PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1258-1268.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.10.009
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yanni WANG(), Hai CHEN*(
), Shixiong SONG, Yajun MEI, Xin WEN
Online:
2016-10-28
Published:
2016-10-26
Contact:
Hai CHEN
E-mail:wynnwu2013@163.com;chw@nwu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Yanni WANG, Hai CHEN, Shixiong SONG, Yajun MEI, Xin WEN. Simulation of households' planting behavior based on a CR-BDI model: Case study of Jiangxingzhuang Village of Mizhi County in Shaanxi Province[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(10): 1258-1268.
Tab.3
Bounded rationality (CR) of the typical farming households"
农户 序号 | 能力(经济效益)指数 | 资源(劳动力)指数 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | 玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | ||
1 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
2 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.41 | 0.56 | |
3 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
4 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
5 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
6 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
7 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
8 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
9 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |
村庄整体均值 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.27 |
Tab.4
Desire of the typical farming households in decision making"
农户序号 | 玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
2 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
3 | 0.29 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
4 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
5 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
6 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
7 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.22 | 0.06 |
8 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
9 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
村庄整体均值 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
Tab.5
Simulation result of the CR-BDI model/hm2"
农户序号 | 玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | 农户失误率合计/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.37(-0.03) | 0.29(0.02) | 0.28(0.01) | 0.00(0.00) | 6.38 |
2 | 0.55(-0.05) | 0.40(0.02) | 0.44(0.07) | 0.05(-0.02) | 10.61 |
3 | 0.54(0.05) | 0.12(-0.02) | 0.08(-0.03) | 0.00(0.00) | 13.89 |
4 | 0.71(0.06) | 0.09(-0.05) | 0.35(0.04) | 0.15(-0.05) | 15.75 |
5 | 0.34(-0.06) | 0.67(0.02) | 0.39(0.06) | 0.05(-0.02) | 10.06 |
6 | 0.49(-0.04) | 0.63(-0.04) | 0.47(0.10) | 0.12(-0.02) | 12.59 |
7 | 0.14(0.03) | 0.07(-0.04) | 0.54(0.07) | 0.08(-0.05) | 23.53 |
8 | 0.17(-0.05) | 0.04(-0.02) | 0.52(0.09) | 0.07(-0.02) | 23.38 |
9 | 0.25(-0.02) | 0.08(-0.05) | 0.57(0.07) | 0.00(0.00) | 14.58 |
村庄失误面积累计 | 1.21 | 0.96 | 1.86 | 0.76 | 6.78 |
Tab.6
Simulation result of the BDI model/hm2"
序号 | 玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | 农户失误率合计/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.35(-0.06) | 0.28(0.02) | 0.31(0.04) | 0.00(0.00) | 12.77 |
2 | 0.50(-0.10) | 0.46(0.08) | 0.35(-0.02) | 0.11(0.04) | 18.18 |
3 | 0.42(-0.11) | 0.20(0.07) | 0.10(0.04) | 0.00(0.00) | 30.50 |
4 | 0.52(-0.16) | 0.27(0.13) | 0.33(0.08) | 0.15(-0.05) | 33.07 |
5 | 0.42(0.02) | 0.50(-0.17) | 0.40(0.06) | 0.16(0.09) | 22.97 |
6 | 0.56(0.03) | 0.50(-0.15) | 0.33(0.06) | 0.20(0.06) | 18.87 |
7 | 0.20(0.07) | 0.20(0.09) | 0.35(-0.12) | 0.10(-0.04) | 37.64 |
8 | 0.15(-0.05) | 0.05(0.01) | 0.51(0.11) | 0.06(-0.07) | 31.17 |
9 | 0.20(-0.10) | 0.26(0.13) | 0.50(-0.03) | 0.00(0.00) | 27.08 |
村庄失误面积累计 | 2.12 | 2.20 | 1.42 | 1.57 | 15.26 |
Tab.7
Simulation errors of the main natural conditions of the CR-BDI and BDI models/%"
自然条件 | CR-BDI模型 | BDI模型 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | 合计 | 玉米 | 土豆 | 红葱 | 杂粮 | 合计 | ||
31 + 41 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.7 | |
22 + 32 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 6.3 | |
23 + 33 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 7.0 | |
44 + 45 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 4.8 | |
整体失误 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 6.1 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
[1] | 常笑, 刘黎明, 刘朝旭, 等. 2013. 农户土地利用决策行为的多智能体模拟方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 29(14): 227-237. |
[Chang X, Liu L M, Liu Z X, et al.2013. Method of multi-agent system for simulating land-use decision-making behavior of farmer households[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(14): 227-237.] | |
[2] |
陈海, 梁小英, 高海东, 等. 2008. Multi-Agent System模型在土地利用/覆盖变化中的研究进展[J]. 自然资源学报, 23(2): 345-352.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.02.019 |
[Chen H, Liang X Y, Gao H D, et al.2008. A review on Multi-Agent System for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(2): 345-352.]
