PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2013, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 975-983.doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2013.06.015
• Tourism and Leisure Geography • Previous Articles Next Articles
QI Tong, WANG Yajuan, WANG Weihua
Received:
2012-11-01
Revised:
2013-02-01
Online:
2013-06-25
Published:
2013-06-25
QI Tong, WANG Yajuan, WANG Weihua. A review on visual landscape study in foreign countries[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(6): 975-983.
[1] Arriaza M, Cañas-Ortega J F, Cañas-Madueño J A, et al. 2004. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1): 115-125.[2] Ayad Y M. 2005. Remote sensing and GIS in modeling visual landscape change: A case study of the northwestern arid coast of Egypt. Landscape and Urban Planning, 73(4): 307-325.[3] Beza B B. 2010. The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97(4): 306-317.[4] Cañas I, Ayuga E, Ayuga F. 2009. A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26(4): 1173-1181.[5] Carvalho-Ribeiro S M, Lovett A. 2011. Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13 (1): 46-54.[6] Clay G R, Daniel T C. 2000. Scenic landscape assessment: The effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1-2): 1-13.[7] Daniel T C. 2001. Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4): 267-281.[8] De Groot W T, Van den Born R J G. 2003. Visions of nature and landscape type preferences: An exploration in The Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63(3): 127-138.[9] De Vries S, De Groot M, Boers J. 2012. Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(1-2): 118-127.[10] Dramstad W E, Tveit M S, Fjellstad W J, et al. 2006. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4): 465-474.[11] Franco D, Franco D, Mannino I, et al. 2003. The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(3): 119-138.[12] Fry G, Tveit M S, Ode Å, et al. 2009. The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecological Indicators, 9(5): 933-947.[13] Gallent N, Andersson J. 2007. Representing England's rural-urban fringe. Landscape Research, 32(1): 1-21.[14] Garré S, Meeus S, Gulinck H. 2009. The dual role of roads in the landscape: A case study in the area around Mechelen (Belgium). Landscape and Urban Planning, 92(2): 125-135.[15] Hernández J, García L, Ayuga F. 2004a. Integration methodologies for visual impact assessment of rural buildings by geographic information systems. Biosystems Engineering, 88(2): 255-263.[16] Hernández J, García L, Ayuga F. 2004b. Assessment of the visual impact made on the landscape by new buildings: A methodology for site selection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1): 15-28.[17] Junge X, Lindemann-Matthies P, Hunziker M, et al. 2011. Aesthetic preferences of non-farmers and farmers for different land-use types and proportions of ecological compensation areas in the Swiss lowlands. Biological Conservation, 144(5): 1430-1440.[18] Kaplan A, Taskin T, Önenc A. 2006. Assessing the visual quality of rural and urban-fringed landscapes surrounding livestock farms. Biosystems Engineering, 95(3): 437-448.[19] Kim N H, Kang H H. 2009. The aesthetic evaluation of coastal landscape. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 13(2): 65-74.[20] Lange E, Hehl-Lange S, Brewer M J. 2008. Scenario-visualization for the assessment of perceived green space qualities at the urban-rural fringe. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(3): 245-256.[21] Li R J, Lu Z. 2011. Virtual expression and LOD model designing for theme park based on semantic features: A case of the water and soil conservation technology park. Progress in Geography, 30(4): 504-512. [李仁杰, 路紫. 2011. 主题 公园多细节层次景观语义模型与虚拟表述: 以北京延 庆县水土保持科技示范园为例. 地理科学进展, 30(4): 504-512.][22] Liu H L, Li D H, Huang G. 2006. Landscape assessment on impacts of the hydroelectric development in the valley region: Case study of Nujiang River. Progress in Geography, 25(5): 21-31. [刘海龙, 李迪华, 黄刚. 2006.峡谷区 域水电开发景观影响评价: 以怒江为例. 地理科学进 展, 25(5): 21-31.][23] Lokocz E, Ryan R L, Sadler A J. 2011. Motivations for land protection and stewardship: Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(2): 65-76.[24] Lothian A. 1999. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: Is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44 (4): 177-198.[25] Lupp G, Höchtl F, Wende W. 2011. "Wilderness": A designation for Central European landscapes? Land Use Policy, 28(3): 594-603.[26] Mao J W, Zhu F J, Che S Q. 2010. Study on landscape assessment of urban remnant natural area: Theory and application of psychophysical method. Chinese Landscape Architecture, (3): 51-54. [毛炯玮, 朱飞捷, 车生泉. 2010. 城市 自然遗留地景观美学评价的方法研究: 心理物理学方 法的理论与应用. 