流域LUCC水文效应研究中的若干问题探讨

doi:10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.03.004

Abstract

Abstract:

With the research on global change deepening, hydrological effects of Land-use and Land-cover change (LUCC) are becoming the focus of attention. Based on the progress in the study on hydrological effects of watershed land use and land cover change, some issues are summarized and discussed. Spatially distributed or semi-distributed hydrological models have important applications in the interpretation and prediction of the effects of land use change. Considering the spatial variation of precipitation and land surface characteristics, the precondition of distributed hydrological model is to partition a watershed into many non-nesting units. There are four methods to delineate watershed units: partitioning watershed by precipitation gages, partitioning watershed into rectangle grids, partitioning a watershed into ‘homogeneous’ units known as hydrologic response units, HRU, by physical characteristics, and partitioning watershed into sub-watershed by divides. Sub-watersheds and hydrological response units, HRU, are preferred units in distributed hydrological model. The land use and land cover classification system based on hydrological response is established by means of adjusting and merging existing classification. There are 9 level-Ⅰcategories and 21 level-II categories in the land use and land cover classification system. Level-Ⅰcategories include arable land, grass land, forest land, orchard, shrub, water, built-up land, barren land and wetland .The methods of setting up land use and land cover change scenarios include paired contrast, historical speculation, modeling forecast, extreme land use and land use spatial allocation, etc.

Key words: hydrological effects, hydrological response units (HRU), land use and land cover change, land use and land cover classification, scenario analysis

WAN Rongrong, YANG Guishan. Discussion on Some Issues of Hydrological Effects of Watershed Land Use and Land Cover Change[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(3): 25-33.

References

[1] IGBP. IGBP newsletter. No.61, March 2005. http://www.igbp.kva.se//uploads/NL_61.pdf

[2] 夏军, 谈戈. 全球变化与水文科学新的进展与挑战. 资源科学, 2002, 24(3):1~7.

[3] 赵生才. 全球变化与中国水循环前沿科学问题——香山科学会议第187次学术讨论会. 地球科学进展, 2002,17(4):628~630.

[4] 万荣荣, 杨桂山. 流域土地利用/覆被变化的水文效应与洪水响应研究. 湖泊科学. 2004,16(3):258~264.

[5] Onstad C A, Jamieson D G. Modelling the effects of land use modifications on runoff. Water Resource Research. 1970, 6(5): 1287~1295.

[6] Crooks S, Davies H. Assessment of land use change in the Thames catchment and its effect on the flood regime of the river. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B), 2001, 26: 583~591.

[7] De Roo A P J, Ddijk M, Schmuck G, et al. Assessing the effects of land use changes on floods in the Meuse and Oder catchment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B), 2001, 26:593~599.

[8] Flügel W A. Delineating hydrological response units by geographical information system analyses for regional hydrological modeling using PRMS/MMS in the drainage basin of the river Brol, Germany. In: Kalma J D,Sivapalan M(Eds.),Scale Issues in Hydrological Modeling, Wiley, New York.1995, 181~194.

[9] Krause P. Quantifying the impact of land use changes on the water balance of large catchments using the J2000 model. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27: 663~673.

[10] Fohrer N, Haverkamp S, Eckhardt K,et al. Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B), 2001, 26: 577~582.

[11] Becker A. Criteria for a hydrologically sound structuring of large-scale land surface process models. In: O’Kane J.O.P. (Ed.). Advances in Theoretical Hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, 97~112.

[12] Schultz G A.Hydrological modeling based on remote sensing information. Adv. Space Res.1993, 13: 149~166.

[13] Knudsen J, Thomsen A, Refsgaard J C. WATBAL – a semi-distributed physically based hydrological modeling system. Nord Hydrol, 1986, 17: 415.

[14] Karvonen T, Koivusalo H, Jauhiainen M, et al. A hydrological model for predicting runoff from different land use areas. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 217: 253~265.

[15] Lahmer W, Pfützner B, Becker A. Assessment of land use and climate change impacts on the Mesoscale. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (B), 2001, 26: 565~575.

[16] Anderson J R, Hardy E E, Roach J T, et al. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. United States Government Printing Office, Washington: 1976.

[17] USGS. NLCD land cover class definitions. http://landcover.usgs.gov/classes.asp

[18] Fuller R M. The land cover map of Great Britain. Earth Space Rev, 2:13~18.

[19] 全国农业区划委员会．土地利用现状调查技术规程．北京：测绘出版社,1984.

[20] USDA-SCS (Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service). National engineering handbook. Section 4:hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DC.1985.

[21] 高俊峰, 闻余华. 太湖流域土地利用变化对流域产水量的影响. 地理学报, 2002, 57(2): 194~200.

[22] D’Herbès J M, Valentin C. Land surface conditions of the Niamey region: ecological and hydrolotical implications. Journal of Hydrology. 1997, 188~189: 18~42.

[23] Lφrup J K, Refsgaard J C, Mazvimavi D. Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modelling: case studies from Zimbabwe. Journal of Hydrology, 1998, 205, 147~163.

[24] Wegehenkel M. Estimating of the impact of land use changes using the conceptual hydrological model THESEUS—a case study. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. 2002, 27: 631~640.

[25] Fohrer N, Eckhardt K, Haverkamp S, et al. Applying the SWAT Model as a Decision Support Tool for Land Use Concepts in Peripheral Regions in Germany. In: Stott D E, Mohtar R H and Steinhardt G C. (eds). Sustaining the Global Farm. 2001: 994~999.

