北京市等时间交通圈的范围、形态与结构特征

doi:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.03.013

Abstract

Abstract:

Traffic circles of different hierarchies and scopes are an important basis for the spatial organization of socioeconomic activities. With the integration of network analysis and cost-weighted distance analysis, a technical framework was designed for the quantitative identification of traffic circles. Taking commuting convenience as the primary factor, a classification of hierarchies within one hour traffic circles and a rail transportation service index were put forward. The hierarchical and structural characteristics of the one hour traffic circle of Beijing were analyzed with real-time data. Then, taking the coordination of economic activities as the primary factor, the zones inside the one day traffic circle of Beijing were divided on the basis of travel time and modes of transport. According to the spatial convergence effect of transportation infrastructure, traffic corridors were identified, and the spatial scope and economic foundation of traffic corridors inside the one day traffic circle of Beijing were analyzed with real-time data. The results indicate that the scope and shape of traffic circles of equal travel time in Beijing are greatly influenced by high-speed transportation infrastructure. These circles have significantly greater extension along high-speed transport infrastructure, and there are some “islands” on the fringe. Rail transportation provides little support within the one hour traffic circle and construction of rail transportation infrastructure in the key directions should be a priority in the future. With regard to the traffic corridors inside the one day traffic circle of Beijing, the Beijing-Tianjin corridor and Beijing-Tangshan corridor are important transport lines for the collaborative development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province. The Beijing-Shijiazhuang corridor should become an important recipient area for industrial transfer of Beijing. The Beijing-Chengde corridor and Beijing-Zhangjiakou corridor are suitable for developing ecological or green economy.

Key words: traffic circle, scope, shape, structure, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region

Zhuo CHEN, Fengjun JIN. Scope, shape, and structural characteristics of traffic circles of equal travel time in Beijing[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 35(3): 389-375.

Figures/Tables 14

Tab.1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Tab.3

Fig.9

Fig.10

Tab.4

References 20

1	黄翌, 李陈, 欧向军, 等. 2013. 城际“1小时交通圈”地学定量研究: 以上海主城区为例[J]. 地理科学, 33(2): 157-166.
	[Huang Y, Li C, Ou X J, et al.2013. Geoscience quantitative research on intercity "one hour traffic circle": A case of Shanghai main city[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33(2): 157-166.]
2	金凤君, 王姣娥. 2004. 20世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性[J]. 地理学报, 59(2): 293-302.
	[Jin F J, Wang J E.2004. Railway network expansion and spatial accessibility analysis in China: 1906-2000[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 59(2): 293-302.]
3	李廉水, Stough R R, 施卫东, 等. 2006. 都市圈发展: 理论演化·国际经验·中国特色[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Li L S, Stough R R, Shi W D, et al.2006. Dushiquan fazhan: Lilun yanhua, guoji jingyan, Zhongguo tese[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
4	王德, 郭玖玖. 2008. 北京市一日交流圈的空间特征及其动态变化研究[J]. 现代城市研究, (5): 68-75.
	[Wang D, Guo J J.2008. The daily communication area of Beijing: Spatial characteristics and dynamics[J]. Modern Urban Research, (5): 68-75.]
5	吴必虎, 唐俊雅, 黄安民, 等. 1997. 中国城市居民旅游目的地选择行为研究[J]. 地理学报, 52(2): 97-103.
	[Wu B H, Tang J Y, Huang A M, et al.1997. A study on destination choice behavior of Chinese urban residents[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 52(2): 97-103.]
6	邬伦, 于海龙, 高振纪, 等. 2002. GIS不确定性框架体系与数据不确定性研究方法[J]. 地理学与国土研究, 18(4): 1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2002.04.001
	[Wu L, Yu H L, Gao Z J, et al.2002. The frame of GIS uncertainty and methods of GIS data uncertainty[J]. Geography and Territorial Research, 18(4): 1-5.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2002.04.001
7	张超亚, 张小林, 李红波. 2015. 快速交通对区域中心城市日常可达性影响: 以长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 24(2): 194-201. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201502003
	[Zhang C Y, Zhang X L, Li H B.2015. Influence of rapid transit on daily accessibility of regional center cities: A case study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24(2): 194-201.] doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201502003
8	张莉, 陆玉麒. 2006. 基于陆路交通网的区域可达性评价: 以长江三角洲为例[J]. 地理学报, 61(12): 1235-1246.
	[Zhang L, Lu Y Q.2006. Assessment on regional accessibility based on land transportation network: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 61(12): 1235-1246.]
9	张亦汉, 褚浣桦. 2013. 基于城市交通网络的广州“1小时交通圈”划分[J]. 热带地理, 33(6): 695-702.
	[Zhang Y H, Chu H H.2013. One-hour traffic circle of Guangzhou based on transportation network[J]. Tropical Geography, 33(6): 695-702.]
10	朱杰, 管卫华, 蒋志欣, 等. 2007. 江苏省城市经济影响区格局变化[J]. 地理学报, 62(10): 1023-1033. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.10.002
	[Zhu J, Guan W H, Jiang Z X, et al.2007. The evolution of urban economic effect regions in Jiangsu Province since 1978[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(10): 1023-1033.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2007.10.002
11	Berry B J L.1970. The geography of the United States in the year 2000[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 51: 21-53. doi: 10.2307/621761
12	Green N.2007. Functional poly centricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis[J]. Urban Studies, 44(11): 2077-2103. doi: 10.1080/00420980701518941
13	Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X W, et al.2010. China's regional transport dominance: Density, proximity, and accessibility[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 295-309. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0295-6
14	Kwan M P, Murray A T, O'Kelly M E, et al.2003. Recent advances in accessibility research: Representation, methodology and applications[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(1): 129-138. doi: 10.1007/s101090300107
15	Miller H J, Wu Y H.2000. GIS software for measuring space-time accessibility in transportation planning and analysis[J]. Geo Informatica, 4(2): 141-159. doi: 10.1023/A:1009820006075
16	Ortega E, López E, Monzón A.2012. Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008
17	Radke J, Mu L.2000. Spatial decompositions, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs[J]. Geographic Information Sciences: A Journal of the Association of Chinese Professionals in Geographic Information Systems, 6(2): 105-112. doi: 10.1080/10824000009480538
18	Smith S L J.1983. Recreation geography[M]. London, UK: Longman Group Limited.
19	Tong G J, Wang T K.2011. The economic disparities of Shenyang economic region with cluster analysis[M]//Dai M L. Innovative computing and information. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
20	Yiu A.2006. Tokyo and beyond: Reading Japan from the metropolis introduction[J]. Japan Forum, 18(3): 291-293. doi: 10.1080/09555800600946845

