京津冀地区城镇空间扩张模拟与分析

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to predict future urban layout in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (JJJ), we developed a BUDEM-JJJ model on the basis of the Beijing urban development model (BUDEM). BUDEM, based on prevalent urban growth theory and constrained cellular automatic, was developed in 2008 for analyzing and simulating urban growth for the Beijing Metropolitan Area(BMA). It is proved that the model is capable of analyzing historical urban growth mechanisms and predicting future urban growth for metropolitan areas in China. In this research, we extended the study of BUDEM from the BMA to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region (JJJ), via replacing the datasets of the model and making necessary adjustments to the parameters. In BUDEM-JJJ, the parameters include minimum distance to the center of Beijing (f_ctr_bj), minimum distance to the centers of Tianjin and Shijiazhuang (f_ctr_tjsjz), minimum distance to the centers of prefecture-level cities of Hebei province (f_ctr_other), minimum distance to the centers of other urban areas (f_ctr_cty), minimum distance to railways (f_rail), minimum distance to highways (f_r_hig), minimum distance to national roads (f_r_nat), minimum distance to provincial roads (f_r_pro), location in or outside areas prohibited for construction (constrain), and neighborhood development intensity (neighbor). The model BUDEM-JJJ was used to identify urban growth mechanisms in two historical phases from 2000 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2010, to simulate urban growth scenarios for 2049. Six urban growth scenarios were put forward, including the base (business as usual) scenario, high-speed growth scenario, low-speed growth scenario, highway finger-shaped growth scenario, small cities and towns promoting growth scenario, and transportation-led growth scenario. BUDEM-JJJ considers the heterogeneity of driving force and model parameters, and fulfills accurate simulation in large-scale. Using the model urban layout can be predicted for each scenario. From the number of increased cellular and the occupation of farmland, grassland, forestland, and unused land, we found that the different scenarios have different effects on the environment. BUDEM-JJJ is the first applicable urban growth model in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region. These scenarios can be applied in several planning projects and also can be used to evaluate the present urban growth rate.

Key words: cellular automata, BUDEM-JJJ, urban expansion, simulation, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region

Cuiling LIU, Ying LONG. Urban expansion simulation and analysis in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 34(2): 217-.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Tab.4