中国园林, (3): 51-54.][27] Meitner M J. 2004. Scenic beauty of river views in the Grand Canyon: Relating perceptual judgments to locations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68(1): 3-13.[28] Misgav A. 2000. Visual preference of the public for vegetation groups in Israel. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(3-4): 143-159.[29] Molina-Ruiz J, Martínez-Sánchez M J, Pérez-Sirvent C, et al. 2011. Developing and applying a GIS-assisted approach to evaluate visual impact in wind farms. Renewable Energy, 36(3): 1125-1132.[30] Möller B. 2006. Changing wind-power landscapes: Regional assessment of visual impact on land use and population in Northern Jutland, Denmark. Applied Energy, 83(5): 477-494.[31] Müderrisoğlu H, Eroğlu E, Özkan S, et al. 2006. Visual perception of tree forms. Building and Environment, 41(6): 796-806.[32] Ode Å, Fry G, Tveit M S, et al. 2009. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1): 375-383.[33] Ode Å, Tveit M S, Fry G. 2008. Capturing landscape visual character using indicators: Touching base with landscape aesthetic theory. Landscape Research, 33(1): 89-117.[34] Ouyang X Z, Liao W M, Peng S K. 2007. Landscape quality evaluation and vertical structure optimization of natural broad leaf forest. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 18 (6): 1388-1392. [欧阳勋志, 廖为明, 彭世揆. 2007. 天然 阔叶林景观质量评价及其垂直结构优化技术. 应用生 态学报, 18(6): 1388-1392.][35] Palmer J F, Hoffman R E. 2001. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4): 149-161.[36] Panagopoulos T. 2009. Linking forestry, sustainability and aesthetics. Ecological Economics, 68(10): 2485-2489.[37] Pflüger Y, Rackham A, Larned S. 2010. The aesthetic value of river flows: An assessment of flow preferences for large and small rivers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95 (1-2): 68-78.[38] Pullar D V, Tidey M E. 2001. Coupling 3D visualisation to qualitative assessment of built environment designs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55(1): 29-40.[39] Ramírez á, Ayuga-Téllez E, Gallego E, et al. 2011. A simplifi ed model to assess landscape quality from rural roads in Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 142 (3-4): 205-212.[40] Rodrigues M, Montañés C, Fueyo N. 2010. A method for the assessment of the visual impact caused by the large-scale deployment of renewable-energy facilities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4): 240-246.[41] Rogge E, Nevens F, Gulinck H. 2008. Reducing the visual impact of "greenhouse parks" in rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(1): 76-83.[42] Roth M. 2006. Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment: An empirical study from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3): 179-192.[43] Schmid W A. 2001. The emerging role of visual resource assessment and visualisation in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4): 213-221.[44] Sevenant M, Antrop M. 2010. The use of latent classes to identify individual differences in the importance of landscape dimensions for aesthetic preference. Land Use Policy, 27 (3): 827-842.[45] Stamps III A E. 1997. A paradigm for distinguishing significant from nonsignificant visual impacts: Theory, implementation, case histories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 17(4): 249-293.[46] Tahvanainen L, Tyrväinen L, Ihalainen M, et al. 2001. Forest management and public perceptions: Visual versus verbal information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 53(1-4): 53-70.[47] Tang X M, Wang X R. 2007. Landscape visual environment assessment(LVEA): Conception, origin and development. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University: Agricultural Science, 25(3): 173-179. [汤晓敏, 王祥荣. 2007. 景观视觉 环境评价: 概念、起源与发展. 上海交通大学学报: 农业 科学版, 25(3): 173-179.][48] Tönnes S, Karjalainen E, Löfström I, et al. 2004. Scenic impacts of retention trees in clear-cutting areas. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19(4): 348-357.[49] Torres-Sibille A C, Cloquell-Ballester V-A, Cloquell-Ballester V-A, et al. 2009a. Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(1): 40-66.[50] Torres-Sibille A C, Cloquell-Ballester V-A, Cloquell-Ballester V-A, et al. 2009b. Aesthetic impact assessment of solar power plants: An objective and a subjective approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5): 986-999.[51] Tsoutsos T, Tsouchlaraki A, Tsiropoulos M, et al. 2009. Visual impact evaluation of a wind park in a Greek island. Applied Energy, 86(4): 546-553.[52] Tveit M, Ode Å, Fry G. 2006. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research, 31(3): 229-255.[53] Tveit M S. 2009. Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference: A comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(9): 2882-2888.[54] Van den Berg A E, Koole S L. 2006. New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(4): 362-372.