PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1430-1438.doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.08.015
• Reviews • Previous Articles
Received:
2020-11-17
Revised:
2021-05-12
Online:
2021-08-28
Published:
2021-10-28
Contact:
TAN Rong
E-mail:444631907@qq.com;tanrong@zju.edu.cn
Supported by:
GONG Yanqing, TAN Rong. Archetype analysis in social-ecological system governance research: Concepts, methods and prospect[J].PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(8): 1430-1438.
[1] | 刘志敏, 叶超. 社会—生态韧性视角下城乡治理的逻辑框架[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021,40(1):95-103. |
[ Liu Zhi-min, Ye Chao. A logical framework of rural-urban governance from the perspective of social-ecological resilience. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(1):95-103. ] | |
[2] | Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 2009,325:419-422. |
[3] | 宋爽, 王帅, 傅伯杰, 等. 社会—生态系统适应性治理研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(11):2401-2410. |
[ Song Shuang, Wang Shuai, Fu Bojie, et al. Study on adaptive governance of social-ecological system: Progress and prospect. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(11):2401-2410. ] | |
[4] | 王群, 银马华, 杨兴柱, 等. 大别山贫困区旅游地社会—生态系统脆弱性时空演变与影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 2019,74(8):1663-1679. |
[ Wang Qun, Yin Mahua, Yang Xingzhu, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and impact mechanism of socio-ecological system vulnerability in poor mountainous tourist distinations: Taking Dabie Mountain area as example. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(8):1663-1679. ] | |
[5] | Cox M. Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental problems[J]. International Journal of the Commons, 2011,5(2):346-363. |
[6] | Ostrom E. Understanding institutional diversity [M]. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press, 2005. |
[7] | Agrawal A. Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2003,32:243-262. |
[8] | Ostrom E. Analyzing collective action[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2010,41:155-166. |
[9] | Jäger J, Kok M T J, Koshy L, et al. Vulnerability of humans and the environment: Challenges and opportunities[J]. Oncology, 2007,27(5):301-360. |
[10] | Eisenack K, Lüdeke M, Kropp J. Construction of archetypes as a formal method to analyze social-ecological systems[C]// Proceedings of the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Synthesis Conference. Bali, Indonesia, 2006. |
[11] | Oberlack C, Sietz D, Bürgi Bonanomi E, et al. Archetype analysis in sustainability research: Meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making[J]. Ecology and Society, 2019,24(2):26. doi: 10.5751/ES-10747-240226. |
[12] | Oberlack C, Eisenack K. Alleviating barriers to urban climate change adaptation through international cooperation[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,24:349-362. |
[13] | Eisenack K, Villamayor-Tomas S, Epstein G, et al. Design and quality criteria for archetype analysis[J]. Ecology and Society, 2019,24(3):6. doi: 10.5751/ES-10855-240306. |
[14] | Sietz D, Frey U, Roggero M, et al. Archetype analysis in sustainability research: Methodological portfolio and analytical frontiers[J]. Ecology and Society, 2019,24(3):34. doi: 10.5751/ES-11103-240334. |
[15] | Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter B, et al. Human-nature interactions in the Anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis[M]. New York, USA: Routledge, 2012. |
[16] | Wang R Y, Eisenack K, Tan R. Sustainable rural renewal in China: Archetypical patterns[J]. Ecology and Society, 2019,24(3):32. doi: 10.5751/ES-11069-240332. |
[17] | Sietz D, Ordoñez J C, Kok M T J, et al. Nested archetypes of vulnerability in African drylands: Where lies potential for sustainable agricultural intensification?[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2017,12(9):095006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa768b. |
[18] | Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, et al. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005,30:441-473. |
[19] | Oberlack C, Tejada L, Messerli P, et al. Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016,41:153-171. |
[20] | van Vliet J, Magliocca N R, Büchner B, et al. Meta-studies in land use science: Current coverage and prospects[J]. AMBIO, 2016,45(1):15-28. |
[21] | Epstein G, Pittman J, Alexander S M, et al. Institutional fit and the sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015,14:34-40. |
[22] | Václavík T, Lautenbach S, Kuemmerle T, et al. Mapping global land system archetypes[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013,23(6):1637-1647. |
[23] | Václavík T, Langerwisch F, Cotter M, et al. Investigating potential transferability of place-based research in land system science[J]. Environmental Research Letters, 2016,11(9):095002. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095002. |
[24] | Manuel-Navarrete D, Gómez J J, Gallopín G. Syndromes of sustainability of development for assessing the vulnerability of coupled human-environmental systems: The case of hydrometeorological disasters in Central America and the Caribbean[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2007,17(2):207-217. |
[25] | Bocken N M P, Short S W, Rana P, et al. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014,65:42-56. |
[26] | Wardropper C B, Gillon S, Mase A S, et al. Local perspectives and global archetypes in scenario development[J]. Ecology and Society, 2016,21(2):12. doi: 10.5751/ES-08384-210212. |
[27] | Lüdeke M K B, Petschel-Held G, Schellnhuber H J. Syndromes of global change: The first panoramic view[J]. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 2004,13:42-49. |
[28] | Schellnhuber H J, Block A, Cassel-Gintz M, et al. Syndromes of global change[J]. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 1997,6:18-33. |
[29] | Moraine M, Duru M, Therond O. A social-ecological framework for analyzing and designing integrated crop-livestock systems from farm to territory levels[J]. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2017,32(1):43-56. |