Tab.5

Fig. 11

Tab. 6

References 25

1	陈述彭. 1999. 城市化与城市地理信息系统[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Chen S P.1999. Chengshihua yu chengshi dili xinxi xitong[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
2	何春阳, 陈晋, 史培军, 等. 2002. 基于CA的城市空间动态模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 17(2): 188-194.
	[He C Y, Chen J, Shi P J, et al.2002. Study on the spatial dynamic city model based on CA(cellular automata)model[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 17(2): 188-194.]
3	何春阳, 史培军, 陈晋, 等. 2005. 基于系统动力学模型和元胞自动机模型的土地利用情景模型研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 35(5): 464-473.
	[ He C Y, Shi P J, Chen J, et al.2005. Land use scene model based on system dynamics model and CA model[J]. Science China: Earth Science, 35(5): 464-473.]
4	刘翠玲, 龙瀛, 王艳慧. 2013. MonoLoop: CA城市模型状态转换规则获取的一种方法. 测绘与空间地理信息[J], (4): 122-125.
	[Liu C L, Long Y, Wang Y H.2013. MonoLoop: a new approach to retrieves status transition rule of CA urban model[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, (4): 122-125. ]
5	刘纪远, 邓祥征. 2009. LUCC时空过程研究的方法进展[J]. 科学通报, 54(21): 3251-3258.
	[Liu J Y, Deng X Z.2009. Progress of the research methodologies on the temporal and spatial process of LUCC[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(21): 3251-3258.]
6	龙瀛, 韩昊英, 毛其智. 2009. 利用约束性CA制定城市增长边界[J]. 地理学报, 64(8): 999-1008.
	[Long Y, Han H Y, Mao Q Z.2009. Establishing urban growth boundaries using constrained CA[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 64(8): 999-1008.]
7	龙瀛, 毛其智, 沈振江, 等. 2008. 综合约束CA城市模型:规划控制约束及城市增长模拟[J]. 城市规划学刊, (6): 83-91.
	[Long Y, Mao Q Z, Shen Z J, et al.2008. Comprehensive constrained CA urban model: institutional constraints and urban growth simulation[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (6): 83-91.]
8	龙瀛, 沈振江, 毛其智, 等. 2010. 基于约束性CA方法的北京城市形态情景分析[J]. 地理学报, 65(6): 643-655.
	[Long Y, Shen Z J, Mao Q Z, et al.2010. Form scenario analysis using constrained cellular automata[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(6): 643-655.]
9	陆大道. 2007. 我国的城市化进程与空间扩张[J]. 城市规划学刊, (3): 16-22.
	[Lu D D.2007. Urbanization process and sprawl in china[J]. Urban Planning Forum, (3): 16-22.]
10	王成新, 王格芳, 刘瑞超, 等. 2011. 高速公路对城市群结构演变的影响研究: 以山东半岛城市群为例[J]. 地理科学, 31(1): 61-67.
	[Wang C X, Wang G F, Liu R C, et al.2011. The impact of highway on the structure evolution of urban agglomeration: a case of urban aglomeration of Shandong Peninsula[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(1): 61-67.]
11	杨明, 尹军梅, 吉跟林. 2008. 不平衡数据分类方法综述[J]. 南京师范大学学报: 工程技术, 8(4): 7-12.
	[Yang M, Yin J M, Ji G L.2008. Classification methods on imbalanced data: a survey[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 8(4): 7-12.]
12	周成虎, 孙战利, 谢一春. 1999. 地理元胞自动机研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社.
	[Zhou C H, Sun Z L, Xie Y C.1999. Dili yuanbao zidongji yanjiu[M]. Beijing, China: Science Press.]
13	Amorosos S, Patty Y N.1972. Decision procedures for surjectivity and injectivity of parallel maps for tessellation structures[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 5(6): 448-464.
14	Batty M, Xie Y.1994. From cells to cities[J]. Environment and Planning B, 21: 531-548.
15	Batty M, Xie Y.1997. Possible urban automata[J]. Environment and Planning B, 24: 175-192.
16	Butler R W H.1982. A structural analysis of the Moine Thrust Zone between Loch Eriboll and Foinaven, NW Scotland[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 4(1): 19-29.
17	Kahn M.2000. The environmental impact of suburbanization[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19: 569-586.
18	Lancaster.1966. A new approach to consumer theory[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132-157.
19	Long Y, Mao Q Z, Dang A R.2009. Beijing urban development model: urban growth analysis and simulation[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 14(6): 782-794.
20	Long Y, Shen Z J, Du L Q, et al.2008. BUDEM: an urban growth simulation model using CA for Beijing metropolitan area[J]. Proceedings of the SPIE-Geoinformatics, 71431D-1-15.
21	Ward D P, Murray A T, Phinn S R.2000. A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24: 539-558.
22	White R, Engelen G.1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns[J]. Environment and Planning A, 25: 1175-1199.
23	White R, Engelen G, Uijee I.1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics[J]. Environment and Planning B, 24: 323-343.
24	Wu F.1998. Simland: a prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12: 63-82.
25	Yeh A G O, Li X.2001. A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS[J]. Environment and Planning B, 28: 733-753.

类型	变量	最大值	均值	标准差	数据
空间约束	与北京中心的距离	1	0.0029	0.0269	图1a
	与天津、石家庄中心的距离	1	0.0059	0.0380	图1b
	与河北地级市中心的距离	1	0.0254	0.0767	图1c
	与京津冀小城镇的距离	1	0.2082	0.1931	图1d
	与铁路的距离	1	0.3797	0.3141	图1e
	与高速公路的距离	1	0.2662	0.3043	图1f
	与国道的距离	1	0.3690	0.2925	图1g
	与省道的距离	1	0.5519	0.2711	图1h
制度性约束	是否为禁止建设区	1	0.1300	0.3350	图1i
邻域约束	邻域内城镇建设元胞数目/8	1	-	-	-