[55] Van den Berg A E, Van Winsum-Westra M. 2010. Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles. Urban Forestry& Urban Greening, 9(3): 179-186.[56] Walker A J, Ryan R L. 2008. Place attachment and landscape preservation in rural New England: A Maine case study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2): 141-152.[57] Wang B Z, Wang B M, He P. 2006. Aesthetic theory and meth-od of landscape resource assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 17(9): 1733-1739. [王保忠, 王保明, 何 平. 2006. 景观资源美学评价的理论与方法. 应用生态 学报, 17(9): 1733-1739.][58] Weng S F, Ke F, Li C M. 2009. Application of AHP and SBE methods in the study of landscape plant composition in Guangzhou parks. Chinese Landscape Architecture, (4): 78-81. [翁殊斐, 柯峰, 黎彩敏. 2009. 用AHP 法和SBE 法研究广州公园植物景观单元. 中国园林, (4): 78-81.][59] Wu B H, Li M M. 2001. EDVAET: A Linear landscape evaluation technique: A case study on the Xiaoxing'anling scenery drive. Acta Geographica Sinica, 56(2): 214-222. [吴 必虎, 李咪咪. 2001. 小兴安岭风景道旅游景观评价. 地 理学报, 56(2): 214-222.][60] Yabuki N, Miyashita K, Fukuda T. 2011. An invisible height evaluation system for building height regulation to preserve good landscapes using augmented reality. Automation in Construction, 20(3): 228-235.[61] Yu K J. 1987. A discussion about the conception of landscape and the development of landscape study. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 9(4): 433-439. [ 俞孔坚. 1987. 论景观概念及其研究的发展. 北京林业大学学报, 9(4): 433-439.][62] Zhang H, Shen W S, Jiang L S, et al. 2004. Approach of evaluation on landscape protection along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(3): 575-582. [ 张慧, 沈渭寿, 江腊沙, 等. 2004. 青藏铁路沿线景观保护评价 方法研究. 生态学报, 24(3): 575-582.][63] Zheng B, Zhang Y Q, Chen J Q. 2010. Preference to home landscape: Wildness or neatness? Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(1): 1-8. |
[1] | SUN Kun, ZHONG Linsheng. International research on national park management for public welfare and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(2): 314-329. |
[2] | TAN Ronghui, LIU Yaolin, LIU Yanfang, HE Qingsong. A literature review of urban growth boundary: Theory, modeling, and effectiveness evaluation [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(2): 327-338. |
[3] | XUE Lan. A review and prospect of international studies on rural amenity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(12): 2129-2138. |
[4] | ZHOU Kai, HE Linyi, ZHANG Yiwen. A review of literature on the concept, impacts, and spatial interactions of sharing short-term rental platform [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(11): 1934-1943. |
[5] | ZHAO Ruidong, FANG Chuanglin, LIU Haimeng. Progress and prospect of urban resilience research [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1717-1731. |
[6] | DUAN Hongtao,LUO Juhua,CAO Zhigang,XUE Kun,XIAO Qitao,LIU Dong. Progress in remote sensing of aquatic environments at the watershed scale [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1182-1195. |
[7] | Qing GAO, Huasong LUO, Zhenbo WANG, Jinping SONG. Research progress and prospect of Beautiful China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(7): 1021-1033. |
[8] | Limin LIU, Linsheng ZHONG, Hu YU. Progress of glacier tourism research and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(4): 533-545. |
[9] | Manchun LI, Mengru YAO, Xia WANG, Xiaoqiang LIU, Yanming CHEN. A review of studies on the “pole-axis system” theory based on citation analysis [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 164-174. |
[10] | Yingbiao CHEN, Zihao ZHENG, Zhifeng WU, Qinglan QIAN. Review and prospect of application of nighttime light remote sensing data [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(2): 205-223. |
[11] | Xin XU, Yuan ZHAO, Xinlin ZHANG, Tonggang ZENG, Siyou XIA, Qianqian XIE, Qi SUN. Research progress and prospects of Chinese geriatric geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 37(10): 1416-1429. |
[12] | Hongyan LIU, Wen CHEN. A review of research on the distribution of basic education resources in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(5): 557-568. |
[13] | Ling'en WANG, Lei WANG, Linsheng ZHONG, Shengkui CHENG. A literature research on tourism food consumption [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(4): 513-526. |
[14] | Lianlian XIAO, Linsheng ZHONG, Rui ZHOU, Hu YU. Review of international research on national parks as an evolving knowledge domain in recent 30 years [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(2): 244-255. |
[15] | Jiawei WU, Wen CHEN, Peng ZHANG. A literature review of merger and acquisition (M&A) study from the geographical perspective: Location choice, driving mechanism and implications [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1423-1434. |
|