[30] | Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2011,54(2):393-420. |
[31] | Meuer J. Archetypes of inter-firm relations in the implementation of management innovation: A set-theoretic study in China's biopharmaceutical industry[J]. Organization Studies, 2014,35(1):121-145. |
[32] | Oberlack C, Eisenack K. Archetypical barriers to adapting water governance in river basins to climate change[J]. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2018,14(3):527-555. |
[33] | Sietz D, Lüdeke M K B, Walther C. Categorisation of typical vulnerability patterns in global drylands[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2011,21(2):431-440. |
[34] | van Vliet N, Mertz O, Heinimann A, et al. Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: A global assessment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012,22(2):418-429. |
[35] | Kok M, Lüdeke M, Lucas P, et al. A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016,16(1):229-243. |
[36] | Frey U J, Rusch H. Using artificial neural networks for the analysis of social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(2):40. doi: 10.5751/ES-05202-180240. |
[37] | Frey U J, Rusch H. Modeling ecological success of common pool resource systems: Using large datasets[J]. World Development, 2014,59:93-103. |
[38] | Wang R Y, Tan R. Patterns of rural collective action in contemporary China: An archetype analysis of rural construction land consolidation[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2020,79:286-301. |
[39] | Petschel-Held G, Lüdeke M K B. Integration of case studies on global change by means of qualitative differential equations[J]. Integrated Assessment, 2001,2(3):123-138. |
[40] | Kropp J, Lüdeke M K B, Reusswig F. Global analysis and distribution of unbalanced urbanization processes: The favela syndrome[J]. GAIA: Ecological Perspectives on Science & Society, 2001,10(2):109-120. |
[41] | Sietz D, Untied B, Walkenhorst O, et al. Smallholder agriculture in Northeast Brazil: Assessing heterogeneous human-environmental dynamics[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2006,6(3):132-146. |
[42] | Schellnhuber H J, Lüdeke M K B, Petschel-Held G. The syndromes approach to scaling describing global change on an intermediate functional scale[J]. Integrated Assessment, 2002,3(2/3):201-219. |
[43] | Levers C, Müller D, Erb K, et al. Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2018,18(3):715-732. |
[44] | Sietz D. Regionalisation of global insights into dryland vulnerability: Better reflecting smallholders' vulnerability in Northeast Brazil[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014,25:173-185. |
[45] | Sietz D, Mamani Choque S E, Lüdeke M K B. Typical patterns of smallholder vulnerability to weather extremes with regard to food security in the Peruvian Altiplano[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2012,12(3):489-505. |
[46] | Vidal Merino M, Sietz D, Jost F, et al. Archetypes of climate vulnerability: A mixed-method approach applied in the Peruvian Andes[J]. Climate and Development, 2019,11(5):418-434. |
[1] | JIN Zerun, ZHU Shengjun. Technology-introduction pattern of cities in China and its mechanism of change based on technology relatedness and complexity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(6): 897-910. |
[2] | WU Lei, LI Guicai, CHAO Heng, LI Bin. Thoughts on the development of urban political geography in China in the new era [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(5): 858-869. |
[3] | ZHANG Wenbin, ZHANG Zhibin, DONG Jianhong, ZHANG Huailin, GONG Weimin. Toward rural-urban co-governance: An interpretation of the change of rural-urban relationship since the reform and opening up [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(5): 883-869. |
[4] | LI Wei, HE Canfei. Regional industrial diversification of China: Based on technological relatedness and complexity [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(4): 620-634. |
[5] | YANG Yu, HE Ze. Energy geopolitics and power [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(3): 524-540. |
[6] | HU Die, ZHOU Shangyi, CHEN Zixiong, GU Lili. Effect of “Traditional Chinese Village” policy under the background of rapid urbanization in China:Taking Jiangxi Province as an example [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 104-113. |
[7] | YE Chao, YU Jie, ZHANG Qingyuan, ZHU Xiaodan. From governance to rural-urban co-governance: Research frontiers, trends, and the Chinese paths [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 15-27. |
[8] | LIU Zhimin, YE Chao. A logical framework of rural-urban governance from the perspective of social-ecological resilience [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 40(1): 95-103. |
[9] | ZHOU Guohua, ZHANG Rujiao, HE Yanhua, DAI Liuyan, ZHANG Li. Optimization of rural settlements and the governance of rural relative poverty [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(6): 902-912. |
[10] | LI Yurui, CHANG Guijiang, CAO Lizhe, LONG Hualou. Rural elite and rural development [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 39(10): 1632-1642. |
[11] | XIE Jiayan, ZENG Gang. Geography of complex knowledge and types of local knowledge pool in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(12): 1968-1976. |
[12] | HAN Zenglin, LI Yuan, LIU Tianbao, DONG Mengru. Spatial differentiation of public service facilities’ configuration in community life circle: A case study of Shahekou District in Dalian City [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1701-1711. |
[13] | LIU Xiaofeng, GE Yuejing, HU Wei, HUANG Yu, MA Teng. Spatial impacts of the geopolitics of non-state actors and their formation pathways [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(11): 1735-1746. |
[14] | Zhengyuan ZHAO, Zhigao LIU. Review of tourist destination research in the perspective of evolutionary economic geography [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 101-110. |
[15] | Dan CUI, Hao WU, Dianting WU. A review and prospect of regional governance in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region [J]. PROGRESS IN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 38(1): 1-14. |
|