时段	权重	0的数目	1的数目	比例	GOF/%	Kappa
2000-2005	1	856697	4942	17335/100	99.40	0.000
	50	856697	247100	347/100	86.90	0.613
	100	856697	494200	173/100	85.30	0.686
	200	856697	988400	87/100	87.00	0.737
	300	856697	1482600	58/100	88.30	0.741
	500	856697	2471000	35/100	90.40	0.733
	1000	856697	4942000	17/100	93.50	0.714
	10000	856697	49420000	2/100	98.30	0.577
2005-2010	1	857661	3978	21560/100	99.50	0.000
	50	857661	198900	431/100	87.60	0.580
	100	857661	397880	216/100	85.60	0.671
	200	857661	795600	108/100	86.70	0.734
	300	857661	1193400	72/100	87.10	0.730
	500	857661	1989000	43/100	89.60	0.741
	1000	857661	3978000	22/100	93.20	0.741
	10000	857661	39780000	2/100	98.70	0.612

变量	B(回归系数)
变量	2000-2005年	2005-2010年
与北京中心的距离	0.911	-2.188
与天津、石家庄中心的距离	-1.989	-2.903
与河北地级市中心的距离	-.328	2.016
与京津冀小城镇的距离	1.435	1.021
与铁路的距离	2.940	2.276
与高速公路的距离	3.451	4.051
与国道的距离	1.520	1.524
与省道的距离	3.981	4.025
是否为禁止建设区	-1.197	-.813
邻域内城镇建设元胞数目/8	-6.953	-7.485

类型	变量	基准情景	高速发展情景	低速发展情景	高速公路指状发展情景	小城镇促进发展情景	交通引导发展情景
宏观约束	城镇建设用地元胞数目	65692	80000	50000	65692	65692	65692
空间约束	与北京中心的距离	-2.188	-2.188	-2.188	-2.188	-2.188	-2.188
	与天津、石家庄中心的距离	-2.903	-2.903	-2.903	-2.903	-2.903	-2.903
	与河北地级市中心的距离	2.016	2.016	2.016	2.016	2.016	2.016
	与京津冀小城镇的距离	1.021	1.021	1.021	1.021	5.021	1.021
	与铁路的距离	2.276	2.276	2.276	2.276	2.276	2.276
	与高速公路的距离	4.051	4.051	4.051	8.051	4.051	6.051
	与国道的距离	1.524	1.524	1.524	1.524	1.524	3.524
	与省道的距离	4.025	4.025	4.025	4.025	4.025	6.025
制度性约束	是否为禁止建设区	-0.813	-0.813	-0.813	-0.813	-0.813	-0.813
邻域约束	邻域内城镇建设元胞数目/8	8.000	8.000	8.000	8.000	8.000	8.000
常量		-7.485	-7.485	-7.485	-7.485	-7.485	-7.485

市域	基准情景			高速发展情景		低速发展情景			高速公路指状发展情景			小城镇促进发展情景			交通引导发展情景
市域	元胞/个		元胞/%		元胞/个	元胞/%		元胞/个		元胞/%	元胞/个	元胞/%	元胞/个	元胞/%	元胞/个	元胞/%
北京市	16554	25.2		18960	23.7	13850	27.7		15766	24.0		16489	25.1		15963	24.3
天津市	15372	23.4		18000	22.5	12100	24.2		15306	23.3		15635	23.8		14649	22.3
石家庄市	3416	5.2		4160	5.2	2700	5.4		3482	5.3		3547	5.4		4007	6.1
邯郸市	4533	6.9		5360	6.7	3050	6.1		3613	5.5		4073	6.2		4336	6.6
邢台市	3022	4.6		3680	4.6	2500	5.0		2956	4.5		2693	4.1		2890	4.4
衡水市	3613	5.5		4160	5.2	2800	5.6		3153	4.8		3416	5.2		3088	4.7
保定市	3679	5.6		4560	5.7	2800	5.6		3942	6.0		3744	5.7		3744	5.7
廊坊市	2234	3.4		2880	3.6	1450	2.9		2036	3.1		2234	3.4		2234	3.4
秦皇岛市	2234	3.4		2880	3.6	1450	2.9		2628	4.0		2365	3.6		2234	3.4
沧州市	3547	5.4		4880	6.1	2400	4.8		4007	6.1		3547	5.4		3876	5.9
唐山市	3088	4.7		4080	5.1	2400	4.8		3547	5.4		3219	4.9		3219	4.9
张家口市	3810	5.8		5200	6.5	2100	4.2		4270	6.5		4007	6.1		4533	6.9
承德市	591	0.9		1280	1.6	450	0.9		985	1.5		657	1.0		920	1.4
京津冀	65692	100		80000	100	50000	100		65692	100		65692	100		65692	100