交通方式	区域交通基础设施							城市交通基础设施
交通方式	高铁		普铁	高速公路	国道	省道	县道	城郊铁路	地铁	快速路	主要街道
时速/(km/h)	300	120	120	80	60	40		60	45	60	30

圈层	核心区			中间区			边缘区
圈层	15 min		30 min		15 min	30 min	15 min	30 min
面积/km²	553.21	1042.38		20.26	49.85		0.00	2.81
地铁服务指数a_i	20.28	38.22		1.88	4.62		0.00	0.15

交通圈	面积			县(区)数量		人口			GDP
交通圈	数量/km²		占比/%		数量/个	占比/%	数量/万人	占比/%	数量/亿元	占比/%
1小时交通圈	8787.05	4.03		33	16.50	3381.41	31.02		25072.39	37.71
2小时交通圈	43859.27	20.12		102	51.00	6371.15	58.45		46189.60	69.46
3小时交通圈	109327.41	50.15		165	82.50	9416.10	86.39		58094.11	87.36
普通公路圈	49505.85	22.71		62	31.00	5094.12	46.74		38880.60	58.47
高速公路圈	74331.17	34.10		104	52.00	6475.91	59.41		46399.88	69.77
高铁圈	109327.41	50.15		165	82.50	9416.10	86.39		58094.11	87.36

廊道	面积			县(区)数量		人口			GDP
廊道	总值/km²		占比/%		总值/个	占比/%	总值/万人	占比/%	总值/亿元	占比/%
京石廊道	37978.21	17.42		76	38.00	3702.80	33.97		12696.89	19.09
京津廊道	27882.37	12.79		37	18.50	2105.03	19.31		17221.00	25.90
京唐廊道	8112.79	3.72		21	10.50	966.91	8.87		6977.89	10.49
京承廊道	8029.13	3.68		7	3.50	191.54	1.76		715.08	1.08
京张廊道	4909.25	2.25		11	5.50	461.00	4.23		1561.10	2.35

[1]	SUN Na, ZHANG Meiqing. Network structure and evolution characteristics of cities in China based on high-speed railway transport flow [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(5): 727-737.
[2]	GUO Qingbin, LUO Kang, LIU Chengliang. A comparative study on the differences of factors aggregating ability among urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 542-552.
[3]	XU Ning, LI Xiande. Evolution of Shanghai listed companies’ outward investment network and its determinants [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(4): 553-566.
[4]	DU Delin, WANG Jiaoe, WANG Yi. Market structure and competition of the three major airlines in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 367-376.
[5]	ZHANG Feng, CHEN Yanguang, LIU Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 377-388.
[6]	LIU Xiaoxiao, WU Kang. Change of industrial investment networks in the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of non-capital function dispersal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1972-1984.
[7]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[8]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[9]	ZHANG Chun, CHENG Zhihua, YU Xiaoping, WANG Yaqun, SHEN Chen. Impact of public transportation infrastructure on employment of the low-income group in Urumqi [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(1): 111-119.
[10]	LUO Jing,JIANG Liang,LUO Minghai,TIAN Lingling,CHEN Guolei,TIAN Ye,WU Yikun. Rural development level of villages in Wuhan City’s new urban districts and its hierarchical structure [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1370-1381.
[11]	YANG Kui,ZHANG Yu,ZHAO Xiaofeng,WEN Qi,ZHONG Taiyang. Temporal and spatial characteristics and influencing factors of structural efficiency of rural land use [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1393-1402.
[12]	CHEN Kunqiu,LONG Hualou,MA Li,ZHANG Yingnan. China’s rural land reform and rural vitalization [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(9): 1424-1434.
[13]	DUAN Xuejun,ZOU Hui,CHEN Weixiao,WANG Yazhu,YE Lei. Formation and change of the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a geographical perspective [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1217-1226.
[14]	Xiaoxue SHI, Daoyi GONG, Yihong HU. Regional strong winter wind events over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the associated atmospheric circulation changes during 1979-2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1069-1079.
[15]	Liang ZHOU, Qi ZHAO, Fan YANG. Identification of urban agglomeration boundary based on POI and NPP/VIIRS night light data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(6): 840-850.

Scope, shape, and structural characteristics of traffic circles of equal travel time in Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0