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(4): 479-486.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2009.04.010
[10]	马延吉. 2010. 辽中南城市群产业集聚发展与格局[J]. 经济地理, 30(8): 1294-1298.
	[Ma Y J.2010. Development and pattern of industrial agglomeration in central and southern Liaoning[J]. Economic Geography, 30(8): 1294-1298.]
[11]	沈静, 向澄, 柳意云. 2012. 广东省污染密集型产业转移机制: 基于2000-2009年面板数据模型的实证[J]. 地理研究, 31(2): 357-368. doi: 10.11821/yj2012020015
	[Shen J, Xiang C, Liu Y Y.2012. The mechanism of pollution-intensive industry relocation in Guangdong Province, 2000-2009[J]. Geographical Research, 31(2): 357-368.] doi: 10.11821/yj2012020015
[12]	王家庭, 曹清峰, 田时嫣. 2012. 产业集聚、政府作用与工业地价: 基于35个大中城市的经验研究[J]. 中国土地科学, 26(9): 12-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.09.002
	[Wang J T, Cao Q F, Tian S Y.2012. Industrial agglomeration, government intervention and industrial land prices: An empirical study on 35 cities in China[J]. China Land Sciences, 26(9): 12-20.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2012.09.002
[13]	王贤彬. 2014. 土地出让与产业发展[J]. 经济管理, (1): 12-21.
	[Wang X B.2014. Land lease and industry development[J]. Economic Management Journal, (1): 12-21.]
[14]	乌铁红, 张捷, 李文杰, 等. 2009. 中国入境旅游经济发展水平的空间格局演变及成因: 基于入境旅游经济区位熵的分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 23(5): 189-194.
	[Wu T H, Zhang J, Li W J, et al.2009. The spatial pattern evolution of the inbound tourism economic development level and the causes in China: Based on the inbound tourism economic entropy analysis[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 23(5): 189-194.]
[15]	武前波, 宁越敏. 2010. 中国制造业企业500强总部区位特征分析[J]. 地理学报, 65(2): 139-152. doi: 10.11821/xb201002002
	[Wu Q B, Ning Y M.2010. Headquarter locations of top 500 enterprises of Chinese manufacturing industries[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(2): 139-152.] doi: 10.11821/xb201002002
[16]	谢花林, 王伟, 姚冠荣, 等. 2015. 中国主要经济区城市工业用地效率的时空差异和收敛性分析[J]. 地理学报, 70(8): 1327-1338. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508011
	[Xie H L, Wang W, Yao G R, et al.2015. Spatial and temporal differences and convergence of China's main economic zones[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(8): 1327-1338.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201508011
[17]	曾春水. 2013. 京津冀城市群城市规模等级与服务业发展差异[D]. 北京: 首都师范大学.
	[Zeng C S.2013. Urban size hierarchy and service industry development differences in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration[D]. Beijing, China: Capital Normal University.]
[18]	赵浚竹, 孙铁山, 李国平. 2014. 中国汽车制造业集聚与企业区位选择[J]. 地理学报, 69(6): 850-862. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201406011
	[Zhao J Z, Sun T S, Li G P.2014. Agglomeration and firm location choice of China's automobile manufacturing industry[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(6): 850-862.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201406011
[19]	周霞. 2013. 城市群工业地价与产业结构高级化的互动机理研究: 以京津冀城市群为例[D]. 北京: 首都经济贸易大学.
	[Zhou X.2013. The research on interaction mechanism between manufacturing industry land price and the promoting of industrial structure in urban agglomerations: A case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration[D]. Beijing, China: Capital University of Economics and Business.]
[20]	朱华晟, 王缉慈, 李鹏飞, 等. 2009. 基于多重动力机制的集群企业迁移及区域影响: 以温州灯具企业迁移中山古镇为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 28(3): 329-336. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.03.002
	[Zhu H S, Wang J C, Li P F, et al.2009. Firm migration of clusters in east coastal areas of China: A case study of lamp-making clusters in Wenzhou, Zhejiang[J]. Progress in Geography, 28(3): 329-336.] doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.03.002
[21]	Ellison G, Glaeser E L.1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5): 889-927. doi: 10.1086/262098
[22]	Gordon I R, McCann P.2000. Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks[J]. Urban Studies, 37(3): 513-532.
[23]	Lu J Y.2010. Agglomeration of economic activities in China: Evidence from establishment censuses[J]. Regional Studies, 44(3): 281-297. doi: 10.1080/00343400802195139
[24]	Smith D M.1971. Industrial location: An economic geographical analysis[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[25]	Varian H R.1992. Microeconomic analysis[M]. 3rd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company: 24-26.