Urban expansion simulation and analysis in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

方案名称	基准情景	高速发展情景	低速发展情景	高速公路指状发展情景	小城镇促进发展情景	交通引导发展情景
占用农田的面积/km²	7229.54	9733.45	4654.94	7515.81	7251.04	7327.31
占用林地的面积/km²	530.64	770.09	313.77	530.63	543.06	563.18
占用草地的面积/km²	182.99	290.72	81.84	221.73	192.12	221.66
占用水地的面积/km²	690.28	841.00	72.88	680.40	696.70	643.07
占用未利用地的面积/km²	27.02	28.32	17.49	16.62	26.82	24.03
斑块数	237	217	255	255	238	234
平均斑块面积/m²	90890.19	99267.17	84474.41	84474.41	90508.30	92055.45
聚合度指数	99.05	99.02	99.08	98.91	99.04	98.98
分离度指数	1.17	1.22	1.18	1.18	1.17	1.17
蔓延度指数	77.59	74.52	81.11	76.90	77.47	77.30

[1]	SUN He, SU Fengge. Evaluation of multiple precipitation datasets and their potential utilities in hydrologic modeling over the Yarlung Zangbo River Basin [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(7): 1126-1139.
[2]	ZHANG Feng, CHEN Yanguang, LIU Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(3): 377-388.
[3]	LIU Xiaoxiao, WU Kang. Change of industrial investment networks in the central core area of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the background of non-capital function dispersal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1972-1984.
[4]	FU Hui, LIU Yanjun, SUN Hongri, ZHOU Guolei. Spatiotemporal characteristics and dynamic mechanism of cultivated land use transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 1985-1998.
[5]	NIU Qiang, SHEN Yingjie, ZHOU Yi, HUANG Jingnan, WANG Pan. Effect and lag period of urban agglomeration construction land growth on economic growth based on lagged variable model:A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1656-1666.
[6]	YIN Shuiqing, WANG Wenting. A review on the stochastic simulation of rainfall process data for soil erosion assessment [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1747-1757.
[7]	ZHU A-Xing, ZHU Liangjun, SHI Yaxing, QIN Chengzhi, LIU Junzhi. Integrated watershed modeling and scenario analysis: A new paradigm for integrated study of physical geography? [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1111-1122.
[8]	SHI Lifeng,HUANG Xianjin. Spatiotemporal differences of urban expansion along China’s Grand Canal [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1206-1216.
[9]	Xiaoxue SHI, Daoyi GONG, Yihong HU. Regional strong winter wind events over Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the associated atmospheric circulation changes during 1979-2017 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1069-1079.
[10]	Limin JIAO, Chen GONG, Gang XU, Ting DONG, Boen ZHANG, Zehui LI. Urban expansion dynamics and urban forms in three metropolitan areas—Tokyo, New York, and Shanghai [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(5): 675-685.
[11]	Hui ZHANG, Cheng LI, Jiong CHENG, Zhifeng WU, Yanyan WU. A review of urban flood risk assessment based on the framework of hazard-exposure-vulnerability [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 175-190.
[12]	Yao XIONG, Runqiu PAN, Gang XU, Limin JIAO, Kai LI. A comparison of spatial and temporal characteristics of urban expansion in India during 1990-2014 [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 271-282.
[13]	Dan CUI, Hao WU, Dianting WU. A review and prospect of regional governance in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 1-14.
[14]	Linshan HUANG, Yanguang CHEN, Shuangcheng LI. Multifractal spectral analysis of land use structure of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban system [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 50-64.
[15]	Feng ZHANG, Yanguang CHEN, Xiaosong LI. Radial dimension analysis of growth and form of cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 65-76.