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.02.019 |
|
[3] | 陈海, 梁小英, 王国义, 等. 2014. 基于过程的农户土地利用行为模型的设计与模拟研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 29(6): 1076-1089. |
[Chen H, Liang X Y, Wang G Y, et al.2014. A process-based decision-making model and its application for farm households' learning behavior responding to environmental changes[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 29(6): 1076-1089.] | |
[4] | 陈海, 王涛, 梁小英, 等. 2009. 基于MAS的农户土地利用模型构建与模拟: 以陕西省米脂县孟岔村为例[J]. 地理学报, 64(12): 1448-1456. |
[Chen H, Wang T, Liang X Y, et al.2009. Simulation and application of household's LUCC based on a Multi-Agent system: A case study for Mengcha Village of Mizhi County of Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(12): 1448-1456.] | |
[5] |
陈姗姗, 陈海, 梁小英, 等. 2012. 农户有限理性土地利用行为决策影响因素: 以陕西省米脂县高西沟村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 27(8): 1286-1295.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.08.003 |
[Chen S S, Chen H, Liang X Y, et al.2012. Effect of the household bounded rationality decision-making about land use behavior: A case study for Gaoxigou Village of Mizhi County in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(8): 1286-1295.]
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2012.08.003 |
|
[6] |
杜守帅, 宋婷, 马兴波. 2011. 多智能体模拟在土地变化预测中的应用[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 39(10): 1510-1516.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2011.10.018 |
[Du S S, Song T, Ma X B.2011. Application of multi-agent simulation in land change prediction[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 39(10): 1510-1516.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-374x.2011.10.018 |
|
[7] |
梁小英, 刘俊新. 2010. 农户土地利用决策对农业景观格局的影响研究: 以陕西省米脂县孟岔村为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 25(9): 1489-1495.
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.09.008 |
[Liang X Y, Liu J X.2010. The study on the effect of the household decision-making to the agriculture landscape pattern: A case study for Mengcha Village of Mizhi County in Shaanxi Province[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 25(9): 1489-1495.]
doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.09.008 |
|
[8] | 宋长青, 冷疏影. 2005. 21世纪中国地理学综合研究的主要领域[J]. 地理学报, 60(4): 546-552. |
[Song C Q, Leng S Y.2005. Some important scientific problems of integrative study of Chinese geography in 5 to 10 years[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(4): 546-552.] | |
[9] | 吴文斌, 杨鹏, 柴崎亮介, 等. 2007. 基于Agent的土地利用/土地覆盖变化模型的研究进展[J]. 地理科学, 27(4): 573-578. |
[Wu W B, Yang P, Shibasaki R, et al.2007. Agent-based model for land-use/cover change: A review[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 27(4): 573-578.] | |
[10] | 郗静. 2009. 退耕还林政策影响下区域土地利用/覆被变化微观行为机制研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学. |
[Xi J.2009. Study on micro behaviour mechanism of regional land use and land cover change influenced by grain for green policy[D]. Xi'an, China: Northwest University.] | |
[11] | 张佰林, 蔡为民, 张凤荣, 等. 2016. 中国农村居民点用地微观尺度研究进展及展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 35(9): 1049-1061. |
[Zhang B L, Cai W M, Zhang F R, et al.2016. Progress and prospects of micro-scale research on rural residential land in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 35(9): 1049-1061.] | |
[12] |
张保华, 谷艳芳, 丁圣彦, 等. 2007. 农业景观格局演变及其生态效应研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 26(1): 114-122.
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.01.012 |
[Zhang B H, Gu Y F, Ding S Y, et al.2007. Research development on driving factors and ecological effects of agriculture landscape pattern change[J]. Progress in Geography, 26(1): 114-122.]
doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2007.01.012 |
|
[13] |
张小林, 盛明. 2002. 中国乡村地理学研究的重新定向[J]. 人文地理, 17(1): 81-84.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.019 |
[Zhang X L, Sheng M.2002. The reorientation of rural geography in China[J]. Human Geography, 17(1): 81-84.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2398.2002.01.019 |
|
[14] |
张云鹏, 孙燕. 2013. 基于Multi-Agent系统的土地利用情景模拟[J]. 南京工业大学学报: 自然科学版, 35(3): 75-81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2013.03.016 |
[Zhang Y P, Sun Y.2013. Scenario simulation of land use based on Multi-Agent System[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology: Natural Science Edition, 35(3): 75-81.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.2013.03.016 |
|
[15] |
Balke T, Gilbert N.2014. How do agents make decisions? A survey[J]. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(4): 13.
doi: 10.18564/jasss.2687 |
[16] | Costanza R, Ruth M.1998. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus[J]. Environmental Management, 22(2): 183-195. |
[17] |
Feitosa F F, Le Q B, Vlek P L G.2011. Multi-Agent Simulator For Urban Segregation (MASUS): A tool to explore alternatives for promoting inclusive cities[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(2): 104-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.06.001 |
[18] |
Filatova T, Voinov A, van der Veen A.2011. Land market mechanisms for preservation of space for coastal ecosystems: An agent-based analysis[J]. Environmental Modeling & Software, 26(2): 179-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.08.001 |
[19] |
Le Q B, Park S J, Vlek P L G, et al.2008. Land-Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): A multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification[J]. Ecological Informatics, 3(2): 135-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.04.003 |
[20] |
Mena C F, Walsh S J, Frizzelle B G, et al.2011. Land use change on household farms in the Ecuadorian Amazon: Design and implementation of an agent-based model[J]. Applied Geography, 31(1): 210-222.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.04.005 |
|