年份	长三角城市群			珠三角城市群		京津冀城市群			长江中游城市群			成渝城市群
年份	数量/宗		面积/hm²		数量/宗	面积/hm²		数量/宗	面积/hm²	数量/宗	面积/hm²	数量/宗	面积/hm²
2009	9222	19956.26		771	2565.99	1886	11843.10		920	3324.76		1194	5656.10
2010	11134	27928.48		902	3904.11	2074	10864.17		1331	5934.86		1437	6690.05
2011	9722	25843.85		800	2968.72	2282	10523.07		1588	6789.98		1781	8130.50
2012	10137	23985.22		698	2769.32	2408	11824.48		1636	6203.39		1499	6927.68
2013	9926	20839.92		744	3152.36	2960	9656.18		1681	6383.98		1668	7247.79
合计	50141	118553.73		3915	15360.50	11610	54711.00		7156	28636.97		7579	34652.12

		长三角县区中心度			珠三角县区中心度			京津冀县区中心度			长江中游县区中心度			成渝县区中心度
		相关系数		Sig.		相关系数		Sig.		相关系数	Sig.	相关系数	Sig.	相关系数	Sig.
电子信息产业	地价水平	0.356^**	0.000		0.652^**	0.000		0.335^**	0.007		0.382^**	0.001		0.459^**	0.000
	活跃水平	0.095	0.177		0.174	0.236		0.083	0.241		-0.103	0.284		0.139^*	0.095
	规模水平	-0.037	0.600		-0.217	0.138		0.287^**	0.000		-0.167^*	0.080		0.115	0.168
消费品工业	地价水平	0.557^**	0.000		0.500^**	0.001		0.533^**	0.000		0.453^**	0.000		0.646^**	0.000
	活跃水平	-0.104	0.142		0.074			0.616	0.016			0.823		-0.167^*		0.080	-0.050	0.547
	规模水平	-0.058	0.412		-0.217			0.138	-0.079			0.263		-0.325^**		0.002	-0.050	0.548
原材料工业	地价水平	0.537^**	0.000	0.547^**	0.000	0.360^**	0.000	0.492^**	0.000	0.568^**	0.000
	活跃水平	-0.132^*	0.061	-0.232		0.112	0.052		0.468	-0.293^**		0.002	-0.131		0.114
	规模水平	-0.149^*	0.034	-0.497^**		0.000	-0.025		0.729	-0.325^**		0.000	-0.216^**		0.009
装备制造业	地价水平	0.678^**	0.000	0.735^**	0.000	0.617^**	0.000	0.564^**	0.000	0.615^**	0.000
	活跃水平	-0.013	0.856	0.022		0.883	0.046		0.516	-0.088		0.357	0.102		0.218
	规模水平	-0.106	0.132	-0.158		0.284	0.002		0.974	0.433^**		0.000	-0.013		0.880

Characteristics of new manufacturing land and coupling analysis with urban system in Chinese major urban agglomerations

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	CHEN Zhuo, LIANG Yi, JIN Fengjun. Simulation of city network accessibility and its influence on regional development pattern in China based on integrated land transport system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 183-193.
[2]	CHEN Ruishan, ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Di, CHEN Yi. Progress of research on sustainable development index for cities and urban agglomerations [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 61-72.
[3]	JIANG Wanbei, LIU Weidong, LIU Zhigao, HAN Mengyao. Inequality and driving forces of energy-related CO₂ emissions intensity in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1425-1435.
[4]	HUANG Yingze, QIU Bingwen, HE Yuhua, ZHANG Ke, ZOU Fengli. Optimal elevation interval of rice expansion in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1557-1564.
[5]	HU Guojian, LU Yuqi. Progress, thoughts, and prospect of urban network research based on enterprise perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(9): 1587-1596.
[6]	FU Zhanhui, MEI Lin, ZHENG Rumin, WANG Tongtong. Spatial differentiation mechanism of urban female employment rate in Northeast China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1308-1318.
[7]	ZHU Shengjun, HUANG Yongyuan, HU Xiaohui. Research framework and prospect of industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading based on a multiple scale perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384.
[8]	DU Xinru, LU Zi, LI Renjie, DONG Yaqing, GAO Wei. Estimation of time delay cost of hub airports in China, air routes effect and comparison with the United States [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1160-1171.
[9]	ZHOU Guohua, ZHANG Rujiao, HE Yanhua, DAI Liuyan, ZHANG Li. Optimization of rural settlements and the governance of rural relative poverty [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 902-912.
[10]	TAN Xuelan, JIANG Lingxiao, WANG Zhenkai, AN Yue, CHEN Min, REN Hui. Rural poverty in China from the perspective of geography: Origin, progress, and prospect [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 913-923.
[11]	LIU Xiaopeng, CHENG Jing, ZHAO Xiaoyong, MIAO Hong, WEI Jingyi, ZENG Duan, MA Cunxia. Sustainable poverty reduction of China in a view of development geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 892-901.
[12]	GUO Jianke, HOU Yajie, HE Yao. Characteristics of change of the China-Europe port shipping network under the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 716-726.
[13]	SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737.
[14]	GUO Qingbin, LUO Kang, LIU Chengliang. A comparative study on the differences of factors aggregating ability among urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 542-552.
[15]	TANG Chengli, GUO Xiashuang, ZHOU Guohua, WU Jiamin, CHEN Weiyang. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of innovation platforms in urban agglomerations of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 531-541.