[26] Hasegawa I, Mitomi Y, Nakayarna Y, et al. Land Cover Analysis Using Multi Seasonal NOAA AVHRR Mosaicked Image for Hydrological Applications. Adv. Space Res. 1998, 22, (5): 677~680.

[27] Zhu Yaomei, Yu Yiannian. Parameters for evaluation water circulation environment. Hydrological Processes, 1988,2:285.

[28] Bosch J M, Hewlett J D. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evaportranspiration. Journal of Hydrology, 1982, 55:3~23.

[29] Keppler E T, Ziemer R R. Logging effects on stream flow: water yield and summer low flows at caspar creek in Northwestern California. Water Resources Research, 1990, 26(7): 1669~1679.

[30] Schulze R E. Modelling hydrological responses to land use and climate change: a Southern African perspective. Ambio, 2000, 29(1):12~22.

[31] Legesse D, Vallet-Coulomb C, Gasse F. Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 275: 67~85.

[32] Calder I R, Hall R L, Bastable H G.The impact of land use change on water resources in sub-Saharan Africa: a modeling study of Lake Malawi. Journal of Hydrology, 1995, 170:123~135.

[33] Bhadurl B, Harbor J, Engel B, et al. Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS model. Environmental Management. 2000, 26: 643~658.

[34] Weng Q. Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Management, 2001, 28(6): 737~748.

[35] Niehoff D, Fritsch U, Bronstert A. Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 2002, 267: 80~93.

[36] Eckhardt K, Breuer L, Frede H-G.Parameter uncertainty and the significance of simulated land use change effects. Journal of Hydrology. 2003, 273:164~176.

[37] Kl?觟cking B, Haberlandt U. Impact of land use changes on water dynamics—a case study in temperate meso and macroscale river basins. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27: 619~629.

[38] Helmschrot J, Flügel W-A. Land use characterization and change detection analysis for hydrological model parameterisation of large scale afforested areas using remote sensing. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2002, 27: 711~718.

[39] Dunn S M, Mackay R. Spatial variation in evapotranspiration and the influence of land use on catchment hydrology. Journal of Hydrology. 1995, 171:49~73.

[40] Biftu G F, Gan T Y. Semi-distributed, physically based, hydrologic modeling of the Paddle River Basin, Alberta, using remotely sensed data. Journal of Hydrology. 2001, 244: 137~156.

[41] Wilk J, Andersson L and Plermkamon V. Hydrological impacts of forest conversion to agriculture in a large river basin in northeast Thailand. Hydrological process. 2001, 15: 2729~2748.

[42] Naef F, Scherrer S, Weiler M. A process based assessment of the potential to reduce flood runoff by land use change. Journal of Hydrology. 2002, 267: 74~79.

[43] De Roo A, Schmuck G, Somma F, et al. Simulating Flood Events in Transnational European Catchments. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMS/june99/papers/deroo.pdf

[44] Tenenbaum D. Distributed hydrological modeling of urbanizing ecosystems: Investigating the impact of urbanization pattern in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. http://www.enpc.fr/cereve/HomePages/thevenot/www-jes-2002/Tenenbaum-Paper-2002.pdf

[45] Campana N A., Tucci C E M. Predicting floods from urban development scenarios: case study of the Dilúvio Basin, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Urban Water, 2001, 3:113~124.

[46] Chatterjea K. The Impact of Tropical Rainstorms on Sediment and Runoff Generation from Bare and Grass-covered Surfaces: A Plot Study from Singapore. Land Degradation Development. 1998, 9: 143~157.

[47] Scott D F, Schulze R E. The hydrological effects of a wildfire in a eucalypt afforested catchment. South African Forestry J. 1992, 160: 67~78.

Discussion on Some Issues of Hydrological Effects of Watershed Land Use and Land Cover Change

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	ZHU A-Xing, ZHU Liangjun, SHI Yaxing, QIN Chengzhi, LIU Junzhi. Integrated watershed modeling and scenario analysis: A new paradigm for integrated study of physical geography? [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(8): 1111-1122.
[2]	Dalong LI, Shaofeng JIA, Aifeng LV, Wenbin ZHU. Regional difference of cost effectiveness of low impact development (LID) technical facilities in Chinese cities [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 36(11): 1402-1412.
[3]	LIU Xiaona, FENG Zhiming, JIANG Luguang. Review of land use and land cover change of Golden Economic Quadrangle Region in the border of China, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 32(2): 191-202.
[4]	SHAN Yuhong, ZHU Xinyan. Multi-agents Model for Simulation of Urban Residential Space Evolution [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 30(8): 956-966.
[5]	ZHU Likai, MENG Jijun. Advance in and Tendencies of Land Use and Cover Change Model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 28(5): 782-790.
[6]	HAN Haihui, YANG Taibao, WANG Yilin. Dynamic Analysis of Land Use and Landscape Pattern Changes in Guinan County, Qinghai, in the Past 30 Years [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 28(2): 207-215.
[7]	ZHANG Yili, NIE Yong, LV Xiaofang. Chinese Literature Analysis on Land Use Research in China [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 27(6): 1-11.
[8]	DU Lingtong. Study on Land Use/ Cover Change in Mountain Ar eas of Southern Ningxia Based on RS Technology [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 25(6): 94-101.
[9]	LIN Qing, LUO Geping,CHEN Xi. Review of Land-use Model [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 24(5): 79-87.
[10]	CHEN Bai ming, LIU Xin wei, YANG Hong. Review of Most Recent Progresses of Study on Land Use and Land Cover Change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2003, 22(1): 22-29.
[11]	ZHANG Ming . The Progress on Comprehensive Land Sciences focused on Land-use and Land-cover change [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 20(4): 297-304.